Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • McDavid's Contract Doesn't Change the Kaprizov Calculus


    Image courtesy of Perry Nelson - Imagn Images
    Tony Abbott

    Since Kirill Kaprizov put his pen to paper last week, the hockey world has turned its sole attention to Connor McDavid. If Kaprizov was going to get a record-shattering eight-year, $136 million deal, then what did the best player in the world deserve? $18 million? $20 million?

    When you've won three Hart Trophies, five Art Ross Trophies, and racked up over 1,000 points before your 29th birthday, you get exactly what you want. If you thought Kaprizov had leverage over the Minnesota Wild, McDavid might even have had more over the Edmonton Oilers. So it was strange when we found out, apparently, exactly what he wanted. 

    McDavid signed a laughably below-market deal on Monday, going very short-term with a two-year, $25 million contract. That's not per year. His $12.5 million AAV won't be the highest on the Edmonton Oilers when it kicks in -- that'll be Leon Draisaitl's $14 million AAV.

    After signing his deal, McDavid is set to be just the fifth-highest-paid player in the league, behind Kaprizov, Draisaitl, Auston Matthews ($13.25M AAV), and Nathan MacKinnon ($15.6M). With Jack Eichel, Cale Makar, Artemi Panarin, and Kyle Connor slated for UFA status next year, he might fall to ninth by the time the season starts.

    The contrast comes ready-made. The Good Canadian Boy stayed in his country, with the team that drafted him, and even gave them a huge break. The Greedy European Guy stayed with the team that drafted him, but turned down a giant, record-setting contract to squeeze another million bucks a year out of them. Kaprizov making $4.5 million more than McDavid and $3 million more than anyone else will surely put a bullseye on him for criticism, perhaps even in the local market.

    However, McDavid's deal doesn't sour Kaprizov's. It probably doesn't mean we should view Kaprizov's contract any differently than we did last week.

    Yes, McDavid forgoed a raise to free up dollars for the Oilers, and that's not nothing. His making $12.5 million instead of $18 million-plus for the next three years maximizes his team's odds of getting a third, fourth, and fifth whack at the Stanley Cup. It's a move that's absolutely motivated by winning.

    Still, that's not an act of charity, or what's best for the Oilers. It's got Edmonton in a place where Minnesota didn't want to be.

    Their superstar has a foot out the door. 

    Instead of being in limbo with McDavid for one year, their superstar delayed doomsday by only two years. If the team wins a Cup in those seasons, then great. Flags fly forever. But if not, or if they win, and McDavid doesn't feel like Edmonton can build a dynasty, then McDavid has built himself the most golden of parachutes. 

    In the final year of McDavid's contract, the salary cap is slated to be $113.5 million. Presumably, it will increase the following year. Still, even if it stays stagnant, McDavid is set to hit the free agent market with the ability to make a maximum of $22.7 million.

    We've seen McDavid enough to know that he's not likely to max out his cap hit. Still, all he would need to do is sign a six-year, $112 million deal ($18.67M AAV) to exceed Kaprizov's $136 million over the next eight seasons. Even while taking less, he will be made whole. The only question is, where will he get that payday?

    Did any Wild fan really want to sign up for two more years of limbo, of the wolves known as NHL Insiders circling the State of Hockey, playing matchmaker with Kaprizov and other big markets? Is a $4.5 million discount for two seasons worth that?

    Probably not! It might have been a hefty price, but Kaprizov bought in, and did so with less reason than McDavid has to buy into the Oilers' long-term outlook. Say what you want about Edmonton, but they've won more playoff series in the past two seasons (six) than the Wild have in 25 (four). The Oilers have a Hart Trophy winner locked up for eight seasons (Draisaitl), a former 100-point center (Ryan Nugent-Hopkins), and a 26-year-old defenseman with an 80-point season (Evan Bouchard) as teammates. All due respect to Matt Boldy, Marco Rossi, Zeev Buium, or any other Wild player, but no one else in Minnesota has anything approaching those credentials. 

    It must also be noted that Minnesota isn't in as dire need of an extra $4.5 million in the short term as the Oilers are. Even after signing Kaprizov and Filip Gustavsson to a combined $23.8 million, Minnesota is set to enter next summer with over $16 million of cap space to fill just six roster spots. The Wild have just over $70 million committed for the 2027-28 season, which is slightly more than 60% of the $113.5 million salary cap.

    While Edmonton's cap situation might look better now -- they have $22.7 million to fill nine roster spots -- they don't have a goalie under contract for 2026-27. Assuming that takes somewhere in the $7 million range, then McDavid's discount becomes the difference between the Oilers having to fill eight roster spots with $15.7 million or $11.2 million. Those dollars are simply going further in Edmonton. 

    Really, though, it shouldn't take much math to show that Kaprizov staying in Minnesota for the next nine seasons has value that supercedes a short-term discount. This wasn't just the Wild needing to retain a star player. It's not even as big a deal as what Edmonton's facing with their franchise player. Losing McDavid would be devastating, but Draisaitl is a decent backup plan if McDavid moves on in three years.

    Retaining Kaprizov for the long haul was an existential problem for the Wild. If they couldn't keep their only star player, they'd have lost all credibility with the fanbase. What's the point of paying attention if the players can't buy in?

    The Wild had to pay top-dollar to keep Kaprizov in Minnesota, a disadvantage that Edmonton doesn't have to worry about for the next three years. But when stacked against the possibility of staring down another doomsday scenario in 2028, the Wild should be glad to take the eight years, regardless of the cost.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 3
    • Thanks 1

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    15 hours ago, AKwildkraken said:

    I just looked this up on AI

    "Over the last five seasons (2020-2025), the Minnesota Wild have had a dominant record against the Edmonton Oilers, with a 8-4-0 record as of October 5, 2025, and a strong 11-3-0 record over the last 14 games since October 2019. The Wild have won six of their last seven home games against the Oilers since October 2019, and they hold the second-best point percentage against the Oilers in that period (19-5-0 since the 2010-11 season). " 

    I always wanted the Wild to draw Edmonton in the first round in the playoffs to see if their success vs EDM would translate in the playoffs.

    Was just about to point this out too.  If you factor out the games where Brodin was injured, it's even more skewed in the Wild's favor.  Edmonton isn't a team the Wild need to find a way to beat.  They already do a better job of that that most teams.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The difference between a player that only wants to win a cup and a player that only talks about wanting to win a cup.

    I don’t blame anyone for getting paid.  I’m sure nearly all of us would do the same.  But, those are just the facts and perception around it.  McDavid said, “whatever it takes to win one here, I’ll worry about getting paid later.”  Kaprisov and his agent sent both sides back to drawing board over $1M AAV on an already record breaking contract.

    Not the greatest look for Kaprizov’s camp in the eyes of Wild fans.  Bad luck for him related to the timing of these things.  But these two deals will be tied together by Wild fans for a while. If the team stinks and he’s not playing a Hart level….he could go from hero to villain quickly.

    Your average Wild fan isn’t like these bloggers digging through minute details.  They/we only care about him having the opportunity to do what McDavid did, and chose not to.  Like it or not, that speaks something  to your actual desire to win a cup before anything else.  Right or wrong, thats what it boils down to.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The Oilers have been Stanley Cup contenders the past four seasons, and will be for at least the next three, after that their core will have aged out and they don't have any top prospects in their pipeline since they trade first round picks which is the nature of going all in for a cup, just like PIT.  For the past five seasons during Kaprizov's tenure, the Wild were playoff hopefuls & a wild card team, nobody actually thought we had a chance to win the Cup.

    The Wild could not afford to let Kaprizov walk to UFA, especially coming out of the Suter/Parise buyouts.  Kaprizov had all of the leverage in this negotiation, a full NMC, and an owner that should have kept his mouth shut.

    Jeff Marek made a great point the other day, it's not the players (whether Kaprizov or McDavid) job to manage the cap.  Fans shouldn't put the onus on the top players, it's the GM's job.  IMO, the two worst contracts on the team are Trenin and Tarasenko's, and I'm rooting for both to turn it around this season, but that remains to be seen, that's $8.25M this season.  So if Kaprizov or McDavid takes less, that doesn't guarantee the GM doesn't waste that money elsewhere.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 10/7/2025 at 9:00 PM, AKwildkraken said:

    I just looked this up on AI

    "Over the last five seasons (2020-2025), the Minnesota Wild have had a dominant record against the Edmonton Oilers, with a 8-4-0 record as of October 5, 2025, and a strong 11-3-0 record over the last 14 games since October 2019. The Wild have won six of their last seven home games against the Oilers since October 2019, and they hold the second-best point percentage against the Oilers in that period (19-5-0 since the 2010-11 season). " 

    I always wanted the Wild to draw Edmonton in the first round in the playoffs to see if their success vs EDM would translate in the playoffs.

    Brodin is a great equalizer for McDavid.  Pretty cool that we have that kind of record against such a great team.

    But there is a difference between beating someone in a regular season game and beating them in a 7 game playoff series.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    For those who are not happy with how much Kap got, I get it.  It is more than I was hoping we would spend too, but I am going to move on because what is done is done.  At least we have some good contracts for the next three years to help balance it out. 

    Looking at the UFA's for next year and the year following, it will probably be the highest contract in the league until around 2028 when Mathews and McDavid are up for new contracts unless Kucherov gets more in 2027 at age 34.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Quick question for everyone.  Would you rather have Eichel and Marner at $25.5M for the 4 seasons starting in 2026, or Kap and Boldy at $24M.

    Edited by SkolWild73
    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    23 minutes ago, SkolWild73 said:

    Quick question for everyone.  Would you rather have Eichel and Marner at $25.5M for the 4 seasons starting in 2026, or Kap and Boldy at $24M.

    I'd rather have Kaprizov and Boldy, I think both are going to have a big year, Kaprizov 100+ points and Boldy 80-95 points this year, but Boldy is going to have a break out year.

    Doesn't matter BG has been to risk averse to take a big swing to go after a big time player like Eichel pre-surgery.  Looking back, Eichel probably would've cost Fiala, drafted Boldy, and the Rossi draft pick, which in retrospect would've been worth it.  Obviously Fiala trade doesn't become Ohgren and Faber though from LAK.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, 0 Stanley Cups said:

    I'd rather have Kaprizov and Boldy, I think both are going to have a big year, Kaprizov 100+ points and Boldy 80-95 points this year, but Boldy is going to have a break out year.

    Doesn't matter BG has been to risk averse to take a big swing to go after a big time player like Eichel pre-surgery.  Looking back, Eichel probably would've cost Fiala, drafted Boldy, and the Rossi draft pick, which in retrospect would've been worth it.  Obviously Fiala trade doesn't become Ohgren and Faber though from LAK.

     Agree and it is for less money

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...