Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness
  • Matt Boldy's Contract Already Looks Like A Steal For the Wild


    Image courtesy of Charles LeClaire-USA Today Sports
    Tony Abbott

     

    They say you can't judge a draft class until 1,000 years later. Then, after the NHL arenas have long turned into dust, archaeologists can uncover the carefully-preserved bodies of amateur scouts, buried with their draft lists, and use the benefit of a millennia's worth of hindsight to decide which one was right.

    Four years might be okay, too.

    It's getting to be decision time for many of the players in the 2019 Draft class, if it hasn't arrived already. While we've only seen 60 members make their debuts in these past four years, and know more are surely on their way, the top players are already in the NHL and approaching their second contracts.

    The second contract is a big deal for both players and NHL clubs. For the players, it's their first opportunity to cash in coming off an entry-level contract that artificially underpays them by a massive amount. The clubs see it as their last, best chance to get a good deal on their up-and-coming players, a good opportunity to buy out some free agent years, or both. 

    More will join the ranks this summer, surely, but there are only four members of the 2019 Draft currently signed to a long-term second contract (five-to-eight seasons, which buy out UFA seasons). Those are Jack Hughes, Dylan Cozens, Matt Boldy, and Cole Caufield, who signed his seven-year contract this week.

    Here's a breakdown of how those deals look:

    image.png

    It's curious how Boldy's deal carries both the lightest overall cap hit and overall value. There are reasons for this, of course. Boldy's deal only buys out two UFA years, while Hughes, Cozens, and Caufield's bought out more. That's a fair bit of extra value at the end of that contract.

    But in terms of getting bang for a team's buck throughout most of a great player's prime, Boldy's $7 million cap hit is going to look like a steal as we see more of these deals get made.

    Hughes is going to be the gold standard of this draft class, of course, and his contract will be, too. There's a reason he went No. 1 in the draft, after all. The first year of Hughes' deal saw him score 43 goals and 99 points in 78 games, an MVP-worthy performance from the 21-year-old center. 

    No one's toppling Hughes as being the best in the class anytime soon. Still, four years after the 2019 Draft, Boldy already stands as the second-best player the class produced, at least by some measures. 

    We may not even be that far away from getting to drop that qualifier. Only Hughes (87), Caufield (53), Trevor Zegras (49), and Cozens (48) have more goals than Boldy's 46 tallies. Hughes (207), Zegras (139), and Cozens (119) are the only ones with more points.

    These numbers are also just raw totals without consideration for the gap in games played between Boldy and the top names in this draft class. Going on a per-game basis, here's how Boldy stacks up in the top-5 scorers from 2019 over the past two years, when most of them made their debuts:

    image.png

    Even this season, a "down" year from Boldy where he struggled mightily through a large chunk of games, his 31 goals were still tied with Cozens for second in the class, and his 63 points ranked fourth. And that's just based off points, which we know don't tell the whole story.

    Looking at stats that make a more holistic view of their value, we'll turn to Evolving Hockey's Standings Points Above Replacement model. According to that, here's how the top of the class stacks up in SPAR for their careers:

    1. Hughes, 13.8
    2. Boldy, 8.2
    3. Kirby Dach, 4.7
    4. Moritz Seider, 4.6
    5. Philip Tomasino, 4.3
    6. Cozens, 4.1
    7. Alex Newhook, 3.5
    T-8. Caufield, 3.4
    T-8. Zegras, 3.4
    10. Rafael Harvey-Pinard, 2.8

    Not only is Boldy the second-most valuable player in the 2019 Class, it's not even particularly close. Even this year's Boldy has been more valuable than almost anyone else at their best. The top five individual SPAR seasons by anyone from the 2019 class, at any time break down thusly:

    1. 2022-23 Hughes: 6.8
    2. 2021-22 Hughes: 4.9
    3. 2021-22 Boldy: 4.7
    4. 2021-22 Seider: 4.2
    5. 2022-23 Boldy: 3.5

    That's right, even Boldy's worst season so far has not only been better than almost anyone else's best, it'd be enough to match or exceed all but five players' careers in this draft class so far. Boldy's career value doubles-up Cozens, and does more than lap the likes of Caufield, Zegras, and anyone else.

    All for the low, low price of $7 million per season throughout his prime. These long-term second contracts aren't getting any cheaper, so expect Boldy's deal to hold up as a fantastic bargain throughout the next seven years. Even if it only buys out two years of UFA status, keeping that figure locked in at $7 million as opposed to having him sign a bridge deal, then hitting a home run in his third contract figures to save the Wild an incredible amount of money.

    Instead, it's the Wild who hit back-to-back Jacks when it came to Boldy. The first was getting the second-best player in the class all the way at 12th overall. This contract is another towering shot, and both should only look better with time.

     

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 2

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    While Matt Boldy's contract looks like a steal already, the way I read the headline was that he was currently performing to making it a steal. In the body of the article, though, it's clear we are still talking about potential.

    I'd have to agree that Boldy's potential looks like this contract will be a steal. I wonder what Seider's deal will look like?

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'm curious what Cozens posted as a SPAR number for just 22-23.

    He may have been on the negative side for his first 2 seasons, but his most recent season was substantially better, and delivered more points than Boldy.

    Looks like Cozens improved in every facet of the game and is well on his way to a great career at the C position. It will be interesting to see how he plays in the playoffs should Buffalo improve as a team and reach round 1 next year.

    Interesting to think that if either Buffalo or Pittsburgh had just 1 of their outright 1-goal losses turn into an OT win in the regular season, Florida would never have made the postseason.

    Buffalo had 7 one-goal losses in regulation, including 2 to Florida, and Pittsburgh had 8 one-goal losses in regulation...

     

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 hours ago, mnfaninnc said:

    While Matt Boldy's contract looks like a steal already, the way I read the headline was that he was currently performing to making it a steal. In the body of the article, though, it's clear we are still talking about potential.

    I'd have to agree that Boldy's potential looks like this contract will be a steal. I wonder what Seider's deal will look like?

    He's a 30-goal, 60-point winger in a season that definitely wasn't his best, I'm not really sure if you can call that "potential," the guy's delivered.

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    We all know he can play in the regular season.  But, 1 goal, 3 assists, and -6 in 12 career playoff games is concerning.  Especially when you consider that the opposition is more focused on shutting down Kaprisov.

    Give him the participation ribbon for the regular season, but I need to see more in the playoffs before I can say Boldy is the answer.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    There is something to be said of delivering consistently and in the playoffs.  Boldy is still a work in progress and finding that specific niche or line or style of play that optimizes his talent is yet to be determined.  The talent is both potential and defined right now.

    Is there confidence that we will find it... hell yeah.  Only a fool wouldn't bet on Boldy IMO.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    16 hours ago, Tony Abbott said:

    He's a 30-goal, 60-point winger in a season that definitely wasn't his best, I'm not really sure if you can call that "potential," the guy's delivered.

    For starters, thanks for participating in the comments, Tony. I know you do periodically, but since I thanked Justin, I'm thanking you too.

    60 points should not be Boldy's goal, I think he's got 80+ in him given the right linemates. It appeared that he had that with Johansson and Ek near the end of the season, but we can't eliminate his scoring desert in February, and some of his streakiness. 

    While I'll admit, the Wild haven't had the most 60 point seasons in the league, especially by players so young, I don't think we should be saying "wow, 60 points, that $7m/yr. is a bargain." I think it's way too early to come to that conclusion.

    But, it is looking promising. I'm hoping to see a far thicker Boldy this upcoming season!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Beast said:

    We all know he can play in the regular season.  But, 1 goal, 3 assists, and -6 in 12 career playoff games is concerning.  Especially when you consider that the opposition is more focused on shutting down Kaprisov.

    I think this can be explained by the absence of Ek, and now his impact is seen at 5v5 too. It seemed like Boldy did have a lot of chances, but he either clanked them off posts, or Oettinger was just better.

    What's the difference between a 98 mph fastball and one clocking in at 102? For me, I can't hit either unless I start swinging before it leaves a pitcher's hand and I get really lucky to swing in its path. I suspect that this is where Boldy's at. The goalies are able to catch and react to his fastball, so it needs a little more jump, something that can be accomplished with more upper body strength. 

    Oettinger was able to throw body parts at his shots as Boldy simply couldn't blow it by him. Boldy's got to both release a split second quicker and get more speed on it. It would also help if he'd cut down on the shanks, especially from 1-timers. 

    If Boldy eventually takes Zuccarello's spot on Kaprizov's line, is this where he scores 40 and 80? I'd like to see a larger sample size of him with Ek and Johansson. I'd also like to see what a Boldy-Rossi-Kaprizov line could do!

    I do believe in earning your spot in the lineup, however, I also believe in trying things to see how they work out. Trying something and earning your spot can be part of the same thing. If it doesn't work out, fine, try something else, if it does work out, that looks like earning your spot! I don't see how you earn your spot by grinding on the 4th line at 5'9" 180. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...