Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • Kirill Kaprizov Re-Signs with the Wild on Record-Breaking Contract


    Image courtesy of © Timothy T. Ludwig-Imagn Images
    Thomas Williams

    It's finally done. Superstar Kirill Kaprizov is reportedly re-signing with the Minnesota Wild, keeping him in the State of Hockey beyond this upcoming season.

    First reported by ESPN's Kevin Weekes and then later confirmed by The Athletic's Michael Russo, the Wild and Kaprizov have agreed to a contract. There was no official word on the dollar amount or the length, until Sportsnet's Elliotte Friedman quickly reported that it is an eight-year extension that will come in with a cap hit over $16 million AAV.

    Then, just in time to not let the rumors fester, the Wild officially announced the new deal that keeps the best player in franchise history, in St. Paul for potentially the rest of his career.

    This contract will keep him with the Wild through the 2033-34 season and will kick in starting next season, the 2026-27 campaign. Kaprizov was a pending unrestricted free agent and was set to hit the open market next summer, with all 31 other teams licking their lips at the thought of being able to bring in one of the best players in the world.

    As Friedman posted, this is the biggest contract in NHL history. Kaprizov now has the highest cap hit in the league, a record previously held by Toronto Maple Leafs captain Auston Matthews and his $13.25-million AAV, and the Wild star will also have the largest contract in terms of total dollars, with $136 million committed to the 28-year-old winger. Previously, Alex Ovechkin's 13-year, $124-million contract held that title.

    This deal now comes after Kaprizov reportedly rejected a deal that was also eight years but exactly $16-million per year. One would have to assume that this slight increase in dollars is something that pushed the deal over the finish line and got the Russian superstar's signature on the dotted line.

    Now, the Wild will thankfully be heading into a very crucial 2025-26 season without the noise surrounding their best player. The contract is done and finalized, and now everyone knows where Kaprizov will be playing for several more years.

    Last year, Kaprizov scored 25 goals and 56 points in just 41 games and was on pace to finish as a Hart Trophy finalist before an injury derailed his MVP-level season. He already owns the Wild franchise record for most points in a season when he scored 47 goals and 108 points during the 2021-22 campaign, and with some boring contract talks behind him, maybe he'll break his own record once again.

    The Wild knew that this would essentially be life or death for the franchise. Either sign him for anything at all and keep your playoff dreams alive and possible contention hopes fruitful, or be a bubble playoff team for eternity.

    Thank goodness that's done.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Thanks 1

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    1 minute ago, Pewterschmidt said:

    Yurov may not even make the team out of camp.  Ogz ceiling is post season Trenin.  So now Haight is the last hope that a second top 6'r is already in the organization. 

    P-Scout, keep in mind that OgZ is a 2nd half player. His stick was pretty slow last season, I anticipate without having watched him that it is still a bit slow but better. 

    What I'm looking for is an early sniper goal and an early greasy goal from OgZ. To me, confidence is his biggest issue. I'm sticking with Nino as his comparison. And I'd love to see him throw the wood a little.

    I haven't actually watched Yurov yet, but I'm thinking he is one of those who will just keep improving all season. I consider the K and A to be about the same level leagues, and I think he's put in his time. I'll bet he's one of those guys who just gets a little bit better every game.

    One last thing, there is a lot of pressure now on the guys we resigned a couple of years ago. They have got to get these guys into consistent NHL guys before their time ends here. If they don't mentor well, the signing was a waste of time.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    44 minutes ago, Patrick said:

    IF Kaprizov stays healthy we need one more big time addition. 

    The problem is we don't have the money for it because we overpaid by close to 30% unless we become top heavy.

    Additionally, KK is fragile.  8 years is too long. 

    I don't think this will age well.

     

    This is patently false. According to puckpedia, we have $23.1M leftover in cap room for next season. 

    We need to extend Gustavsson (probably $7M tops) and likely Jiricek on an RFA deal ($3M tops) which leaves us around $13.1M in cap space before they make any trades to create more. 

    They have plenty of flexibility to still add pieces. 

    And how cares about how the contract will age? The Wild are literally about to go all-in over the next 3 years now. Forget about how the contract will look in 6 or 7 seasons. Worry about that when we get closer to it. Just enjoy the ride in the meantime. 

    • Like 5
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Quote

     I don't know how Thompson is on the back end, but in zones 2 and 3 he is a monster. Larkin, to me, adds that speed element and I think he's pretty responsible defensively, at least per reputation. 

    I was curious since you mentioned it, Thompson is a lifetime -56 and Larkin is a lifetime -103. Ouch!

    However, Thompson was +4, -1, -2 the last three seasons. Larkin -7, +5, -16. Thompson gets the easy nod for being more responsible.

    Last season:
    Thompson 76GP 44G 28A 72P -2 +/- 35PIM 16PPP 18:45TOI

    Larkin 82GP 30G 40A 70P -16 +/- 40PIM 27PPP 20:04TOI

    Thompson, more goals and points in fewer games with less TOI. Also higher shooting percentage (with more shots) 18.2 vs. 12.8.

    Larkin's strengths; PP points (27 vs. 16) and FO% (54.5 vs. 42.2).

    Contract:

    Thompson 5 x $7.1M

    Larkin 6 x $8.7M

    Add in Thompson's size (6'6", 220 vs. 6'1", 199) and reach and it's a no brainer to me. Tage is two years younger as well.

    Buffalo is more likely to deal their best players than Detroit (Eichel, Reinhart, Peterka).

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 hours ago, MNCountryLife said:

    Now that is a scary statement.  Corruption in the NHLPA to ensure others get paid.  I could see it happening as well.

    Scary stuff, seeing a union working to get its members more money. Blatant corruption.

    • Thanks 1
    • Haha 4
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, Tony Abbott said:

    Scary stuff, seeing a union working to get its members more money. Blatant corruption.

    LOL.. I see the sarcasm there.   But seriously... Unions are supposed to work on behalf of all players, with an emphasis on those that are in the bottom run of the ladder....not the wealthy few.  Corruption occurs when the union favors the big guy vs the little.   I would also be surprised if the CBA didn't have collusion language in it for union reps interferring in contracts.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    44 minutes ago, Tony Abbott said:

    Scary stuff, seeing a union working to get its members more money. Blatant corruption.

    As I read through the CBA it appears that the NHLPA must review all contracts to ensure it meets the guidelines of the CBA.  As long as the contract falls within the guidelines of the CBA it would pass the NHLPA.  

    I do see in section 26.3 it discusses Circumventions.  The idea of manipulation.  Which could place a union rep in a tricky situation if they pushed talks.  I would need a lot more time to study the CBA to have a confident argument one way or the other.

    Edited by MNCountryLife
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 hours ago, MNCountryLife said:

    That is probably one of the best reasons to sign him at such a high AAV.  Minnesota needs to be considered a legitimate place to go.  A contender willing to spend the money to get there.

    You understand there is a salary cap right?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 hours ago, Citizen Strife said:

    This was the only thing they could do.  Even if you hope the newer guys can be, should be, will be, or do become as good as Kap is, the fact that literally no one else in this franchise has done it says, "Yeah, fuck it.". From day one, Kap was just plain better than Gaborik, Parise, Suter, and Boldy and Rossi now 

    The Wild play better (much) better with him in the lineup.  Is it enough to stop the whining?  Will it stop the Lols if "$17m and they still couldn't win a round?". Sure.

    What is also true is other teams best the Wild for decades because they had the talent ceilings the Wild just don't. Kaprizov is an x-factor.  

    I'm just happy the Wild finally kept one for once.

     

     

    We all know you are 2nd to none when to comes to Kaprizov fandom.  Not even his own mother is as big a fan as you are! 😂😂😂

    • Confused 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Just now, Patrick said:

    You understand there is a salary cap right?

    Yep. sure do.   Players want to play for contenders, not pretenders.  Kirill will attract the attention of other player wanting to play with him... the high contract will also tell players that the Wild are willing to spend the money to get them there.

    Don't get me wrong.  I have been a big advocate on paying a player a value based on performance.  I think this is an overpay... but there will be an upside to the overpay as well.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 minutes ago, MNCountryLife said:

    Yep. sure do.   Players want to play for contenders, not pretenders.  Kirill will attract the attention of other player wanting to play with him... the high contract will also tell players that the Wild are willing to spend the money to get them there.

    Don't get me wrong.  I have been a big advocate on paying a player a value based on performance.  I think this is an overpay... but there will be an upside to the overpay as well.

    So how does overpaying attract more talent? I would think underpaying would attract more talent. Not only would there be more money to spread around but it would also signal to the league that there something in Minnesota worth more than money.  

    I think this does the opposite. I think it's says MN is so toxic we had to overpay KK by 30% to get him to stay.

    I'm guessing a temperamental GM with a philosophy 20 years out of date and one the the most vanilla coaches in the NHL is why KK made bank.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Just now, Patrick said:

    So how does overpaying attract more talent? I would think underpaying would attract more talent. Not only would there be more money to spread around but it would also signal to the league that there something in Minnesota worth more than money.  

    In all likelihood it does both to some degree or another.

    Players want to play with other good players.  Did Kirill convince Tarasenko to come here?  Maybe.  Did Zuc sign a team friendly deal to keep playing with Kirill?  Maybe.  Do players talk and convince players to join a team or stay with a team.  Yes, I think that happens frequently.   

    Teams like Vegas, Oilers, Panthers and Lightning are all right up next to the cap.  They are paying out as much as allowed to get that winning team.  They are all in.  Players see that and want to be on teams like that.  Yes, it matters to players.  Especially to those that want to win a cup now.

    The Ducks, Blues and Blackhawks are all at the bottom of the cap.  We don't see people like Mitch Marner advocating to move to Anaheim just because they have cap space.  

    Is there a downside? Absolutely.  We have less money to spend and if we can't afford a player that wants more money for whatever reason... Yep.. we are going to lose them.  

    The best of both worlds would be to sign a player like Kirill at a lower cost... but it is what it is.

     

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    37 minutes ago, Patrick said:

    We all know you are 2nd to none when to comes to Kaprizov fandom.  Not even his own mother is as big a fan as you are! 😂😂😂

    Why does everyone who is anti-Guerin/anti-Kap contract, anti/Leipold, think I am some raving lunatic brainwashed optimist or something?

    First Scalp thinks I am personally attacking him cause I called him out on being angsty all off season (which I feel he was being to the point he was yelling at me for half an hour while I was heading into work), and now this?

    Thinking the owner, GM, and players aren't the scum of the earth each day makes me a koolaid drinker.  Sure.  That's healthy thinking.  I can't just be an optimist happy we finally signed an elite player to an extension or something.

    Signing Kap and Rossi to extensions was my hopeful outcome, and it happened.  I can just relax on the season now.

    Sorry I don't prescribe to constant pessimism like it's a life choice or something.  Finding the worst outcome or bad vibes of EVERYTHING the franchise does is certainly normal 

    *Note: almost everything.  I would rather not get into another shouting match.  

    Edited by Citizen Strife
    • Like 4
    • Thanks 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Also, if I ever "attack" someone, it's never personal.  I know jack shit about anyone here other than being "fans" of the team.  I just think some go out of their way to be overly toxic (maybe not on purpose), so I don't like that.  I don't like being like that, so I act realistic or optimistic.  It just feels better.

    I get enough toxic bullshit on the Internet as is.If the teams suck or bad stuff happens, I laugh it off and find it hilarious instead.  Not sure why that sounds like I worship at some Altar of Minnesota can do no wrong and never sucked ever.

    Edited by Citizen Strife
    • Like 4
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 hours ago, Scalptrash said:

    Now they won't be able to afford a true 1A center

    There’s cap space in the coming years for a big add. Finding someone willing to come will take patience. Every few years someone seems to want out of their current team or has short term health issues. St Louis added ROR, Vegas got JE. MN is a team on the rise. Enen if a 1C doesn’t become available or isn’t interested in MN then add the best playoff style scoring forward available. 

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, MNCountryLife said:

    In all likelihood it does both to some degree or another.

    Players want to play with other good players.  Did Kirill convince Tarasenko to come here?  Maybe.  Did Zuc sign a team friendly deal to keep playing with Kirill?  Maybe.  Do players talk and convince players to join a team or stay with a team.  Yes, I think that happens frequently.   

    Teams like Vegas, Oilers, Panthers and Lightning are all right up next to the cap.  They are paying out as much as allowed to get that winning team.  They are all in.  Players see that and want to be on teams like that.  Yes, it matters to players.  Especially to those that want to win a cup now.

    The Ducks, Blues and Blackhawks are all at the bottom of the cap.  We don't see people like Mitch Marner advocating to move to Anaheim just because they have cap space.  

    Is there a downside? Absolutely.  We have less money to spend and if we can't afford a player that wants more money for whatever reason... Yep.. we are going to lose them.  

    The best of both worlds would be to sign a player like Kirill at a lower cost... but it is what it is.

     

    Panthers and lightning underpay...and win cups.  Vegas cheats. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The way i see it is the league isnt really that deep with elite talent , you have alot of really good players but really there arent alot of elite players in the  Mcdavids class ,  Having Kaprizov is like the Twins having Santana  there isnt ever gonna be another one and if you trade them the return wont be as good .       We might need a good center but i dont think we need a top 5 center .

    • Like 4
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    54 minutes ago, Citizen Strife said:

    Why does everyone who is anti-Guerin/anti-Kap contract, anti/Leipold, think I am some raving lunatic brainwashed optimist or something?

    First Scalp thinks I am personally attacking him cause I called him out on being angsty all off season (which I feel he was being to the point he was yelling at me for half an hour while I was heading into work), and now this?

    Thinking the owner, GM, and players aren't the scum of the earth each day makes me a koolaid drinker.  Sure.  That's healthy thinking.  I can't just be an optimist happy we finally signed an elite player to an extension or something.

    Signing Kap and Rossi to extensions was my hopeful outcome, and it happened.  I can just relax on the season now.

    Sorry I don't prescribe to constant pessimism like it's a life choice or something.  Finding the worst outcome or bad vibes of EVERYTHING the franchise does is certainly normal 

    *Note: almost everything.  I would rather not get into another shouting match.  

    For everything KK this is true...when it's Rossi you are all doom and gloom though.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Was I though?  I waffled back and forth saying, "maybe he was just a complementary player" despite championing him quite a bit when he keeps racking up points.

    How Guerin got a 3x5 when evidence pointed elsewhere around the league was beyond me.  But keeping Rossi's cost down for now makes sense in hindsight.  I want Rossi to shut us all up and be the best center the Wild have ever had.  He may, he may not.  

    The only players I've ever outwardly shit on were the AHL+ depth the Wild had (Letteri, Walker, Beckman), or Khusnutdinov.  But that was from the stance of, "if the Wild can't find better depth or find better top liners to force these guys out...fuck!"

    I don't ever go doom and gloom.  I would just like to think the team isn't as bad as it sometimes looks.  Or, even if it is, then whatever.  Doesn't kill me anyway.  Better luck next game.  Better to think about happy things.

     

     

    Edited by Citizen Strife
    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I like Kaprizov for MN!

    BUT, did OCL just advocate for another big, record-setting contract like he did for Parise/Suter?

    Better start winning more playoff rounds now. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I've heard insiders say the contract holdup wasn't so much about the extra dollars but the Twin Cities sorry lack of borscht. BG found a nice beet farm not far from Fargo and now the state of hockey will have an ample supply of the  best cold, blood red soup this side of Moscow.

    • Like 1
    • Haha 4
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, Fezig said:

    I've heard insiders say the contract holdup wasn't so much about the extra dollars but the Twin Cities sorry lack of borscht. BG found a nice beet farm not far from Fargo and now the state of hockey will have an ample supply of the  best cold, blood red soup this side of Moscow.

    I see you've never been to Moscow On The Hill! 

    • Like 1
    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    21 hours ago, mnfaninnc said:

    I don't necessarily consider this an overpay

    You can consider it market rate since KK's agent got a few bids (tampering) to settle on this price.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    15 hours ago, NoJoSux said:

    I like Kaprizov for MN!

    BUT, did OCL just advocate for another big, record-setting contract like he did for Parise/Suter?

    Better start winning more playoff rounds now. 

    Here's the thing...the cap is nearly guaranteed to grow and grow by about 7 mil next season and 9 mil the 2 seasons after that. There was a DROP in cap two seasons into the Parise/Suter deals. And only rose 22.7 mill from '10 to '19 (2.5 mill per season). We got so hung out to dry by the stagnant cap increases AND fooked by the cap recapture rule that comparing the two situations isn't relevant. (My opinion)

     

    09-10: 56.8 million

    10-11: 59.4 million

    11-12: 64.3 million

    12-13: 60,0 million, can spend 70.2 million (pro-rated)

    13-14: 64.3 million

    14-15: 69.0 million

    15-16: 71,4 million

    16-17: 73.0 million

    17-18: 75.0 million

    18-19: 79.5 million

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, FredJohnson said:

    Here's the thing...the cap is nearly guaranteed to grow and grow by about 7 mil next season and 9 mil the 2 seasons after that. There was a DROP in cap two seasons into the Parise/Suter deals. And only rose 22.7 mill from '10 to '19 (2.5 mill per season). We got so hung out to dry by the stagnant cap increases AND fooked by the cap recapture rule that comparing the two situations isn't relevant. (My opinion)

     

     

    09-10: 56.8 million

    10-11: 59.4 million

    11-12: 64.3 million

    12-13: 60,0 million, can spend 70.2 million (pro-rated)

    13-14: 64.3 million

    14-15: 69.0 million

    15-16: 71,4 million

    16-17: 73.0 million

    17-18: 75.0 million

    18-19: 79.5 million

    Sure, this is a solid argument for the new contract being close to fair value. 

    My point was bent more towards the OCL influence and whether that's a good thing. Not necssarily that Kaprizov's deal would age as poorly as the other two resulting in penalties or buyouts. The rising cap is good for MN, but I can't help notice OCL's impact on Fletcher, then the Fenton hiring, and now meddling during Guerin's tenure. It's been a pattern. I don't recall his hockey knowledge or team management expertise ever being a huge plus. 

    What do I know though? I just think NoJo sucks and is poised for another year of body-check fly-bys and perimeter-putzing around. 

    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...