Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness
  • How High Can the Wild Trade Up (and Should They Do It)?


    Image courtesy of David Banks-USA TODAY Sports
    Justin Hein

     

    The NHL draft is only two weeks away, and it’s time to start thinking about draft moves. Where do the Minnesota Wild want to pick, and how much can they reasonably move around the board? 

    To understand what Minnesota might do, we must figure out what they can do. That starts with the market for past trades. It could be difficult if the front office wants to trade up from their 13th overall pick into the top ten. Over the past 13 drafts, no team has ever dealt a top-ten pick. 

    The Sound of Hockey does historical research on NHL trades and the market for picks. “The highest pick traded was the 11th pick,” he wrote, “which happened twice – once in 2016 in a swap for the 12th and 80th picks and once in 2019 in exchange for the 14th and 45th picks.”

    However, by analyzing past trades, anybody can get a good idea of the trade value for each draft pick. It sounds complicated at first, but it’s actually pretty easy to wrap your head around. Researchers have pulled lists of recent pick-for-pick trades and used them to build a mathematical model. By definition, if both GMs agreed to the trade, the market must have considered it fairly even. 

    If you set each side of the trade equal to each other, the model can assign a value to each draft slot. Curtis Isacke from Sound of Hockey used 98 trades between the 2009 draft and the 2021 draft to create a mathematical value for each draft slot. To anchor the picks’ relative value, the value of the first overall pick is set to 1000.

    Hein1.png

    With no trades in or out of the top ten, Isacke faced a challenge modeling those pick values. Theory can only take us so far. 

    To account for that, Isacke piggybacked on Dom Luszczyszyn’s research. While there were no trades in the top ten, players were drafted with those picks. Luszczyszyn’s chart below is based on the analytical value of players selected at those positions. With that information, Isacke was able to get a rough idea of their value.

    Hein2.png

    The only limitation to Luszczyszyn’s chart is that it isn’t based on the trade market, so it may still undervalue how much NHL GMs want to hold onto their top-10 picks. That would make it even more expensive for Minnesota to make a significant move up the draft board. 

    So, based on theory alone, how high could the Wild trade up to? By Isacke’s estimate, a package of Minnesota's first- and second-round picks would be equivalent to the 8th or 9th overall pick. Luszczyszyn’s model puts it close to the 7th overall. 

    But if the GMs holding top-ten picks are as stingy this year as they have been, Minnesota would probably have to offer more to execute a trade. Whichever GM wants to trade back with the Wild has most of the negotiating leverage because sticking with their own pick isn’t as risky as passing on a top-ten selection. That makes it more realistic that Minnesota can only move up as high as 9th or 10th overall -- only three or four picks ahead of their current selection. That’s not nothing, but it’s a pretty small move. 

    Furthermore, even a small move like that could be difficult to pull off due to the perceived talent cliff in the 2024 draft. Draft analysts in the public sphere have noted that the top 10-12 picks are better than usual this year. For example, Corey Pronman of The Athletic ranked 11 2024 draft-eligible players as “top of the lineup” or better. That’s on par with his 2023 draft rankings, in which he rated 10 players in that tier -- and the 2023 class was one of the deepest in two decades. 

    Wild director of amateur scouting Judd Brackett said something similar on a recent episode of the Fellowship of the Rink podcast: “I just think the chances to move up will be difficult. Some teams have eyes on players they’ve liked. We’re 13, and if that range (of top players) is 12-14, most teams are liking the players in their grouping.”

    If this class has another once-in-a-decade top-ten, why would another GM give up the right to select one of those prospects? It’s another reason Minnesota would have to pay an even steeper price than usual. 

    The Wild must also consider their plan for the rest of the 2024 draft. They may be reluctant to part with that second-round pick because they don’t hold another selection until the fourth round. Usually, when teams trade away their second-round pick, their third-round selection can be a small consolation to round out the draft class. However, Guerin traded away Minnesota’s third-round pick in the Marcus Johansson trade. If the Wild trades their second-rounder, they would be going all-in with their draft capital. 

    On top of that, Guerin’s front office has made hay in the second round during his Wild tenure. In his four drafts as Wild GM, Guerin has picked three seven times in the second round and three more times in the third. Second-round picks Marat Khusnutdinov and Riley Heidt made Scott Wheeler’s top-75 prospects this spring. Guerin also used top-100 picks to stock the defensive pipeline with Jack Peart, Ryan O’Rourke, and Daemon Hunt

    If he’s identified an efficiency there, would Guerin really give it up in exchange for picking ninth or tenth instead of 13th? It’s also noteworthy that based on Luszczyszyn’s research, the average outcome of players picked at 13 and 45 is closer in value to the 7th overall pick, so packaging those picks to get the 9th or 10th pick would be an overpay. 

    So, Minnesota might be reluctant to pull off a trade-up, and the GMs ahead of them aren’t likely to jump at the chance to trade down. It seems that the only way to make a deal is if one of the Guerin has his eye on one or two prospects that drop to the end of the top ten. Until draft night, nobody outside the Wild front office will know that information. 

    I don’t think the Wild will pull off a trade-up on June 28th. But if they do, they likely have a good reason for it, which should make draft night especially exciting for Wild fans.

     

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    17 minutes ago, Will D. Ness said:

    I want to draft BPA at 13 and then use that 2nd rd pick on a specific need.

    I want to never be reminded again that we gave up a 3rd for NoJo.  💩

    What would you say is the most specific need right now?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Wild should not be trading up but instead packaging their pick and either 

    a - dumping spurge (pick + spurge + Freddy for nothing)

    And/Or

    b - along w another prospect get a proven physical player above 6’1 

    And/or

    C - look to package a crazy offer and pull out a heist at the draft

    I have zero excitement for adding another prospect with whatever pick we have. He won’t have impact until at least 3 years from now and odds he may not be ready then or will not be what we were told he was (stramel is not the first “bright” young star and not our last)

    im going to say it one more time! Kap is the number one priority - all this crap of planning for future and building pipeline of what if’s is waste of assets. Use them for the now. Perhaps it’s not the right way to build a team if one started from beginning but we are not that team and we have to adjust based on our situation, so getting excited about adding useless prospect to our pipeline that won’t be available for few years all while doing minimal to keep your super star is idiotic! My weekly rant over! 
     

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Wild should not be trading up but instead packaging their pick and either 

    a - dumping spurge (pick + spurge + Freddy for nothing)

    And/Or

    b - along w another prospect get a proven physical player above 6’1 

    And/or

    C - look to package a crazy offer and pull out a heist at the draft

    I have zero excitement for adding another prospect with whatever pick we have. He won’t have impact until at least 3 years from now and odds he may not be ready then or will not be what we were told he was (stramel is not the first “bright” young star and not our last)

    im going to say it one more time! Kap is the number one priority - all this crap of planning for future and building pipeline of what if’s is waste of assets. Use them for the now. Perhaps it’s not the right way to build a team if one started from beginning but we are not that team and we have to adjust based on our situation, so getting excited about adding useless prospect to our pipeline that won’t be available for few years all while doing minimal to keep your super star is idiotic! My weekly rant over! 
     

    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Package Gus and our first round pick move up and grab a difference maker that can be NHL ready ASAP. Or, go ahead move Gus and shoot to draft 2 first round players. ( not sure if it’ll still be at 13.) Hopefully one of the top players drops and we can either grab them or get top value in a trade back. Gotta come out swinging in 2025. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, Pewterschmidt said:

    What would you say is the most specific need right now?

    Power forward ala Greenway but with work ethic and shoots right.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Biggest need is a younger Top-2/4 defenseman.  Brodin and Spurgeon aren't getting any younger, and Middleton is a risky re-signee.  Russo seems to think he'll get resigned for that magical $4m number...but he's not a 4 unless he's stapled to Spurgeon.  

    If all the defenseman are taken, don't go nuts and see what forwards are left.  

    • Like 5
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Prospects and draft picks are not the Wild's problem. Development is the root problem and poor judgement in handing out contracts and trade rumors are. They finally hit on a prospect developing into something and then want to trade him. I have said before Guerin has created dysfunction in the front office and that 

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    So here is my counter argument to drafting defense this year.

    1) We already have quite a few defensive prospects as well as Chisholm.  

    2) Picking up a veteran 3D with size isn't too difficult or expensive.

    3) For whatever reason D takes longer to develop so realistically it will be around 2028 before anyone we pick this year will be ready.

    With that said, I do really like Yakemchuk at 13 anyways.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 6/15/2024 at 8:54 AM, Will D. Ness said:

    So here is my counter argument to drafting defense this year.

    1) We already have quite a few defensive prospects as well as Chisholm.  

    2) Picking up a veteran 3D with size isn't too difficult or expensive.

    3) For whatever reason D takes longer to develop so realistically it will be around 2028 before anyone we pick this year will be ready.

    With that said, I do really like Yakemchuk at 13 anyways.

    We do have a good amount of d prospects but honestly none of them seem to be anything special and they’re all 6ft or so. It’s still early for them but none seem to be more than a 3rd pairing player. In This draft which is d heavy, it makes sense to grab a big dman. Yakemchuk would be great but I bet he goes early. Jiricek wouldn’t be great but when he fills out I really think he could be good. I guess he’s actually very aggressive and likes to take guys heads off. Helenious would be ok but he’s still a little undersized. We really need a big defenseman but Michael Hage is a true center who is 6’1 190lbs, is one of the better skaters in the draft and all the articles I’ve seen about him can’t come up with any type of deficiency’s. He’s going to Michigan too which is a sign he’s going to be good too.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 6/14/2024 at 6:37 PM, OldDutchChip said:

    Wild should not be trading up but instead packaging their pick and either 

    a - dumping spurge (pick + spurge + Freddy for nothing)

    And/Or

    b - along w another prospect get a proven physical player above 6’1 

    And/or

    C - look to package a crazy offer and pull out a heist at the draft

    I have zero excitement for adding another prospect with whatever pick we have. He won’t have impact until at least 3 years from now and odds he may not be ready then or will not be what we were told he was (stramel is not the first “bright” young star and not our last)

    im going to say it one more time! Kap is the number one priority - all this crap of planning for future and building pipeline of what if’s is waste of assets. Use them for the now. Perhaps it’s not the right way to build a team if one started from beginning but we are not that team and we have to adjust based on our situation, so getting excited about adding useless prospect to our pipeline that won’t be available for few years all while doing minimal to keep your super star is idiotic! My weekly rant over! 
     

    And if no matter what they do he decides to leave? We'll be wishing we had an Eiserman or Helenius waiting in the wings to add more top-6 talent at that point instead of whatever veteran we were getting to entice him to stay. 

    The team is getting close to being a Cup contender, they're on a good trajectory right now, I don't know about blasting a hole in that in the final year of the bad-cap penalties to convince Kaprizov to stick around. 

    If he goes, it sucks, but he goes. We'll have to do something else with that $9.5M then. And we'll have a top-6 talent coming to bolster the team a season later (Since Kap's under contract for 2.) Picking at #13 they could get, at worst, a safe reliable top-6 C in Helenius. There's a chance its a higher upside player though, depending on how crazy teams go for size. 

    With the uncertainty of Kap sticking around, and I assume the FO has a better pulse on those negotiations than ourselves, I'm not sure how smart it is to swing big just because of the chances of him leaving you holding the bag are higher than 0 right now. 

    On 6/15/2024 at 8:00 AM, MacGyver said:

    Prospects and draft picks are not the Wild's problem. Development is the root problem and poor judgement in handing out contracts and trade rumors are. They finally hit on a prospect developing into something and then want to trade him. I have said before Guerin has created dysfunction in the front office and that 

    Development is the problem but then you acknowledge they've developed players.. The blue liners in the AHL have been disappointing so far, sure, but I think that we've barely gotten to see the Brackett drafts take off yet. Rossi, in Calder talks and among the top-3 rookie point leaders for most of the season despite playing with Freddy and Foligno for a good chunk of it, and Khusnut just made it to the NHL and they were his first draft class. Wallstedt is about to become an NHL goalie after looking good, and developing, in the AHL.

    Sure there are 'rumors' that Rossi is on the block, but it doesn't make much sense to trade him. Even when Yurov comes over, Marco has the two-way game to succeed as a 3C if they don't move him over to wing. If they're listening to offers for Rossi, well, that's just doing their job. 

    I wouldn't get too upset about a Rossi trade until it happens though, it just makes little sense for a Center-starved team (And we still are until Yurov arrives) to trade away a top-6 C. 

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, B1GKappa97 said:

    And if no matter what they do he decides to leave? We'll be wishing we had an Eiserman or Helenius waiting in the wings to add more top-6 talent at that point instead of whatever veteran we were getting to entice him to stay. 

    The team is getting close to being a Cup contender, they're on a good trajectory right now, I don't know about blasting a hole in that in the final year of the bad-cap penalties to convince Kaprizov to stick around. 

    If he goes, it sucks, but he goes. We'll have to do something else with that $9.5M then. And we'll have a top-6 talent coming to bolster the team a season later (Since Kap's under contract for 2.) Picking at #13 they could get, at worst, a safe reliable top-6 C in Helenius. There's a chance its a higher upside player though, depending on how crazy teams go for size. 

    With the uncertainty of Kap sticking around, and I assume the FO has a better pulse on those negotiations than ourselves, I'm not sure how smart it is to swing big just because of the chances of him leaving you holding the bag are higher than 0 right now. 

    Development is the problem but then you acknowledge they've developed players.. The blue liners in the AHL have been disappointing so far, sure, but I think that we've barely gotten to see the Brackett drafts take off yet. Rossi, in Calder talks and among the top-3 rookie point leaders for most of the season despite playing with Freddy and Foligno for a good chunk of it, and Khusnut just made it to the NHL and they were his first draft class. Wallstedt is about to become an NHL goalie after looking good, and developing, in the AHL.

    Sure there are 'rumors' that Rossi is on the block, but it doesn't make much sense to trade him. Even when Yurov comes over, Marco has the two-way game to succeed as a 3C if they don't move him over to wing. If they're listening to offers for Rossi, well, that's just doing their job. 

    I wouldn't get too upset about a Rossi trade until it happens though, it just makes little sense for a Center-starved team (And we still are until Yurov arrives) to trade away a top-6 C. 

    And if no matter what they do he decides to leave? then we at least did all we could do put ourselves in the best position to retain him 

    We'll be wishing we had an Eiserman or Helenius waiting in the wings to add more top-6 talent at that point instead of whatever veteran we were getting to entice him to stay. who is this eiserman and helenius? 

    The team is getting close to being a Cup contender i guess i don't agree given the current make up and what awaits them should Kap leave

    If he goes, it sucks, but he goes. We'll have to do something else with that $9.5M then i am sure there is another top 5 superstar just waiting for billy to call him and sign him. yeap agree.

    Development is the problem but then you acknowledge they've developed players.. The blue liners in the AHL have been disappointing so far, sure, but I think that we've barely gotten to see the Brackett drafts take off yet. i don't need to acknowledge that they develop players - that's a GIVEN and natural progression. but that progression seems to either be slow AF or going in the wrong direction. Barely seeing Bracket drafts but don't worry - he is a genius because he knows how to use Stats. Got it - trust and believe.

    Rossi, in Calder talks and among the top-3 rookie point leaders for most of the season Good! his stock is high! trade his ass then to the highest bidder

    • Confused 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, OldDutchChip said:

    Barely seeing Bracket drafts but don't worry - he is a genius because he knows how to use Stats. Got it - trust and believe.

    Yurov looks to be every bit as impressive as Kaprizov was and he should be over next year, with or without Kap. No, there's not another top-5 player who'll be available to replace him with but getting that cap space back will allow the team to find some sort of a replacement.

    Obviously losing Kap will hurt, but somehow the Panthers are in position to win a Cup and they don't have him on their team either. We will have to adjust if he decides to leave but its not like he takes $9M of our cap with him when he goes. 

    You've barely seen Brackett's drafts because this is the NHL and it generally takes your picks 3 to 4 years after being drafted to finally make an impact in the big leauges.

    The 2020 draft was his first year, so we have only just seen Rossi and Khusnutdinov make it to this level to this point. He drafted Lambos and Wallstedt in 2021. Lambos probably isn't ready for the NHL yet, and likely won't be what he was billed as pre-draft, but Wallstedt certainly is knocking on the door. There's an outside chance he becomes a starting goalie for us by the TDL.

    2022 1st round picks Ohgren and Yurov will also be in line to begin making contributions to the team this year and next.

    We're only just now to the point where we'll begin to be able to evaluate Brackett's drafting more clearly.

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 minutes ago, B1GKappa97 said:

    Yurov looks to be every bit as impressive as Kaprizov was and he should be over next year, with or without Kap. No, there's not another top-5 player who'll be available to replace him with but getting that cap space back will allow the team to find some sort of a replacement.

    Obviously losing Kap will hurt, but somehow the Panthers are in position to win a Cup and they don't have him on their team either. We will have to adjust if he decides to leave but its not like he takes $9M of our cap with him when he goes. 

    You've barely seen Brackett's drafts because this is the NHL and it generally takes your picks 3 to 4 years after being drafted to finally make an impact in the big leauges.

    The 2020 draft was his first year, so we have only just seen Rossi and Khusnutdinov make it to this level to this point. He drafted Lambos and Wallstedt in 2021. Lambos probably isn't ready for the NHL yet, and likely won't be what he was billed as pre-draft, but Wallstedt certainly is knocking on the door. There's an outside chance he becomes a starting goalie for us by the TDL.

    2022 1st round picks Ohgren and Yurov will also be in line to begin making contributions to the team this year and next.

    We're only just now to the point where we'll begin to be able to evaluate Brackett's drafting more clearly.

    Yurov looks to be every bit as impressive as Kaprizov was and he should be over next year, with or without Kap. yakupov was the next big thing, so was zach phillips and so was tyler cuma. 

    No, there's not another top-5 player who'll be available to replace him with but getting that cap space back will allow the team to find some sort of a replacement. totally agree! there will always be a minnesotan wanting to come home and we will be too excited to pay up for that

    Obviously losing Kap will hurt, but somehow the Panthers are in position to win a Cup and they don't have him on their team either. i think panthers got aggressive (which is what i am advocating for) and moved some pieces for tkachuk and had other players take a bit of a discount (hint - Faber) so that they can form a nucleus that will contend for years

    He drafted Lambos and Wallstedt in 2021he did indeed, are we going to see them this decade? 

    2022 1st round picks Ohgren and Yurov will also be in line to begin making contributions to the team this year and next. i am going to again hold off on excitement for the unproven rookies till they show something

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I have to think ODC is doing this intentionally to troll us.

    Kaprizov is a top-10-15 player, but look what Edmonton has done with the top 2 for a decade: barely avoid getting swept by Florida.

    You would think they would be gifted 5-6 cups, but life is strange.  For all we know, if Kaprizov leaves, the Wild get to the finals...

    It sounds very, VERY silly, but sports are fluky things.  Clinging to one player just because he's the best doesn't mean he is there all end all thing ever in the team has had (yet), and doesn't mean slobbering over the thought of him leaving as some life or death struggle.

     

     

     

     

    Edited by Citizen Strife
    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 minutes ago, OldDutchChip said:

    somehow the Panthers are in position to win a Cup

    They've got a world class lineup with the right balance of size, grit, talent and heart.  World class goalie.

    And Maurice appears to be a wizard behind the bench.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, Pewterschmidt said:

    They've got a world class lineup with the right balance of size, grit, talent and heart.  World class goalie.

    And Maurice appears to be a wizard behind the bench.

    i'll be pulling for them to close out canada in G5

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 minutes ago, Citizen Strife said:

    I have to think ODC is doing this intentionally to troll us.

    Kaprizov is a top-10-15 player, but look what Edmonton has done with the top 2 for a decade: barely avoid getting swept by Florida.

    You would think they would be gifted 5-6 cups, but life is strange.  For all we know, if Kaprizov leaves, the Wild get to the finals...

    It sounds very, VERY silly, but sports are fluky things.  Clinging to one player just because he's the best doesn't mean he is there all end all thing ever in the team has had (yet), and doesn't mean slobbering over the thought of him leaving as some life or death struggle.

     

     

     

     

    Kaprizov is a top-10-15 player no he is not, that is the core problem here, you think he is replaceable, but he is NOT. you do not just replace that kind of player. you CAN replace Rossis and prospects, you cannot just replace superstars like Kaprizov

    Kaprizov is a top-10-15 player, but look what Edmonton has done with the top 2 for a decade: barely avoid getting swept by Florida. huh? yeah i would hate to be Edmonton, having to be in the final and a contender every year. very very bad. and you know they are battling the team that i think did the exact thing i am advocating for, but that is not a point right?

    if Kaprizov leaves, the Wild get to the finals...miracles do happen

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It WOULD be an interesting point, of it wasn't all you seem hung up on.

    Guerin and the coaches have known how valuable he is, but have their reasons for buyouts, extensions, etc.  Excuse me for giving them the benefit of the doubt because one bad year filled with injuries didn't net 100-point seasons and another playoff spot.  No team is entitled to playoff spots, the best players, ref calls, etc.  The NHL is a hard sport, and a business at the end of the day.

    I would love Kaprizov staying longer.  But I realize the team has to try and win to keep the owner happy too.  Flecther's method was an abject failure for a decade, because he chased every year without any prospect help for the future.  Guerin had to clean up a LOT of mistakes made by two GMs.  It isn't perfect, but the team he's tried to construct for Kaprizov is down a McDavid contract (to ensure Kaprizov stayed the first time). 

    I don't think Guerin is infallible, but I also think he knows what we know: winning takes time, luck, and not panicking over short term problems.

    I give Guerin 2-3 more years before calling for heads.

    Edited by Citizen Strife
    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...