Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • Matt Boldy Is Closing the Gap Between Himself And Kirill Kaprizov


    Image courtesy of Stephen R. Sylvanie-Imagn Images
    Tony Abbott

    Back in October, Bill Guerin posed a simple question about Matt Boldy to The Athletic's Joe Smith: "You tell me. What wingers are better than him?"

    At the time, the list wasn't very long. The Minnesota Wild's "second star" was already in the top-20 wingers, according to NHL Network. Jack Fresher, or JFresh, of Elite Prospects ranked him 17th in the league, ahead of bona fide high-end players like Kyle Connor, Brady Tkachuk, and Filip Forsberg. The Athletic's Player Tiers was even higher on him, placing Boldy ahead of all but nine wingers. 

    Obviously, it's a subjective question, and 10 different people might have produced 10 different lists when asked that question before the season started. Still, no matter who created the list or who was on it, it's a virtual guarantee that there would be a lot fewer names on it today.

    We're approaching Game 40 of the season, and it's impossible to dismiss Boldy's tear to start the year as a hot streak. On Saturday night -- Game 39 for Boldy and the Wild -- Boldy claimed the team lead in goals with his 23rd and 24th of the season, and is up to 45 points on the season. The 24-year-old has enjoyed hot starts before, but would often hit a slump that would derail a true breakout season. If that slump is coming, we haven't seen it yet.

    Matt Boldy, Time To Reach 45 Points By Season:

    2022-23: 67 games
    2023-24: 50 games
    2024-25: 50 games
    2025-26: 39 games

    At this point, it'll be shocking if this doesn't go down as the year Boldy finally takes "The Leap." Boldy is currently on pace for 50 goals -- a would-be Wild record -- and 95 points. His upside has taken an upturn in the past two weeks, even with Quinn Hughes joining the team. The All-World defenseman has assisted on Boldy's past three goals, after all.

    We've seen Boldy go on tears before, but he's never sustained something quite this good, this long. Maybe it's an awkward data point to not wait until Game 40, but this is Boldy's best 39-game stretch in any season by a wide margin. That's impressive, but not nearly as impressive as matching Kirill Kaprizov's output almost perfectly.

    Boldy's 24 goals are one ahead, and his 45 points are one behind the Wild's $17 million man. That's no criticism of Kaprizov, who comes into Monday tied with Jason Robertson for fifth in the NHL with goals, and eighth in the league in points. Instead, it's a testament to just how high Boldy's stock is rising, keeping up with a player who was an MVP favorite at this time last season.

    Usually, when you see these kinds of results from a "second star," you can credit the "Batman" for elevating "Robin's" numbers. Kaprizov and Boldy make for a lethal battery on the power play, but Boldy has thrived away as the primary driver of his own line at 5-on-5. Boldy has spent just 36.5% of his 5-on-5 minutes with Kaprizov, and when Boldy has been on a line with Joel Eriksson Ek and Marcus Johansson, the Wild have out-scored opponents 12-2. 

    Recency bias can overwhelm us, but it's still probably a bridge too far to suggest Boldy has leapt over Kaprizov. Kaprizov can run off a stretch where he scores nearly a goal per game for two months. It's telling that we're treating Boldy's production as a major revelation, while Kaprizov's nearly-identical numbers feel ordinary for him. But there's no doubt Boldy is closing the gap. The question is: How much?

    All three of the lists we mentioned earlier were solid on their top-three wingers, in some order: Kaprizov, Nikita Kucherov, and David Pastrnak. If we average out their placings on each list, the top-15 breaks down as such (tiebreaker goes to the highest rank on any list):

    1. Nikita Kucherov (Avg Rank: 1.00)
    2. David Pastrnak (2.33)
    3. KIRILL KAPRIZOV (2.67)
    4. Mikko Rantanen (5.00)
    5. Mitch Marner (5.33)
    6. Matthew Tkachuk (6.00)
    7. Artemi Panarin (7.33)
    8. William Nylander (7.33)
    9. Sam Reinhart (8.00)
    10. Jake Guentzel (11.33)
    11. Brendon Hagel (11.67)
    12. Jason Robertson (13.67)
    13. Jesper Bratt (13.67)
    14. Kyle Connor (14.67)
    15. MATT BOLDY (15.33)

    Boldy started the year at the very fringes of the top-15. Let's see how our 15 heroes have fared in terms of points per game (tiebreaker goes to goals):

    1. Kucherov, 1.44
    2. Rantanen, 1.42
    3. Connor, 1.25
    4. Nylander, 1.24
    5. Pastrnak, 1.21
    6. KAPRIZOV, 1.18
    7. Robertson, 1.18
    8. BOLDY, 1.13
    9. Marner, 1.08
    10. Reinhart, 1.05
    11. Guentzel, 1.03
    12. Panarin, 0.97
    13. Hagel, 0.94
    14. Bratt, 0.81
    15. Tkachuk, DNP

    Of course, we know that points are a big part of a forward's value, but it's not the end-all, be-all. Defense comes into play, and the ability to draw power plays without going to the penalty box matters a ton. So, let's take a look at how these players stack up through the lens of Evolving-Hockey's Standings Points Above Replacement, which tries to measure all-around value into an easy-to-digest number.

    1. Marner, 4.3 SPAR
    2. Robertson, 3.3
    3. BOLDY, 3.2
    4. Guentzel, 3.2
    5. Connor, 2.7
    6. Panarin, 2.7
    7. Hagel, 2.4
    8. Rantanen, 2.4
    9. KAPRIZOV, 2.3
    10. Nylander, 2.1
    11. Bratt, 1.9
    12. Kucherov, 1.8
    13. Pastrnak, 1.6
    14. Reinhart, 1.3
    15. Tkachuk, DNP

    It's pretty indisputable that Boldy has moved past Bratt, Hagel, Panarin, and Reinhart. That puts him on the fringes of the top-10, automatically. We can also firmly keep Kucherov, Pastrnak, and Kaprizov in the top-3, given their reputation and production. Robertson's edged out Boldy in points and SPAR, so that also limits Boldy's ceiling to fifth. Make it sixth, giving Matty Tkachuk some deference for wherever he comes back.

    Now it gets interesting: Where does he land in the 6-to-11 range? Ultimately, it comes down to personal preference, but we're talking about some fascinating debates. To recap, this group comes down to, in alphabetical order:

    Boldy
    Connor
    Guentzel
    Marner
    Nylander
    Rantanen

    Your mileage may vary, but here's one opinion as to where these shake out:

    1) Marner -- It's hard to discount either of these two things: His impact with the Vegas Golden Knights, and the fact that the Toronto Maple Leafs have completely fallen apart without him. He feels like an MVP candidate this year.

    2) Rantanen -- He's putting up elite numbers on his second team, and with the Dallas Stars, he's arguably the best player on a contender. 

    (small gap)

    3) Boldy -- Homer pick? Maybe, maybe, but Boldy's contributions on both sides of the puck can't be ignored. His shorthanded chops have been a great development, and he's always been a low-key elite shutdown forward, especially with Eriksson Ek beside him. If his scoring is equivalent to this tier, the rest of his game makes a difference here.

    (small gap)

    4) Guentzel -- Another player who puts up great numbers wherever he goes. He's 31, but not yet on the downswing of his career, and his passable defense elevates him over the rest in this mini-tier.

    5) Connor -- Yes, defense matters, but so does scoring goals, and few do it better than Connor. Dude's averaged 40 goals per 82 games in the 2020s, gotta give him some props for it.

    6) Nylander -- Great production, coming off three-straight 40-goal campaigns. But someone's gotta be here, and his defense has graded worse than Connor for this season and last. 

    Again, your mileage may vary, and people who've watched other players for 82 games may well bring a different and valid perspective to the table. But it's hard to put Boldy outside the top-10 wingers right now, and that's a pretty remarkable development for the Wild.

    Boldy's not just showing himself to be a "second star" forward in Minnesota, but he's pushing to be a legitimate 1B to Kaprizov's 1A. If we're still having this conversation by Game 82, it will go a long way to helping the Wild's playoff chances.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 7

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    KK is getting significantly more 5v5 ice time than Boldy. 

    Boldy's line is tasked with shutting down the other teams top line 5v5.

    KKs line is getting the best matchups Hynes can find.

    Boldy is an elite penalty killer.

    KK leads Boldy in turnovers by a country mile.

    This season, Boldy is SIGNIFICANTLY better than Kaprizov.

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I hate the awards, mostly because of the East Coast bias. But, in this conversation, could Boldy be playing himself into a Selke? He is a wing, but, I believe he is also the best drawman on the Wild. He should definitely practice that more. I'm not suggesting we make him a center, but I am suggesting that he take important draws and switch to wing after the face off. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, mnfaninnc said:

    He is a wing, but, I believe he is also the best drawman on the Wild.

    He's at 40.7% currently. Definitely not the best but passable for a wing. It's an interesting concept to have him playing center. A true 1c possibly if he could master it, and I think he could. It'd kill our line 2 for sure though...

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Me being nothing more than a fan of hockey never played "except high school gym class plastic pucks and sticks "  and field hockey ,  ive always wondered how players get determined on what position they play or should they play ,  i mean do peewee , highschool or even college level coaches really have the expertise to determine that a player is a center or wing  etc ,  the reason i ask is maybe Boldy is better suited as a center just needs more practice ,  was Boldy 5-6 in high school and others were 6-0 so he took the wing spot and never looked at himself as a center .    Thats something ive always wondered a players physical growth through school years  if that made them change positions .

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, Dango said:

    Me being nothing more than a fan of hockey never played "except high school gym class plastic pucks and sticks "  and field hockey ,  ive always wondered how players get determined on what position they play or should they play ,  i mean do peewee , highschool or even college level coaches really have the expertise to determine that a player is a center or wing  etc ,  the reason i ask is maybe Boldy is better suited as a center just needs more practice ,  was Boldy 5-6 in high school and others were 6-0 so he took the wing spot and never looked at himself as a center .    Thats something ive always wondered a players physical growth through school years  if that made them change positions .

    My experience is many decades ago but it really is a combo of things you mention. Some players love the center position because of the responsibility and QB feel. Others like the free wheeling wing/goal scorer position. Often it is team needs, such as who is the best stick handler or who is the fastest or who likes to mix it up in the corners and likes the dirty area work.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This is a great article and really gets me thinking about how great this team can be. I always expected Boldy to become a 1B to KK and its literally happened in the last 39 games.  The dude can flat out play at an elite level, every shift, every game. How do teams defend our top 6 and then throw in the elite blue liners.  Teams may get 40 SOG but if 38 of them aren’t high risk shots, are teams going to score more than a goal or 2 per game? I can see a lot of 5-2 or 4-1 games this season! 
    seriously, who wants to even play us? 

    Edited by Pablo
    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I cringe seeing him out there on the PK, blocking shots.  Just a matter of time before he takes a bullet to the laces or an unpadded spot or a hand. We should protect him.  Put Trenin or Yurov out there instead. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 12/29/2025 at 4:54 PM, Dango said:

    Me being nothing more than a fan of hockey never played "except high school gym class plastic pucks and sticks "  and field hockey ,  ive always wondered how players get determined on what position they play or should they play ,  i mean do peewee , highschool or even college level coaches really have the expertise to determine that a player is a center or wing  etc ,  the reason i ask is maybe Boldy is better suited as a center just needs more practice ,  was Boldy 5-6 in high school and others were 6-0 so he took the wing spot and never looked at himself as a center .    Thats something ive always wondered a players physical growth through school years  if that made them change positions .

    This is a great question. At BC, Boldy was tried at center and then moved back to wing when he couldn't score. Yurov had the same thing happen to him in the K but he ended up making the position switch. Hartman did it on the fly with the Wild when asked to center Kaprizov and Zuccarello. Evason tried it in short spurts with Boldy coming out of the PK and centering Kaprizov and Zuccarello. 

    From my time in the pee wees and up, generally the center was the best skater of that forward group. Defensemen were the guys who could skate the best backwards. Goalies were also kids who just loved the big pads. Generally, as they grew, the centers were converted to wings as the teams had more talent come in. 

    Since centers needed to skate the length of the ice, and the wings did not, this meant that the centers needed to be better skaters. Taking draws were just what the centers learned to do. I have no experience in the high school leagues because I was too small and not good enough, but, I think the politics of a lot of feeder programs probably played a role in who was the center. I'm sure the coaches at major junior and in Europe do have the expertise to know where a guy can play best. If not, they probably aren't employed too long. The guys we had were just volunteer dads. The kids knew more where they would play. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    8 minutes ago, mnfaninnc said:

    This is a great question. At BC, Boldy was tried at center and then moved back to wing when he couldn't score. Yurov had the same thing happen to him in the K but he ended up making the position switch. Hartman did it on the fly with the Wild when asked to center Kaprizov and Zuccarello. Evason tried it in short spurts with Boldy coming out of the PK and centering Kaprizov and Zuccarello. 

    From my time in the pee wees and up, generally the center was the best skater of that forward group. Defensemen were the guys who could skate the best backwards. Goalies were also kids who just loved the big pads. Generally, as they grew, the centers were converted to wings as the teams had more talent come in. 

    Since centers needed to skate the length of the ice, and the wings did not, this meant that the centers needed to be better skaters. Taking draws were just what the centers learned to do. I have no experience in the high school leagues because I was too small and not good enough, but, I think the politics of a lot of feeder programs probably played a role in who was the center. I'm sure the coaches at major junior and in Europe do have the expertise to know where a guy can play best. If not, they probably aren't employed too long. The guys we had were just volunteer dads. The kids knew more where they would play. 

    Back when i was in school money was a huge difference maker as well you could tell who the poorer kids were by the equipment they had ,  i had  garage sale skates from 1944 i think and looked like a 45degree angle to my legs and other kids had brand new 70-100 dollar skates would fly circles around everyone .     everyone got addidas i got traxx from kmart .   Wouldnt have mattered though grades werent good enough i wonder if that benefits kids in  other countries that dont hold you off sports if your grades arent good enough  .    

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    14 minutes ago, Dango said:

    Back when i was in school money was a huge difference maker as well you could tell who the poorer kids were by the equipment they had ,  i had  garage sale skates from 1944 i think and looked like a 45degree angle to my legs and other kids had brand new 70-100 dollar skates would fly circles around everyone .     everyone got addidas i got traxx from kmart .   Wouldnt have mattered though grades werent good enough i wonder if that benefits kids in  other countries that dont hold you off sports if your grades arent good enough  . 

    I'm not so sure that money was the issue, but the kids parents were responsible for the equipment. I was right at the end of the full steel blade era, so there wasn't that much different from a skate level. Bauer, CCM were the most common, and most of the kids got trade ins from our skate shop. They were broken in and still had a lot more life in them. 

    The politics I was talking about probably came from the travel team coaches who had some sway with the kids coming up. That might be where some money was spent for favor, like team bags or team sponsorships. I wasn't good enough to play on those teams so I really don't know first hand.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    24 minutes ago, Dango said:

    the poorer kids were by the equipment they had ,  i had  garage sale skates

    Played goalie in HS and varsity goalie got hurt. I was in 10th grade and got called up. Coach noticed I had old regular skates. He bought me brand new white CCM goalie skates we could have never afforded. Played 3 years varsity and to this day Rod Magnusson’s kindness has stayed with me. 

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...