Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • How Do the Wild Maximize Quinn Hughes?


    Image courtesy of Nick Wosika-Imagn Images
    Luke Sims

    Adding Quinn Hughes, arguably the best defender on the planet, does a lot for a team’s gameplan. So, how should the Minnesota Wild deploy their shiny new blueliner? Well, there are a few ways to look at this.

    Who should the Wild pair Hughes with?

    Hughes finished ninth in the league in ice time during his Norris Trophy-winning season. Brock Faber is also in the top 10 in time on ice over the past two seasons and is no stranger to playing big minutes. 

    Faber is also more of a defensive player. Still, he’s not a bad offensive player, and probably one of the better offensive defensemen the Wild have ever had. Still, relative to Hughes, Faber’s defensive metrics are better. 

    Hughes and Faber are responsible in all areas of the ice, 200-foot players. Faber makes up for what Hughes lacks in defense. Where Faber lacks in offense, Hughes delivers in spades. These two seem like a natural fit to play together, and John Hynes and the Wild coaching staff seem to agree.

    Jonas Brodin would also seem like a natural fit, given his strong reputation as a shutdown defender. The Wild could pair Hughes with a defensive defenseman, as the Edmonton Oilers do with Evan Bouchard and Mattias Ekholm, or as the Colorado Avalanche do with Cale Makar and Devon Toews. However, the luxury of having players like Jared Spurgeon, Brodin, and Faber is that you can create one of the best shutdown pairs by having Spurgeon and Brodin play together on the second pair. 

    Now with injuries, that dream will have to wait. Still, when that top four is assembled, the Wild arguably have the most complete D-core in the NHL. It allows them to slide Jake Middleton down to the third pair, a more natural fit for him. And then give that other spot to Daemon Hunt, Zach Bogosian, or David Jiricek

    In the past, people have been concerned about Hughes’s size. He’s only 5’10”, 185 lbs, but he won the Norris Trophy in 2023-24, and that has not stopped him from being a productive playoff performer. While he’s the sixth smallest active full-time NHL defender in the league, none of that seems to matter because of how good he is with his stick, his edgework, and his intelligence.

    And that’s to say, anyone playing with Hughes is going to play better. There are 0, yes zero, full-time Canucks skaters since 2023-24 who have a sub 50% xGF% at 5v5 when playing with Hughes. That is an asinine stat. Any way you look at it, Hughes is a floor raiser for the players he’s playing with. Suddenly, the third line of Vladimir Tarasenko and Yakov Trenin looks a whole lot better with Hughes as one of the defenseman skating with them.

    How should they deploy him?

    Hughes is going to play a lot, make no mistake about that. Still, how to deploy Hughes is another story. Naturally, he’ll get the most time as the QB1 on the power play for Minnesota, but at 5-on-5 or on the penalty kill, it gets a little more complicated.

    Of his nearly 24 minutes at 5-on-5 against the Boston Bruins on Sunday, Hughes spent nine-and-a-half of those minutes against David Pastrnak, or 40.3% of his ice time. 

    However, Hughes doesn’t typically spend nearly half of his playing time matched up against the other team’s top forward. Of his 26 games with the Canucks this season, Hughes only matched up with the other team’s top forward more than 40% of the minutes a total of six times. And this trend looks even worse when you look at last season's schedule, where it was only 6 times in 68 games.

    The Wild typically play Faber often against the other team's best players. But after adding Hughes, Faber doesn’t have to be the sole offensive contributor for the Wild on the back end. They can also pair Brodin and Spurgeon, freeing the defensive stalwarts to take on the tough matchups and allowing Hughes to take a more aggressive offensive role without as much of a defensive burden.

    We saw the Vancouver Canucks do this with Tyler Myers. They matched him up with the other team's best players more often, freeing up Hughes to do his thing offensively. We’ve seen this in Nashville and in Tampa Bay with guys like Mattias Ekholm covering for Roman Josi and guys like Eric Cernak and Ryan McDonagh covering for Victor Hedman.

    What’s the ideal role for Hughes?

    The Wild lead the league in attempted stretch passes, but aren’t good at completing them. They also lead the league in icings. Well, Hughes leads the league in completed stretch passes this season. We’ve already seen it pay dividends in both of his first two games.

    Check the end of this clip to spring a Tyler Pitlick chance:

    And this viral tweet from Mike Kelly sums it up pretty well:

    Where the Wild lacks, Hughes makes up for with his individual abilities. He’s able to carry the transition game and break the puck out at a level that no other player can match. He’s also a catalyst for zone entries, which was previously a weakness for the Wild.

    The best way to use Hughes is to play him a lot, pair him with whoever the Wild wants, and use him in whatever situation they want. Give him the minutes, give him the matchups, let him control the puck, control the flow of your defense and transition, and you’ll more likely than not see yourself on the winning side of most hockey games.

    With the way he weaponizes the Wild’s defensive core and with the way he elevates everyone around him, the Wild can’t go wrong with playing Hughes and playing him a lot.

    All stats and data via HockeyDB, Evolving Hockey, and Natural Stat Trick unless otherwise noted.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 4
    • Thanks 1

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    9 minutes ago, FredJohnson said:

    Great article, Luke! Thanks for sharing.

    Does anyone know what Jo Bro's injury status is?

    I believe he's day to day. I'm guessing they rested him for Edmonton/Colorado but what the hell do I know?

    • Thanks 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Put him with Jiricek! All gas, no brakes (literally xD)

    But for real, I think putting him with Fabes is best. Its getting Faber to step into the play more too and he's got some underrated offensive chops.

    Real question, to me, is what you do with the rest of them. Brodin-Spurgy would be a great shutdown pair, and I think Middsy-Bogo is a good 3rd pairing, but we also know that a Middsy-Spurgy combo can be great too. And if you put Brodin with Bogo/Jiricek, then those guys can focus on shooting bombs from the blueline more. 

    I suppose Hynes could always just mix and match with the bottom-4 too, depending on who he's going up against. 

    Edited by B1GKappa97
    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    22 minutes ago, B1GKappa97 said:

    I suppose Hynes could always just mix and match with the bottom-4 too, depending on who he's going up against

    Probably this^^^

    Who is healthy...who just needs rest...who needs to sit??

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Along with BK97, I also think Faber is his best partner. Faber can defend 2/3rds of the gaps defensively, but has shown the ability to hit another level with someone who can keep up with him.

    It's one thing to play in structure, and Faber has done that. It's another thing to play with a dynamic partner where you have the ability to keep up and see the game much like the other guy. Structure tends to then be a suggestion rather than a rule. 

    There's still quite a learning curve on both sides. It appears as if Hughes has downshifted a lot, and is trying to play the game within the structure. However, he has game breaking ability and the only other partner to deal with this is Faber + Faber is right handed furthering the partnership. That D pair has extra jump that I think is sustainable. And, both can eat minutes well.

    As far as being a 1 man breakout, I do think this is where Hughes has slowed the most on the PP. They keep trying to do that stupid drop pass thing when Hughes is more than capable of bringing the puck up himself. To date, they are not taking full advantage of the player's strengths, and our special teams coach needs to change this. Let Hughes come up the ice with speed and get some of the other guys to come up with speed with him. Having guys standing at the blueline leaves them flat footed, they need to be moving when Hughes or others get there. 

    With the lack of practice days right now, changing this up is going to be a challenge. It might not be able to be done until after the Olympic break. But, that also gives the coaches time to redesign. This should be a tremendously potent PP, but right now it looks to me like they're spinning their wheels in sand. That is a sign of mentally not knowing what the other is going to do.

    I wouldn't mind tinkering with Faber on PP1, and putting Zuccy on PP2. Kaprizov stays for the full 2 minutes, but I think having Zuccy and Hughes together is redundancy. PP2 lately has been the better unit, mainly because they know each other. 

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...