Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness
  • Jesper Wallstedt's Future Was Now -- Until It Wasn't


    Image courtesy of Credit: David Gonzales -- Imagn Images
    Tony Abbott

    Hockey Wilderness is counting down the Minnesota Wild’s Top-10 Prospects, as voted by our staff. Today, we give you everything you need to know about our No. 1 prospect, Jesper Wallstedt.

    The Minnesota Wild's goalie succession plan looked so clear. Marc-Andre Fleury's two-year deal with the Wild expired this summer, opening up a backup spot. Filip Gustavsson's two final years on his deal provided a perfect window for prospect Jesper Wallstedt to take starts from the Gus Bus, then take over by the starting gig end of the deal. 

    Until it wasn't. Fleury and the Wild decided he'd get one more year in Minnesota before shipping out to Margaritaville. Um, OK? So does that mean Wallstedt would apprentice as the backup to the Future Hall-of-Famer? Maybe! But if the Wild wanted to trade Gustavsson, they picked the wrong offseason. Jacob Markstrom, Darcy Kuemper, Logan Thompson, and super-prospect Yaroslav Askarov landed in new homes this summer, leaving no parking spots in the garage for the Bus.

    That clear line of succession has become the disorienting red lines that dance around the "PEPE SILVIA" board. This doesn't look like a plan, per se. Instead, this almost feels like a reactionary process where every bit of straying from the plan creates a new problem.

    Oh, no, Gustavsson has a down year ----> Don't worry, we can sign Fleury for another season to stabilize things ----> Oh, no, wasn't Wallstedt supposed to start getting games? ----> No worries, we can trade Gustavsson ----> Oh, no, nobody's biting ----> Uhhhhhh, let's just roll with three goalies, maybe? 

    That's not a generous read of the situation, and we're a generous site. Wallstedt is the team's No. 1 prospect, after all, as voted by our staff. Wallstedt is the Minnesota Wild's Goalie of the Future. There has to be a rhyme and reason to potentially carry three goalies. But what is it?

    Thinking about it, the plan seems to be to have no set plan. Usually, that's a bad thing. However, Minnesota has provided maximum flexibility for themselves to play Wallstedt as many or as few games as the situation demands. And that is, arguably, the best scenario to be in if you're trying to break in your Goalie of the Future.

    Do we believe in Wallstedt? Of course. He doesn't land at No. 1 on our list if we don't. But do we believe in him for this season, specifically? That's a trickier question. There were things about the future Great Wall of St. Paul's game that shone last season. We'll leave that to Sean Shapiro, a writer and scout for EP Rinkside, to lay that out:

    "He's always calm and composed in the net, and his control of the net and his depth -- even when dealing with heavy traffic -- is remarkably good for any goalie, not just a prospect learning the ropes...in the AHL.

    "It's hard to find an example of him getting beaten on a clean shot."

    He's also strong statistically. Wallstedt was only tied for 27th in the AHL among goalies with more than 10 games played last year, but he was an absolute workhorse. He was tied for fourth in the AHL with 45 games. Of the three players who logged more games, only Matt Villalta had a higher save percentage (.911 in 51 games to Wallstedt's .910).

     

    Statistically, Wallstedt also went toe-to-toe with some of the top young goalies in the AHL. Here's how he stacks up alongside other top Under-24 goalies:

    Devon Levi, BUF: 26 GP, .927 Sv%
    Dustin Wolf, CGY: 36 GP, .922 Sv%
    Joel Blomqvist, PIT: 45 GP, .920 Sv%
    Sebastian Cossa, DET: 44 GP, .913 Sv%
    Yaroslav Askarov, NSH (now SJ): 44 GP, .911 Sv%
    JESPER WALLSTEDT, MIN: 45 GP, .910 Sv%
    Spencer Knight, FLA: 45 GP, .905 Sv%

    That looks underwhelming, but the Iowa Wild's defense, um, let their youth and inexperience show, to put it kindly. You'll notice that Daemon Hunt and Carson Lambos were the only representatives on the Iowa defense on our list, and they came in near the bottom. It didn't translate into Wallstedt facing a ton of shots, per se. However, it translated into breakdowns that often put him in tough spots.

    Yet, Wallstedt was able to rise above it... at least for spurts. Wallstedt took a Mitch Hedbergian philosophy to goaltending in 2022-23. He started the season strong and ended it strong, and repeated that pattern last season.

    You can divide his season into three almost equal chunks.

    Games 1 through 16: .935 Sv%
    Games 17 through 32: .871 Sv%
    Games 33 through 45: .925 Sv%

    Now we're looking at two years in a row where Wallstedt has had a large slump in the middle of his season. He also seems especially prone to an awful start. Last season, he had four games where he surrendered six goals or more. Sure, he's a young goalie, but look at Askarov. He had zero games where he surrendered six or more, with a similar workload and results. Sebastian Cossa only had one. 

    According to Shapiro, that's a bit of a red flag, especially when looking at his weaknesses. "Talking to those in the goalie universe," he wrote, "the questions about Wallstedt center on his quickness and work ethic, which seem to be connected."

    Now, we finally have the reason why it actually makes sense to carry three goalies, at least for stretches of the season.

    If you're the Wild and Wallstedt, you want to see some progression toward the NHL. Is it necessary for Wallsted to spend three full seasons in Des Moines? Probably not. However, Bill Guerin's philosophy of not simply giving someone a spot comes in handy here. Unlike someone like Marco Rossi, who has a single-minded work ethic, Wallstedt might need that carrot in front of him this summer.

    It also explains why Minnesota needs Fleury and Gustavsson in the fold. Fleury is the ideal mentor for Wallstedt. He not only came into the NHL with incredible expectations. He started for the Pittsburgh Penguins at age-18, and they expected him to be their savior before they got Evgeni Malkin and Sidney Crosby in back-to-back drafts. However, Wallstedt has a top-tier work ethic. He famously keeps himself in fantastic shape, which is how you still stick in the NHL until you're almost 40.

    Fleury is simply too valuable a resource for Wallstedt to let out the door. However, for the rookie to take proper advantage, he must study under him in the NHL, at least for long stretches.

    But Gustavsson is also necessary for this puzzle. If Minnesota traded Gustavsson, Wallstedt would be one Fleury injury away from having to start every game for the Wild. He's pulled out of big slumps in Iowa, but what happens when a six-week slump happens with all eyes on him? Can he work his way through that? For a soon-to-be 22-year-old, it's better not to have to find out. 

    The Wild may be making this plan as they go along. Still, they have the tools to play Wallstedt 45 games or 15, with minimal risk and maximum flexibility. Maybe the time is now for our No. 1 prospect, and maybe that comes in mid-season, and perhaps it comes next season. All that will matter is that whenever Wallstedt's moment arrives, Minnesota can make it the right time.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 3

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    Agree.  I like the way Guerin is handling Jesper intro to the big leagues.

    Best case scenario: GUS returns to the form he was in when he played post trade when he was playing for his next contract.  This GUS gets traded at this years deadline and return a solid middle 6 forward.

    Worst case scenario: GUS again plays this season similar to last season (and reverts back to the young goalie prospect Ottawa was willing to cut bait on for journeyman goalie T-Bot)

    Meanwhile, Wally gets this season to play in NHL with training wheels and Fleury there as his Emotional Support Animal.  

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It also helps that the start of the season isn't bogged down by Addison, Merrill, Mermis, and Goligoski.  Instead, you get Spurgeon back with Middleton, Bogo, Chisholm, and Faber one year older.

    I'd like to think many of Gus (and Fleury's) problems were a result of the defense being a mess last year.  They played better when Bogo and Chisholm were added, but you can't tell me Brodin/Faber and Middleton/Spurgeon doesn't settle things down quite a bit.  If Spurgeon gets anywhere close to his former self, you really only have Merrill at #7 that's "kinda" weak.  There's no excuse for Gus and Fleury to improve from 55-60 in both major categories.  You'd also assume Wallstedt would not surrender 7 to a Dallas team if the D is on their game.

    This is a chance for a refresh for a lot of people on the team.  If the defense plays the way they always do, the goaltending trio has no one else to blame if they falter.

    • Like 10
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I see this in two ways.  I get why they are bringing him along slowly and they want him to have confidence.  We admit that the AHL team lacks defense yet he is still posting very good numbers.  Impressive.  At this point I kind of doubt the AHL is actually helping his confidence. He is getting it because he is just that good.

    I don't like spending money on a player when you have so much confidence in the guy waiting in line.  That money could have been used to bring in needed help and potentially made it easier on whoever was playing goalie.

    If we are depending on the D to help improve the goalie situation and believe it will be better because of the D, why not have the Wall step up and play.  At some point you must role the dice and take a chance with the cap space you have....playing it safe constantly is not getting us a cup.

    • Like 4
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Even the best goalies look mortal regardless of their teams. Vasilevskiy and Bobrovsky had underwhelming regular seasons last year for different reasons, but goes to show how connected their performances are to the team performance. Vegas probably has the best top to bottom d corps along with Carolina’s depth both taking serviceable tendies for good strong regular season records. 
     

    I also believe the continuity and health of our defense will greatly impact the security we see in net. 

    With how the last two years have gone, it is going to be a Wild season, good or bad, this year.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'm in favor of the 3 goalie situation. I think it can work out. If not, The Wall heads back to Des Moines without passing through waivers. The way I see it, we'll need all 3. Should Goose get hurt, I do not see Fleury starting a bunch of games in a row, I could see The Wall doing that, but probably more likely a shared net. Really, I like the tandem of Goose and The Wall going forward. 

    This is the last year of an ELC for The Wall, I would anticipate a very team friendly bridge deal for The Wall coming out of this year regardless of how he plays. 

    However, Tony missed a couple of things in his article that I'd like to point out. 1) While it looks like a mid season slump for The Wall last season, he also came up with an injury. If remembered, when Goose went down, The Wall had to still get healthy while Fleury started games until The Wall got called up for Dallas. McIntyre was on the club with the "in case of emergency, break glass" backup position. As soon as The Wall was healthy they switched. It is also likely that The Wall was not completely healed when he came back, or just before he went out, which likely led to his .871 play, which leads me to the 2nd point.

    2) The difference between The Wall and all the other guys who played goalie for Des Moines was unbelievable. For the better part of the season, McIntyre played at an .87 sv%, 40 points behind The Wall. For a few previous seasons, McIntyre looked like a decent 3rd goalie option in case of disaster in St. Paul. But, looking at last season, did he just forget to pack his game? I would probably say no and blame the young Des Moines defenders. The Wall was quick enough to cover for the defense and get his fair share of rebounds, McIntyre was not. To me, this was the stat that made the biggest difference. 

    For a long part of the season, The Wall was hovering around .500 for Des Moines. However, McIntyre was way below that mark. Des Moines was considerably better with The Wall in net.

    The Wall's debut came with an exhausted team in front of him. Highly injured at the time with the flu bug heading through the team, his debut was set up to be a disaster. Fleury was even wiped out, so The Wall had to eat minutes even though he gave up a bunch. I didn't watch the 3rd period of that game, but from what I could remember, The Wall was on his angles pretty well, but was not used to the velocity and corner picking shooters in the N can give you. He seemed surprised on a shot that got through but was called back in the 1st, and then he slid with Pavelski opening up a far corner that Pavelski hit no problem. The 3rd period was just a goalie whose team had simply forgotten to come out for the 3rd period. He showed us in 2 other performances the type of goalie he was. 

    When will Fleury get his turns? That would be the question. His value right now is as the goalie whisperer. I'm not sure how many starts he gets. I also don't think we really know what kind of trigger finger Heinzy has in pulling goalies. This could add to opportunities if he has a Baldelli type of philosophy.

    I was hoping for The Wall to get 5 starts last year. He got 3. It's in his best interest to play. I could see him starting out on the big squad, but should we run in to minor injury trouble, he'll get sent down due to cap space as we look for callups. Doing this would mean that we carry 23 instead of our normal 22. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    29 minutes ago, mnfaninnc said:

    last year of an ELC for The Wall, I would anticipate a very team friendly bridge deal for The Wall coming out of this year regardless of how he plays. 

    A savvy GM restricts Wall's starts so that he doesn't get the chance to pop off during this team-going-nowhere season, so that Wall's agent has no leg to stand on asking for nothing more than a bridge deal

    But P-Gravel that doesn't seem very nice.  It's called making a good business decision.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 minutes ago, Willy the poor boy said:

    I'm against the 3 goalie approach. Wally needs to play, play, play... It does him little good to be sitting on the bench watching at this stage of his career..

    With 3 goalies, it is not a given that he will be sitting on the bench. He may be up with Merrill and Johansson eating nachos.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 9/20/2024 at 10:47 AM, mnfaninnc said:

    I'm in favor of the 3 goalie situation. I think it can work out. If not, The Wall heads back to Des Moines without passing through waivers. The way I see it, we'll need all 3. Should Goose get hurt, I do not see Fleury starting a bunch of games in a row, I could see The Wall doing that, but probably more likely a shared net. Really, I like the tandem of Goose and The Wall going forward. 

    This is the last year of an ELC for The Wall, I would anticipate a very team friendly bridge deal for The Wall coming out of this year regardless of how he plays. 

    However, Tony missed a couple of things in his article that I'd like to point out. 1) While it looks like a mid season slump for The Wall last season, he also came up with an injury. If remembered, when Goose went down, The Wall had to still get healthy while Fleury started games until The Wall got called up for Dallas. McIntyre was on the club with the "in case of emergency, break glass" backup position. As soon as The Wall was healthy they switched. It is also likely that The Wall was not completely healed when he came back, or just before he went out, which likely led to his .871 play, which leads me to the 2nd point.

    2) The difference between The Wall and all the other guys who played goalie for Des Moines was unbelievable. For the better part of the season, McIntyre played at an .87 sv%, 40 points behind The Wall. For a few previous seasons, McIntyre looked like a decent 3rd goalie option in case of disaster in St. Paul. But, looking at last season, did he just forget to pack his game? I would probably say no and blame the young Des Moines defenders. The Wall was quick enough to cover for the defense and get his fair share of rebounds, McIntyre was not. To me, this was the stat that made the biggest difference. 

    For a long part of the season, The Wall was hovering around .500 for Des Moines. However, McIntyre was way below that mark. Des Moines was considerably better with The Wall in net.

    The Wall's debut came with an exhausted team in front of him. Highly injured at the time with the flu bug heading through the team, his debut was set up to be a disaster. Fleury was even wiped out, so The Wall had to eat minutes even though he gave up a bunch. I didn't watch the 3rd period of that game, but from what I could remember, The Wall was on his angles pretty well, but was not used to the velocity and corner picking shooters in the N can give you. He seemed surprised on a shot that got through but was called back in the 1st, and then he slid with Pavelski opening up a far corner that Pavelski hit no problem. The 3rd period was just a goalie whose team had simply forgotten to come out for the 3rd period. He showed us in 2 other performances the type of goalie he was. 

    When will Fleury get his turns? That would be the question. His value right now is as the goalie whisperer. I'm not sure how many starts he gets. I also don't think we really know what kind of trigger finger Heinzy has in pulling goalies. This could add to opportunities if he has a Baldelli type of philosophy.

    I was hoping for The Wall to get 5 starts last year. He got 3. It's in his best interest to play. I could see him starting out on the big squad, but should we run in to minor injury trouble, he'll get sent down due to cap space as we look for callups. Doing this would mean that we carry 23 instead of our normal 22. 

    Also keep in mind that during the middle of the season Hunt was called up for a while as well as other forwards because of injuries.  If the defense in the AHL was poor, it got worse in that span.  It's no surprise his numbers sagged a bit as a result.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    He'll get the puck-handling and pad-stacks experience with goalie-gaffes from MAF. Then absorb the boring Swedish positional style of Gus. 

    If everything works out, Wallstedt has pushed Gus down the lineup and GMBG can trade Gus at the deadline. Wallstedt and MAF take the Wild deep into the playoffs. 😀

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...