Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • Jared Spurgeon Is Still A Force For the Wild


    Image courtesy of Matt Krohn - Imagn Images
    Tony Abbott

    The Minnesota Wild are finally getting flexibility this offseason. Most of this will come from the bulk of Zach Parise and Ryan Suter's buyout charges disappearing, which helps Minnesota to get to nearly $22 million in cap space, according to the NHL's estimates.

    That number sounds like a lot, and relative to the cap room the Wild have had the last four years, it's a windfall. It's also a number that might disappear faster than we'd think. After taking care of Marco Rossi's RFA status, acquiring a top-six player, potentially retaining other RFAs like Declan Chisholm, and maybe dipping into the goalie market after Marc-André Fleury's retirement... their flexibility might not last long.

    So, it makes sense that Wild fans would like to see the team trim more salary. More flexibility can't be a bad thing, right? And a fairly obvious target for the would-be The Bobs in the fanbase to downsize is Jared Spurgeon.

    It's not a hard argument to make. Spurgeon is 35 years old, which is generally not an age you want to be paying $7.575 million to a player. The Wild have his successors in place, with Brock Faber (22) already established as a top-pairing defenseman and David Jiricek (21) still considered a great defensive prospect.

    Spurgeon has also missed 15 or more games in three of his last four seasons, including playing just 16 games in 2023-24. And, fair or not, Spurgeon does have the distinction of being the constant in a 13-year stretch where Minnesota has only advanced past the first round once. 

    You can see all that listed out, and understand why someone might think Spurgeon is a viable trade candidate. But you can also watch Spurgeon playing for the Wild this year, and if you are, it's hard to argue that Minnesota is better off without him.

    The Wild got blown out on Saturday afternoon 5-2, but Spurgeon showed the kind of plays he's still capable of making at 35. In the final seconds of the period, Nico Hischier (who scored his 31st, 32nd, and 33rd goals of the season), Jesper Bratt (20 goals), and Timo Meier (22 goals) caught Minnesota for a 3-on-1. Jared Spurgeon was the only thing standing between three top-line forwards and certain paydirt.

    And then...

    You can dish out the blame to Meier for actually deflecting the shot harmlessly away, but Spurgeon's stickwork calmly guided Meier into that spot, creating maximum chaos with zero help. It was vintage Spurgeon: relying on his feet, poise, and experience to snuff out threats. 

    It'd be one thing if this were but one flash of his former glory, but Spurgeon is every bit as ageless as he looks. Frankly, we're past the point where someone needs to investigate his attic for a portrait of a graying Spurgeon getting turnstiled by some young forward. The man spits in the face of aging curves. 

    Spurgeon's workload may be decreasing. His 20 minutes, 31 seconds per game is the first time he's averaged fewer than 21 minutes a night since his rookie season. However, his play during that time has hardly missed a beat. Look at the bottom graph to see his xStandings Points Above Replacement (an all-in-one metric from Evolving-Hockey) over time:

    image.png

    You practically have to take out a straight edge to confirm that his 2024-25 season is a half-step below the incredibly consistent level of his prime. It's still enough for him to have entered Saturday with 3.3 xSPAR, which ties him with Jake Sanderson and others for 25th in the NHL. As for those three points in the standings, those absolutely matter, given that Minnesota is currently tied with the St. Louis Blues for the last Wild Card spot and just six points ahead of the playoff bubble.

    Why let those points go to another team?

    Given Spurgeon's age, it's hard to see him playing at that high level for much longer, but there are always outliers. It's fair to say Spurgeon has been one of those outliers and is as good a bet as anyone to continue to do so.

    Here are the top 10 players in total xSPAR between ages 30-to-34 seasons during the Analytics Era:

    1. Zdeno Chara, 28.1
    2. Lubomir Visnovsky, 28.0
    3. Mark Giordano, 27.9
    4. Shea Weber, 25.0
    5. Brent Burns, 24.3
    6. Dan Boyle, 24.0
    7. Brian Campbell, 23.8
    8. Roman Josi, 22.8
    9. Kris Letang, 22.1
    10. JARED SPURGEON, 21.1

    Josi is the only player in Spurgeon's age range, so we have data on the next two seasons for each player. That should give us a pretty good look at possibilities for Spurgeon in the final two seasons of his deal with the Wild. With that in mind, here are their xSPAR totals for their age 36 and 37 seasons, followed by their rank among all defensemen in that range:

    Chara, 9.3 (first)
    Campbell, 8.2 (fourth)
    Boyle, 7.0 (seventh)
    Letang, 5.7 (10th)
    Giordano, 4.8 (11th)
    Burns, 3.3 (T-14th)
    Visnovsky, 3.2 (T-16th)
    Weber, 1.5 (T-32nd)

    Of course, there are no guarantees, but besides Weber (limited to 48 games due to injury), every defenseman joining Spurgeon was more than usable, with three (and arguably five) elite players in that group.

    You can't ignore the absurd longevity some of these players had, either. Brent Burns is 39 and only now seeing Father Time catch up with him a bit. Giordano had a similar path in his late-30s. Boyle retired after his age-39 season and was an elite puck-moving defenseman until the end. And, of course, Chara was a first-pairing caliber defenseman until age-41 and still had three more seasons to give the Boston Bruins.

    As long as Spurgeon's body holds up, it's hard to see an imminent decline. He's the definition of a dude with Old Man Skills. Spurgeon's a great skater, but not in a straight-line speed sense. He relies on craftiness and positioning to manipulate attacking forwards.

    Spurgeon's always been a puck-mover, but his offensive toolkit is more about making smart plays than dancing through traffic and dazzling with his puck skills. The hands and feet may go eventually -- that moment comes for all players -- but someone who relies on their brain to excel is a better bet to age gracefully.

    Having an extra $7.575 million to play with this summer might be tempting for Minnesota, but investing that money in Spurgeon, who's bankable for three points in the standings, is a strong use of that cap space. Even if Jiricek is ready next year, we've seen the insane workload Faber has had to take on, and how it's grinded him down in each of the last two seasons. Keeping both Spurgeon and Jiricek in-house to hedge against Faber having to take on 25-plus minutes a night feels like a wise plan.

    Someday, we'll wake up and witness a version of Spurgeon that can no longer help the Wild. It's inevitable. However, that moment isn't here and will not likely arrive soon. Spurgeon still has much more to give, and it'd be a shame to see him helping another team make the playoffs next season.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Thanks 3

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    TRADE HIM!!!

    But seriously, dude still has game. It's amazing to me to see how he can out leverage guys with 3-6" in height and 30-50lbs on him. Still kills me Addison wasn't glued to his hip in practice and seemingly didn't want to be.

    Could realistically see him on 2nd pair again next year unless his body breaks down.

    Edited by M_Nels
    • Like 9
    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I understand the fear he'll fall off the Goligioski cliff.  But the team has seen what happens when both he and Brodin are both out.  Faber isn't Spurgeon's replacement just yet.  Bogo, Merrill, and Chisholm are solid 3rds who get exposed when higher up.  Buium and Jiricek are wild cards.

    Spurgeon should still be able to offer a lot when or if those guys are good enough to move on from him.  It's like the Zuccarello thing: you keep waiting for him to fail spectacularly due to age, but he doesn't.

    If he falls off in a year or two, sign his last contract on a discount or let him walk.  He's far from that point though.

    Edited by Citizen Strife
    • Like 6
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I will admit that 2 or 3 years ago, I suggested the Wild might need to trade Spurgeon in order to have cap space through these last 2 seasons. Now that they have gotten through the worst of their cap situation, it's hard to imagine them trading out his leadership/play for a return that would be as solid.

    When I initially suggested the following pairings early this year, I was mildly concerned that it might be putting too much on some young guys, but with more time to think it through, I think these lines could give the Wild one of the top defensive units in the league next season.

    Faber/Buium

    Jiricek/Brodin

    Spurgeon/Middleton

    Faber and Buium seems like the future top pairing, so might as well get to it right away. Jiricek(with a summer of skating training) and Brodin seems like a really complementary combination, and the Wild have seen success with Spurgeon and Middleton already, as the top pairing not long ago.

    The Wild should be able to play these lines fairly evenly and get strong play for 60 minutes without exhausting anyone.

    Faber, Brodin, and Middleton would be more of the stay at home guys while Buium, Jiricek, and Spurgeon bring some offense to each pairing.

    Bogo and Lambos would be the 7th D and AHL callup options.

    Faber and Buium both seem confident and smart with the puck, with strong skating. Their pairing could lead to strong offensive results, particularly with anticipated upgrades in the top 6 forwards.

    • Like 7
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    14 minutes ago, Imyourhuckleberry said:

    it's hard to imagine them trading out his leadership/play for a return that would be as solid.

    But, but, but he's not brash and boisterous getting in guy's faces so he must not be a good leader!

    The best leaders I've played sports with and have worked for lead by example and work harder than anybody else. Leaders aren't always rah rah guys but their attitude and work ethic speak loud.

    • Like 4
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, M_Nels said:

    But, but, but he's not brash and boisterous getting in guy's faces so he must not be a good leader!

    The best leaders I've played sports with and have worked for lead by example and work harder than anybody else. Leaders aren't always rah rah guys but their attitude and work ethic speak loud.

    Yeah, we can have that.  Trade him for a guy who bounces Raymond's head off the ice.  Hartman needs a buddy.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    If the Wild were going to trade Spurgeon (a bad idea).  The time to do it would have been two years ago.  Now it makes zero sense.  Cap space is ideally used for productive players.  Spurgeon is still that. People are overreacting to the Wilds injury situation.  If you add Kaprizov and Ek to ANY of the 7th,8th, or 9th seeded teams they would immediately become contenders.  When healthy the Wild are contenders.  Buium and Yurov will make them better next year AND they have money to sign a legitimate top line forward.  Stay the course!

    • Like 7
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    13 minutes ago, Patrick said:

    If you add Kaprizov and Ek to ANY of the 7th,8th, or 9th seeded teams they would immediately become contenders. 

    Exactly.

    KK97 (23-29-52) and JEE (9-15-24) have 32 goals and  44 assists for 76 pts. combined in 79 total man-games this season (average of 39.5 games each).  Divide that out and it's nearly two full points per game that the Wild are missing and should be coming back in the next 7-10 days.

    • Like 5
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    If you could just have him on the ice when the puck was in the Wild zone he would be fantastic.  Occasionally he gets a shot off and occasionally he can score.  But if you look at his numbers on the Power Play it is alarming.  The last three years he has been on the Power Play a lot and he has 2 goals and 16 points.  That seems like good numbers.... for one season, but we are talking about 3 seasons.  Granted one of those seasons was 16 games.  Numbers say that he is not good on the power play. 

    As far as his offense outside the power play it isn't much better.  He scores at a .44 points per game pace over the last three years.  You might say well he isn't supposed to be a top scoring asset.  Yet his salary says that it he should score at a higher rate.

    His defensive game is still elite.  Honestly, if I was going to pick a defender to stop someone it would be him.  However, we need more offense out of him and we are never going to get that.  

    Now with the cap going up and hopefully two offensively minded players coming into the defensive rotation his salary and play won't be in question as much anymore.  Right now we are paying a lot for no offense. 

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    7 hours ago, bisopher said:

     

    KK97 (23-29-52) and JEE (9-15-24) have 32 goals and  44 assists for 76 pts. combined in 79 total man-games this season (average of 39.5 games each).  Divide that out and it's nearly two full points per game that the Wild are missing and should be coming back in the next 7-10 days.

    The key words in that paragraph are 'that the Wild are missing'. When Wild top six core forwards are missing, opponents shut down lines are able to focus on the supposed secondary scoring. As a Wild fan, do you simply want the team to get past the first round of the playoffs? Or be a serious cup contender? If you are in the former, keep Spurgeon, hope Buium and Yurov are as billed, and add a good top six forward to the mix. But if you are in the latter, you want them to find a great (if not elite) top six forward to replace or complement the above mentioned players currently out of the line-up, and if so, what remains from the $22M cap space after signing some key players isn't going to cut it. Moving on from Spurgeon is the easiest way to free up an extra $7.58M to afford an elite top six player. Harsh? yes. But take a look at the last few cup winners...all are known for making some bold, cold blooded, harsh decisions. Would Spurgeon be missed? Absolutely, but not as much as the void of an elite playmaker currently missing from the top two lines.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Spurgeon has lost a step and a half if you ask me. He's always late getting to the puck in the D-zone, his offensive upside ran dry, I'd give him away to clear space for a north to south American or Canadian forward. Isnst Kyle Conner a free agent this year? Conner and Kaprizov would be silly dangerous.

    • Confused 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    18 hours ago, Patrick said:

    When healthy the Wild are contenders. 

    Patrick, I caution you on drinking this kool-aid. The Wild are not yet contenders even with a fully healthy roster. They are competitive. Expectations higher than this asks for disappointment and later an attitude of tear the whole thing down. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    12 hours ago, 1Brotherbill said:

    His defensive game is still elite.  Honestly, if I was going to pick a defender to stop someone it would be him.  However, we need more offense out of him and we are never going to get that.  

    Could it be that his prospective offensive numbers go up, more in the assist area, when we get better quality forwards which are coming? The same thing could be said about his PP numbers too, if he had Kaprizov and Ek for the full season, wouldn't he likely have better PP numbers?

    I think we're looking at the wrong thing when seeing his offensive numbers. He can drive all he wants but picks his chances. But, if the guys around him can't convert that into a goal, well, he has nothing to show for it in the points column. 

    Maybe a more interesting stat would be chances created where he did his job but someone else shanked it into the corner.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    9 hours ago, Lern2spell said:

    But if you are in the latter, you want them to find a great (if not elite) top six forward to replace or complement the above mentioned players currently out of the line-up, and if so, what remains from the $22M cap space after signing some key players isn't going to cut it.

    L2S is right on target with what we want to do, but it's real easy to suggest we trade out Spurgeon for the generic top 6 forward guy who is nameless at this time. The key thought here is who? UFA looks like it will be slim pickin's, and lots of teams overbidding with new found cap space. I think the trade route is going to be the best way.

    Spurgeon still has game left, but do you go with a proven target, or maybe someone in that '20-22 draft range? Where I think Spurgeon gives you the biggest bang for the buck is finding a team that underperformed and needs the intangibles he provides. With that, I look squarely at 2 teams. Buffalo and Detroit. Spurgeon has a 10 team NTC, and I would assume that Shooter would work with him if he's going to deal him because Spurgeon's earned that respect, and Shooter does this sort of thing.

    Spurgeon would immediately help shore up Buffalo's defense, however, I believe Buffalo might be on his list. To me, Tuch would be the guy I wanted. Those would be the principles in the deal.

    But, I think the more desperate team is Detroit. While Yzerman has preached patience, you cannot overlook the fact that Detroit has been in a solid position for the playoffs 2 years in a row and stumbled down the stretch. I believe Spurgeon helps solve that issue. I don't think Detroit is on Spurgy's list, and here I go off the board a little bit and go for 2023 9th overall pick in Nate Danielson. He's had 1 season in the A which was adequate, but gives us more depth down the middle. It's a gamble on a young player, but I think Detroit is wanting to keep their roster intact and deal from the prospects on this one. It would be likely we retain salary too. Those would be the principles.

    I am not opposed to trading out Spurgeon, and his salary. I think we can backfill pretty well, so we'd be dealing from a position of strength. I do believe we need a new captain, and this would also be a leadership change. We've had far too many nights where the team either didn't show up at the drop of the puck, or didn't show up at all. I get that they're exhausted, but for fans, we expect no game nights off. While this is unrealistic, I think 5 off games a season is the most I am willing to swallow, and none of those better be on home ice!

    So, for me, this whole conversation boils down to part 2: Who we are bringing in to replace Spurgeon's cap hit. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Where is this praise of spurge coming from?

    I’ve been away for a bit so missed last few games, but spurge has been showing his decline - slower and even less physical deterrence 

    if we can unload his 7.5 after this year on some sucker - you do that 

    give his captaincy to Kap and move on

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Dis-allowed display name said:

     

    If they charged $1 per goal the Wild score, it would be around $3 a month.

    This adds to my conclusion that the Wild are unwatchable right now. It's not the results, it's that they simply can't score. It's extremely frustrating to watch rim after rim and perimeter play, offense that goes to die in the corners. 

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    PP1 breakout, Quadruple Boldy button hooks through neutral ice, saucer pass over to Zuccerallo, another button hook into the boards, cross ice pass back to Boldy. Loose puck NYR 2 on 1 short handed.

    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, Dis-allowed display name said:

    I am paying $20 a month to watch these games on Fanduel Sports.

     

    If they charged $1 per goal the Wild score, it would be around $3 a month.

    I am thinking about chord cutting and what it would do to my sports watching. The Fanduel app is one I have  little info on. How has it worked for you? I know the old Bally's app sucked.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, mnfaninnc said:

    Patrick, I caution you on drinking this kool-aid. The Wild are not yet contenders even with a fully healthy roster. They are competitive. Expectations higher than this asks for disappointment and later an attitude of tear the whole thing down. 

    In my mind you have the favorites (usually one, two or 3 teams), contenders (usually 5, 6, or 7ish teams) and bubble teams.  We might just be disagreeing over terminology.  Is it kool-aid to suggest a healthy Wild roster is the 9th best team in the NHL?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Up North Guy said:

    I am thinking about chord cutting and what it would do to my sports watching. The Fanduel app is one I have  little info on. How has it worked for you? I know the old Bally's app sucked.

    It actually works very well.  All the crashing is gone.  

    The only annoying thing and it is not that big a deal is that everything on the schedule is a segmented program.  So when pregame ends, the video just stops, and you need to back out and then click on the actual game.  When the game is over it stops again and you need to back up and click on the postgame show.  You don't have to reboot the app, just hit the back button and choose the new program.  Not a big deal, but my only minor complaint.

     

    Oh and the signal is still compressed a bit but looks like better video quality than last year.  But when a game is on TNT on my Sling Subscription, I do notice the network video quality is a bit better, you can see the puck easier on TNT.  Not a huge difference though.

    Edited by Dis-allowed display name
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 hours ago, Dis-allowed display name said:

    I am paying $20 a month to watch these games on Fanduel Sports.

     

    If they charged $1 per goal the Wild score, it would be around $3 a month.

    I'm paying 200.00 a month for Wifi, cable with fanduel, and espn+ Next year I'm dropping the cable and Mn Wild outta my life. I'll keep ESPN plus to follow the Jets, Oilers, and Flordia Panthers. 25 years of burning dumpster fires is enough for me. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...