Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • Expect Marco Rossi To Rebound Soon


    Image courtesy of Jerome Miron - Imagn Images
    Tony Abbott

    No Kirill Kaprizov? No problem.

    At least, that was the case with Marco Rossi for a while. When the Minnesota Wild's superstar winger went down with injury just before Christmas, he left his center in a tricky spot. Rossi was enjoying a true breakout season, with 12 goals and 28 points through 35 games. Those were impressive numbers. Still, how long would they last without Kaprizov's ability to set up and finish golden scoring chances?

    Improbably, Rossi shone even brighter without Kaprizov. From December 27 to February 25, Rossi had nine goals and 22 points in 23 games -- nearly being a point-per-game player. On February 25, the sophomore center was on-pace for a 30-goal, 71-point season.

    But after two months and the injury of power-play presence Joel Eriksson Ek, we finally saw the Wild's losses catch up to Rossi. Starting February 27, he scored only one goal and had five points in 17 games. What happened? Has he struggled with being one of two or three forwards Minnesota can count on for reliable offense? Is he just getting exhausted down the stretch?

    "I think some of the detail things and the focus things can be a little bit better, along with our team," John Hynes told The Athletic on Monday. "I think it’s kind of seeped into [our] game just a tad... like it’s not bad, but there’s a little bit of a missed assignment. It’s just off in those areas."

    However, Rossi showed signs of life against the New York Rangers on Wednesday. There are things to nitpick about his game. He was a minus-two and went 1-for-14 in the faceoff dot. Still, he made an impact offensively. Rossi scored the goal that tied the game at 4-4, ultimately delivering the Wild a point. He also was a consistent offensive threat, launching five shots on goal, his most since December 31. 

    Is there more to come? Looking under the hood, the signs indicate Rossi is getting back on track. 

    Hynes might be noting a lack of details in Rossi's game, but that hasn't stopped him from dictating the game's flow better than his teammates. During Rossi's 17-game slump, he's been Minnesota's best player in controlling the expected goal share (59.6%) at 5-on-5. The Wild are below 50% overall and 44.1% whenever Rossi isn't on the ice at 5-on-5. 

    Rossi was outscored at 5-on-5 (6 to 7) during that stretch. Still, he was well above the Wild's average. Minnesota has scored just 38.9% of the goals when Rossi's not on the ice at 5-on-5. That's hardly surprising, considering the sheer number of injuries on the team. However, it's worth noting that they've had much bigger problems than Rossi.

    Particularly since Rossi has arguably been Minnesota's best player in generating and suppressing offense. Only Marcus Foligno has more on-ice expected goals per hour at 5-on-5 (2.63) than Rossi (2.58). Looking at 5-on-5 defense, Rossi has allowed just 1.75 expected goals per hour, which leads the Wild. 

    That's often while taking on the toughest assignments on the team. In New Jersey on Monday, he faced 11 head-to-head minutes with Nico Hischier. Rossi played the Devils' two-way star to a draw, getting the better of the play. He outscored the hulking Tage Thompson's line 2-0 in over nine 5-on-5 minutes. Rossi outscored Nathan MacKinnon 1-0 in 10-and-a-half head-to-head minutes. You can see a similar story play out in games against Anze Kopitar and Robert Thomas.

    Rossi's biggest problems during this stretch may be related. The biggest is that his on-ice shooting percentage during that 17-game stretch is 5.85%. That's about 30% below the NHL's average of 8.92%, and that trend is probably not going to continue. The other related problem is that Rossi's simply not shooting enough. 

    During his first 58 games, Rossi shot 102 times on 196 attempts (or 1.76 shots on 3.78 attempts per game). In the following 17 games, he took just 20 shots on 40 attempts (1.18 on 2.35 per game). Rossi probably wasn't shooting enough in the first place, and six shots every five games is definitely not enough.

    Rossi's shown in the past two seasons that he is great at getting high-danger chances. It's a big reason why he has an 18.1 shooting percentage this year... and that's not a fluke. His expected goal total (22.2) and actual goals (23) are almost identical. That suggests he's got more to give with his shot, and if he can do this well at close range, it'd probably help his (and the Wild's) cause to let it fly a bit more on mid-range shots.

    The good news is, whatever the reason for this slump is, help is on the way. Kaprizov and Eriksson Ek should be back soon, giving Rossi his superstar winger and a center to support him in handling some of the toughest assignments. Combine Rossi's two-way excellence and Kaprizov's finishing ability, and that's a recipe for success. If Rossi can start heating up in time for the playoffs, that will make things much more interesting for the Wild heading into the first round.

    *Head-to-head data via Natural Stat Trick. All other data via Evolving-Hockey.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 3
    • Thanks 2

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    8 minutes ago, Citizen Strife said:

    I'm simply saying Ottawa is going to overvalue Brady as "their guy" they don't trade for anything other than Kap or a bunch of firsts and Faber.  Faber and Ohgren might not be near enough for a guy that is Ottawa's main scorer.

    Good! So you at least acknowledge the possibility. We come in with an offer, I’m not sure we have to go multiple picks, but I’m fine with Faber, Ohgren and first 

    are you in?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    13 minutes ago, Citizen Strife said:

    Gonna say Brodin, Ohgren, Heidt, and a pick.  Steep, but probably works well enough.

    Faber/Jiricek is Spurgeon insurance being way older than Brodin.

    Ok that’s fine, we are a go!

    finally Citi we agree 

    🍻 

    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    ODC too many people on here overvalue our current players.  Homer bias I call it.  To get Brady it will cost Faber, Ohgren, and Rossi.  I would do that.  If Ottawa doesn’t want to play go to the next team and go to Buffalo and offer Faber, Ohgren, Rossi, and a pick for Thompson and Tuch or Peterka. 
     

    Also find a suitor who will take spurgeons salary and we get a cheap player back then we can find a top 4 D to replace both and jiricek and Zeev can fill the holes.  
     

    Billy has to think outside the box and we need 3 new top 6 player in addition to Yurov. Dont be dumb bill and overpay for Nelson or boeser.  Neither are worth over 4mm at 2-3years max and I like Nelson more than Boeser.   Boeser is a soft floater player. 

    foligno, Hartman Freddie, etc should all be playing 4th line roles on a good team. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 hours ago, OldDutchChip said:

    I’d prefer Seeler as he is a sure thing at what he brings. Stable 3rd pair guy at a very low cost. That gives you more money to aggressively pursue a decent top 4 D

    We've got 3rd pairing defenders covered. Danielson is on an ELC so that would be even more money to aggressively pursue a decent...player. He fits in the young kid's window and could certainly move into the #3C role very comfortably. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 hours ago, OldDutchChip said:

    If Ottawa gets knocked out, I’d wager patriotic Tkachuk wouldn’t oppose a move and Ohgren/Faber package can be marketed well for canadas side.

    Ehlers and Peterka are not in the class that we need. The point is to grab game changers when you can. Tkachuk will bring one more physical player to the top six to balance out skill and physicality. 

    does Faber/Ohgren not get you into a discussion?

    Sadly, I don't think it does. I think CS is right about Rossi needing to be a part of this deal. From Ottawa's perspective, they have a lot of money already tied up on defense. But, a quick look on puckpedia looks like they can afford a Faber in the mix. 

    I would probably start with a Brodin/Rossi offer and see if the phone stays live. I'd also start talking daily with Staios trying to work something out. The impact of B. Tkachuk would be franchising changing. I wouldn't offer up Faber probably for any other player unless McDavid became available. 

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Another option would be to go to the islanders and give them Faber, Oghren, Rossi, Trenin and a pick for Barzal, Lee, Duclair.  We are win now the next 3 years and this greatly helps us.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    27 minutes ago, mnhockeyfan03 said:

    Another option would be to go to the islanders and give them Faber, Oghren, Rossi, Trenin and a pick for Barzal, Lee, Duclair.  We are win now the next 3 years and this greatly helps us.  

    The isle would need two 1sts added to that deal.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 minutes ago, RedLake said:

    The isle would need two 1sts added to that deal.

    Whatever they need give it to them.  We need big changes and 3-4 new top 6 forwards. The only top 6 forwards that should be a lock for us next year are Kap and Boldy.  Zucc should be 3rd line or traded, Ek 3rd line, Rossi traded, Nojo gone, Hartman and Foligno 4th line. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    If Billy got creative could have these lines

    Boldy Barzal  Kap

    Yurov  Lee  Duclair

    Zucc Ek  Nelson (or another FA for 4-5mm)

    foligno  Freddie Hartman 

     

    D lineup 

    Brodin Zeev

    Middleton   FA signing

    FA signing   Jiricek 

     

    could also insert TThompson abd Tuch into there.  Fact is these teams now are winning games with forwards and D that can just stabilize and not flashy.  The good teams done have more than 5-6mm tied up in a D unless they bring huge offensive upside and we have none of those.  Sorry Faber abd spurge aren’t it.   Forwards are way more important.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    46 minutes ago, mnhockeyfan03 said:

    Whatever they need give it to them.  We need big changes and 3-4 new top 6 forwards. The only top 6 forwards that should be a lock for us next year are Kap and Boldy.  Zucc should be 3rd line or traded, Ek 3rd line, Rossi traded, Nojo gone, Hartman and Foligno 4th line. 

    I agree. The bottom six also needs some demo work. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    8 hours ago, mnfaninnc said:

    Sadly, I don't think it does. I think CS is right about Rossi needing to be a part of this deal. From Ottawa's perspective, they have a lot of money already tied up on defense. But, a quick look on puckpedia looks like they can afford a Faber in the mix. 

    I would probably start with a Brodin/Rossi offer and see if the phone stays live. I'd also start talking daily with Staios trying to work something out. The impact of B. Tkachuk would be franchising changing. I wouldn't offer up Faber probably for any other player unless McDavid became available. 

    I wouldn't offer up Faber probably for any other player unless McDavid became available. 
    If OTT to take our offer seriously it does have to be Faber and I’d rather keep Rossi anyway (based on his overall play - would a 5y at 6-6.5 per work? It should)
    Also I can’t agree with this last sentence of yours. You are basically saying Faber is untouchable but he should not be. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    8 hours ago, mnhockeyfan03 said:

    Another option would be to go to the islanders and give them Faber, Oghren, Rossi, Trenin and a pick for Barzal, Lee, Duclair.  We are win now the next 3 years and this greatly helps us.  

    Not a fan of this offer. Islanders would jump on that though. 

    you only include Faber IF the trade creates a better team balance for us and brings an elite partner for Kap (none in that NYI offer is that)

    otherwise you play your hands and wait. Do not trade just to trade- that’s what Billy has been doing.

    Tkachuk is in the same age group as Kaprizov. And is in Tier 2. Kap is Tier 1.

    Perhaps talk to Boston to see if they want to tear it down and offer up Boston own Boldy + Faber for Pasta

    maybe the Canadians are so antiruski that they would send demidov to us for Rossi + Faber

    these 3 are game changer type deals and get us into a competitive window (and may entice Kap to stick around)

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    9 hours ago, OldDutchChip said:

    If OTT to take our offer seriously it does have to be Faber and I’d rather keep Rossi anyway (based on his overall play - would a 5y at 6-6.5 per work? It should)
    Also I can’t agree with this last sentence of yours. You are basically saying Faber is untouchable but he should not be. 

    Misunderstanding, I meant offer up Faber for anyone besides B. Tkachuk in response to the suggestion of if Ottawa says no we move on to Buffalo with Faber. McD is probably the only other player I would offer Faber for besides a Tkachuk.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    37 minutes ago, mnfaninnc said:

    Misunderstanding, I meant offer up Faber for anyone besides B. Tkachuk in response to the suggestion of if Ottawa says no we move on to Buffalo with Faber. McD is probably the only other player I would offer Faber for besides a Tkachuk.

    I think you offer Faber for Tkachuk, Nylander, Pasta, Demidov, Bedard? or Elias, perhaps Guentzel? Those I see as a chance 🙂 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    9 hours ago, RedLake said:

    Just had a dream Crotty got a hattie against Dallas and had 20mins in fighting penalties.

    Keep dreamin.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 4/5/2025 at 12:26 PM, OldDutchChip said:

    Good! So you at least acknowledge the possibility. We come in with an offer, I’m not sure we have to go multiple picks, but I’m fine with Faber, Ohgren and first 

    are you in?

    Found this article the other day while searching if there were any rumors about B. Tkachuk being available.  Not sure how true it is, but the offer for him was pretty substantial.  

    Brady Tkachuk Rumors: St. Louis Blues Go All-In? Wild Offseason Trade Chatter! - NHL Trade Rumors

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, SkolWild73 said:

    Found this article the other day while searching if there were any rumors about B. Tkachuk being available.  Not sure how true it is, but the offer for him was pretty substantial.  

    Brady Tkachuk Rumors: St. Louis Blues Go All-In? Wild Offseason Trade Chatter! - NHL Trade Rumors

     

    High price but I think that is getting closer to what Ottawa would want if he was available. I doubt the wild would match that. Also, isn't he from the St Louis area?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 4/5/2025 at 1:10 AM, Need4speed99 said:

    Well, just waiting for the bg fan bois to tell us he sucks....

    He needs to do better in a couple aspects( face off wins being the biggest) but overall, why trade him? Why?

    I don’t think anyone thinks he “sucks”. But there is a belief of him being overhyped and under performing. He will develop in the future, sure. But as a complementary role. 
     

    The issue at hand are those aspects he needs to do better at aren’t small things. Centers need to win faceoffs. Non- negotiable, you can’t win faceoffs at the 50% mark you’re bad. The team has needed talent at the center position for many years. Nothing has been done, no assets acquired to do that. Hard to win games and score points when you have to fight to get possession all the time. 
     

    Next, is play making ability. You need a guy to score goals and control play with physicality and presence. Rossi is a hard working player with many good qualities. Physical presence is not one of them. He does have moments when his finesse comes to light. But it’s not as often as you’d like to see. He’s not the kind of player other teams fear seeing on the fore check or out in front of the net. 
     

    Taking all this into account he has some large areas for growth to be elevated in the line ups and around higher caliber players. But to do so requires him to be the kind of player that’s value added like consistently winning faceoffs. And not a negative, or at best, a net neutral. 
     

    From what I’ve been hearing his camp wants  a significant pay raise. I don’t think he’ll be worth what they’re asking. Ask yourself this, is he better than Ek or Boldy? The numbers being thrown around are equal to or north of their contracts. If we have the ability to get an actual 1/2C that has decent speed, hands, and wins faceoffs, ya, you trade him. 
     

    Also, not a Billy G fan. His unnecessary overpaying of bottom 6 players over the years is why this team is lacking in depth. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 4/7/2025 at 8:25 PM, Neutral Zone Dangles said:

    I don’t think anyone thinks he “sucks”. But there is a belief of him being overhyped and under performing. He will develop in the future, sure. But as a complementary role. 
     

    The issue at hand are those aspects he needs to do better at aren’t small things. Centers need to win faceoffs. Non- negotiable, you can’t win faceoffs at the 50% mark you’re bad. The team has needed talent at the center position for many years. Nothing has been done, no assets acquired to do that. Hard to win games and score points when you have to fight to get possession all the time. 
     

    Next, is play making ability. You need a guy to score goals and control play with physicality and presence. Rossi is a hard working player with many good qualities. Physical presence is not one of them. He does have moments when his finesse comes to light. But it’s not as often as you’d like to see. He’s not the kind of player other teams fear seeing on the fore check or out in front of the net. 
     

    Taking all this into account he has some large areas for growth to be elevated in the line ups and around higher caliber players. But to do so requires him to be the kind of player that’s value added like consistently winning faceoffs. And not a negative, or at best, a net neutral. 
     

    From what I’ve been hearing his camp wants  a significant pay raise. I don’t think he’ll be worth what they’re asking. Ask yourself this, is he better than Ek or Boldy? The numbers being thrown around are equal to or north of their contracts. If we have the ability to get an actual 1/2C that has decent speed, hands, and wins faceoffs, ya, you trade him. 
     

    Also, not a Billy G fan. His unnecessary overpaying of bottom 6 players over the years is why this team is lacking in depth. 

    So if his camp is asking for the moon, not worth it. But I'm pretty sure most teams and agents can meet in the middle... more importantly, on young up and comers. How high is he asking, exactly? 

    Also not all centers use physicality to win, plenty use skill. He was a top 5 rated prospect for a reason. 

    Wild already gave up on marat, you can't just get centers. They don't have the prospects or cash to get someone better.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...