Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • Is There Any Reason To Fret Over Signing Kaprizov For Eight Years?


    Image courtesy of Brace Hemmelgam - Imagn Images
    Tony Abbott

    In 2012, the State of Hockey celebrated the Minnesota Wild signing two coveted free agents to 13-year, $98 million deals. Part of that celebration was understanding that by the time those deals wrapped up, Zach Parise and Ryan Suter would be in their 40s and not worth the $7.54 million cap hit.

    Who cares? Minnesota collectively said. Let's deal with that when we get to it.

    Those contracts wound up, predictably, becoming an albatross by the end. Was it worth it? Probably. But that's the thing with most long-term contracts to players approaching their 30s:

    You will likely have the deal turn bad at some point.

    Similarly, Wild fans are about to celebrate another long-term contract, this time for Kirill Kaprizov. After 185 goals and 386 points in 319 games during his first five years, Kaprizov's gonna have the closest thing to a blank check as we've seen in the NHL. If he wants eight years, $120 million, he's gonna get it. Heck, he might be able to get $16 million per year without the Wild blinking.

    His age is the one area for hesitation. Kaprizov's no ordinary sixth-year player. If he arrived in his age-19 season, the Wild would be handing this deal to a 23-year-old, and that contract wouldn't expire until his age-31 season. Instead, Kaprizov debuted at 23, and he'll be getting a contract that (likely) will take him through his age-35 season.

    Is it going to go badly at the end? It's not as slam-dunk a proposition as, say, Parise and Suter, but that threat is there. Even last year, you won't find a shortage of players who've gone on the decline as they entered their mid-30s.

    Two-time Rocket Richard Trophy winner Steven Stamkos (34) had his worst season since his rookie year, with 27 goals and 53 points in 82 games. Former Hart Trophy winner Taylor Hall (age 33) had 18 goals and 42 points last season. Chris Kreider (33) went from scoring 39 goals and 79 points in 82 games to 22 and 30, respectively, in 68 games. Six-time 30-goal-scorer Vladimir Tarasenko (33) had just 11 goals and 33 points last season -- or in Wild terms, Marcus Johansson-type numbers.

    But all Kaprizov needs to do to find hope that fate won't befall him is turn his head right.

    That's where he'll see Mats Zuccarello, who just wrapped up his age-37 season.

    Once upon a time, it looked like Zuccarello was headed for a mid-30s free-fall. He only scored 37 points in 65 games in his first year with the Minnesota Wild. Still, after forming his bond with Kaprizov the following year, he put any concerns to rest almost instantly.

    At 34, 35, and 36, he scored 79, 67, and 63 points, more than he'd ever had in a single campaign beforehand. Even last season (54 points in 69 games) was impressive, especially considering he spent half the season without his wingman.

    Sure, there's no doubt that Kaprizov drove that bus, but Zuccarello is the eighth-most productive player between ages 34 and 37 of the post-2004-05 lockout era. That's incredible, and you have to wonder why Zuccarello has aged so well.

    The hypothesis is simple: Zuccarello's longevity is partly due to a lack of wear-and-tear that comes from being a late bloomer. 

    There are plenty of players who make the NHL by age 21. Zuccarello wasn't one of them. Instead, he made his SHL debut at 21, after dominating Norway's top league. Zuccarello finally made his NHL debut two years later, playing 42 games for the New York Rangers. He struggled to crack the NHL lineup the following season, and a lockout and injuries limited him to 15 games in 2012-13.

    By the time he entered his age-26 season (where he finally played 77 games), Zuccarello had a grand total of 67 NHL games under his belt. That's insane, especially compared to some of the contemporaries we've listed as starting to fall off the cliff in their mid-30s. Here are those players' games played through age-25:

    Stamkos: 569
    Hall: 453
    Tarasenko: 341
    Kreider: 323

    For a No. 1 overall pick like Stamkos or Hall, forget about it. They're gonna have hundreds of games more worth of wear and tear than Zuccarello did. But even Tarasenko and Kreider, who didn't debut until turning 21 and with the 2012-13 lockout depressing their early-career totals, had 150 to 200 games more miles on them than Zuccarello. 

    Kaprizov's not entirely at Zuccarello's extreme, but debuting at age-23 and having COVID shorten his rookie year have kept his games played totals down. He had just 203 games of experience through age-25, and even at 27, has fewer career games played than Tarasenko or Kreider had at 25.

    We're not looking at a universal rule here. Alex Ovechkin logged more games through age-23 (324) than Kaprizov has through 27, and the dude just had 44 goals in 65 games. Meanwhile, someone like Jason Pominville had just 222 games of experience through age-25, but still saw his goal production decline hard in his mid-30s.

    So, games played aren't everything, but Kaprizov has another quality that's helped Zuccarello age beautifully.

    His playmaking skills.

    Players not named Ovechkin tend to age out of having an elite shot. Beating the best goalies in the world requires elite reaction time and some extra oomph, to use a scientific term, when shooting the puck. Those two things fade as you get older.

    Meanwhile, passing requires a much different skill set -- the vision to see plays develop and the ability to manipulate space being the primary ones. Sure, you have to get the puck from your stick to someone else's, but that requires a lot less top-tier physical gifts than beating a goalie one-on-one.

    Kaprizov won't score 40 goals forever, but it's hard to see him losing his playmaking chops at 34. He's got an Old Man Skill to fall back on as his career goes on, and he's always been as crafty as he is talented.

    Nothing is a slam-dunk when it comes to long-term contracts, but the players who age best tend to have a strong answer to the following question: What are you when you're not at your physical peak? Kaprizov's fastball is a 50-goal/100-point type MVP-caliber player. But if that slows down, you can bet he'll find a way to create offense.

    He can play Zuccarello's game and has been similarly shielded from early-career wear-and-tear. Those parallels to his best friend are primed to keep him productive through whatever length of contract he'd sign in Minnesota.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    Yes, he's now injury prone after Logan Stanley broke him. I've said it a few times here, I'd look to trade him this summer. Tage Thompson and Jiri Kulich? Take the risk out of him not re-signing here and don't overpay him to stay.

    • Like 1
    • Confused 5
    • Sad 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This will undoubtedly be the MOST important signing for the Wild this year and the duration of the contract.  It will dictate just about every financial move going forward while that contract is in place... Just like the Parise/Suter signings did.  Other teams and players will also be paying attention.  Do it right and we will have a contender.  Do it wrong and we will have a pretender.  Good luck GMBG.  Your negotiation skill will likely keep you around or negatively impact the next GM as well.  

    Unless you sign Nojo... in which case I want you fired no matter what.  🤡

    Edited by MNCountryLife
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    27 minutes ago, Scalptrash said:

    Yes, he's now injury prone after Logan Stanley broke him. I've said it a few times here, I'd look to trade him this summer. Tage Thompson and Jiri Kulich? Take the risk out of him not re-signing here and don't overpay him to stay.

    May be true, may not be true. No one knows if kk will be healthy or not, same as all the players. That said, there is no chance that he gets traded unless he does not sign a new contract. I am not sure of his contract situation whether he has trade protection. I would assume he does judging by all the other contracts on the team.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The next big step in KK's development is seeing, sensing and feeling defensive pressure better and sooner and learning how to react to that pressure quicker. I think Kap is a fantastic player and one of the top 10 or 15 in the league. However, with the contract amount and term that he will sign for, I'd like to see him become a top five.

    I think Kirill's Achilles is letting one-on-ones become two and three-on-ones too often. He has terrific skating, puck handling and passing skills, but those skills are difficult to use when there are two or three NHL-level defenders on you. The lesson is that when you have two or three guys on you, there should be two or three of your guys open somewhere on the ice.

    Part of the problem could be that teammates are not moving and getting in a position to help relieve pressure on Kap. I can recall more than a few occasions when linemates get caught puck watching rather than moving when KK is on the move. Either way, Kaprizov and Co. need to learn how to deal with defensive pressure more effectively to get him to the next level. It may also increase his durability and longevity if he can take fewer hits.

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    58 minutes ago, Scalptrash said:

    Yes, he's now injury prone after Logan Stanley broke him. I've said it a few times here, I'd look to trade him this summer. Tage Thompson and Jiri Kulich? Take the risk out of him not re-signing here and don't overpay him to stay.

    You obviously have no idea how injury prone Thompson is..

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    57 minutes ago, Scalptrash said:

    Yes, he's now injury prone after Logan Stanley broke him. I've said it a few times here, I'd look to trade him this summer. Tage Thompson and Jiri Kulich? Take the risk out of him not re-signing here and don't overpay him to stay.

    KK has a NMC, so he can only be traded with his approval. Do you think it would help extension talks to say "oh yeah, is there any teams youre willing to waive your NMC for?"

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    39 minutes ago, ArizonaWildFan said:

    I think Kirill's Achilles is letting one-on-ones become two and three-on-ones too often.

    Most of the team does that, so I think it may be a system issue.

    Even when it's 1v1 or 2v2 in the offensive zone and the rest of the players from both teams haven't gotten back yet, there's a tendency to hold up and wait for the rest of the team.  Of course the other team is more likely to get back first, leading to turnovers or pressuring an ill-advised pass that causes the team to extend a lot of energy to maintain possession.

    I'd like to see everyone on the team attack more often in those situations.

    One of the few who does is Boldy, but it depends on whether he is in power forward or sniper mode for that game.  Hynes needs to get him to toggle that switch over to power forward and glue it there.  He's a lot more dangerous when he isn't standing still trying to be a sniper.

    Hartman is also good about this.  He recognizes that space and open ice can be his ally.  Players like Johansson, Nyquist, etc skate up the side and then just stop.  If the skate any further it is around the back of the goal.  The first thing they do is look to pass the puck away rather than to attack.  We need people who are looking to attack at least 50% of the time there is an opportunity to do so.

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Reading a yahoo article about possible Rossi trades , they brought up some interesting analytics. Fred g is an was the worst analytics player in the entire playoffs .  He did nothing offensively or defensively. The weakest player in the entire playoffs an yet he still was given more opportunities than Rossi . The idea a healthy wild team put him out there as 2 nd line center is  a dereliction of duty .  Billy cries about having his hand tied because of cap penalties yet keeps giving  fred g opportunities. Fred g ties the teams hands with his sheepish play , wasted opportunities taken from others an a roster spot Rossi an others sit behind so he can be the worst analytical player in playoffs.. 3 more years of him and the wild making excuses for him. 
       So I guess what does it matter what kappy signs for when Billy employs dead weight like Fred g. How can you be a contender when you can’t even evaluate your own players?  Fred g needs to be gone to really believe the wild are serious about winning. If you want to build a contender. Start by getting rid of dead weight that has no value . 40 point fred half of which were empty netters a the other half against Chicago.  Billy is a fraud. 

    • Like 4
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, Scalptrash said:

    Yes, he's now injury prone after Logan Stanley broke him. I've said it a few times here, I'd look to trade him this summer. Tage Thompson and Jiri Kulich? Take the risk out of him not re-signing here and don't overpay him to stay.

    I would love to see what we would get in return if we sign and trade him (like in an NHL game I mean not real life come on) Can we even do that? He’s an unrestricted free agent so probably won’t get crap or much in a trade.

    Edited by TCMooch
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    32 minutes ago, Dean said:

    Fred g is an was the worst analytics player in the entire playoffs .  He did nothing offensively or defensively.

    He’sa bubble nhl’r. Always has been.  His breakout year with Dean and his shootout skills has created a mirage that Fred is a competent nhl C.  He’s defensively ‘responsible’ but not effective. Offensively impotent.  

    • Like 4
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    “In 2012, the State of Hockey celebrated the Minnesota Wild signing two coveted free agents to 13-year, $98 million deals.”

    Kiril is a lot better than Parise or Suter were back then (plus he’s just one player not two taking up all the cap). Don’t forget that Penguin Bettman gave us the prison shower treatment when he implemented the cap recapture rule that made the Parise-Suter deals so dangerous. Unless 8 year deals get punished like those 13 year ones were, we’ll be fine.

     

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Marner will get 14-15 million probably 7 years so Kaprizov should get the same. Hey Wild fans, would you trade Rossi for Cam York and Philadelphia’s last first round pick 25’ ?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Feedback requested. McDavid and Draisaitl; who's Batman and who's Robin? Would McDavid be McJesus without Leon and vice versa? Throw Zach Hyman, who is a good but not great NHL'er, in with those two and he often looks spectacular.

    The reason for the questions is trying to figure out how the Wild could build a line like that around Kirill. To me, KK could be the Draisaitl. Hartman could be the Hyman. McDavid? Not Ek, Rossi or Gaudreau (obviously). Do you bring Yurov in and tell him that you are going to do everything possible and give him every opportunity to become the Soviet McJesus? I would. Don't bury him in the bottom six, let him succeed and fail and learn and improve.

    Think of what you could do with your second and third lines with Boldy, Ek, Rossi, Zuccarello, Foligno and maybe an Ohgren. You have to believe that Kap would do everything possible to make Yurov successful and I have to believe Hartman would up his game consistently playing top line like he has done in the past. To me, Hartman works and plays harder further up the lineup as opposed to being bottom six.

    Throw Danila into the fire from Day 1. He and the team will get burned every now and then, but he may also be the fuel that feeds the fire. Treat him like the Blackhawks did with Bedard or the Sharks did with Celebrini. If the Wild do, he and KK could be our Batmanov and Robinov for years to come.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    19 minutes ago, ArizonaWildFan said:

    Would McDavid be McJesus without Leon and vice versa?

    Have you paid any attention or seen any highlights of McDavid? He is the epitome of a one man wrecking crew. He McDangles threw 3 or 4 guys with ridiculous speed. Yes, I am somewhat of a fanboy, but it’s hard not to be. Leon is really good too, no doubt. 
     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    28 minutes ago, Sam said:

    Have you paid any attention or seen any highlights of McDavid

    I think McDavid is the best player in the league and is a generational talent. I love watching him play, even against the Wild. He's playing 5 on 5, PP and PK. Reminds me of Michael Jordan. MJ was very good, became great, and when he started to prioritize defense he became the GOAT.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It’s the price you pay for a player of that caliber.

    I’m not saying they should or shouldn’t, or that Kaprizov is that guy.  But, if you want a high end point scorer, it’s how life works.  And those guys tend to be pretty important when it comes to winning.  

    Steven Stamkos, used as an example in the article, won multiple cups during his prime.  If a player like him comes up for a contract at age 27, you’re going to have to pay him in his mid 30s for the benefit of owning the rights for the seasons in his 20s.  Tarasenko, used an example, also won a Cup in his relative prime.

    I’d gladly pay Kirill in his age 34 season for  a Cup in his age 29 season.  What I don’t know is if Geurin is capable of icing a team capable of that, or if he’ll continue to surround him with mediocrity.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    14 hours ago, ArizonaWildFan said:

    The reason for the questions is trying to figure out how the Wild could build a line like that around Kirill. To me, KK could be the Draisaitl. Hartman could be the Hyman. McDavid?

    As good as Kirill is he is still probably only top 15 in the league.  McDavid and Draisaitl are both arguably better than Kirill.  McDavid is the best in the league.  That is the best line in hockey and they ride that 1 line to the cup.  Pretty amazing ... and I would think rare. 

    Building a team like Florida, Vegas or Carolina seems a lot more viable.   Those teams have depth and structure.  Toronto tried to build a line like Edmonton... but they don't have the best player in the league.... Yeah.. I'm a fan of McDavid as well.  You have to appreciate what that guy does on ice.  He is on another level.  Matthews is a great player.. but not on that level.

    Edited by MNCountryLife
    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    20 hours ago, TCMooch said:

    He’s an unrestricted free agent so probably won’t get crap or much in a trade.

    Kaprizov is not an unrestricted free agent. He is under contract for next season and if the Wild were to consider trading him, they would get a major return.

    I think they'll want to avoid that situation and keep him with a nice extension, then continue to build around him. The defense looks pretty nicely set and they have a chance to add some offensive talent to help take another step.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Kaprisov is a top 5 point generation talent in the NHL. He's a game changing talent which turns a team from a playoff caliber organization to a Stanley Cup caliber organization. You pay him because guys like Kaprisov get you Stanley Cup trophies. He's what Marian Gaborik could have been. Speaking of Gaborik, the oft injured forward managed to play very well through age 32, and I think Gaborik is kind of a worst reasonable case for Kaprisov.

    As far as the amount of the contract, I wouldn't expect it'll be much higher than $14MM AAV. Enough to get him the biggest contract should be enough, IMHO.

    The cap has been increasing, on average, by about 4.4% annually. In 8 years, the cap would be expected to be $121MM or so. Depending on the way the contract is structured, the Wild should be able to remain competitive even if Kaprisov declines in the final couple years of an 8 year deal.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    15 hours ago, ArizonaWildFan said:

    Feedback requested. McDavid and Draisaitl; who's Batman and who's Robin? Would McDavid be McJesus without Leon and vice versa? Throw Zach Hyman, who is a good but not great NHL'er, in with those two and he often looks spectacular.

    The reason for the questions is trying to figure out how the Wild could build a line like that around Kirill. To me, KK could be the Draisaitl. Hartman could be the Hyman. McDavid? Not Ek, Rossi or Gaudreau (obviously). Do you bring Yurov in and tell him that you are going to do everything possible and give him every opportunity to become the Soviet McJesus? I would. Don't bury him in the bottom six, let him succeed and fail and learn and improve.

    Think of what you could do with your second and third lines with Boldy, Ek, Rossi, Zuccarello, Foligno and maybe an Ohgren. You have to believe that Kap would do everything possible to make Yurov successful and I have to believe Hartman would up his game consistently playing top line like he has done in the past. To me, Hartman works and plays harder further up the lineup as opposed to being bottom six.

    Throw Danila into the fire from Day 1. He and the team will get burned every now and then, but he may also be the fuel that feeds the fire. Treat him like the Blackhawks did with Bedard or the Sharks did with Celebrini. If the Wild do, he and KK could be our Batmanov and Robinov for years to come.

    Interesting off season ideas. Of course, no one knows what Yurov will be like in the NHL so it is an academic exercise. The team still needs another front line forward, in case Yurov needs more cooking in the A. Ek, Moose and another banger would make a great 2 or 3 line. Rossi, Zucci and Ohgren would also make a solid 2-3 line.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    21 hours ago, Dean said:

    Reading a yahoo article about possible Rossi trades , they brought up some interesting analytics. Fred g is an was the worst analytics player in the entire playoffs .  He did nothing offensively or defensively. The weakest player in the entire playoffs an yet he still was given more opportunities than Rossi . The idea a healthy wild team put him out there as 2 nd line center is  a dereliction of duty .  Billy cries about having his hand tied because of cap penalties yet keeps giving  fred g opportunities. Fred g ties the teams hands with his sheepish play , wasted opportunities taken from others an a roster spot Rossi an others sit behind so he can be the worst analytical player in playoffs.. 3 more years of him and the wild making excuses for him. 
       So I guess what does it matter what kappy signs for when Billy employs dead weight like Fred g. How can you be a contender when you can’t even evaluate your own players?  Fred g needs to be gone to really believe the wild are serious about winning. If you want to build a contender. Start by getting rid of dead weight that has no value . 40 point fred half of which were empty netters a the other half against Chicago.  Billy is a fraud. 

    Now that you got that out of your system, think about it for a bit.

    Gaudreau got more time and situations because the wild were often on the PK.  Guess who isn't on the PK (or the 1st PP unit) - Rossi.  You take that out and consider that players on the PK aren't often able to get off the ice immediately after the PK ends and it's an entirely different story of ice time and utilization.

    You have to consider special teams situations and their affect on line rotation.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...