Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness
  • Making Sense Of the Jake Middleton Extension


    Image courtesy of Timothy T. Ludwig-USA TODAY Sports
    Justin Hein

    Jake Middleton has established himself as one of the Minnesota Wild’s most likable players. His toothless grin, bombastic mustache, and blue-collar upbringing call to mind memories of a bygone era of hard-nosed hockey. He’s charismatic on camera and endeared himself further to the entire State of Hockey with a dig at Edina in a feature in The Athletic.

    “I don’t think I’m (going to) Cake Eater country just yet,” he joked. “That’s not my speed yet. We’ll see. But not anytime soon.” 

    His striking appearance and physical on-ice style combine with that charisma to make Middleton something of a modern enforcer. He’s the type of player that makes fans and teammates glad he’s on their side. 

    So why did people meet his extension with groans?

    It’s not hard to find analysts and blog posts criticizing the front office for this move. There’s no need to rehash it here: public consensus is that while Middleton is an effective bottom-four defenseman, the Wild overpaid him on his new extension. Furthermore, the timing of this move makes little sense, given that Middleton is 28 years old and under contract for the 2024-25 season. With no pressure to retain him, why would Minnesota feel urgency to sign him to an extension -- least of all at this number? 

    That’s enough for some people to conclude that the front office had made a massive mistake by signing this extension – and perhaps those people are correct. However, for the curious mind, why? is not an incredulous remark but the beginning of a beautiful journey. 

    To answer that why, I started with an interesting piece of reporting from The Athletic’s Michael Russo: “Middleton played through injuries this past season himself, including a knee that had to be cleaned up after the season.” 

    Could that injury be the key to explaining this whole extension? 

    What comes next will require some speculation about what it means to “clean up a knee.” Please note that I am not reporting the nature of Middleton surgery because I do not have any new information to share. Based on Russo's wording in his report, I am simply speculating about the nature of that procedure. 

    Taking that leap in logic, it sounds like the procedure involves the removal of something from the knee. That could include a meniscus trim or repair. That hypothesis is also supported by the report that Middleton played through injury before the procedure, as is possible with meniscus injuries. It doesn’t prove that Middleton had a meniscus injury, but it’s possible. 

    It’s worth continuing down that rabbit hole, even with several degrees of uncertainty, because a meniscus procedure would explain a lot about Middleton’s extension. 

    There are two common procedures for treating an injured meniscus: a full repair and a meniscectomy (or a “trim”). The trim simply removes the damaged portion of the meniscus. It’s minimally invasive, and many professional athletes elect this procedure for its short recovery timeline. They can typically return to athletic activity in a month or two.  

    The repair has a longer recovery timeline: “Jogging typically begins around three to four months with return to sports around six to nine months.” The tradeoff is that a repair has better outcomes concerning strength, stability, and pain in the knee. These are crucial to the performance and future health of a player like Middleton, who the Wild often task with boxing out opponents at the net. 

    When a professional hockey player has the option to return to play sooner but work through more pain, that’s going to sound pretty familiar. Aside from the daily workout schedule, Middleton is no stranger to cross-checks, slashes, and blocking 90 MPH slap shots. But get him back on the ice sooner, and he’ll do it enthusiastically. So, perhaps he opted for the meniscus trim. 

    On the other hand, why would the team commit to Middleton this summer after a procedure like that? What if Middleton opted for the full repair, and they offered the extension after a successful surgery? 

    Middleton should be ready for the beginning of the season; the team hasn’t indicated otherwise. But with an aggressive timeline, Middleton could return to skating six months after surgery. If the procedure happened just after the season ended on April 18, he could be eyeing a return to the ice right around the October 10 season opener. 

    Steven Stamkos had a meniscus surgery in November 2016. It was presumably a full repair, given that it kept him out for the rest of the season; a trim would have allowed him to return before springtime. After that procedure, he never regained the breakneck scoring pace of his younger years, but he still played at an elite level. 

    Stammer Stats.JPG

    Steven Stamkos career statistics, courtesy of Hockey Reference

    Stamkos played a full load of games and minutes the year after his procedure but scored at a lower rate than his rookie season. The long recovery timeline may have played a part in his decreased production. Notably, he had one of the best seasons of his career the following year in 2018-19. 

    Stamkos also missed games due to injury in the 2019-20 and 2020-21 seasons. However, some of that was related to a core muscle injury. The team also termed some of it a “lower-body injury,” which may have been related to his meniscus. When he was healthy in those seasons, he scored at his usual elite rate or just below it. 

    If Middleton’s recovery follows this timeline, the four-year extension makes more sense. It also explains the contract’s timing. If Middleton returns to his second-pair form by the end of 2024-25, the whole league will know he’s back. He would then hit the open market, which could increase his price. By extending him this summer, the Wild are taking advantage of their trainers’ knowledge of Middleton’s outlook. In exchange, Middleton gets security. 

    That explains the term and the timing, but does it explain the price? Some of the $4.35 Average Annual Value (AAV) can be chalked up to Middleton’s locker room presence and veteran leadership. However, the AAV is well above his projected on-ice value from most publicly available models. As cool as Middleton is, surely Bill Guerin isn’t throwing in an extra $3 million annually for it. 

    Take a look at Dom Luszczyszyn’s contract value graphic below. Russo has reported that Middleton’s performance was marred by injury, but this model does not quantify how much injury hampered Middleton’s 2023-24 performance. Some of that is baked in because it predicts age-related decline, which is often related to injury. The model projects a significant dropoff in 2024-25, which could be accurate if Middleton needs time to ramp up to full strength. 

    However, if Middleton is poised for a bounce-back in the second year after his surgery (like Stamkos), he could reverse the aging curve in that season (2025-26) and the years after. Those are the years that this extension covers. If Middleton returns closer to his pre-injury performance, his 2022-23 performance is a better benchmark for those years. In that season, his on-ice value was near $5 million. In that scenario, he could live up to the full value of this extension in three or even all four years of the deal. 

    Add in his veteran leadership and some cap inflation, and it actually presents a scenario for Minnesota to come out ahead on this deal. However, it’s an unlikely situation. 28-year-old defensemen don’t usually return from injury at 100% of their pre-injury value because even healthy players in their late 20s typically don’t play at the same level as they did two years ago. 

    HV Age vs. Defensive impact.JPG

    Based on research courtesy of HockeyViz.com

    None of this makes the contract a great deal for the Wild. Still, it’s a much more reasonable analysis than looking at the deal and concluding, Man, Minnesota really stepped in it this time. Even if the deal is somewhat inefficient over its lifetime, that’s extremely common for veteran contracts in the NHL. Front offices must spend their money somewhere, and ELC and RFA deals nearly always favor the team. 

    On the negative side, remember that it took a few assumptions to get here. For example, we don’t know if Middleton’s injury was related to the meniscus. That’s mostly conjecture based on the wording of Russo’s report. It’s also still fair to criticize this move in light of the need to make room for younger players to join the NHL club. However, Minnesota’s defense prospects still have the opportunity to compete with players like Declan Chisholm. Middleton can also slide to the third pairing in the final years of this extension if those prospects grow into a second-pairing role. 

    There’s not much left to do, but watch and see how the deal plays out. In the words of another charismatic professional athlete, “Hate me or love me, you watched. And that’s all that you could do.” 

    Ultimately, I’m glad we get to love Jake Middleton for another four years. And if we hate the contract, there may not be a better guy the Wild could overpay. 

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Thanks 1
    • Confused 1

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    On 7/6/2024 at 9:59 AM, mnfaninnc said:

    I don't think Justin was speculating one way or the other, he was kind of playing both sides. I've had 3 trims in my life, and the last 2 were really easy to get back into the swing of things (and were more trimmed). 

    It's an injury that is pretty painful to play through, but once adrenalin kicks in, it's doable. All 3 times I came back better than I was. However, there is a time lapse from the body being healed and the mind. I had to bang the knees around a bit before my mind was convinced they were ok.

    Interestingly, my 1st was in my late 20s, and that was 2 weeks on crutches. My 2nd and 3rd were done in my late 50s and those were not even a day of crutches. I think the drs. have gotten better at the procedure. 

    Weirdly, though, my drs. did not call this a clean out. I didn't have a lot of swelling in my knee. This sounds like there were some floating things also in the knee, possibly bone fragments. It may have been a meniscus surgery, but I think there were other things cleaned out too. 

    Thanks for sharing! I definitely think that sports medicine, and specifically treatments for pro athletes, has come a long way. Adrian Peterson's return from a torn ACL comes to mind -- a lot of these knee injuries aren't as tough to fix as they used to be, and especially for pro athletes the recovery windows are getting shorter and shorter. 

    To your point about the cleanup, that's some great insight. I don't know any more specifics than what's been reported by Russo, and there's no way to be sure it was a meniscus injury. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 7/6/2024 at 7:24 PM, Lovehockey said:

    it becomes more and more obvious that Guerin does all the signings based on the favoritism first and team needs second. The buyouts was the first indication (unknown guy - Guerin had nine of the GM experience) coming to the established team which needs extra help to go more deep in playoffs and screwing the team for the 5 years without any plans. And don’t fool yourself, if it would not be Kaprizov (whos present in the team has nothing to do with Guerin) Wild would be picking first in the next 5 drafts. Than we have a Fiala which remove secondary scoring from the team and we still don’t have it. Yes we got Favor but not having Fiala crate much more fundamental problems than have great young defender. There are few more less known examples like this.

    First off, if we couldn't afford Fiala during the buy-out period it means we wouldn't have been able to afford him if we'd kept Parise and Suter either, because the buy-outs actually gained us cap-space in those first 2 seasons. Guerin would have had to slash and burn the roster to fit Fiala in with Ek and Boldy and Kaprizov and, at the time, Dumba and Zuccarello at $6M. So you'd have gotten your secondary scoring and horrible depth. 

    Its funny to me you don't give Geurin credit for Kaprizov but still blame him for the overpaid contracts to Dumba and Zuccarello that he had no part of, which played a role in the need to trade away Fiala. 

    Instead he took a bad situation and turned it into a middle-6 winger, which allowed him to potentially add a top-6 talent with his original pick, and a 21-year old top-pair defenseman. The overall team will be stronger for it going forward than if they'd kept Fiala. That trade will only look more lopsided for us once Ohgren and Yurov establish themselves.

    Second, I'm not sure how the Middleton signing is favoritism. Remind me which 6'3'', 210+ lbs blueline prospect we've got who's ready to take over on the 2nd pairing in the next 4 years again? Maybe that will be Lambos or Hunt but I don't know that we can expect that currently. 

    And even if they do end up becoming that, both are due to be RFAs in the next year or two with practically no NHL experience. Meaning they're going to be extremely cheap on whatever deal they sign next. 

    Then, by the time they are potentially ready to replace Middleton (or more likely Zach Bogosian), he will have only a 15-team no-trade list for protection. Or we could decide that we like having a defensive defenseman with that kind of size on the bottom-pairing. Which we have all been clamoring for in the post-season. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 7/6/2024 at 10:37 AM, Will D. Ness said:

    I'm mostly disturbed that BG is revealing his hand here beyond much of a doubt.  His MO doesn't give a f* about optimizing the Wild's cap.

    Does he have a vision, or is he playing tic tac toe?

     

    I think he has a better long-term vision than a lot of us do, given that he's operating with more information on how prospects are developing, or not, than the fanbase does. 

    You don't need to optimize every last cap-dollar to put together a good roster. And let's not act like Geurin hasn't gotten good value from some of his long-term deals, for top-6 players, either. 

    I think its fairly apparent that Geurin is trying to keep the team competitive while he tries to get Kaprizov signed to a second deal, to show him that they are only a few pieces away from competing for a Cup. 

    Slashing and burning the roster if you can't maximize every single deal so that we end up with a top-10 pick who won't get here for another 3 seasons is not going to sell Kaprizov on sticking around.. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 minutes ago, B1GKappa97 said:

    I think he has a better long-term vision than a lot of us do, given that he's operating with more information on how prospects are developing, or not, than the fanbase does. 

    You don't need to optimize every last cap-dollar to put together a good roster. And let's not act like Geurin hasn't gotten good value from some of his long-term deals, for top-6 players, either. 

    I think its fairly apparent that Geurin is trying to keep the team competitive while he tries to get Kaprizov signed to a second deal, to show him that they are only a few pieces away from competing for a Cup. 

    Slashing and burning the roster if you can't maximize every single deal so that we end up with a top-10 pick who won't get here for another 3 seasons is not going to sell Kaprizov on sticking around.. 

    I used to think he had a vision but not so sure anymore.  Dead cap comes off the books next season to the tune of 13M.  There is no special insight to this number.  

    It is a singular opportunity to bring in a singular player without giving up any assets.  

    BG has taken this singular opportunity and somewhat apathetically nibbled away at it with unforced moves and a weird sense of player loyalty that has minimized it to the point that it might not be much of an opportunity anymore.

    I was hoping that BG had something up his sleeve and is making these moves with a long view that surpasses all of us dumbass fans but...

    That hope is fading.  BG has painted us into a corner with this player loyalty aspect and it is going to take the exact opposite to get us out of it.  I just don't see the guy changing his MO.

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    13 minutes ago, Will D. Ness said:

    I used to think he had a vision but not so sure anymore.  Dead cap comes off the books next season to the tune of 13M.  There is no special insight to this number.  

    It is a singular opportunity to bring in a singular player without giving up any assets.  

    BG has taken this singular opportunity and somewhat apathetically nibbled away at it with unforced moves and a weird sense of player loyalty that has minimized it to the point that it might not be much of an opportunity anymore.

    I mean the main reason that cap-space is 'gone' is because he turned Kevin Fiala into a much younger Brock Faber.. and given the lack of development of our blueline draft picks, that has proven to be a huge addition for the team.

    If we weren't signing Faber to that deal, we'd likely be using that cap space to try and find a Faber-esque defenseman in UFA anyway.

    I think the vision for the future of the roster is fairly clear myself. He's getting heavier in the bottom-6/bottom pairing (which we've needed) while relying on incoming draft-picks on ELCs to boost the top-6/top-4 over the next few years and replace some of the veteran placeholders. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, B1GKappa97 said:

    Maybe that will be Lambos or Hunt but I don't know that we can expect that currently. 

    And to think it was just year ago we were beating our chests re our #1 ranked prospect pool of which these two were riding white horses at the front of the pack

    Anyone heading to Development camp?  Would love a Milne, Heidt update.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    56 minutes ago, B1GKappa97 said:

    I mean the main reason that cap-space is 'gone' is because he turned Kevin Fiala into a much younger Brock Faber.. and given the lack of development of our blueline draft picks, that has proven to be a huge addition for the team.

    If we weren't signing Faber to that deal, we'd likely be using that cap space to try and find a Faber-esque defenseman in UFA anyway.

    I think the vision for the future of the roster is fairly clear myself. He's getting heavier in the bottom-6/bottom pairing (which we've needed) while relying on incoming draft-picks on ELCs to boost the top-6/top-4 over the next few years and replace some of the veteran placeholders. 

    True on Faber, but that doesn't excuse the Middleton contract because he knew Faber was legit a year ago.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    30 minutes ago, Pewterschmidt said:

    And to think it was just year ago we were beating our chests re our #1 ranked prospect pool of which these two were riding white horses at the front of the pack

    Anyone heading to Development camp?  Would love a Milne, Heidt update.

    Well I think Faber was the main white horse on that. Faber and Rossi and Wallstedt.

    Returns have looked pretty good on 2 of the 3 so far! 

    From what I recall, Lambos and Hunt were both considered middle-pairing defensemen at best in their respective draft classes which is why they fell as far as they did. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 minutes ago, Will D. Ness said:

    True on Faber, but that doesn't excuse the Middleton contract because he knew Faber was legit a year ago.

    Yes, but Faber isn't here to replace Middleton. He's replacing Sutes.

    Middleton is replacing Carson Soucy as a future 3rd pairing guy who can play up in the lineup if there are injuries in the top-4. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    8 hours ago, B1GKappa97 said:

    I mean the main reason that cap-space is 'gone' is because he turned Kevin Fiala into a much younger Brock Faber.. and given the lack of development of our blueline draft picks, that has proven to be a huge addition for the team.

    If we weren't signing Faber to that deal, we'd likely be using that cap space to try and find a Faber-esque defenseman in UFA anyway.

    I think the vision for the future of the roster is fairly clear myself. He's getting heavier in the bottom-6/bottom pairing (which we've needed) while relying on incoming draft-picks on ELCs to boost the top-6/top-4 over the next few years and replace some of the veteran placeholders. 

    Two things that confused me.

    1. He does not have 2 years ( meaning Kaprisov )

    2. why do u want to wait two more year for him to start on something and we are not even talking like becoming contenders. Guerin is already Wild GM for 5 years. Forget about players he signed/trade and so on. What he achieved? Did we get to the second round at least once? . So how anyone can be satisfied with his work. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    16 minutes ago, Lovehockey said:

    Two things that confused me.

    1. He does not have 2 years ( meaning Kaprisov )

    2. why do u want to wait two more year for him to start on something and we are not even talking like becoming contenders. Guerin is already Wild GM for 5 years. Forget about players he signed/trade and so on. What he achieved? Did we get to the second round at least once? . So how anyone can be satisfied with his work. 

    He has this year which hasn't even started and next year under contract. I assume if they don't sign him next off-season they'll have to consider trading him. 

    I think that is just the timeline that the team is on. This is the final year of the high dead-caps, then next year we should start to see the fruits of Geurin's draft classes since he took over for Fenton. We've already gotten a taste with Rossi, next up is Wallstedt, Khusnutdinov and Ohgren, then next year we likely see Yurov and can put him with Kaprizov. 

    He has achieved giving us the potential to have the best team we've ever had next season. He already has given the Wild their most successful regular season in team history and that was with less talent in the top-6 than we'll likely have next year. The foundation is there and the finishing pieces look to be on the way. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    23 minutes ago, B1GKappa97 said:

    He has this year which hasn't even started and next year under contract. I assume if they don't sign him next off-season they'll have to consider trading him. 

    I think that is just the timeline that the team is on. This is the final year of the high dead-caps, then next year we should start to see the fruits of Geurin's draft classes since he took over for Fenton. We've already gotten a taste with Rossi, next up is Wallstedt, Khusnutdinov and Ohgren, then next year we likely see Yurov and can put him with Kaprizov. 

    He has achieved giving us the potential to have the best team we've ever had next season. He already has given the Wild their most successful regular season in team history and that was with less talent in the top-6 than we'll likely have next year. The foundation is there and the finishing pieces look to be on the way. 

    Makes sense 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    11 hours ago, Pewterschmidt said:

    And to think it was just year ago we were beating our chests re our #1 ranked prospect pool of which these two were riding white horses at the front of the pack

    Anyone heading to Development camp?  Would love a Milne, Heidt update.

    I'm headed there. Not sure how much I will glean from it since I am taking my kiddo.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...