Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • Joel Eriksson Ek Is the NHL’s Most Overlooked Two-Way Force


    Image courtesy of Sergei Belski-Imagn Images
    Robert Brent

    When discussing underrated players, you often hear names like Aleksander Barkov (who is so commonly referred to as underrated that he can’t possibly be underrated), Sebastian Aho, Gustav Forsling, etc. While those players certainly deserve credit, Joel Eriksson Ek is also deserving of the title.

    Eriksson Ek has consistently been an X-factor for the Wild, playing sterling defense while contributing offensively and adding a gritty side to his game, making him a formidable opponent. 

    While Eriksson Ek has been shutting down top competition for years, it was natural to wonder if that could continue. He’ll turn 29 this season (around the age many players start to decline) and dealt with injuries last season that held him to just 46 games. He also plays a fairly physical game and is often involved in plays in front of the net. Eriksson Ek’s minutes are more punishing than those of the average NHL player.

    Fortunately for the Wild, the versatile center has dispelled concerns of a regression this season.

    Joel Eriksson Ek has continued to contribute offensively, matching his career scoring pace with .55 points-per-game this year, an exact parallel to his career average of .55 points-per-game. 

    He’s accomplished that feat despite shooting just 4.8%, which should increase at some point this year, given his relatively consistent shooting percentage year-over-year. Since the 2021-22 season, Eriksson Ek has shot at a rate between 9.3% and 11.7%.

    Eriksson Ek has also been an effective offensive possession driver. He’s leading all Wild centers in Corsi-for percentage (54%) and Fenwick-for percentage (55%). Eriksson Ek may never be the team’s flashiest scorer, but he’s still a crucial cog in Minnesota’s attack.

    Of course, Eriksson Ek’s offense is the secondary tool in his kit. The most crucial thing he does is play shutdown defense, a trait he’s continued to accomplish this season.

    Joel Eriksson Ek ranks 50th out of 429 forwards in the league in goals against per 60 minutes, and he’s done that while facing other teams’ best forwards. Minnesota’s fantastic run of games in November highlighted that dominance.

    In a recent set of games, the Wild played the Colorado Avalanche, the Chicago Blackhawks, the Pittsburgh Penguins, the Carolina Hurricanes, the Vegas Golden Knights, the Anaheim Ducks, and the San Jose Sharks. 

    All those teams employ some of the top-scoring centers in the league. MVP candidates like Nathan Mackinnon. Breakout superstars Connor Bedard, Leo Carlson, and Macklin Celebrini. Even Sidney Crosby, one of the greatest players of all time.

    Joel Eriksson Ek shut down all those centers. The following chart shows the top-line centers’ expected goals percentage against Eriksson Ek and against other Wild centers.

     

    image.png

    (Source: The Athletic)

    Eriksson Ek’s stats are staggering and reveal how crucial his defense is to the team’s success. The Wild’s goaltenders deservedly got a lot of credit for Minnesota’s winning streak. Still, Eriksson Ek's suffocation of some of the league's most dangerous scorers also deserves recognition.

    While Eriksson Ek’s complete control over play against some of the league’s top centers is noteworthy, it’s important to note that’s something he’s done against all of his competition this year. 

    This phenomenon is evident: no matter who Eriksson Ek plays with or against, the Wild generally play better than their opponents. There have been seven line combinations that have played more than 40 minutes together for Minnesota this season. Of those seven lines, Joel Eriksson Ek has centered the top three in expected goals percentage.

    image.png

    (Source: Moneypuck)

    Eriksson Ek has continued to dominate in all the ways he did in previous years, but he’s even added new wrinkles to his game. The main knock on the center in past seasons has been his relatively unremarkable faceoff success. 

    While Joel Eriksson Ek is incredibly talented defensively, Selke Trophy-winning centers are expected to dominate in the dot. For example, Aleksander Barkov is a regular Selke winner or nominee, and one of the hallmarks of his game is his faceoff excellence, with a career winning percentage of 58.9%.

    Before this season, Eriksson Ek had never won more than 50% of his faceoffs in a given year. However, he’s winning 51.5% of his draws this year. It’s not quite the dominance of a player like Barkov or Patrice Bergeron. Still, it’s a career high for a center who has managed to be one of the game’s most prolific defenders without that skill. 

    Eriksson Ek is still a weapon offensively while continuing to be one of the game’s best defenders. The center raises the floor of every line he plays on. He’s a stabilizing force for a team that is once again dealing with injuries down the middle, and he’s even adding new abilities to his skill set.

    Joel Eriksson Ek may always be underrated, in part because Minnesota receives less media attention than other markets. While it would be nice to see the Swedish standout get his flowers league-wide, the most important thing is that he continues to be a key factor in the Wild's wins. 

    Minnesota is at its best when Eriksson Ek is a factor in games, a trend that has continued this season. If he keeps playing the way he has, Eriksson Ek should continue to be a crucial contributor far into the team’s future.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 2

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    Whether it was the GREEF line, KK97 - Ek - Boldy, or the combos above, JEE has this amazing ability to find himself part of dominant lines.  Shame he never gets the credit he deserves for this.

    • Like 6
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Funny, where did we draft this guy, somewhere in the 20s? I guess you can find really good players down that low, who knew?

    I still believe he is the most unreplaceable player we have on this team. I'm hoping that Rossi and Yurov can help cover that position, but until they're ready he remains that guy.

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 12/9/2025 at 2:03 PM, mnfaninnc said:

    Funny, where did we draft this guy, somewhere in the 20s? I guess you can find really good players down that low, who knew?

    I still believe he is the most unreplaceable player we have on this team. I'm hoping that Rossi and Yurov can help cover that position, but until they're ready he remains that guy.

    You remember where Kaprizov was drafted, right? Where would the Wild be without him?!

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    18 hours ago, Scalptrash said:

    You remember where Kaprizov was drafted, right? Where would the Wild be without him?!

    precisely, Fletcher's best draft year. It was a dig at the tank crowd who think you can only find great players at the top of the 1st round.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    40 minutes ago, mnfaninnc said:

    precisely, Fletcher's best draft year. It was a dig at the tank crowd who think you can only find great players at the top of the 1st round.

    Every 25-30 years an org gets to catch lightning in a bottle once

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    16 minutes ago, Pewterschmidt said:

    Every 25-30 years an org gets to catch lightning in a bottle once

    Some organizations get it and some don't. It should be cyclical, but a good scout can find some of these guys in the later rounds where he didn't just throw a dart at a name. 

    I can say that we should start seeing some Judd picks from the later rounds making some noise and becoming almost ready. Should is the key word here, because from the looks of the A, none of them seem to be amounting to anything. It appears that we've even whiffed on the 2nd rounders. 

    I've given Judd a pass on most of his drafts concluding it's too soon. But this year is where the grades start to come in. Just about anyone can hit on the 1st rounders, but it's the mid to late rounders that make a franchise successful or unsuccessful. Having a couple of those guys come up and make it means you can either trade them off for something you need more, or trade off who they're replacing to get something you need more. At this point, it is looking like he's wearing the golden sombrero. 

    And, while looking at the dumpster fire which is currently Vancouver, it's his guys over there that were the draft picks. I'm thinking there may be some changes after this draft with our Amateur department. I realize a lot of time we're guessing on players here, but to come up empty handed, to me, would seem like there is utter failure at this area. The development area is another area of scrutiny that needs investigating, and while the fires have calmed, I think our trainers department probably needs a closer look too. 

    Wow, that sounds really pessimistic when looking at it. Have I gone full Mooch? 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    10 minutes ago, Pewterschmidt said:

    help a playa understand this reference

    baseball term, when a player strikes out 4 times in a row.

    I guess you could say whiffed on 4 drafts in a row, or just whiffed on the picks after the 1st round. I was referring to the ones after the 1st round, though. Just brutal.

    Edited by mnfaninnc
    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    20 minutes ago, mnfaninnc said:

    I can say that we should start seeing some Judd picks from the later rounds making some noise and becoming almost ready. Should is the key word here, because from the looks of the A, none of them seem to be amounting to anything. It appears that we've even whiffed on the 2nd rounders. 

    I've given Judd a pass on most of his drafts concluding it's too soon. But this year is where the grades start to come in. Just about anyone can hit on the 1st rounders, but it's the mid to late rounders that make a franchise successful or unsuccessful. Having a couple of those guys come up and make it means you can either trade them off for something you need more, or trade off who they're replacing to get something you need more. At this point, it is looking like he's wearing the golden sombrero. 

    That's the problem with being an indefinite bubble team, you rarely, if ever, get a legitimate top six player in the draft. Beyond the 10th overall pick, good luck!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    7 minutes ago, mnfaninnc said:

    baseball term, when a player strikes out 4 times in a row.

    I guess you could say whiffed on 4 drafts in a row, or just whiffed on the picks after the 1st round. I was referring to the ones after the 1st round, though. Just brutal.

    Ok got it.  Jury still out on other 1st rounders too: Ogz, stramnuts 

    Edited by Pewterschmidt
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    34 minutes ago, Pewterschmidt said:

    Jury still out on other 1st rounders too: Ogz, stramnuts 

    and Lambos. The thing is, he had 2 cracks in 2 drafts in the 1st round, and at worst it's looking like a 50% hit rate, which should be 75% or higher. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    40 minutes ago, Scalptrash said:

    That's the problem with being an indefinite bubble team, you rarely, if ever, get a legitimate top six player in the draft. Beyond the 10th overall pick, good luck!

    They can be found, you just have to have a better scouting department and amateur drafting team than everyone else. The hope was that during the Covid years, Judd was going to be better. Now, when these guys should be ready, Judd doesn't look so good. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...