Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • Even On A Tryout, The Jack Johnson Signing Misses the Mark


    Image courtesy of David Berding-Imagn Images
    Tony Abbott

    There's an adage in sports that there's no such thing as a bad one-year contract. It's generally one to which I subscribe. If you make a mistake, but it's just for a year, then you just wait it out. Bury that contract, trade it somewhere else, whatever. It's only one year.

    To go a step further, there can't be such a thing as a bad PTO. A Player Tryout is just that -- a try-out. If it doesn't work out, then you've just spent whatever it costs to bring someone to training camp. That's not even against the salary cap! 

    But the Minnesota Wild are perhaps looking to push this adage to the absolute limit. The team signed Jack Johnson to a PTO on Monday, looking to provide insurance for a team that traded Declan Chisholm, hasn't brought back free agent Jon Merrill, and might be missing Jonas Brodin to start the season. Without Brodin, the Wild's depth chart on the left side is Jake Middleton, followed by rookies Zeev Buium and Carson Lambos. It makes sense to shore up that depth.

    Is Johnson the player to do that, though? The former third-overall pick -- way back in 2005 -- has two major things going against him. For one, there's the fact that he was drafted back in 2005. Granted, we still have some 2005 draftees kicking around. Sidney Crosby, Anze Kopitar, and Kris Letang remain effective, perennial All-Star talents.

    That's where we go to the crux of the problem with Johnson. He's not just pushing 40, but the 38-year-old is one of the oldest players in the NHL and has a legitimate claim to being the worst player of the Analytics Era.

    The NHL introduced the Real Time Scoring System (RTSS) for the 2007-08 season, which means we have extensive data on all but five games of Johnson's career. Since the dawn of analytics, Johnson has been worth an astounding minus-11.1 points in the standings, per Evolving-Hockey's Standings Points Above Replacement (SPAR).

    That's not a minority opinion. Their xSPAR model, based heavily on Emmanuel Perry's research, has Johnson as the worst defenseman over that time (minus-15.6 xSPAR), second to only Gregory Campbell for the title of Worst NHLer of the Analytics Era.

    Johnson has the veteran presence, is a beloved teammate, and got a Stanley Cup ring with the Colorado Avalanche in 2021-22. The Avs liked him enough to bring him back at the trade deadline the following season, despite performing poorly with the Chicago Blackhawks up to that point. Those are no doubt things that Bill Guerin values, but how can it be enough to make up for the lack of on-ice performance?

    Or, more pointedly, why would the Wild choose to bring in Johnson over Merrill in this scenario? As much flak as Merrill got from fans for his offensive limitations, his defense has been solid in all four years in Minnesota. We're in the middle of August now, and that suggests that Merrill might sign a PTO somewhere. Why not here?

    Even if Merrill would be more willing to accept a PTO somewhere else than in Minnesota, a one-year deal with Merrill wouldn't be a terrible deal, either. Something around Marcus Johansson's $800K contract would make almost no impact on the Wild's salary cap or roster.

    If it works out, then great, they have a reliable seventh defenseman for the season. If it doesn't, or someone like Lambos forces their way onto the roster, Merrill can go to Des Moines. Either a team would claim him off waivers, or he can play in the AHL without costing Minnesota a cent against the cap.

    Having Johnson in on a PTO suggests that the Wild think he can help Minnesota win games, and that's almost certainly not true. Between his work at even-strength and the penalty kill, Johnson posted the sixth-worst defensive Goals Above Replacement in the league, in just 41 games. The nicest thing you can say about his game over the last decade is that he doesn't put his team on the penalty kill too often. It's not nothing, unless you combine it with the rest of his game. Then, it's less than nothing.

    image.png

    Signing Johnson, even on a tryout, is another example of Guerin's tendency to be attracted to some of the NHL's worst players. During his tenure as Wild general manager, he's signed, claimed, or traded for...

    • Jack Johnson (minus-11.1 SPAR, worst in NHL since 2007-08)
    • Nic Deslauriers (minus-10.9 SPAR, tied second-worst)
    • Ryan Reaves (minus-4.6 SPAR, tied 50th-worst)
    • Rem Pitlick (minus-4.5 SPAR, tied 55th-worst)
    • Zach Bogosian (minus-3.3 SPAR, tied 99th-worst)

    Signing five of the 100 worst players in an 18-year span should be a pretty notorious achievement in itself. It gets worse, though. 60 of the 106 players who were in the bottom-100 (including those who tied for 99th) were out of the NHL for Guerin's entire time as GM. So, we're talking about signing five of the 50 worst players in the NHL during his time. That's... a lot.

    The Wild's immediate future depends on their talent evaluation, and they have taken (or may be about to take) big risks that will succeed or fail based on their ability to judge their players properly. Trading a boatload of draft capital, David Jiříček stands out as a major one. If the Wild trade Marco Rossi later this summer, they'd better be right about Rossi's future production and Danila Yurov's ability to replace their 60-point center. 

    It's not a good time to sow doubt in the Wild's ability to identify what players can help win games properly. Even on a PTO, entertaining a Minnesota roster that includes Johnson shows a troubling lack of judgment from the front office. It's easy for the Wild to avoid stepping on a rake here, but at the same time, it's better not to leave a rake in your yard to step on in the first place.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    How can you complain about Johnson when CBJ liked him better than they liked Jiricek. We gave CBJ a haul for Jiricek and got Johnson for nothing. What could possibly go wrong?

     

     

     

     

    • Like 1
    • Haha 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    How about we offer Johnson back to CBJ for Voronkov? 😉for Pewter

    I really think that Lambos will beat him out. But what does this say about Peart? There was no doubt Peart wasn't close to ready. Or what about Kiersted? He's supposed to be better competition for Lambos. 

    From Johnson's perspective, he wants to show others he's still got enough game to remain in the N. I see it as an extra TC body, and that he doesn't make the team.

    Move on, nothing to see here.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I seriously doubt the Wild are thinking that Jack Johnson is here to play opening day.  They are thinking that this is competition.  Competition to push the other defenders not named Faber, Spurgeon, Brodin, Middleton to actually play in training camp.  You would assume that no mater how Buium plays in camp he will be on the opening day roster.  That leaves two solid spots, and a third with Brodin probably not starting the season, open for someone to step in.  Bogo will be on the roster weather he plays or not is up to Lambos, Jiricek, Spacek, Masters, etc. to step up and make the roster in St. Paul.

    If nobody steps up in camp they could always fall back on Jack Johnson, and god forbid Jon Merrill .

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, 1Brotherbill said:

    I seriously doubt the Wild are thinking that Jack Johnson is here to play opening day.

    I hope you're right, but as Tony highlights. Billy G. appears to have a knack for signing "great teammates" that are terrible at actual hockey.  Even if he's only a "roadblock" for Buium / Jiricek / Lambos to clear, it's an awfully low one.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This is the article I've been waiting for.  I've disagreed with Tony on his assessments of Bogo and using the SPAR number to call him the absolute worst player in hockey.

    As a good practitioner of stats, I would like to take this opportunity  to use those same stats to YELL from the rooftops, HOLY FLIPING COW POOP HIS SPAR IS FOUR TIMES WORSE THAN BOGO!?!?!

    Just to be a playoff bubble team WITH JJ you'd have to start with a Presidents Cup contending team, then add him to your roster.

    Maybe it's just softening the blow for me to say ridiculous things like 'Well, Ryan Suter is available, he sure looks like a great option compared to Jack Johnson'

    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, MrCheatachu said:

    'Well, Ryan Suter is available, he sure looks like a great option compared to Jack Johnson'

    I posted something similar a couple months ago. GMBG makes a call to the NHL and asks if Suter's buyout hit disappears if he is under contract with the Wild. If so, kiss and make up with Suter and problem solved for free. I would rather see Suter cross checking teams while wearing a Wild sweater than cross checking us in a different team's jersey.

    Back to Jack Johnson. Read about this guy's financial problems and I think it is easy to understand Guerin's mindset. He's putting some cash into a guy's pocket to help him out. Not to sound cold-hearted but the Wild can't afford charity cases right now.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    20 hours ago, ArizonaWildFan said:

    Back to Jack Johnson. Read about this guy's financial problems and I think it is easy to understand Guerin's mindset. He's putting some cash into a guy's pocket to help him out. Not to sound cold-hearted but the Wild can't afford charity cases right now.

    I think you are probably right on this one. Billy has a lot of friends and he is very loyal to them. I think some of the moves he makes are just to help somebody out, to pay back a favor, or to gain a favor in the future. I still believe that a lot more goes on behind closed doors between the GM's, under the full purview of the NHL.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    You shouldn’t have faith in prospects. Prospects should prove their mettle on the ice, during camp. Johnson is the optimal insurance policy heading into camp to buttress the team against unproven prospects and increasingly fragile veterans (cough:Borodin and Spurgeon).  There’s no downside to Johnson as a PTO, unless you were planning on asking his folks for financial advice.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...