Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness
  • How Red Are the Minnesota Wild's Red Flags?


    Image courtesy of Charles LeClaire - Imagn Images
    Tony Abbott

    You can't take October away from the Minnesota Wild. John Hynes emphasized the need for a fast start for his team after coming onto the job mid-season once the Wild stumbled to a 5-10-4 record.

    As Banner from "Arrested Development" once infamously read...

    image.png

    Nine games into the season, the Wild have a 6-1-2 record. They have as many points in the standings (14) as they had through 19 games under Dean Evason last year. Those points are in the bank, and if we're using the playoff cutoff from last year (98), Minnesota is already 14% of the way to the playoffs with about 90% of the season to go.

    But this is a sports team in Minnesota; it's the land of 10,000 Shoes To Drop. If you're a pessimist, there's no shortage of red flags for this Wild team.

    It might surprise you that the Wild's opponents are outshooting them at 5-on-5 this season (200 to 201). In terms of overall shot attempts, Minnesota's also well below 50% (392 to 445) and is only barely on top in terms of expected goals (16.0 to 14.5). 

    You can get out-shot, out-attempted, and even out-chanced and still make the playoffs. The Washington Capitals did it last year, and their numbers were worse than Minnesota's. But it's tough. You need killer special teams, some mojo that doesn't run out in the regular season, or, preferably, both. And even then, your luck tends to run out come playoff time.

    The Wild have both things on their side right now. They've got a top-10 power play, the fifth-highest shooting percentage at 5-on-5 (11.5%), and the fourth-highest save percentage (93.5%). That works out to a PDO (shooting plus save percentages) of 105.0, the third-highest in the NHL. Teams at the extreme ends of the PDO spectrum tend to regress to the league average of 100.

    So what happens when things start to break the other way? 

    The Wild might have the classic red flags of a team that will regress, but there's reason to think it might not be so bad. As always, we're dealing with some small sample sizes that produce weird results in the early part of the season.

    In this case, events have conspired to make Minnesota's underlying numbers look worse.

    Remember, the Wild went their first six games without trailing. They've trailed for only 45 minutes and 50 seconds this season, the lowest amount in the league. Only the Vegas Golden Knights have spent more time in the lead.

    This is where score effects come in. Teams in the lead tend to hang back and settle for defending, while the trailing team pushes to create more offense. Over a full season, when most teams spend about 1000 minutes or more leading and trailing, these effects tend to make only a minor impact. But when we're talking, say... nine games, for example... these score effects can skew things significantly.

    We're seeing that with the Wild right now. Let's take a look at what the Wild's 5-on-5 possession numbers are before and after adjusting for score effects, which Evolving-Hockey helpfully does:

    Corsi For Percentage:

    Unadjusted: 46.8% (25th in NHL)
    Adjusted: 50.2% (21st)

    Shots For Percentage:

    Unadjusted: 49.9% (18th)
    Adjusted: 52.6% (9th)

    Expected Goals Percentage:

    Unadjusted: 50.8% (13th)
    Adjusted: 53.1 (9th)

    Once those score effects are accounted for, Minnesota looks much more solid. The Wild pop over 50.2% at controlling shot attempts. However, they have built a reputation for dominating shot quality for over a decade. Once we account for score effects, they're doing it again, and that's very good news for the State of Hockey. 

    Last season, nine of the top-10 teams in (score-adjusted) Expected Goals Percentage at 5-on-5 made the playoffs. Over the last 10 full 82-game seasons, 85 of the 100 teams in the top-10 of Expected Goals Percentage made the playoffs. 

    Better yet, they've done it while missing six games from Jared Spurgeon, their best 5-on-5 player last year (57.8% xGF%). Having Spurgeon back and healthy raises the ceiling for their season. 

    These reasons and the points the Wild have already banked are why Evolving-Hockey projects them to have a 79.9% chance of making the playoffs. There will be times when the shooting goes cold, the goaltending gets a bit leaky, and the power play slumps. Still, Minnesota (when healthy) has enough going for it to believe that it will make the playoffs.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 5
    • Thanks 1

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    The thing that worries me is the PP isn't as lights out as it was the first few games, and the PK is abysmal (66-67%).

    A lot gets masked by how fewer penalties they are taking compared to last year, so I suppose a worse PK showing up less evens out as bad as last year's March to the box showed.

    On the plus side, about 5-7 players are at or near PPG.  Kap's surge is huge, but the team is helping behind him.

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The scoring ability is very good for this team. An injury or special-teams collapse would make it worse for sure.

    It's been a great way to begin, but the Wild need to settle into a routine and find a safe groove to stay firmly on-track. That encompasses a lot of little things but keeping guys healthy, and staying out of the box is the most important.

    The PK has sucked for years. PPs are streaky. EDM had an amazing PK last season, somebody needs to study that. MN's PK or down 6-5 at the end of games has been crummy still. Just stay out of the box and stay healthy.

    • Like 4
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Just like CS, I think being reasonably healthy is the main thing and the red flag here is that depth is not their strong suit especially at forward. 

    I like the way the team is blocking shots and packing the middle of the ice. The red flag here, however, is that sometimes blocked shots lead to injuries. 

    This season's version of the Wild has been to counter score quickly when someone else takes the lead. The red flag here is if this is sustainable? Last season, we had a terrible time scoring 1st. This season seems to be different in that respect, and I think it should be a stressed goal. It is always easier to play with a lead, something that adds confidence to the team and cuts down on injuries. 

    I don't mention the stats here, nor the underlying numbers. It's not that I don't believe in them, it's just that right now, the eye test is much better. The numbers are to goofy this early to mean anything. 

    Another flag, I'm not sure what color it is, is that our schedule to this point has been Eastern Conference heavy. To me, the Eastern Conference is probably the better conference at this time. Banking points against those teams is very good. 

    You could say something similar about our road/home ratio too. Coming up big in that long 7 game road trip probably puts us in the playoff hunt with 5 games to go. 

    I think it is still way too early to believe anybody's % on playoff odds. I said this a little while ago, but you cannot make the playoffs with a good October and November. However, you can miss the playoffs with these as bad months. Just like in a game, chasing teams ahead in the standings is far more exhausting than having the lead. The banked points can actually help you stay within yourself and not try to do too much, keeping you healthier. 

    My biggest red flag, though, is what happens when Kaprizov isn't scoring 2 or more points a night? We've enjoyed 7 in a row. This, to me, is the greatest reason for our record. We need to have improvement throughout the other lines so that they can provide the vital secondary scoring.

    One last item. Hynes. Last night and on some previous nights, Heinzy makes some very subtle line switches through the game. Sometimes it's dictated by special teams screwing up the lines, but moving Trenin to 4th line and elevating Hartman to 3rd line worked well. So did Rossi moving late to Boldy's line. In comparing this with Evason, he didn't really do this. Hynes hasn't hit the line blender as much as Boudreau, but he has a feel that shouldn't go unnoticed. He won't get every switch right, but I do applaud him for doing it.

    • Like 6
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, mnfaninnc said:

    Kaprizov

    He plays like an MVP. Shoots, passes, hockey IQ, attitude in elevating other players… etc. etc. If I can so clearly see this certainly their opponents do as well. Hynes seems to have a sense for mixing things up enough to make KK’s on ice time a little unpredictable. I also think having Rossi dig out pucks and find himself getting to the right positions for a play is helping a lot. With KK being the best player on the ice most nights I’m calling for the Checkered Flag! Disclaimer “The above statement represents the results on any given evening only.” 

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    9 hours ago, terrydactyls said:

    79.9% chance of making the playoffs?  The Twins had a 90% chance with just a couple weeks left.  How did that go?

    Sometimes you roll a 1 on a D20. 

    • Like 1
    • Haha 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    18 hours ago, Burnt Toast said:

    I also think having Rossi dig out pucks and find himself getting to the right positions for a play is helping a lot.

    If only Rossi was a 1C...

    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, FredJohnson said:

    If only Rossi was a 1C...

    You got your wish, looks like Rossi will be the center on the first line between Kap and Zuc…

    Edited by Sam
    Added sarcasm dots
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...