Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • Does the NHL Have A Sun Belt Issue?


    Tom Schreier

    Former Blockbuster magnate Wayne Huizenga brought hockey to South Florida in 1993 as the first owner of the expansion Florida Panthers. He initially wanted to call them the Block Busters. 

    Instead, they adapted Netflix colors and outlasted Huizenga’s video rental chain.

    The Panthers were almost the Vegas Golden Knights of the ’90s. They outsmarted their competition in the expansion draft and reached the Stanley Cup Final in 1996.

    “They used to refer to themselves as castoffs,” said Michael Russo, who covered the Panthers before becoming a Minnesota Wild beat writer. “The Panthers essentially drafted the core for their Cup run through that expansion draft and then they made a lot of shrewd moves behind the scenes to gobble up draft picks.”

    The Quebec Nordiques relocated after the 1995 season, became the Colorado Avalanche, and swept the Panthers in the 1996 Stanley Cup Finals. It was the beginning of an Avs dynasty. They made the playoffs during their first ten seasons and won the Cup again in 2000-01.

    However, Florida made the playoffs twice in the next four years, then went ten seasons without making the postseason from 2000-01 to 2010-11. However, the Panthers reached the Stanley Cup Final three years ago and became repeat champions this year. 

    They are the first back-to-back Stanley Cup champions since the Tampa Bay Lightning won in 2020 and 2021, meaning four of the past six Cup winners have come from Florida. Meanwhile, Canada hasn’t won a Stanley Cup since the Montreal Canadiens beat the Los Angeles Kings in 1994.

    The 1996 Stanley Cup Finals symbolized the NHL’s shift from traditional hockey markets to larger American cities. The Edmonton Oilers had traded Wayne Gretzky to the Los Angeles Kings in 1988, signaling hockey’s tectonic shift from smaller northern markets to large, warm-weather cities. 

    In the 1990s, the NHL left hockey-crazy locals to chase corporate dollars and cable money with relocations and expansion teams. The league said goodbye to Winnipeg, Quebec City, and Minnesota, opting for Sun Belt cities like Dallas, Atlanta, and Phoenix. Dallas-Ft. Worth is the fifth-largest American TV market. Atlanta is the eighth-largest; Phoenix, the 12th.

    Some of the Sun Belt teams thrived. The Tampa Bay Lightning have won three Stanley Cups, including back-to-back championships in 2020 and 2021, and the Anaheim Ducks and Carolina Hurricanes have won the Stanley Cup. The San Jose Sharks had 90-plus points in every season from 2000-01 to 2018-19, except for two.

    However, the Sun Belt teams’ success came at the expense of the Canadian clubs. Tampa beat the Calgary Flames in 2004. The Hurricanes beat Edmonton after the 2005 lockout, and Anaheim beat the Ottawa Senators in 2007. 

    Canada hasn’t won a championship since the Montreal Canadiens beat Gretzky’s Kings in 1994. The Toronto Maple Leafs haven’t won one since 1967, and the Vancouver Canucks haven’t ever won. The Canucks fans nearly burned down their city when the Boston Bruins beat them in 2011. 

    Still, it’s not as though the league’s longstanding teams haven’t won the Stanley Cup recently. From 2008 to 2019, the Chicago Blackhawks won three, and the Pittsburgh Penguins and the Los Angeles Kings won two. The other teams were the Original 6 or 1967 expansion teams: the Bruins, Detroit Red Wings, Washington Capitals, and the St. Louis Blues.

    However, a Florida-based team has won the Stanley Cup in four of the past six years. Meanwhile, the Avs and Vegas Golden Knights have won the other two.

    There’s nothing inherently wrong with Sun Belt teams winning hockey championships. Their success has expanded the game to new areas. However, it’s come at the expense of better-supported teams, and the cable bundle is coming undone

    To survive in the streaming era, the NHL must ensure that the league’s most supported teams have an advantage. The teams in Atlanta and Phoenix have relocated to Winnipeg and Utah, and The Athletic doesn’t have beat writers for the Panthers and Knights because there aren’t enough people to pay for day-to-day coverage. That’s not the case for the teams in Canada, the East Coast, and the Midwest.

    That doesn’t mean the league shouldn’t have teams in large, sunny cities. However, sports teams make most of their money from season-ticket holders and television revenue. The league must allow the teams with the most support to leverage their financial might to have an advantage. Otherwise, it risks losing fans in cities with the most support while advantaging the Sun Belt teams with a tight salary cap. 

    As the cable bundle comes undone, teams must sell individual subscriptions akin to Twins.TV and similar services, then package those subscriptions to Apple or Amazon to replicate the cable bundle. People in San Jose, Tampa, and Sunrise will buy them. However, there are more hockey fans in Toronto, Boston, and Chicago. 

    The league must raise the cap ceiling and lower the floor to allow the teams with the most support to leverage their financial advantage, within reason, while allowing the lesser-supported teams to operate on a budget in losing seasons. 

    That will mean teams in Canada, the Northeast, and the Midwest will have an advantage. Still, so will the well-supported Sun Belt teams. Florida may continue to win championships because they have a savvy front office. Conversely, the Calgary Flames must manage their team better to return to the playoffs. 

    However, this new model will give teams like Toronto, Montreal, and Boston an advantage over many Sun Belt teams. It will allow the most supported teams to succeed, with the tacit understanding that some Sun Belt expansion teams may fail. Fortunately, the league could move those teams to Hamilton, Ont., or Quebec City, putting a second team in the Greater Toronto Area or near Montreal.

    A financial model built around the most supported teams would help the Minnesota Wild. However, it might not help as much as big-market teams like the Chicago Blackhawks, New York Rangers, or the Philadelphia Flyers. People here fill the Xcel Energy Center and would buy TV subscriptions, but they might not at the rate of fans in the bigger cities. 

    Regardless, the only positive takeaway from the league punishing the Wild for the Zach Parise and Ryan Suter contracts is that it indicates ownership is willing to spend on the team. Detroit, Vancouver, and the New Jersey Devils also suffered cap circumvention penalties, meaning ownership in those markets was willing to spend more than the league would allow.

    To survive as the cable bundle comes undone, the league must allow teams willing to spend to spend within reason. Nobody wants a 1990s Penguins situation, and the NHL shouldn’t let Toronto and the Rangers become the New York Yankees and Los Angeles Dodgers. Still, the league must let teams like Detroit, Vancouver, and Minnesota leverage their financial might to survive in a post-cable world.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    It's not sun belt teams that are winning, it's large market teams. There is more to the story and how the NHL generates revenue and avoids losing revenue. Welcome to the modern era of professional sports. The leagues dictate, in one way or another, who succeeds, to some degree. Not trying to sound like a conspiracy theorist, but there is a lot going on behind the scenes with the league, owners and player association. One example, why is the draft lottery conducted behind closed doors? Why is that even necessary? How did Chicago conveniently get the first pick after Kane and Towes left the team? Just ask the Timberwolves about "draft lottery" luck.

    Why are elite players conveniently traded without any discussion or negotiation? Examples: Rantanen and/or Doncic.

    Don't plan on the Wild appearing in any cup championship games until there is a new owner, NHL commissioner, and the league is exposed. The Wild are a successful franchise and everyone involved is happy, or at least content. As long as tickets are being sold and the team is generating revenue, it's good enough.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Bettman targets non - traditional markets and non - traditional markets win 75% of the Stanley Cups....coincidence?  Absolutely not.

    To all the skeptics.  Look at the Avs PP advantage the year they won the Cup vs the year before and the year after.  With nearly the identical roster.  The league is not fixed but they "help" certain teams.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Quote

    The league must raise the cap ceiling and lower the floor to allow the teams with the most support to leverage their financial advantage, within reason, while allowing the lesser-supported teams to operate on a budget in losing seasons. 

    Have we forgotten about the Arizona Coyotes already?  Lowering the cap floor would give guys like Meruelo even less motivation to put a competitive team on the ice

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'm not sure this is right. It looks right until you get to the actual dollars vs. monopoly money. 

    Quote

    Regardless, the only positive takeaway from the league punishing the Wild for the Zach Parise and Ryan Suter contracts is that it indicates ownership is willing to spend on the team. Detroit, Vancouver, and the New Jersey Devils also suffered cap circumvention penalties, meaning ownership in those markets was willing to spend more than the league would allow.

    Tom is suggesting here that the Wild were willing to spend more on their team. In reality, they didn't. With the penalties, it was in cap money, or monopoly money, not real money which was a pittance of a buyout. Now, I'll give you that the original plan was to buyout Parise/Suter's last 3 years and let them go on their way. So, maybe from that perspective there was more. 

    The Devils got burned by Kovalchuk and didn't have much in penalties but were allowed to get out of it. Detroit was able to LTIR Federov, and both the Panthers and Canucks had to pay a portion of the penalties on Luongo. Even Chicago got to LTIR Hossa.

    Tom seems to be advocating going away from a hard cap and more into a soft cap with a luxury tax like baseball has. Personally, I think the hard cap is necessary to keep in place. Sun Belt teams will cycle out of there championship mode and somebody else will take their spot. I do think the Canadian teams are at a disadvantage, as seen by the amount of players who blanket NTCs towards them. Why is that?

    I think part of it is that successful Canadians get taxed very high. Their weather is brutal. Their dollar is weak. We saw in Kalisha's article how much of an advantage a star/elite player has in keeping his money by going to a no tax state, which typically has better weather. Yes, they do have a fan base where hockey is the #1 sport in that city. In the Sun Belt, hockey can be an afterthought, especially in basketball country. 

    But, even then, why do the Sun Belt states attract better talent? The answer isn't to switch the salary cap around. That would give your Rangers a distinct advantage. It wouldn't, necessarily, help your Canadian teams either. 

    My suspicion though is that the NHL has been trying to help these teams, because they definitely seem favored in the draft lottery. This is about the only way they can do it. So, I reject the premise of the article.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...