Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • Indefinitely Might Have Ended For Jared Spurgeon


    Image courtesy of John Jones - Imagn Images
    Tony Abbott

    In the 2003 Michael Lewis book "Moneyball: The Art of Winning An Unfair Game," the Oakland A's acquired David Justice. Justice was a two-time 40-home run player who gave the Athletics what hockey men call Rings in the Room, but that's not nearly why the A's targeted the 36-year-old for the 2002 season.

    Justice was washed, so it seemed. He hit just .241 (back when the league average was .261, not .245) and hit just 18 homers as a 35-year-old for the New York Yankees. But the A's didn't give a rip about his batting average, or his diminished speed, or his nose-diving power. They wanted the skills that didn't age. 

    At the height of his powers, Justice was incredible at telling a ball from a strike. From 1990 to 1999, he clubbed 234 home runs, ranking 24th in the majors. But he was equally as good at drawing walks, getting a free pass to first base 13.9% of the time, ranking 21st among hitters with 2,000-plus plate appearances.

    In 2002, Justice was tied for 161st with 11 home runs... but 17th with a 14.9% walk rate. He got better at walking. Walking is an Old Man Skill, as Bill James, one of baseball's most famous statisticians and cranks, coined.

    It's a long walk from the baseball diamond to the hockey rink, admittedly. But hockey has its own set of Old Man Skills. A player's reflexes decline, as do their speed and shot. If you want to hang on to an NHL career in your 30s, you need to know where to be.

    Positioning is the ultimate Old Man Skill. If you know where to stand and how to slip into those areas unnoticed, you can score goals indefinitely. That's how Jaromir Jagr was a deserving All-Star (27 goals, 66 points in 79 games) at age 43. The same concept applies defensively. Love him or hate him, there's a reason 40-year-old Ryan Suter played nearly 20 minutes a night for a playoff team last year.

    Even as we approach his 36th birthday, Jared Spurgeon looks young enough to slip into a team's development camp undetected. Don't let that fool you, though: The dude was born with Old Man Skills.

    From Day 1, Spurgeon knew where to be on the ice at all times. He picked his spots brilliantly on offense, being opportunistic while rarely getting burned. Knowing where to be made maximum use of his 5-foot-9 frame in the defensive zone. His decision-making with the puck was nearly flawless.

    Those Old Man Skills made Spurgeon the Minnesota Wild's best defenseman as recently as last year. Evolving-Hockey's Standings Points Above Replacement metric rated his play as being worth 2.8 points to Minnesota, 40th among defensemen league-wide. Both Spurgeon's offense and defense remained strengths, and it seemed like that could last indefinitely.

    However, we're about 15% of the way through the 2025-26 season, and it looks like "indefinitely" might have already ended.

    As we flip the calendar to November, it's getting harder to say "it's early." Sure, it's still early. There are 70 games left in the Wild's season. But trends are starting to crystallize, and that is not looking good for Spurgeon. As of Halloween, Spurgeon is the owner of the fourth-worst SPAR in the NHL, costing his team 1.4 points in the standings. 

    image.png

    That isn't Minnesota's only problem -- spotting them 1.4 points in the standings would take them from seventh in the Central Division all the way to... sixth -- but it's a massive problem for a team that needs their captain to be a stabilizing force.

    The Wild may have given Kirill Kaprizov more money than anyone else in NHL history, but they're still, arguably, built around their blueline. Jonas Brodin is maybe the best shutdown defender of his generation, Spurgeon isn't too far behind, and Brock Faber has flashed those skills through his young career. Together, they set a high defensive floor for the team, and limiting scoring chances has been the secret sauce that's sent Minnesota to the playoffs year after year.

    So what happens when the Wild's biggest floor-setter drops through a hole? We're seeing it now, with a 3-6-3 record through 12 games. 

    What's going on here?

    The first thing to worry about for an aging player is mobility. Again, Spurgeon's game was never built on breakneck speed, but part of positioning is physically getting to the correct spots. Spurgeon has dealt with lower-body injuries over the past few years, missing most of the 2023-24 season due to back and hip surgeries, and sustaining lower-body injuries last season. Did all these just catch up to him?

    Surprisingly, no. Spurgeon's top speed is 21.12 miles per hour this season, which is only 1 mph slower than before the injuries happened. Besides, top speed matters less than being able to access the speed a player has when they need it. Spurgeon's 8 bursts of 20-plus mph skating have him in the 74th percentile among NHL defensemen, and his 57 bursts of 18-to-20 mph are 88th in the league. He can still summon those wheels.

    What's surprising, perhaps, is that it's the Old Man Skills that are failing him, at least on the offensive side of the puck. Spurgeon has long been one of the Wild's top offense-generators on the blueline at 5-on-5, and often, the top puck-moving option. Not this year.

    Expected Goals For per hour, 5-on-5, Wild defensemen, 2025-26:

    1. David Jiříček, 3.07
    2. Jonas Brodin, 2.69
    3. Zach Bogosian, 2.63
    4. Brock Faber, 2.53
    5. Jake Middleton, 2.52
    6. JARED SPURGEON, 2.50
    7. Zeev Buium, 2.21

    If you don't like expected goals, substitute that with any other metric you'd like. Looking at shots or shot attempts, Spurgeon stays second-to-last on the team in generating offense. It's worth noting his on-ice shooting percentage is just 2.7%, which is phenomenally unlucky, but he's not giving his team very many chances to turn things around, either. 

    Seeing Buium at the very bottom of the xG heap is interesting, and it's tempting to assign Spurgeon's drop in play-driving to being paired with Buium for much of the year. That's not totally untrue. Buium and Spurgeon played poorly together at 5-on-5 (36.8 xGF%), and a rookie like Buium is a much less reliable defensive partner than the likes of Suter, Brodin, or Middleton. 

    It's not that easy to explain, though. John Hynes has given up on the Buium-Spurgeon experiment and paired the latter with Middleton to get both defensemen going. They're doing better on the offensive side (generating 2.91 xG per hour). However, they've gotten worse defensively, conceding 3.16 xG per hour. What used to be a shutdown pairing is anything but this season.

    Hynes has also tried putting him on the top power play unit to get him (and the unit) going, but that's been a bust. The Wild are 4-for-16 on the power play during their homestand... but just one of those goals has come with Spurgeon on the ice. Evolving-Hockey rates Spurgeon's power play impact as the worst among NHL players, while Zeev Buium, who has the league's second-highest power play GAR, is sitting behind Spurgeon and Faber.

    The Wild went 0-for-4 on the man advantage last night, by the way. They had two chances to extend their first-period lead to 2-0, then missed an opportunity to re-take the lead in the second period.

    This might not be the end for Spurgeon. Remember, he's got the Old Man Skills, and they've carried him this far. There are 70 games for them to kick in and have them turn this season around. But the end always comes, no matter how good you are at positioning yourself on the ice.

    When the end does come for Spurgeon, this is what it'll look like.

    The Wild are relying on him as much as ever, with him averaging over 21 minutes per night. In order for Minnesota to make the playoffs, Spurgeon must, once again, find a way to get the upper hand on Father Time.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 3
    • Thanks 1

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    10 hours ago, MrCheatachu said:

    Spurgy doesnt seem like a thing SillyG is even going to entertain considering how he handled Dumba55.

    I’m curious what you mean about how he handled Dumba?

    Dumba was on his way to being a burns or Subban type player until he tore his pec and he had to completely change the way he played hockey. Dougie Hamilton is going through the same decline as Dumba was because he had the same injury and surgery. Dumba and Brodin were a fantastic pairing defensively even though they didn’t put up much offense. There was actually some great articles on HW and stats to back up how good their defensive metrics were together. Mn wilds defense has always been a strength until now. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    8 hours ago, Dean said:

    I agree with Patrick. Billy didn’t set the market with kappy deal. Eichel did. We are paying a shit organization cap penalty for kappy . What player is going to get 17 mil on there next deal and when? It’s not going to be next year. The league is in that 12-14 range for super stars this year and probably 12-15 next year . Billy got fleeced for a guy who demanded 18 and got 17 . The same guy who won’t talk to media after game last night. Like Russo said if your going to demand being the highest paid player than act like it.  He held up Minnesota fans to squeeze 8 million more and doesn’t give a shit about the fans or organization. He also doesn’t look or play like the guy who was looking for his next contract years prior . Now he just wants to have fun and throw blind  passes around that go in the back of our net. Where is that dog in kappy?  Gone with the payday. . 
       Billy also didn’t set market in trade deals last year when he gave the house away for jiricek. He didn’t start a new trend either in giving every 3rd and 4 th line replaceable players nmc s . Now he’s got bad flexibility.  He’s a bozo that sat on his hands for 6 years while the league passed him by and his lazy players aged themselves out. . He has never had a plan going into any season. What the f is the so called brain trust of the wild doing? How many clowns is Ocl paying to give him this shit advice about running a team. ?  This organization is f d from top down. They really need a new perspective. An entire new drafting department, get all new pro scouts. Turn over every coach , they haven’t  done shit to develop anything . 
      This team needs new eyeballs on it. How do you salvage an over paid baby , mediocre draft picks and aged out veterans who rather go to Halloween parties than pay back the fans by winning a game 

    The only thing I really disagree with here is when you say we have the house away for Jiricek. We didn’t and the first that went over there was In a very weak draft. It was never anything close to a Hershel Walker type trade. Not even close but I agree with a lot of the sentiment about how this team was built. I think the constraints are far too many on this team and  I think that actually comes from the pos owner. The owner wants to have his cake and eat it too. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    11 hours ago, mnfaninnc said:

    I'm still pushing for Spurgeon for Danielson in a trade. 

    I would love this but they aren’t taking our old worn out tire for a well rounded up and coming center prospect. Detroit actually has some very good pieces on D.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    12 hours ago, Mateo3xm said:

    I would love this but they aren’t taking our old worn out tire for a well rounded up and coming center prospect. Detroit actually has some very good pieces on D.

    From what I've read, those pieces are not quite ready yet and they need a top 4 RHS defender with some offensive upside. Detroit hasn't been to the playoffs in a long time and they didn't fill this area in the offseason. Spurgeon is a perfect candidate to help here + has the intangibles of making the playoffs in many different seasons. 

    Depending on the temperature of Yzerman's seat, he may be desperate enough to make the deal. Supposedly, they have the cap space for the move too. Just checked, and that is true. Currently, the Wild look out of the playoff race, whereas, Detroit is at the top of the Atlantic Division tied with the Canadiens. Detroit's problem the last couple of years has been in the hunt at the deadline, not doing much, and fading in the last 10-15 games to get over the playoff drought hump. 

    I believe that Spurgeon has enough gas left in the tank to get Detroit back to the playoffs and help them avoid missing the playoffs again. I would suggest that trading one of their highly rated defenders may not be the way that they will go, but to trade a promising forward. There were a handful of teams looking around for an RHS defender, 2nd pairing, with offensive upside this offseason. If I'm Detroit, I'm trying to assure I get the player, so my offer comes in very competitive. 

    On the Standings chart, the Wild are sitting at 9 pts. in 12 games. Only the Blues are worse in our division and are perennial slow starters. I would expect them to have a very good 2nd half. In the Western Conference, the Wild sit at 13th and are losing ground during this very important homestand which they are letting get away from them. It may not be long before Guerin starts answering his phone listening for offers on vets for futures. By grabbing some nice prospects, it takes the ball out of the hands of Judd and puts it into players closer to being ready. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    15 hours ago, 1Brotherbill said:

    There might be another reason that Kirill got the money he did.  That reason might be Artemi Panarin.  They both have the same agent and the agent gets a good chunk of that money.  Panarin might show up next summer for a decent contract and the two together would give the agent a large payday.  

    To be honest Panarin is the type of guy that BG would want.  Old, declining, etc. 

    I very much agree that the agent had a lot of say in this. I guess the agent's perspective is "never agree with the 1st offer." So, due to OCL's statements, the Wild likely started out at the $16m mark, and OCL thought he had a deal. How would it look for him if he said the deal is almost done, and Kaprizov declines and leaves. I think he painted the club into a corner where they had to come out with the player signed. I'm pretty sure OCL wanted 8 years. Maybe it took an extra bribe of money to get Kaprizov to agree to 8? Maybe he was more in the camp of McDavid and wanted 2 or 3? 

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 10/31/2025 at 11:05 AM, Imyourhuckleberry said:

    Spurgeon is still making quite a few good plays on the ice, but he hasn't been quite as sound all around as he was a few years back, which isn't shocking given his age. He could still be valuable in a 3rd line role with Middleton.

    Might be time to put Buium with Faber and Brodin with Jiricek. If it fails, the Wild get a high pick, but what they've been trying hasn't been ideal so far.

    Spurgeon has been a very good player for a long time, but replacing Buium with Spurgeon on PP1 while also expecting Spurgeon to be a main contributor on PK seems like a horrible idea. Let the youth at least play where they excel.

    I don't even hate Buium on line 3 with Jiricek, but why limit the PP time? They certainly aren't going to deploy either of them on the PK if they can avoid it.

    They have a top talent in Buium who led a strong PP. now he’s not even being used where he’s a strength.  I would argue he looks lost at times on 5on5. How he’s being coached is a negative and you can see it in his posture. 
     

    im all for playing the young kids and if we are last, so be it. We get a high draft pick and the kids get a ton of experience. Playing them on the 4 th line is not development and a waste of their talent. 
     

    I would start the rebuild now and sell off Brodin, Spurgen, Moose and NoJo in my first wave. Next to go is #13(the guy who fans on the puck with an open net 4 times so far), Hartman and the other Russian. 
     

    then I would fire the coach and GM together. 
     

    I would make Boldy the captain and show our commitment to youth with speed and talent. We can build around the core of KK and Boldy with some good young D talent. 
     

    Chicago and San Jose are good examples of young talented teams with the right coach that will be in the playoffs this year or next and making noise. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    12 hours ago, Patrick said:

    11.5 X 1.5 =17.25.  The math looks correct. Pretty insane isn't it?

    Sorry, I understood what you were saying went the other way, my misunderstanding.

    In my mind it was half of Kaprizov's number.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 10/31/2025 at 12:12 PM, Patrick said:

    Kaprizov will make 50% more than Necas. Thats insane. 

    Kap didn't reset the market. He is an outlier and it's going to take 3 to 4 years for the market to catch up.

    Largest overpay in NHL history.  Especially crazy when you consider the deals signed before and after him.

    Who is responsible Leopold or SillyG? Hard to say. Shared stupidity I guess.

    Necas is #3 on the Aves talent list behind Makar and Mack ,  Kaprizov is # 1 on the Wilds talent list  The Aves had to trade away their #2 player at the time on offense ,  you cant really compare the 2 situations . If Boldy continues his progression he probably gets close to Necas money next deal 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 11/1/2025 at 11:31 AM, mnfaninnc said:

    I very much agree that the agent had a lot of say in this. I guess the agent's perspective is "never agree with the 1st offer." So, due to OCL's statements, the Wild likely started out at the $16m mark, and OCL thought he had a deal. How would it look for him if he said the deal is almost done, and Kaprizov declines and leaves. I think he painted the club into a corner where they had to come out with the player signed. I'm pretty sure OCL wanted 8 years. Maybe it took an extra bribe of money to get Kaprizov to agree to 8? Maybe he was more in the camp of McDavid and wanted 2 or 3? 

    I don't know if Kirill wanted 2 or 3 years.  It would have made sense, max out now, max out later.  I'm willing to bet he has a fear of injury like everyone else has about him.  So, I think an eight year deal was always in the mix.  The Wild might have wanted more control on their side.  Like the ability to trade him if he doesn't produce.  But in the end Kirill gets all his money early.  The Wild pay him one million a year base salary for the next 8 years and if the Wild need to buy him out of this contract the buyout won't be excessive for the team.  The AAV still will count but the price of the buyout won't be a lot. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 10/31/2025 at 10:02 PM, Mateo3xm said:

    I’m curious what you mean about how he handled Dumba?

    Dumba once said something along the lines of 'Billys great, you hear him talk and you want to run through a wall.'  Dumba was the mold of a player that SillyG fell in love with.  Likeable guy in the room, great guy in the community, hard nosed, hard working.  Willing to throw a big hit, willing to drop the mitts.  I think SillyG fell in love with the player.

    It might be my affinity to Fifi, but during cap hell, SillyG could have afforded to keep Fiala (who's dropped 72 pts, 75 pts, and 60pts the past three seasons) if he would have traded Dumba.  Instead, he goes on KFAN and shits all over Fifi (he had a good month, he sucks) prior to trading the guy and he also said 'we would have had to move two or three other players to make the money work,' which means trading Dumba was never on the table.

    The next season he could have also moved Dumba at the TDL for something and instead gave us some line about 'not trading a player for a rental is basically the same as the rental, if you think about it'

    It's my opinion that Dumba could have been moved to make the team better, and Guerin didn't do it because he fell in love with the guy.

    Guerin's got a history of not looking objectively at a player once he 'likes' them.  SillyG said Hartman was unmoveable on the $1.8M contract, signed by Hartman below market value because he wanted stability, would lose the room.  Goligoski got a two-year WAY over market after signing a 1 year under market (and now in the front office) based on a their relationship and the handshake deal to circumvent the cap.

    I think Spurgy's in that camp.  The dude has the entire team over to his house (even AHL callups) for thanksgiving.  Unless Spurg is asking to be moved, Guerin's going to let him retire in a wild jersey.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    15 hours ago, 1Brotherbill said:

    Like the ability to trade him if he doesn't produce.  But in the end Kirill gets all his money early.  The Wild pay him one million a year base salary for the next 8 years and if the Wild need to buy him out of this contract the buyout won't be excessive for the team.  The AAV still will count but the price of the buyout won't be a lot. 

    This is a good catch in the way the contract is structured. If there is another lockout, he still gets paid. If he's bought out, he still got paid. I'm not sure what this does to the Wild cap sheet if he is bought out, but, the cap is like monopoly money, and the real money is what OCL actually hands out. I'd really like to know what a buyout after, say, 5 years would look like for the Wild's cap sheet? The real money is all still paid by OCL since the signing bonus portion of the contract cannot be bought out. 

    In the structure, I see signing bonuses assigned to each year. Does this mean that they were just put there on paper and Kaprizov got all his money up front, or does it mean on July 1st every year, Kaprizov gets a pile of money? 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    12 hours ago, MrCheatachu said:

    I think Spurgy's in that camp.  The dude has the entire team over to his house (even AHL callups) for thanksgiving.  Unless Spurg is asking to be moved, Guerin's going to let him retire in a wild jersey.  

    While I think it is best for the Wild to trade him because of the incoming players, I also believe that Guerin really wants to give him the 1,000 games in a Wild sweater silver stick. That kind of thing seems important to him, and one reason why we may not see him moved. 

    However, that is merely intangibles. Guerin needs to start acting on what's best for the team, and if you can backfill his spot with a young, less expensive defender, that's the way he should go. It's not about getting rid of a player, it's about making room for another player that helps the whole while filling Spurgeon's position with a capable internal player. 

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 10/31/2025 at 1:56 PM, Fortis said:

    Spurgeon has 1 goal, 1 assist,* NEGATIVE 12 +/- * in 12 games this year thus far. He is an undersized defenseman. His play and offensive contribution is no longer justifying his place on the roster. 

    But he's the captain!! 🤣 That was the dumbest move I've ever seen.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    47 minutes ago, mnfaninnc said:

    However, that is merely intangibles.

    Agreed, but compared to other sports, the NHL seems to have the greatest number of players choosing 'intangibles' when setting their course in free agency.

    Guerin bitched about the country club, pays a ton to get rid of what he views as locker room cancers, then goes in and fills it with a bunch of 'personality' guys.

    Vegas has been absolutely ruthless in handling of players (ask Flower), but they've also become a destination for top talent due to their lack of income taxes, moderate climate, low pressure, and continually being a cup contender.

    You hear grumblings out of Buffalo or Calgary that they're unable to attract & retain top free agents due to their locale, yet Edmonton seems to have no issues of getting guys willing to play for a perennial contender.

    I guess at the end of the day winning solves everything.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    9 hours ago, mnfaninnc said:

    This is a good catch in the way the contract is structured. If there is another lockout, he still gets paid. If he's bought out, he still got paid. I'm not sure what this does to the Wild cap sheet if he is bought out, but, the cap is like monopoly money, and the real money is what OCL actually hands out. I'd really like to know what a buyout after, say, 5 years would look like for the Wild's cap sheet? The real money is all still paid by OCL since the signing bonus portion of the contract cannot be bought out. 

    In the structure, I see signing bonuses assigned to each year. Does this mean that they were just put there on paper and Kaprizov got all his money up front, or does it mean on July 1st every year, Kaprizov gets a pile of money? 

    I believe the Cap hit would be the 17 million a year.  As far as how much they actually have to pay out for the buyout would be way less than that.  

    This contract is dangerous with his past of injury.  If the Wild trade him lets say after year 5 and he retires after lets say year 6 the Cap penalties would be massive.  I think something like 51 million a year if I understand it right.  So, trading this contract is probably not a good thing.  Only finish the contract, or LTIR or Buyout are the only good ways this contract ends. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, 1Brotherbill said:

    This contract is dangerous with his past of injury.  If the Wild trade him lets say after year 5 and he retires after lets say year 6 the Cap penalties would be massive.  I think something like 51 million a year if I understand it right.  So, trading this contract is probably not a good thing.  Only finish the contract, or LTIR or Buyout are the only good ways this contract ends. 

    This contract does not follow the cap recapture clause that Suter and Parise had. I would think there would be more relief than that. But the real money payout is $128m + however many seasons he plays X $1m.

    Should he retire early, it would just drop off the books since he's not 35 yet. 

    But, if Kaprizov gets bought out, how would the monopoly money play out?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...