Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • Does Vladimir Tarasenko Have Any Gas Left In the Tank?


    Image courtesy of Matt Blewett - Imagn Images
    Tony Abbott

    Before diving into Vladimir Tarasenko's game, it must be said up top:

    There's no such thing as a bad one-year deal.

    The Minnesota Wild acquired Tarasenko from the Detroit Red Wings on Monday in a cap dump trade where they gave up nothing. In a league where few teams are actually against the salary cap, the "Get a player for nothing" market is rapidly dying. Still, Minnesota managed to do just that for a team that had $15 million of wiggle room heading into free agency. For this, they'll get a former six-time 30-goal scorer for one year, $4.75 million.

    Granted, the days of Tarasenko being one of the most feared scorers in the NHL are behind him. Still, we're gonna see way dumber contracts dished out once free agency opens tomorrow. It's a nifty bit of work by Bill Guerin and his front office.

    But making a good-looking move in the summer is one thing. Now Tarasenko has to actually play, and his presence puts Minnesota in a spot where they don't have to make a move to acquire a scoring winger tomorrow... at least on paper.

    Long term, this is good news for Minnesota. Brock Boeser would be intriguing on a three- or four-year deal. Six or seven years would probably be asking for trouble. The Wild are in a position where they can either let a Boeser deal come to them or turn down an unfavorable deal, knowing Tarasenko sets a certain floor.

    But, where is that floor? Last year, Tarasenko scored just 11 goals and 33 points for the Red Wings. His skating took a dive last year, and he's always relied on his shot. That's usually not a recipe for aging super well, and given that Tarasenko is 33, that's kind of a red flag.

    Still, Tarasenko is just one year removed from scoring 23 goals and 55 points for the Ottawa Senators and Florida Panthers. The run in Florida is especially encouraging. He played 43 games (regular season and playoffs), scoring 11 goals and 23 points with bottom-six minutes. That's not bad. Neither is winning a Stanley Cup.

    The Wild aren't the Panthers, though, and Tarasenko isn't starting the season in the bottom-six. Minnesota seems to have him penciled into the second line, and that's likely going to come with about 16 to 17 minutes per night. The last two teams that had him in that role had an 81-point season (2022-23 St. Louis Blues) and a 78-point season (2023-24 Ottawa). That's got to be a concern.

    Not that playing Tarasenko under 15 minutes a night helped the 86-point Red Wings too much last season. So, let's look into why Tarasenko flopped in Detroit and how the Wild might be able to avoid a similar fate.

    At first blush, it seems like Tarasenko had an awkward fit with his linemates, playing about half the season with J.T. Compher and Jonatan Berggren. Both players have some skill, but they didn't complement Tarasenko's abilities at this stage of his career. Neither Compher nor Berggren is a terrific puck-carriers, per Corey Sznajder's All Three Zones tracking project. While Tarasenko used to be strong in the role in his St. Louis days, he's no longer able to be that go-to zone entry guy.

    No clean zone entries means few attempts on the rush, which has generally been where Tarasenko has been productive throughout the years. When he put up 52 points two seasons ago, he had entry wizard Tim Stützle riding shotgun with him in Ottawa, and Sasha Barkov carrying in pucks in Florida.

    The bad news is, the only elite puck-carriers the Wild have are Kirill Kaprizov and Marcus Johansson. There's only one Kaprizov, and a big reason the Wild are trading for Tarasenko in the first place is to keep Johansson firmly in the bottom-six. If Tarasenko is on the second line, either Marco Rossi is going to have to embrace a puck-carrying role that he deferred to Kaprizov last season, or Matt Boldy is going to have to get a touch better at entering the zone cleanly.

    If the Wild can find someone to serve as Tarasenko's caddy and set-up man, he can still do some damage in the offensive zone. Even with the Red Wings last year, All Three Zones had him as above-average in both generating and facilitating scoring chances. That's something the Wild badly need, because they had few dual-threat players last season.

    image.png

    The card for Tarasenko partially obscures Ryan Hartman (who was above-average at both, but skewed towards Scoring Chance Assists) and Kaprizov (average at Scoring Chances, elite at Scoring Chance Assists). Besides those two, only Boldy, Rossi, and Vinnie Hinostroza were average or better at both aspects of offense for Minnesota last season.

    That hints at Tarasenko having use on the second line, but that won't be the ideal outcome for Minnesota. At least, not by the end of the year.

    Tarasenko hasn't been a stout defender for about a decade, and his defensive game has cratered over the past four years. He might still have some offense left in him, but he'll give some on the back end, particularly if he's out and ready to be exploited for 16 minutes a night. The ideal situation is that Tarasenko eventually settles into the lineup on a scoring third line. Perhaps even a fourth-line that gets sheltered minutes in the offensive zone to maximize opportunities at 5-on-5.

    So Tarasenko might not be a great addition as a second-line solution, but that's not his value to the Wild. What Tarasenko does is buy Minnesota time. If Öhgren and Yurov aren't ready for a second-line role to begin the season, the Wild don't have to force it. They can get their feet wet on the third line, and hopefully be ready to swap places with Tarasenko by January or so.

    And if their prospects aren't ready to make that jump, Minnesota can turn to the trade market at the deadline. Unlike now, there will be teams who are resigned to finishing in the basement around March. Even if top-tier players aren't available, the Wild can be in on some pending UFA forward to give them a boost heading into the playoffs.

    That's a lot better than backing up a Brinks truck for Boeser and hoping he can be their big fish solution for the next seven seasons. Tarasenko might not give the Wild a long-term solution, but he represents a floor that the Wild's second line isn't going beneath, no matter what. Even if he can only thrive in a depth role at his age, Tarasenko is more than worth having around at his price, for his term, and for the low, low cost of nothing via trade.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 6
    • Thanks 1

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

     Nice article Tony.  Looking at our cap space and assuming we sign Rossi at under 7M, we have a little bit of money for another depth center.  Since Florida resigned everyone, they have just over 1M to sign 5 players.  They are going to have to move someone.  Anyone think there is a chance they would move on from Lundell? Of all their players without clauses, he would clear the most cap space, unless they are planning on trading Ekblad since it doesn’t look like he has any clauses.  Otherwise, Rodriguez might be available, but he doesn’t clear enough space for them.

    Edited by SkolWild73
    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think the Tarasenko trade could be a good one.  He’s on a prove it deal this year and has a chance to play with good players.  He still has a good shot.  I hope tomorrow we sign Kap to a 3x$12-13mm contract.  Hopefully not longer and not more money.  If he wants to win we need the cap space. Also I hope we go after Kuznetsov, Christian Dvorak and Nico Sturm.  All 3 of these guys could be had for under $8mm total together.  We will then have center depth.  Let Rossi walk and get offer sheet package and then can use those picks to trade for a big fish at trade deadline. These would be our lines if my wish list comes true.  

    Kaprisov Kuznetsov Tarasenko 

    Boldy  Ek  Yurov

    Zucc Dvorak Hartman

    Foligno Sturm Trenin

     

    Extras Ohgren and Nojo

     

    Middleton Faber

    Brodin Jiricek

    Zeev Spurgeon 

     

     

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Given that this is only a one year deal, I am OK with Guering taking a gamble on Tarasenko. If he has a good year, then you can trade him for something at the deadline, otherwise he is gone after the year is over.

    The Wild don't need to waste money on on bad deals for aging players or overhyped free agents, so this should hopefully avoid bad free agent deals.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The hope I have is Yurov and Ohgren still getting their chances on the team.  A high priced free agent like a Boeser or Ehlers is going to lock down a spot no questions asked.  Tarasenko "might" just like Mojo did. The moves Guerin made moving Gaudreau off the roster and decreasing Mojo's salary is he wants Yurov to maybe make the team at 3C (as I have said he should).  Rossi should be signed at some point to make that even more obvious.  Ohgren at 4th line or 13th forward isn't "great, but maybe he finally sticks this season.

    Maybe one of the rookies is the guy they sign someday to a crazy contract.  I checked and it looks like Jiricek's ELC is first.  Who knows what this team will be with youth infused at the bottom of all areas.  

    And those first line guys aren't out there...yet.  Guerin saw everyone sign elsewhere and played it safe.  

    I'm not happy a 30-pt guy is what the Wild are left with.  But 3-4 months of it to wait out other teams is easier than 7-8 years of a potential mistake.  If he sucks, so what?

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, mnhockeyfan03 said:

    I think the Tarasenko trade could be a good one.  He’s on a prove it deal this year and has a chance to play with good players.  He still has a good shot.  I hope tomorrow we sign Kap to a 3x$12-13mm contract

    I'm hoping they sign Kaprizov for 7 years at $13,857,144 per season, or $97M.

    $97M for KK97. Seems reasonable.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...