Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • Marcus Johnasson's Value Is He's Aways In the Right Spot


    Image courtesy of Matt Blewett-Imagn Images
    Neil Urbanski

    When the Minnesota Wild re-signed Marcus Johansson to a one-year, $800,000 extension this week, it meant that the veteran winger from Landskrona, Sweden, will almost certainly play in his 1,000th career NHL game this season while wearing a Minnesota Wild sweater.

    Of the 16-year NHL veteran’s 983 regular-season games, 206 have been with the Wild. At this point, it’s fair to say that the player and organization have a comfort level and familiarity with each other that supersede the unknowns that come with free agency.

    Johansson has often been a lightning rod for criticism during his time in Minnesota, despite generally solid underlying numbers indicative of a player who has outperformed his modest salary more often than not from a value standpoint.

    Still, he has also developed a reputation as a player who plays harder during his contract years. He has unnerved a segment of the fan base with his perceived lack of physical play, and because the Wild have often used him in a top-six role.

    There may be validity to some of the criticism aimed at him. Still, if Johansson repeated his 2024-25 numbers next season, he’ll almost certainly be one of the most productive veteran players in his salary range. 34 points in 72 games isn’t elite production, but no team pays an unrestricted free agent (UFA) $800k and expects elite production.

    Of the 90 NHL skaters that earned $1 million or less last season on contracts signed as UFAs, here are the top point producers (data from PuckPedia):

    Screenshot 2025-06-06 at 12.01.48 PM.png

    Johansson is a good bet to end up near the top of this list next season. But beyond production, why do the Wild value him enough to bring him back for his fifth season with the team? 

    Where do his solid underlying numbers come from?

    Despite what some might think, Johansson offers value to an NHL lineup. One of the keys to understanding his value is to recognize he’s an excellent skater who covers a lot of ice. He’s also a responsible, intelligent player who reads plays well and is almost always in the right position away from the puck.

    That is the key factor with Johansson; many fans spend most of their time watching the puck. However, Johansson excels at positioning himself away from the puck and using his anticipation and strong skating to get to the right place at the right time and influence play, especially in the defensive and neutral zones.

    These attributes become evident when watching Johansson regularly. Choose any game, and you’ll find plenty of clips that exemplify why he has value. That’s exactly what I did.

    “Value” is the key word. He’s not an elite, high-level contributor. But he’s a valuable piece on a roster and is one of the reasons why the Wild have been a strong defensive team every year.

    You’ll notice that none of the clips below show a goal or assist, or even a slick zone entry through traffic, something that Johansson does quite well. Instead, they depict small but meaningful moments within a game that contribute to team success.

    Let’s start with a clip that shows his strong skating, play recognition, and positioning:

    Johansson often has strong positioning and denies passing lanes, which you start to notice when you watch him away from the puck. 

    Here’s another good example, this time in the defensive zone:

    If you question how Johansson is a valuable defensive contributor, these two clips help explain what he’s doing off the puck.

    As mentioned, one of the key aspects of Johansson’s game is his strong skating, which enables him to cover a lot of ice. According to NHL Edge, he's one of the fastest forwards in the league in top skating speed and speed bursts. He also rates high among forwards in terms of distance skated:

    Screenshot 2025-06-06 at 12.03.28 PM.png

    Here’s an example of how he accrues these numbers:

    That clip showcased several excellent plays and exemplified what strong hockey sense and positioning can provide within a sequence. 

    Here’s another one that occurs in the offensive zone:

    The final clip is short and something that is not readily noticeable within the flow of a game. Still, it demonstrates exactly why the Wild trust Johansson so much. He’s a responsible player who will make the right decision more often than not, even in situations where most players wouldn’t:

    So, there you have it. A lot of what Johansson does won’t show up on a scoresheet and will only become evident in advanced stats through high repetition and large sample sizes. However, that’s exactly what NHL teams want. Predictability over volatility. Unflappability versus uncertainty.

    Players like Sammy Walker, Adam Beckman, Gerry Mayhew, or Liam Ohgren haven’t stuck as NHL regulars because they haven’t demonstrated the ability to do these things every single game. For Ohgren, that time may come as soon as next season, but it hasn’t yet.

    A player who can’t do them needs to provide significant value elsewhere. If they can’t, they’re a liability, not a contributor. And in the best league in the world, liabilities get exploited.

    It’s fair to argue about where the Wild should deploy Johansson in a lineup and whether other players should get more ice time, but there’s no questioning his utility as an NHL player.

    So, it’s probably safe to predict that Marcus Johansson will play his 1,000th NHL game sometime next season. When the league awards him with a commemorative silver stick to celebrate his accomplishment, it will be an opportunity to appreciate a player who’s made a career out of predictability. You can bet the Minnesota Wild will.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 2

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    Nonsense.  I could always be in the right spot and not score, will they pay me $800K?

    He takes up a roster spot to produce next to nothing that should go to a young player we think has a future.  NoJo did next to nothing for the better part of two seasons, and then actually had a pulse late in the season and in the playoffs hoping he could fleece someone and play one more year.  It worked because Guerin was smitten and now we are stuck with another 12 months of the NoJo countdown.  

    And seriously, how tone deaf is Guerin?  Even if you were sure to sign him, you think you could have waited until you had Kaprisov signed and THEN make a mistake with NoJo?  I mean, bowing out in the first round was bad enough, your first move after Yurov is to kick us when we are down?  There would be ZERO, let me repeat ZERO market for Johansen so it would be nice if you made it look like you tried to find a better option first.

    Edited by Dis-allowed display name
    • Like 1
    • Confused 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    He doesn't put forth his best effort very often.  He played great the first 3 games against Vegas then absolutely disappeared the last 4.  Why do I want a guy on the team that isn't willing to give it everything he has in the stanley cup playoffs.  I'm hoping he spends most of his time in the press box.

    • Confused 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The $800k contract lets them maybe play him on 4th line with Gaudreau, who produced more points per 60 than Johansson did.

    PPG is not a great way to look at offensive production when teams are playing a guy like Johansson higher than he deserves. For example, Taylor Raddysh produced 1.67 points per 60 minutes even strength, but played only 12.22 minutes per game. Johansson played roughly 33% more and scored at 1.23 points per 60 even strength--NoJo is also blessed with routinely playing on lines with point producers like Boldy, Eriksson Ek, Rossi, or Zuccarello.

    Even with talented linemates, Johansson finished outside of the top 320 forwards in points per 60 even strength, so on average, most teams have at least 10 forwards who are more productive offensively, many of them not being gifted 2nd line minutes.

    I'm not going to argue that Johansson is terrible in transition, but he's not good in the defensive zone or offensive zone. I won't get overly upset about an $800k contract, but Hinostroza probably should be playing ahead of him, along with several others.

    His defensive ability is overstated. I can understand how he can skate well to help get himself into positions to defend, but he's not hard to play against or pass pucks through. His stick leaves a lot to be desired, and he does get himself out of position in the defensive zone.

     

    Edited by Imyourhuckleberry
    Added the points per 60 league ranking
    • Confused 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    "But he blocks my favorite AHL callup from being in a 2nd line spot he deserves even if that isn't true or if that player isn't worth it.  I've convinced myself that's true, and that's what matters.  Mojo sucks!"

    Edited by Citizen Strife
    • Haha 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Big thanks for writing this article!!!

    Mojo is a litmus test for hockey IQ. 

    High IQ fans understand he was not intended to be a top 6 guy and was providing surplus value for his contract.

    Low IQ fans hate Mojo because BG would rather spend on 4th line grinders than top six talent.  Due to that it only took one injury to push Mojo into the top 6.  Your anger should be directed at BG or possibly the Wild medical staff. (I don't understand how they have not all been fired, two consecutive years of record games missed to injury and NO accountability)

    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 hours ago, NoJoSux said:

    No amount of money is worth an aging passenger who plays the wrong way. Guerin is an idiot around half the time at least. 

    So NoJoSux thinks NoJo sucks? 

    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 hours ago, Citizen Strife said:

    "But he blocks my favorite AHL callup from being in a 2nd line spot he deserves even if that isn't true or if that player isn't worth it.  I've convinced myself that's true, and that's what matters.  Mojo sucks!"

    Are they gonna have Nyquist on the team as well because Johansson has scored at roughly a 4th line pace without him around. Here is the list of forwards who scored more points/60 even strength for the Wild prior to Nyquist joining the Wild.

    1. Kaprizov 2.85

    2. Zuccarello 2.27

    3. Rossi 2.17

    4. Boldy 1.78

    5. Gaudreau 1.52

    6. Foligno 1.52

    7. JEE 1.49

    8. Hartman 1.35

    9. Ohgren 1.16

    Yes, Johansson was 10th before Nyquist was brough in.  Basically, it's only 4th line guys who don't score more than him per 60, and Johansson plays more minutes with Rossi, Zuccarello, Boldy or Eriksson Ek than most of these guys do--he has a distinct advantage in being able to tally points over most of the guys who do not get minutes with Kaprizov. Of course, they very rarely play him with Kaprizov because he's not a real scoring threat, so it makes it much easier to defend Kaprizov, or anyone else, with him on the ice.

    I bring this up because Johansson has only scored above 1.25 points/60 with the Wild while Nyquist is on the team. I'd be surprised if Yurov and Ohgren aren't better than Johansson for the 25-26 season, along with everyone else listed above. I'm not even saying that he wasn't as good or better than Ohgren last season, but it was close and Ohgren is likely to take a step forward.

    If they give him 4th line minutes, I'm not going to be outraged, but if Johansson were to play above 16 minutes again, then there should be significant outrage.

    His lines don't shut down scoring from the opposition and he hinders offense, which is why he finished -7 while most of the guys he played with on the Wild finished the season at least at +0. If it was one season, you could claim it's an anomaly, but the prior year, only the injured for most of the season Frederick Gaudreau finished worse than his -15, and his most common linemates all finished at least 10 better in even strength goal differential.

    He occasionally has a nice drop pass, but rarely sets up offense with crafty play. He does occasionally put pucks past the goalie when he is fed nice passes in the middle of the ice, but there are 10+ other Wild forwards capable of that.

    If his suggested good defensive hockey led to winning hockey, I wouldn't have much to say about him, but he's pretty consistently delivering less than a quality 2nd line player typically can. They Wild have plenty of players who are more capable, but many of them are better suited to checking lines, so they play there. Johansson's limited skillset is what has placed him on the 2nd line for the Wild. He's not capable of delivering solid play on a checking line.

    He's a decent press box guy to you could possibly put in if a 2nd line guy goes out, but when the Wild are healthy, he shouldn't be playing above the 4th line in the future. Again, I'm not complaining about the $800k contract, but if he received the limited minutes that his actual play deserves, his points per game would be lower.

    I understand that he's only been playing 2nd line because the Wild had been so salary cap strapped. The funny thing is that I agree with you more than most of the people here on lots of things, but if you think that Johansson should play 2nd line minutes in the future, then I'll just have to disagree on this one.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    32 minutes ago, SkolWild73 said:

    Anyone interested in a game thread like we do for the wild games for this finals?  This game 2 has been a ton of fun and I miss the  threads.

    Been busy doing camping and being out on the water but as time allows, I'd be happy to join in.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    9 hours ago, Imyourhuckleberry said:

    PPG is not a great way to look at offensive production

    Yeah, of course not. It was just to give an idea of what players in that price range produce. That's why I also cited other stats, and used film clips. The analytics come from somewhere, and the Wild like him for some reason, so why?  That's what the article was about.

    I also talked about the legitimacy of questioning his deployment. But that's on the team, not on him. 

    That said, more than twice as many players will play in the NHL next season as have played 1,000 games ever. It doesn't happen for guys that can't play. 

     

     

     

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...