Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • Dylan Cozens Would Be A Potential Minefield For the Wild


    Image courtesy of Nick Wosika - Imagn Images
    Tony Abbott

    Very suddenly, it seems like the Minnesota Wild could have a little bit of wiggle room at the trade deadline. If Joel Eriksson Ek's injury keeps him out until the end of the regular season, the Wild could take advantage of LTIR and free up $5.25 million of cap space. That would change things from the status quo, where Minnesota is virtually unable to make a trade, to a scenario where the Wild could be actual players.

    As a result, The Athletic is daring to speculate about the Wild landing a center. You already know one of the names: native Minnesotan Brock Nelson. The second name is, at least on paper, much more intriguing.

    Dylan Cozens of the Buffalo Sabres.

    It's easy to see why the Wild would be interested in The Workhorse From Whitehorse. He's 24-years-old, and right-shot centermen who've scored 30 goals are in short supply. Since the 2014-15 season, there are only 17 players who've scored 30 goals and won 500 faceoffs in a season. Only 13 of them are active. It also doesn't hurt that Cozens has the kind of frame (6-foot-3, 207 pounds) the Wild seem to covet down the middle.

    It's easy to see Cozens as a cornerstone for a franchise's future. However, a deeper look reveals that Cozens is a substantial risk for any potential suitor -- and that's being generous.

    The big thing to consider with any breakout season is whether it's sustainable. Is the new success born from genuine growth from a player, or is there some smoke-and-mirrors happening?

    At first glance, Cozens' 2022-23 season seems like a breakthrough. He shot 14.7%, which is a touch high. However, he scored 31 goals on nearly 27 expected goals, which doesn't seem outrageous by any means. Worst-case scenario, Cozens seemed ready to settle into the 25- to 30-goal range, which is terrific for a center.

    Since then, Cozens has just 29 goals in 136 games -- an 18-goal 82-game pace. The thing is, you'd expect to see a significant drop in expected goals, but that's not entirely accurate. Last year's 18 goals came from 23.6 expected goals. This season, he's on pace for 16 goals on 21.9 expected. The chances are down, sure, but not back-to-back-sub-20-goal seasons down.

    Looking at his young career, it seems like Cozens might not be a particularly talented shooter. That 14.7% from his 31-goal season is a definite outlier. Take out that season, and his career shooting percentage drops from 10.1% -- about league-average -- to 8.4%, which is pretty abysmal. For context, fourth-line grinder Brandon Duhaime has a career 8.2 shooting percentage.

    It's important to note that talented players sometimes take a while to flip a switch and get higher-percentage shots. In Nathan MacKinnon's first four seasons, he only shot 8.1%, and he's shot 11.1% with one of the highest shot volumes in the NHL ever since.

    Twenty-four isn't too old for the light to come on, either. Joel Eriksson Ek shot an absurdly low 6.8% through his age-23 season, which is lower than, for example, Jared Spurgeon's career mark. But once he figured to get to the net, his game flourished, and his shooting percentage has been at 10.1 ever since.

    Maybe Cozens just needs to have something click. But even if that's the case, there are still two major red flags for the young center.

    The most obvious hole is his defense, which is close to the bottom of the barrel. According to Evolving-Hockey's Goals Above Replacement metric, 432 forwards have played 1000-plus minutes in the past three seasons, and Cozens' defensive impact per minute ranks 402nd. Cozens is a dead-ringer defensively for Cole Caufield, except that Caufield has at least scored 33.7 goals per 82 games over his career. 

    Cozens has scored 19 goals for every 82 games since joining the NHL.

    image.png

    And look, you don't have to care about defense 100%. If you're talking about someone like Caufield or Kyle Connor, you'll take the good with the bad. Their offensive prowess -- particularly on the power play -- helps coaches and fans live much happier with any defensive lapses on their own end. If Cozens isn't a stout two-way guy, he can still be a big, right-shot, goal-scoring threat down the middle. Eriksson Ek can handle the defense and let Cozens do his thing.

    The problem here is that Cozens isn't some major power play threat. In fact, he's one of the least productive forwards in the NHL on the power play.

    Over Cozens' four full NHL seasons, he's logged 670 minutes on the power play. He's one of 145 forwards who have 500-plus minutes during that time. Cozens ranks 133rd in goals per hour (0.99) and 122nd in points per hour (3.58). That's atrocious. There isn't a meaningful distinction between Cozens' numbers and Marcus Johansson's power play stats over that same time (0.92 G/60; 3.70 P/60).

    Again, Cozens is young enough that you can guess he'll have some room to grow after a change of scenery -- but how much are we talking about?

    Cozens is making $7.1 million per season, which will look increasingly better as the cap increases. Still, the player has to perform, especially because taking on someone like Cozens will surely cost a top prospect. I could potentially be the de facto "Christmas Morning" addition, with a trade taking the place of free agency. If the Wild get Cozens, they might not be able to do anything else, at least not without trading a more productive player like Matt Boldy or Marco Rossi.

    Maybe the Wild would be inclined to roll the dice on Cozens. There are absolutely upsides to such a move. Getting a player at this stage in their career is better than getting an older player with similar defensive warts (looking at Brock Boeser, perhaps).

    Cozens' ability to play the pivot is attractive, but those red flags are bright. If a change of scenery isn't the missing piece to unlock a new level of skill from Cozens, the Wild might be stuck with another half-decade-long albatross in his contract.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 4
    • Thanks 2

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    Braden schenn makes more sense than cozens. He’s a proven playoff warrior and winner. Cozens is not. If they think they’re going to be contenders next year than they need playoff players.  Schenn could move anywhere in the lineup and in time settle in to 3 rd line center for less money and less risk . Yeah he’s getting older but he has that desire to win.  So if they are going to waste assets on cozens I’d rather see it go to getting schenn instead. Less money shorter contract. 

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The fact that Buffalo fans/GM want a "scoring" forward at 24 years old traded off their team is also a glaring red flag. Wild will not be interested. Might be interested in a low draft pick to rent Zucker for the remainder of this season though.

    Edited by Imyourhuckleberry
    added Zucker comment
    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Like I said yesterday, high risk, high reward, but the high reward is probably less than 25 percent.  The only thing about it that I can find a positive is the players that have left Buffalo and thrived in Eichel and Reinhart.  Cloud lightning strike thrice?  Of course, I would say Eichel and Reinhart had less red flags, with Eichels only being his injury. 

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Thanks for the in-depth article Tony! Saw his name come up and was really intrigued because of his size and potential offensive upside but didn’t know the underlying issues.
     

    Admittedly, I don’t make it a point to watch Buffalo games unless they’re playing the Wild. 

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Sounds like he can’t shoot very well. Could that skill be improved upon? I’d think it could be. I mean I see kids practicing all the time. Kevin Fiala’s Becoming LA , I mean Wild episode shows him regularly practicing one timers during the offseason. Don’t golfers hit the range daily? If this kid can bring value and play a role buying low might be worth the risk. Ek has improved every single year. Put the kid’s locker next to his and start a career revitalize program. Included in the program is a mandatory NO No trade clause. 

    Edited by Burnt Toast
    Spelling
    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 hours ago, Burnt Toast said:

    Sounds like he can’t shoot very well. Could that skill be improved upon? I’d think it could be. I mean I see kids practicing all the time. Kevin Fiala’s Becoming LA , I mean Wild episode shows him regularly practicing one timers during the offseason. Don’t golfers hit the range daily? If this kid can bring value and play a role buying low might be worth the risk. Ek has improved every single year. Put the kid’s locker next to his and start a career revitalize program. Included in the program is a mandatory NO No trade clause. 

    He’s already scored 31 goals in a season and that was a couple years ago. He’s only 24. The kid can shoot and is a good player but Buffalo is pretty bad at developing players.

    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    20 hours ago, Will D. Ness said:

    Cozens is soft.  I would rather go with Nelson.

    Cozens is 24 years old and has scored 31 goals when he was 22-23 yrs old. 
    Brock N is 33 yrs old. I’d much rather have cozens because he isn’t a finished product yet. Buffalo is a dumpster fire at development. Imagine what he could do on a team that is run better. Cozens isn’t really soft either. The guy loves to skate around and hit too but doesn’t fight.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    22 hours ago, Dean said:

    Braden schenn makes more sense than cozens. He’s a proven playoff warrior and winner. Cozens is not. If they think they’re going to be contenders next year than they need playoff players.  Schenn could move anywhere in the lineup and in time settle in to 3 rd line center for less money and less risk . Yeah he’s getting older but he has that desire to win.  So if they are going to waste assets on cozens I’d rather see it go to getting schenn instead. Less money shorter contract. 

    Would you rather have a 33 yr old schenn who’s in the down swing of his career or a 24 yr old Cozens who scored 31 goals when he was 22/23 yrs old? Cozens will be entering his prime points potential in a yr or two and Schenn will be retiring or severely declining in about 3 years.

    we aren’t winning a cup this year and we don’t need this team to get older. We need players who are going to take positions we need or take positions over from aging players. Need to have a little foresight.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    22 hours ago, GuntChuck said:

    His flags are about as red as Boeser's. Massively red. Stay away. Tuch or Thompson are the only forwards anyone should want from Buf.

    Not true. Peterka, Quinn and Kulick are going to be very good players. Bensen too

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    NoNo to Toronto for future considerations, Folingo to Dallas for a 3rd round pick, Trenin to Edmonton for a 3rd rounder. Gus to the oilers for a 1st and 3rd round pick.

    • Confused 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    10 hours ago, RedLake said:

    Kaprizov Rossi for Tuch, Cozens, and Benson.

    I can’t tell if you are shit posting or if you’re serious..

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    So, lets look at the piece and where it would fit.  He is a big center, which is desirable.  If the Wild happen to keep Rossi in this trade they would have Ek, Rossi, then this guy.  Would he be better than Hartman or Freddy?  I would think he would be.  I don't take a lot of value of the stats being that he plays for Buffalo.  Often they seem like they want to be down by three goals at puck drop.  So, if it is available with the Wild keeping Rossi I would do it. 

    Now the reality of the situation.  Since everyone is going to have money this off season.  The FA market is going to be weak.  Even though the Wild have more money than most teams everyone has a 10 million dollar pool to pull from.  With that all the FA will be asking for top dollar.  I doubt Minnesota will land one of the top FA.  In fact if Rossi doesn't sign an extension before July 1st I bet he is gone.  Because a 23 year old center who can score near a point per game is well worth a 1st round pick and a 3rd.  So, Cozens under contract on the Wild when they potentially loose Rossi is very appealing now.

    This offseason is going to be stressful for the franchise. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I briefly saw Cozens this past weekend vs. the Canes. Kotkaniemi destroyed him in a fight. Kotkaniemi is not a fighter. 

    At $7.1m, this looks like a mistake signing by Buffalo. Yes, Cozens could figure it out, but if we were to take on such a project that had significant term left on his deal, I would suggest that a large retention of cap has to come with it. Cozens currently looks like a $4.5-5m player. 

    Does Buffalo have any locker room problems with this player? I haven't heard anything. So, could it be that Buffalo has not insisted that he play a 2-way game, be responsible defensively and play within structure? Maybe.

    Cozens is currently tied for last on the Sabres in +/- which would suggest that he is poor defensively considering the Sabres are a poor defensive team. The other guy: Jack Quinn who Kalisha had touted to come over in a blockbuster including Boldy. 

    Tony's right on target here, a hard pass on Cozens for me.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...