Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • Low Scores: Why Good Defense is Good Policy


    Guest

    There are two kinds of exciting in most sports. The obvious kind, where someone on a team, or the team itself goes offensively crazy, and scores like there's no one else on the ice:

     

    And then there's the play where someone puts down their foot and says "not in MY house," and denies a great scoring opportunity:

     

    Here's the dirty secret about all this offensive excellence everyone is in love with: the constant focus on offense is making decent defenses few and far between. The NBA Already has offense OCD. It's rarer that I see a game where at least one team wasn't over 100 points, usually both (or close. Granted, I don't keep track of basketball). The NFL is on its way: the league is passing rules that favor offenses, and teams are obsessing over scoring more points rather than stopping the other guy. Don't get me wrong- there are still some elite defenses out there- Seattle...umm... Seattle... the Seahawks.... Seattle... Even the "Black and Blue" Division that were defensive ninjas have abandoned their ways to some extent.

    Russo stated in his blog on Thursday that it was primarily Chicago that was responsible for the slow play, and while that might be true, I submit that the slower pace only aided the Wild. Going into round 1, it was said time and time again- by Russo and many others- that if the Wild were going to win, they had to slow down the pace of the game. With Chicago (whom Paul Allen refers to as the "speedy Hawks"), the same is true.

    A slower paced game does multiple good things for the Wild. It allows them more time for the defense to get into position. It gives them more time to make good passes. Maybe most importantly, it helps lower the score of the game, taking pressure of their offense. No one has ever accused the Wild of being a goal-producing machine, and they're not about to start now. The Wild should be more than happy to play hockey which some would call "boring."

    Personally, I'll call it "responsible," "smart," and "playing to win." I don't need a million goals. I just need wins. The way for the Wild to give me those is to play to their strengths: defensively sound, responsible, tight hockey.

    Maybe what is even more important about great defenses is that as they become rarer, great offenses will not know what to do about them. When a team is used to scoring at whim, they don't know how to handle someone stopping them. If the Wild can become that team, they have a leg up on teams who have forfeited their defense for an exciting offense (ie: one that lost in round one this year and wears red and blue).

    When a game is low scoring, don't fall into the trap of thinking it's boring. Understand that it is a strategy with thought and intention behind it, and is one which works wonderfully when executed properly.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    There are no comments to display.



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...