Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • Does Bill Guerin Have the Right Vision For the Wild?


    Image courtesy of Ron Chenoy-Imagn Images
    Phillip Garrett

    As a hockey fan, there are few more depressing months than the half a year without Minnesota Wild hockey. So, seeing as the Wild are creatures of habit and got eliminated from the postseason early, it’s time to be pessimistic again. 

    The way I look at it is that there is always a chance to win the Cup as long as you’re still playing. So, considering the Wild had occasionally looked impressive, it was safe to say I was skeptically hopeful of a deeper playoff run. However, that hope quickly rushed down the drain the second Gustav Nyquist forgot what constitutes offsides.

    I’m not saying the team's early exit lies solely on one player; that couldn’t be further from the truth. But mistakes like Nyquist's can cost a team a game, or worse, a series. Avoidable mistakes have cost the Wild notoriety for the last decade, but there is a chance to change that. With Minnesota finally out of cap hell, Bill Guerin can build a contending team.

    While one star player can make all the difference, a team's success ultimately comes from the front office. They brought Nyquist back to Minnesota after his first unimpressive stint. But it’s always easier to blame the player. In Nyquist’s case, he is to blame. However, the Wild’s problems run much deeper. 

    The mistakes lie with Guerin’s decision-making.

    Guerin has made a few questionable decisions throughout his tenure as general manager, including bringing in unproductive players. However, there has been a pattern in the preferences of players that Bill Guerin chooses to sign: they’re all old. Guerin signed or traded for Patrick Maroon, Zach Bogosian, Ryan Reaves, and even Marc-Andre Fleury, who were all pick-ups, and only Fleury has done anything memorable in Minnesota.

    I still believe that Bill Guerin will continue to trade for age and experience over developing his highly rated prospect pool. I have had this conversation with many Wild fans, and many still believe that Guerin was simply working with the cap he had. He couldn’t afford better players, and I almost believed it. That was until I realised that Guerin is trying to phase Marco Rossi out of the lineup. What more evidence do you need?

    Since long before the playoffs, rumors of the Wild trading Rossi have created a lot of conversation. I will say now what I said then: They shouldn’t trade Rossi. However, players who haven’t fit Guerin’s mold haven’t developed in Minnesota. Highly anticipated prospects like Calen Addison, Kevin Fiala, and Marat Khusnutdinov have come and gone through the Wild system.

    The Wild finally drafted and developed a top-six center. However, when they needed something from their star players in the series against the Vegas Golden Knights, the coaching staff kept Rossi on the fourth line with grinders like Yakov Trenin and Justin Brazeau. Even though Rossi played fourth-line minutes, he still found the back of the net.

    If I were Rossi, I’d beg the Wild to trade me if it meant more playing time.

    Rossi has earned his right to be paid. However, Guerin appears unwilling to sign him long term, allowing someone who could be part of a competitive core to leave Minnesota eventually. The Wild have valued players like Trenin and Brazeau over prospects with potential like Khusnutdinov and even Lauko. It’s becoming evident that the front office doesn’t prioritize developing players, which is likely why Bill Guerin is notorious for bringing on veterans at the back end of their careers.

    If developing players isn’t a priority for the team, they’re unlikely to build a contending roster under this management. 

    They knew buying Zach Parise and Ryan Suter out would put the Wild in cap hell until the 2025-26 season. That gave Bill Guerin a lot of leeway to build a team his way without expectations to win immediately. All things considered, the Wild have played some of the most exciting hockey in franchise history. However, what good is regular-season success if Guerin has still not proven himself able to assemble a playoff-caliber team?

    I don’t know what is happening in the Wild's front office or Guerin’s plans, but I hope I am wrong. If Guerin can turn the Wild into the team we have seen flashes of, I will support his vision. 

    However, until he shows a clear, compelling vision, I am not sure I trust his capabilities to run this team. Many red flags have made me question whether Guerin is right for the Wild. Still, with more cap space, Guerin must build a roster that’s ready to win now. If the Wild can’t succeed in the playoffs soon, it’s hard to believe Guerin used the cap hell years effectively. 

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 4

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    On 5/21/2025 at 12:56 PM, raithis said:

    The article says we've only brought in older players, preventing the ascension of younger players while also citing a number of other younger players that didn't work out.  Younger players have gotten chances.  It's not just Addison and Khusnutdinov that received playing time.  Players like Hunt, Walker, Beckman, Raska, and others were given chances and never showed that they belonged up in the NHL.  It's not like prospects aren't getting chances.  Even Rossi was given multiple chances before he got to the point where he showed he could be a successful everyday NHLer.

    The thing that really grinds my gears though is these prospects can't be expected to do anything if they're buried on the 3rd and 4th lines. Rossi scored 3 points in the playoffs while playing with Trenin and Brazeau. I'd say that's pretty good for basically carrying the line's offense. And all the guys you named never played or only got 1 or 2 shifts on the 1st and 2nd line. It's hard to develop and flourish when you're being forced to play with 4th liners 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I don't think Guerin really knows what he is doing at this point.  Hynes just keeps burning out the top two lines every game.  Overmatched as a coach.  The Wild have had the luxury of playing the youth and seeing what they have, knowing full well, that the fan base would approve of that.  Instead, they keep extending older players and include no move and modified move deals.  They shot themselves in the foot.  If we would have played some of these guys, we would have a better idea what we really have and we wouldn't have dumped a boat load of picks to get guys we aren't going to keep.  They can't offer sheet anyone now either because they don't have their own picks.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 5/22/2025 at 11:10 AM, mnfaninnc said:

    They weren't afraid to trade Huberdeau to acquire Tkachuk, a franchise changing move. They brought in Reinhardt and he got even better. Somebody knew who to target and how they would fit their system.

    This seems like where the Wild are with Rossi. He's a good player, but they might believe they need to alter the future by including him in a deal.

    Huberdeau had been above 1 PPG for 4 seasons at the time of that trade, but they still traded him for a player they thought could do more to  help them win. Until we see what Guerin does with the salary cap shackles removed, it seems reasonable to keep an open mind about moving guys out for better fits.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Imyourhuckleberry said:

    Huberdeau had been above 1 PPG for 4 seasons at the time of that trade, but they still traded him for a player they thought could do more to  help them win.

    This point is something that doesn't really get discussed around here in full. Huberdeau was a very productive player in the Florida lineup. So was Weegar. He had better production than Tkachuk, and Tkachuk had 104 points in his last year with Calgary which was a really good lineup.

    But, Matthew Tkachuk and Brady Tkachuk both have something that goes way beyond the production stats. People look at a guy like Rossi and say "why give up on a player who had a 60 point sophomore season?" He might hit 80 points next season. 

    Many here do not see the full impact a Tkachuk brings to the lineup! It's way more than simply points, it's a lot of intangibles that have to do with attitude that is contagious. It's energy, effort, and even crossing a line while competing. These types of guys make everyone better, and their effort better. 

    You just can't sit there and look at points, while scoring more goals gets you a win, but there are other important things that lead to goals that never show up on a scoresheet. If you don't have those players who can play in the top 6 and do the dirty work, you're team will not be successful, especially at playoff time. This is the #1 thing that is missing from this team in games 4-7 in the playoffs. And we've got to get guys who will do this. Currently, we do not have anyone within the organization who can provide this, at least that is close. And we don't really spend draft capital on players who could do it. Instead, we've got a bunch of skill players who are too small as a collection.

    To win 16 games in the postseason, it takes a tremendous amount of brutality. Almost every player is playing hurt. We need to have guys who can absorb punishment as well as dish it out while at the same time can score.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Its time to make some trades and build a dynasty. Start with some sort of trade combo with Rossi for Bowen Byram. Then find a Heavy skilled center man and hopefully Yurof is an instant NHL’r. 

    Edited by Pablo
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 5/23/2025 at 3:11 PM, mnfaninnc said:

    Matthew Tkachuk and Brady Tkachuk both have something that goes way beyond the production stats

    Agree, much more with M than B, though. Matthew is a very rare combination that you don't find often in hockey and I am trying to think of any current NHL'ers that are his equal. The closest the Wild have would be if Foligno and Ek merged into one and that still wouldn't match MT.

    Good post, mnfaninnc.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Guerin gets an A from me. There's no reason the Wild should even be competitive in recent seasons, let alone making the playoffs with the catastrophic cap hits from Suter and Parise.

    2022 53-22-7, 113pts
    2023 46-25-11, 103pts
    2024 39-34-9, 87pts
    2025 45-30-7, 97pts

    The team has made the playoffs 3 of 4 years (yeah, everybody does, kinda), remaining competitive, even if a bit of a long shot in the playoffs. I do think it's time for them to make a run now. With $22MM in cap space to spend, the need to be crafty just to put a team together which might succeed is replaced by the legitimate option to build a team that you expect will succeed. A lot will depend on the Wild's highly ranked prospects.

    I don't see any way Guerin could fall below a B or C grade no matter what happens this year considering just how good I think he's been weathering an insanely gross storm he was handed.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    34 minutes ago, bean5302 said:

    Guerin gets an A from me. There's no reason the Wild should even be competitive in recent seasons, let alone making the playoffs with the catastrophic cap hits from Suter and Parise.

    2022 53-22-7, 113pts
    2023 46-25-11, 103pts
    2024 39-34-9, 87pts
    2025 45-30-7, 97pts

    The team has made the playoffs 3 of 4 years (yeah, everybody does, kinda), remaining competitive, even if a bit of a long shot in the playoffs. I do think it's time for them to make a run now. With $22MM in cap space to spend, the need to be crafty just to put a team together which might succeed is replaced by the legitimate option to build a team that you expect will succeed. A lot will depend on the Wild's highly ranked prospects.

    I don't see any way Guerin could fall below a B or C grade no matter what happens this year considering just how good I think he's been weathering an insanely gross storm he was handed.

    Interesting counter take to the general commentary on this site. I can agree with you to a certain extent, but the buildup of what look like boneheaded decisions and comments is quickly overtaking.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Up North Guy said:

    Interesting counter take to the general commentary on this site. I can agree with you to a certain extent, but the buildup of what look like boneheaded decisions and comments is quickly overtaking.

    Advice to Guerin: better to keep mouth shut and let everyone suspect your a moron than open it and confirm your a moron. 
    Guerin get a C from this fan.  Pivotal summer where he has to resign 97 and win a couple trades without giving away Rossi.  
    #dontbedumbbill

    he gets his final grade this summer.  I’m not buying into the 10 year plan he’s selling to Leo and fans.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 5/27/2025 at 12:10 PM, Up North Guy said:

    Interesting counter take to the general commentary on this site. I can agree with you to a certain extent, but the buildup of what look like boneheaded decisions and comments is quickly overtaking.

    The feeling is this team could have been better, maybe even should have been better if just a few decisions were different. The fact this team was close at all is seriously an accomplishment in the first place because it didn't have to be. It could have been so, so much worse. If Suter and Parise are here, is Kaprisov here in 2021 or do the Wild have to trade him because they're unable to put a competitive team on the ice and Kaprisov wants out? How was Guerin even able to navigate that? What about last year's questionable decision to bring back Gustavsson? Looks pretty good now. Beyond that, and I keep coming back to this because I think people are overlooking just how brutal it really is, but the dead cap hit means aggressive and risky decisions for a team looking to be competitive. They're not all going to work out. There are going to be forced bad decisions in there. I don't know of a single bad, crippling decision Guerin has made. There are no Chris Davis signs an extension with the Balitmore Orioles moments.

    Guerin's drafting has been solid with the potential of being great, he's kept the superstar face of the franchise on the roster despite the hardships and he's made bold decisions to correct the locker room and make the team better.

    In some ways, I think the criticism heaped at Bill Guerin is like the Twins' Bill Smith. Smith was maligned for bad decisions with incredibly high expectations, but he was hamstrung from the moment he stepped into the role with Hunter already half out the door and Santana demanding absolutely the highest contract in baseball, and with a MiLB system which was totally gutted already with no pitching help on the way at all. Reviewing Smith's short tenure of drafting and signing gave the Twins Kepler, Sano, Gibson, Dozier, Polanco, he signed good to great extensions for Mauer, Morneau, Cuddyer, Nathan and made some good free agency moves like Crede and Hudson as well as the acquisition of Pavano. There were bad moves he made, too, but overall, Smith actually did a pretty good job in retrospect. Smith was canned after 1 disastrous season where his two MVP players were both dealing with missing huge time and struggling due to injuries in conjunction with the staff ace falling apart with multiple players slumping and Smith's worst free agency bungle, Tsuyoshi Nishioka, taking center stage (it was only like $3MM a year).

    When it comes to his personality, it's obvious BG is hot tempered. I've worked with those people in the past, and they've made it really hard sometimes, but whether or not they're admirable at their job makes a big difference to whether or not they're respected and understood.

    In order to fairly evaluate Guerin, I need to be fair at analyzing what he inherited, what his limitations were, what fair expectations were with a worst case, best case, expected case analysis. Based on the rosters, the Wild have outperformed expectations in 3 of the last 4 seasons according to Hockey Reference's preseason odds. I think we can all agree there are scenarios where the Wild crater at the buyout point as a worst case. If the Wild lost Kaprisov, they'd have never recovered as far as I'm concerned. What about the Faber/Draft pick (Ohgren) for Fiala trade? Lookin' pretty good to me, haha. There are plenty of very good decisions and moves BG has made. Focusing on the forced errors just feels really unfair.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...