Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • How Does Rossi's Contract Fit Into the Wild's Five-Year Plan?


    Image courtesy of Nick Wosika - Imagn Images
    Tony Abbott

    The 2025-26 season is about six weeks away, which means that Year 3 of Bill Guerin's five-year plan is about to get underway. The Minnesota Wild undoubtedly were hoping to enter this phase with their freed-up cap space spent on some big-name reinforcements -- no such luck.

    Instead, the Wild are wrapping up their unfinished business as we enter the home stretch of the offseason. Kirill Kaprizov's incoming mega-extension is the big thing on the docket. Still, Guerin settled another negotiation last week, inking young center Marco Rossi to a three-year deal carrying a $5 million AAV.

    Last week, we noted a curiosity in these extension talks. The market had been swinging towards giving young players like (and in many cases, less productive than) Rossi seemingly big paydays that would become modest as the salary cap skyrockets. Why fight so hard to keep the cap hit at $5 million when $7 million could have sewn him up for four extra seasons?

    Reading back his talks with the media from July, it appears he already gave us the reason. "We have a structure in our pay that we have him slotted in at a certain level and that's just the way we're doing our business," the GM said as free agency opened.

    Guerin's viewpoint was that term wasn't the priority for Minnesota, as it was for teams that inked up-and-coming players to long-term deals; it was the dollars.

    So why was keeping the money down so important? When viewed through the lens of Guerin's plan, the tough negotiations and lack of willingness to go long-term become more understandable. It might be a coincidence that Rossi's deal starts in Year 3 and ends following Year 5 -- RFA extensions typically either buy UFA years, which the Wild didn't do with Rossi, or they walk them to within a year or two of free agency.

    However, driving down Rossi's price to the exact endpoint of Guerin's five-year plan is also very helpful to his timeline. If it's a coincidence, it's a happy one.

    The Wild will enter the season with a full roster and around $4.4 million in cap space, the most this team has had to play with in-season in a long time. That leaves them free to make a play the next time someone like Mikko RantanenMatthew Tkachuk, or Jack Eichel becomes available. As long as that move is made near the trade deadline, where pro-rated cap hits make taking on salary easier to do, the Wild are in a good spot to add whoever might be on the block.

    There would have been benefits to locking in Rossi long-term, but to be fair, a $5 million commitment instead of $7 million does help enormously with their shorter-term flexibility. It will undoubtedly help them in the summer of 2026 or 2027, should Minnesota go big-game hunting then.

    Looking at the 2026-27 season, the Wild have about $64.4 million committed against a $104 million cap ceiling. That's almost $40 million!... and it's also misleading. That cap space is going to get snapped up relatively quickly. Kaprizov's mega-extension might take up $14 or $15 million of that pie. Evolving-Hockey's contract projections predict a five-year deal carrying a cap hit nearing $7.5 million for Filip Gustavsson, unless Minnesota wants to roll the dice on Jesper Wallstedt

    Let's aim high with Kaprizov's deal ($15 million) and assume that Guerin sweet-talks Gustavsson down to $7 million. Suddenly, we're talking about $18 million of cap space. 

    That's still a lot! But again, it goes quickly. Presumably, the Wild will need to replace (or re-sign) Mats Zuccarello, Vladimir Tarasenko, and Marcus Johansson at forward, then Zach Bogosian at defense. Even on $1 million/entry-level deals, that's three players and $3 million gone.

    They'll also presumably give a raise to pending RFA David Jiříček, who the Wild hope will be in a position to command a few million. Say Jiříček gets three years, $3 million AAV. Now, Minnesota's got at least $6 million of that $18 million off the board.

    In doing this, we saved a Superstar Slot for whichever beautiful, talented so-and-so decides to grace the Wild with their presence. Whoever it is, our quick-and-dirty cap management predicts there'd be about $12 million at Minnesota's disposal to throw at them. That leaves just enough room for someone like, say, Artemi Panarin, who would be projected to make a bit over $11 million under a $104 million cap, per Evolving-Hockey. 

    Here's where the saved $2 million might be the most beneficial to Minnesota: Many keen observers have noted that Rossi's salary makes him easier to trade. But what if it also makes him easier to keep?

    If Rossi's making $7 million instead of $5, it becomes much more difficult for the Wild to land a star player for 2026-27 without giving up salary somewhere else. $2 million is a relatively small amount against a $104 million cap. However, in practical terms, having $18 million to spend on five roster spots makes a significant difference compared to $16 million. Especially when $10 to $12 million of those dollars are earmarked for an impact player.

    Many have assumed that trading Rossi is the path to landing that Rantanen-type player. But after this summer, which saw a shockingly tepid trade market for a 23-year-old, 60-point center, that might not be the case. Perhaps that changes if Rossi achieves another 20-point improvement next season and raises his value. But in that case, he's a point-per-game center making $5 million. Is that someone the Wild would really trade, even with the sometimes-bizarre relationship between player and club?

    Probably not. It's just too nice of a bargain, even if Rossi stays at a 60-point level. And while $7 million for Rossi would be a similar home-run bargain, and for longer, it also makes it more difficult to slot in a big-time player into Minnesota's salary structure. Rossi at $5 million gives Minnesota a lot of options, and that includes the ability to easily keep him, even after star-plucking season begins.

    It's still very possible that the Wild will come to regret not going long-term with Rossi and finding a way to move out other money whenever the need arises. Guerin still also has to execute on his five-year plan, not just bringing in a big-name player for its own sake, but one who can elevate his team's ceiling. However, seeing the $5 million next to Rossi's name on PuckPedia, we can begin to understand why securing a bargain on their young RFA center was their top priority.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 3
    • Thanks 1

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    1st, condolences to the victims of the past couple of days in Minneapolis. The news today weighed heavily on my heart.

     

    Another nice thing about Rossi's new deal is that instead of waiting completely to the deadline, we can maybe start our shopping in January. That gives us, essentially, 3 months to figure out this team. I imagine that we will also need to give up some salary, but, it puts us in fine shape moving forward. 

    Who knows? Maybe all 5 or 6 rookies hit and we don't need to add anywhere? Maybe our adds come from the college ranks after the NCAA tourney? Maybe we finally have positive injury luck? A younger roster typically has a tendency to have better injury luck. 

    So, what if we were buyers through selling? Some of our vets would make nice pieces to playoff bound or playoff wannabe teams. Maybe instead of that "big" piece, we get more of an unproven piece somewhere within the '20-23 draft window? A guy on the upswing who hasn't quite had that breakthrough yet. 

    It seems to me that Judd probably has a list of guys who either were taken before his chance or that he liked and missed on. Maybe he gets a 2nd swing on one of those guys? 

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The best part of the Rossi contract is he still will have one year of RFA after the deal.  So, a qualifying offer will be in the 6 million range and anyone who wants him will have to pay more than that and give compensation to the Wild if they take him.  Or if Rossi falls of the edge of the table and is a terrible player they Wild can just walk away.  

    It is doubtful that Zucarello will come back he already has said that he doesn't want to be a third line or fourth line guy he doesn't think that is his game.  Taresenko will be interesting, if he plays well the FA offers will come from everywhere, if he plays bad he can go away.  Johansson if he comes back will only make less than what he makes now.  Bogo has to go and probably will being that the Defensive rotation for the Wild is going to be the strongest part of the team for a few years.  I'm not talking only about Buium and Jiricek, Iowa has Peart, Spacek, and Lambos.  The Wild also have two or three prospects in the system that could easily fill a Bogo slot.  

    Haight, Bankier, Stramel, Random Finn or Sweed and Hiedt are all able to fill spots. The Wild will have a lot of money next season if they play the kids more. 

    I also think that spending 7 million plus on Gus would be a mistake.  Love the guy and he is a really good goalie.  However, in a league where good goalies are everywhere why spend top dollar on a position that can be filled by two people in your system or a free agent that is looking for a team.   

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This only makes sense as long as you don't examine how incredibly stupid BG and the Wild have been with Kaprizov. With his injury history and point production he isn't any more valuable than Rantanen or Marner. In fact in a 2015 redraft The Athletic had him FIFTH in that draft. 

    Saying nobody will pay more and inflating expectations to a 14 or 15 million dollar deal is INSANE.  He is worth 12 and would have likely signed for 12 or 13 if management hadn't been so stupid.

    Yeah. You save 1.5 million on Rossi but throw away 3 on Kaprizov....

    Hopefully, they are not that stupid.

     

    • Confused 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Saving 3 mil on Kap?  For whom? What "elite" (top 10 quality, nor Parise/Suter level) free agent in their prime ever decided, "You know, I could go to Florida or LA, but MINNESOTA is where I want to go? Rantanen and Marner chos perennial 2nd/3rd round teams like Carolina, Colorado, and Vegas.

    The team needs Kap to even sniff the playoffs, injury risk or not.  If the team as constructed can get anywhere, THEN other high level players might waive clauses or jump here as free agents.

    Edited by Citizen Strife
    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    13 hours ago, 1Brotherbill said:

    I also think that spending 7 million plus on Gus would be a mistake.  Love the guy and he is a really good goalie.  However, in a league where good goalies are everywhere why spend top dollar on a position that can be filled by two people in your system or a free agent that is looking for a team. 

    100% agree.  GUS ranked 7th in league in nhl 26!!!  But it’s a video game P-Polly Pocket…it might be the most impartial goalie ranking out there.  We got GUS off the goalie scrap pile for T-bot (also decent goalie) because bill rage traded him.  If I’m GM I pick up a recycled goalie every couple years to keep the position filled and spend my money on skaters

    Edited by Pewterschmidt
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    If the Wild are looking to get a reasonable deal for a new contract with Gus, it would be wise to get him signed sooner rather than later.  Don't make the same mistake they made with Rossi, since he'll be UFA, he'll hold all the leverage later in the season as long as he's playing decent.  If Gus is bad this year, this season's over.

    Let alone if Wally is just average or stumbles a bit this season, which wouldn't be a surprise for a young goalie in his first real NHL season.  If BG waits and Gus has a great year, Gus would probably seek $8M like Oettinger & Swayman, whether with the Wild or elsewhere, and he could probably get it since the cap increases next season.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    25 minutes ago, 0 Stanley Cups said:

    If Gus is bad this year, this season's over.

    This is why GM’s make the big bucks.  Which GUS do e we get this year?  Top 7 in league Gus OR train wreck new born Gus.  No one can see the future but bill is GM presumably for his high end hockey IQ.  Dumb as a post in every other aspect of life, but high hockey IQ.  I cannot wait for the season to start

    • Confused 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, 0 Stanley Cups said:

    Let alone if Wally is just average or stumbles a bit this season, which wouldn't be a surprise for a young goalie in his first real NHL season.

     
     

    No, it wouldn't be a surprise, but I believe he will play better with a better defense in front of him, just as Gustavsson has.

    And Wallstedt can be average and be just fine as long as Gustavsson plays decent.  Fleury had some moments, but overall he was a fairly average.  Generally the backup goalie is average or slightly below that and about a quarter of the games they play get away from them.  If Wallstedt does the same, it's no different than the norm.

    My main concern is not riding Gustavsson so much or for such long stretches.  He looked tired by the end of the season and Wallstedt will need games more often than Fleury was getting in order to keep progressing.

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    16 minutes ago, Citizen Strife said:

    Sheesh Pewter.  Guerin steal your mail or something?  Bordering on Protec hates Mojo levels there.

    No not a fan.  Been watching the same movie from Guerin for 7 years now, same results.  But P-eterbuilt at least he’s not Fenton…. Carrot top is an improvement over Fenton that’s why he was fired in one year.  At least Fletcher took some swings and didn’t assault the staff.  Yes I guess I’m pining for the Fletcher years.  My fear is that Leo gets wood with the access bill gets in the league to former stars and that alone is enough for us to be talking about bill’s third 5 year plan installment. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    9 hours ago, Citizen Strife said:

    Saving 3 mil on Kap?  For whom? What "elite" (top 10 quality, nor Parise/Suter level) free agent in their prime ever decided, "You know, I could go to Florida or LA, but MINNESOTA is where I want to go? Rantanen and Marner chos perennial 2nd/3rd round teams like Carolina, Colorado, and Vegas.

    The team needs Kap to even sniff the playoffs, injury risk or not.  If the team as constructed can get anywhere, THEN other high level players might waive clauses or jump here as free agents.

    Not saving, throwing away. 

    Lets stick with facts over speculation.

    -Marner and Rantanen are nearly identical comps.  Both signed at 12 million a year.  --With the new collective bargaining agreement only MN can offer 8 years.

    - Of the 20 largest NHL contracts 18 of them resigned with their existing teams.  The only exceptions are Rantanen and Marner.

    Considering all of the above MN should be in a great position to sign Kaprisov without overpaying by 20%.

    Marquee talent is almost never found in free agency.  You have to draft or trade for it.  Three million is the difference between having a Tarasenko or having a Kevin Fiala.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 8/28/2025 at 6:56 AM, Patrick said:

    Yeah. You save 1.5 million on Rossi but throw away 3 on Kaprizov....

    Hopefully, they are not that stupid.

    You don't underpay a player like Rossi and still keep him on a Five year plan .Kaprisov salary is a totally different matter 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...