Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • Like It Or Not, the Wild Miss Calen Addison


    Image courtesy of Brace Hemmelgam-USA Today Sports
    Tony Abbott

    The power play is a gigantic sore spot for the Minnesota Wild throughout their recent playoff history. In their 2021 series against the Vegas Golden Knights, Kirill Kaprizov and Co. went 2-for-11 in their seven-game series. They got more calls the next year against the St. Louis Blues, but to little avail, going 4-for-24 in six games.

    Add that all up, and Minnesota was clipping at a robust 6-for-35. That's 17%. As you can tell by the results, that's not going to cut it.

    Is it any better this year? Yes and no. You can't say that the power play hasn't showed up. The Wild notched a goal on the man advantage in every game so far and is 4-17. 23% isn't lighting the world on fire, but that's better, right?

    Right?

    Eh. We've got to remember that goal-scoring is on the rise, so a 23% power play isn't exactly what it used to be. The Wild are ninth in the league in power play percentage, compared to last year, when they were... tenth. The year before that? Tied for ninth.

    This parallels Minnesota's long-standing history of being pretty mediocre on the power play. With all the star players cycling through the organization -- your Zach Parises, Kaprizovs, Kevin Fialas, Matt Boldys, and a large group of name-brand defensemen -- the Wild have exactly one top-10 finish in power play rate in their last 13 years. That would be the 2019-20 season, and they finished tied for 10th. 

    For a bright moment, it looked like the Wild had the juice to crack the league's top-10, but they trailed off as the year drew to a close. Why? You can point to injuries with Kaprizov, but there's no denying one thing:

    The Wild miss Calen Addison running the power play.

    Well, maybe there is denying it. Addison has been firmly on the bench since the trade deadline, with only injuries and rest allowing him back in the lineup. Right now, he's nowhere close to drawing into the lineup, at least as far as we know. With Brock Faber's emergence, it'd be a shock to find out Addison is even the team's eighth defenseman on their internal depth chart.

    To some extent, you get it. The Wild certainly don't miss Addison at 5-on-5. Like a young Matt Dumba, Addison's mistakes stand out on a blueline that prides itself on its discipline. His ghastly minus-17 in the regular season is more fueled by poor goaltending than anything else, but no one will sincerely argue he's an above-average defender.

    image.png

    But through four games, it's clear that the way Addison runs a power play outstrips anyone else in the organization. It sounds silly to point the finger at the power play, when the Wild's biggest concern is their suddenly-leaky penalty kill. But if Dallas is going to rain goals on Minnesota on the man advantage, they have to try and keep up.

    John Klingberg isn't capable of that right now.

    We get it, they're 23% on the series, and 2-for-8 since Klingberg came back and took over for Jared Spurgeon at the point. Klingberg has been a power play quarterback his entire career, and was a great one at his peak. We still haven't seen much time with him and Kaprizov, let alone a healthy version. There are a number of reasons you can throw out to absolve the power play.

    But it isn't about assigning or deflecting blame, not in the playoffs. It's about winning. To do that, Minnesota has to be opportunistic, and they just haven't been that on the power play this series. Let's list the situations where the Wild scored their power play goals, and how much they increased their chances of winning:

    Game 1: Kaprizov opened scoring; increased Minnesota's chances of winning 22.1%
    Game 2: Marcus Johansson closes Dallas' lead to 5-2 in second period; increased Minnesota's chances of winning 5.9%
    Game 3: Marcus Foligno (second unit) notches insurance goal in second period to make it 3-1 Wild; odds of winning increase 18.9%
    Game 4: Minnesota scores on 6-on-4 with 1:20 remaining in game to make it 3-2 Dallas; increased Minnesota's chances of winning 3.0%

    Not surprisingly, the Wild won the two games where they scored timely power play goals, and they lost when they couldn't convert in high leverage opportunities.

    The Wild went 1-for-4 on Sunday, but that is divorced from the leverage of those opportunities. They had an opportunity to break a scoreless game with a power play 12 minutes into the second period, then two more to tie the game at one to close the second period and open the third.

    They failed. The first missed opportunity allowed Dallas to score the first goal of the game. Immediately after the end of their third failed power play, Evgenii Dadonov stepped out of the penalty box and put the game all but out-of-reach at 2-0. 

    The Wild only mustered four unblocked shot attempts with any sort of danger on those power plays. The two most dangerous were a missed net from Kaprizov, and a shot in close by Freddy Gaudreau on the second unit. The other two were a shot by Boldy and a missed shot by Kaprizov in the slot, both with only about an 8% chance of going in. 

    Rewatching those three power plays is an exercise in frustration, and Klingberg was often at the center of it. He twice failed to hold the zone on clearing attempts and mishandled a pass to see the puck leave the zone a third time. He only fired one shot, from the point, which was blocked like many-a Ryan Suter wrister from the days of old.

    And the zone entries! He twice burned 11 valuable seconds off the clock with slow drop-passes to Johansson, allowing Stars penalty killers to get set. On the third power play, he and Johansson couldn't get into the zone for over half a minute.

    On top of all that, Addison's quick-zip passing style was absent in favor of a slower, more methodical perimeter passing game. Wild fans have to remember better days and know they can have so much better.

    Counting playoffs, the Wild are scoring just 5.25 goals per hour with Klingberg on the ice on the power play. Minnesota averaged a staggering 10.42 goals per hour with Addison manning the power play in the regular season. Klingberg's underlying numbers look better than his results, but his shots and expected goal rates trail Addison.

    On the other side, Miro Heiskanen quarterbacked the Stars' power play to over 12 goals per hour. In a small sample size, he's doubled it in the playoffs. Minnesota's giving up too much to keep Addison off of the power play.

    But it's not as simple as putting him in for Klingberg. Minnesota needs him at 5-on-5 play. For all his faults on the power play and in his own zone, Addison can lead the breakout and contribute offensively at even strength in a way few Wild defensemen can. We saw Klingberg's magic when he saved a goal at one end of the ice, then converted at the other seconds later to make the game 2-1.

    But if you start Addison and Klingberg on defense, that's two pretty big defensive liabilities out on the blueline. So how do the Wild navigate this?

    The answer: Go with an 11-forward, 7-defenseman lineup and use Addison purely as a power play specialist.

    This goes against Evason's pointed comments to Addison about how the league is too good to be a specialist. That might be true long-term, but the Wild have needs right now. If they have to get a specialist to fulfill them, so be it.

    Besides, it's not like the Wild don't have specialists as it is. Connor Dewar and Ryan Reaves take a semi-regular 5-on-5 shift, but what are they to this team but specialists at the moment? Dewar is in the lineup almost purely for his penalty-killing abilities. Reaves is in there almost purely for his physicality. 

    What's the harm in hiding a third specialist on that fourth-line in Addison? In crunch time, they can double-shift players like Kaprizov, Boldy, or even Gustav Nyquist, who deserves more minutes than he currently is getting in his role.

    The gap in Addison's ability to run a power play against the rest of the team's defensemen is greater than any marginal benefit they'd lose in not playing Sam Steel or Oskar Sundqvist at 5-on-5. Evason can hide Addison to his heart's content while keeping him fresh enough to have a rhythm on the power play. Perhaps it's not ideal, but they need more goals than they're getting now.

    Evason is a coach who is very much set in his ways, and it's hard to imagine him letting Addison out of the doghouse with the season on the line. But doing so would be the kind of... if not overly creative, then certainly necessary adjustment that he didn't make until it was too late last season. Like it or not, they need what Addison can bring.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    I would like to see a crisper more proactive PP for sure.  I am not so sure that the reason is squarely Addison.  Even KK doesn't look that sharp.  Boldy seems to be fighting it as well.  Maybe it is just out of sync with Klingberg, maybe Dallas is keying on something.. I don't know but I do know that Addison doesn't possess greater skill, and keeps it pretty tight whereas Klingberg does have just a little better skill and experience and it translates to a looser game that is looking more sloppy than anything.  

    In his defense though Klinger has tightened up 5v5 and it shows.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Interesting take. 11-7? It might work. You must have more faith in Addison’s defensive play regardless of where you put him on the ice. I think he’s completely untrustworthy with his defense and the effort he shows with it.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Why not put blame where it is, or at least a reason.  The QB right now doesn't matter, it's replacing Ek that is the problem.  While Johansson brings a different skill set to the PP, we don't have that guy in the middle who whacks away at rebounds.  Replacing Ek's 12 goals isn't easy, but replacing that skill set has been impossible.  

    With nobody there to do what Ek does, the defensive box can shade slightly to Kaprizov cutting down his gap.  This affects every other threat on the PP.  It's not the zippy passes from the top that are missing, it's the hammering away in front that's most glaring.  

    What we need is a solution to Ek. Could Boldy take the pounding inside?  He's got a good enough stick. Maybe someone as savvy as Dewar could get it done?  Moose is big but doesn't have the quick stick.  Hartman might be able to do it, or maybe even Gaudreau. 

    One issue is that this PP is designed to have that threat in the middle and then pass around the perimeter. Without that threat in the middle, they are just wasting time. The shots aren't coming from the home plate area, there's not enough traffic in there either.  

    Conclusion: Find a suitable replacement for Ek's role, or redesign the PP. We've got plenty of guys who can QB, and Klingberg/Spurgeon are much better at all the other aspects than Addison.  Even Addison on the wing isn't much of a solution as Steel is a C and we need the beef.  Grit first is supposed to be the mantra, Addison has none in his game.  

    I realize Addison is one of Tony's darling players, but the argument is just plain wrong for him, unless he adapts his play to the style of the team.  So far, he has shown an unwillingness to do so, and for that, your butt gets splinters.

    • Like 5
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    40 minutes ago, mnfaninnc said:

    Why not put blame where it is, or at least a reason.  The QB right now doesn't matter, it's replacing Ek that is the problem.  While Johansson brings a different skill set to the PP, we don't have that guy in the middle who whacks away at rebounds.  Replacing Ek's 12 goals isn't easy, but replacing that skill set has been impossible.  

    With nobody there to do what Ek does, the defensive box can shade slightly to Kaprizov cutting down his gap.  This affects every other threat on the PP.  It's not the zippy passes from the top that are missing, it's the hammering away in front that's most glaring.  

    What we need is a solution to Ek. Could Boldy take the pounding inside?  He's got a good enough stick. Maybe someone as savvy as Dewar could get it done?  Moose is big but doesn't have the quick stick.  Hartman might be able to do it, or maybe even Gaudreau. 

    One issue is that this PP is designed to have that threat in the middle and then pass around the perimeter. Without that threat in the middle, they are just wasting time. The shots aren't coming from the home plate area, there's not enough traffic in there either.  

    Conclusion: Find a suitable replacement for Ek's role, or redesign the PP. We've got plenty of guys who can QB, and Klingberg/Spurgeon are much better at all the other aspects than Addison.  Even Addison on the wing isn't much of a solution as Steel is a C and we need the beef.  Grit first is supposed to be the mantra, Addison has none in his game.  

    I realize Addison is one of Tony's darling players, but the argument is just plain wrong for him, unless he adapts his play to the style of the team.  So far, he has shown an unwillingness to do so, and for that, your butt gets splinters.

    Not once did you mention Sundqvist. Would he be worthy a try on the PP making small talk with Oetter?

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Jon said:

    i’d argue putting Sundqvist on the PP1 and in the lineup might do more good than Addison. I like his front net presence.

    This is the problem. The last game our first unit on the power play looked dreadful because they were just passing around the perimeter and shooting mostly harmless shots on Oettinger who was unscreened and playing lights out. We need a big body in the blue paint to take his eyes away and hame home rebounds and loose pucks. The second unit looked much better having a screening forward.

    I don’t really understand a lot of what this team did last game with screening the goaltender. For a while when 6 on 5 we had Jared Spurgeon (!) screening Oettinger…..are most of our forwards unwilling to do this? It’s a pretty basic and necessary strategy against a hot goaltender (or really any goaltender for that matter).

    I don’t really think it has anything to do with QBing the power play.

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Not. Keep Faber in, he's earned this and has a much more complete game then Addy.

    The only time I would want to see Addy on ice is on the PP if he's in the lineup. That means throwing an extra 5 minutes at both Dumba and Spurgeon.

    Frankly, we need to fix our woeful PK which is sitting 25% lower then the regular season right now before I start caring about a PP that's technically 2% better then the regular season.

    You can whine about penalties all you want, but they're gonna happen. I'd expect no less then 2 per game for both teams. Which with a (currently) 56% PK means Dallas likely gets a gimme goal every game.

    Edited by Millante
    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 hours ago, jgodwin17 said:

    This is the problem. The last game our first unit on the power play looked dreadful because they were just passing around the perimeter and shooting mostly harmless shots on Oettinger who was unscreened and playing lights out. We need a big body in the blue paint to take his eyes away and hame home rebounds and loose pucks. The second unit looked much better having a screening forward.

    I don’t really understand a lot of what this team did last game with screening the goaltender. For a while when 6 on 5 we had Jared Spurgeon (!) screening Oettinger…..are most of our forwards unwilling to do this? It’s a pretty basic and necessary strategy against a hot goaltender (or really any goaltender for that matter).

    I don’t really think it has anything to do with QBing the power play.

    Right?! It’s very bizarre why the hell there is quite literally zero front net presence. But, then again as I’m typing this, I recall seeing Suter cross-checking Kirill multiple times without any call. This doesn’t excuse the Wild but I can see how the fwds might be hesitant to continue doing that if they know they’re going to be brutalized without repercussions. Kirill might actually be hurt because of that. Still, who isn’t hurt in the playoffs right? No net presences = little chance of scoring.

    Edited by Jon
    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Maybe Foligno should go battle in front and try to draw a penalty for a change?

    I'll tell ya what I am beginning to see. Foligno becoming the next cap casualty as GMBG decides who he's tired of seeing the same stuff from. Greenway wore the patience thin, Fiala didn't produce when needed. GMBG is gonna have a lot to think about if this series goes down in flames for MN on Friday night.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, Jon said:

    Right?! It’s very bizarre why the hell there is quite literally zero front net presence. But, then again as I’m typing this, I recall seeing Suter cross-checking Kirill multiple times without any call. This doesn’t excuse the Wild but I can see how the fwds might be hesitant to continue doing that if they know they’re going to be brutalized without repercussions. Kirill might actually be hurt because of that. Still, who isn’t hurt in the playoffs right? No net presences = little chance of scoring.

    But playoffs, right? 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Quite frankly, I see Klingberg as less of an offensive asset and more of a defensive liability than Addison.  I'd bench one and play the other.  I don't think you want to go short on the forward lines in the playoffs.

    My two cents.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...