Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • Declan Chisholm Is the Calen Addison Replacement


    Image courtesy of James Carey Lauder-USA TODAY Sports
    Justin Hein

     

     

    We didn’t appreciate Declan Chisholm’s arrival enough.

    When the Wild claimed the 24-year-old left-shot defenseman, it quietly made the news. Minnesota’s third pair has been a liability all season, and Chisholm has only played four NHL games. At first glance, it looked like this waiver claim might be a long shot. 
    But after turning on the tape, Chisholm’s tools seem to fit exactly what Minnesota needs on the third pair. 

    A few skills make up the strongest parts of Chisholm’s game: quick hands, a hard shot, and a knack for carrying the puck. His hands are evident in the offensive and defensive zones, and he uses his skating stride to carry the puck in transition. 

    Chisholm’s abilities put him in place to contribute to the team’s 5-on-5 offense and on the power play in some of the ways that Calen Addison should have. Chisholm likely won’t quarterback the man advantage like Addison because he’s not as agile. But his ability to create fast, simple puck movement should earn him a defined role. 

    Chisholm’s breakout and transition skills are different from Addison’s. Addison was great at seeing and completing long passes from deep in the defensive zone to the other side of the ice. Chisholm doesn’t make those home-run passes, but his deft stickhandling serves him well in tight corners and against the opposing forecheck. 

    The messy-looking breakout play above is standard in the NHL. It’s been a Wild staple under John Hynes, and even before his arrival. Jack Han scouted this out and diagramed it in Hockey Tactics 2023. Hynes ran the same breakout last year in Nashville. 

    Strong Side BO.JPG

    Note how both of Chisholm’s passes draw an opponent deep into his own defensive zone. First, along the left faceoff circle, then below the goal line on the goaltender’s right. That opens space deeper down the ice for the forwards to get open. 

    The breakout above isn’t a perfect example of the shape Hynes wants to create on the breakout. Chisholm’s partner is spread out behind the net rather than pushing through the center of the defensive zone. But that’s not terribly important because it still demonstrates the value of Chisholm’s quick hands along the boards. 

    However, it’s important to note Hynes’s preferred structure because it fits Chisholm’s straight-line speed. Looking at the weakside defenseman (D2 in the above diagram), you can see how that speed will serve him well in this system. If his partner breaks the puck up the wall, Chisholm is free to join the rush if the opportunity is right. 

    When executed correctly, the neutral zone looks something like this: 

    Strong Side BO to NZ Rush.JPG

    Chisholm (D2 in this scenario) is a great fit to catch and skate a change-of-side pass. D2’s first priority is gaining the zone onsides and then establishing the cycle. Chisholm has done this before in the OHL:  

    Surely, Chisholm won’t have quite as much space in the NHL as he does in the clip above, but it demonstrates how his speed allows him to gain the zone, even when outnumbered. This skill can establish easier forechecking or extended zone possessions for the forwards. That will serve him well when he’s feeding shooters like Kaprizov and Boldy. 

    When Chisholm isn’t the puck carrier, he’s still a great support player off the rush. He sees opportunities to join the rush early, which leads to odd-man rush opportunities. Chisholm also has the skills to finish when he’s called upon. 

    All of this is highly encouraging. It may lead the Ontario native to be a better 5-on-5 contributor than Addison was in Minnesota. Chisholm still has some of the defensive warts that come with the “offensive defenseman” label, but his skills in the rush may be a better fit than Addison’s possessive play style. On top of that, the 6-foot-1, 190 lbs. defenseman is built a bit sturdier than Addison (5-foot-11, 173 lbs.), which should allow him to box out the front of the net at the level of most third-pair defensemen. 

    Addison holds one trump card over Chisholm, which is his ability to “quarterback” a power play. While Chisholm’s profile makes him a better option from the top of the circles, Addison’s quick feet allow him to direct traffic from center ice because of his agile, powerful footwork. That will enable him to manipulate shooting and passing lanes in a way that Chisholm can’t. 

    The right-handed power play quarterback is a sought-after role in the NHL because few players have the vision and edgework to execute that role. However, Chisholm is useful in another power-play role. His heavy slapshot and knack for handling the puck make him useful from the perimeter.

    1-3-1 PP.JPG

    Like No. 86 on the Tampa Bay Lightning above, Chisholm can set up from the top of either circle for a one-timer, and a passing option to relieve pressure. He's no Nikita Kucherov, but his skill set fits that role because Chisholm won't be the focal point of the power play. 

    The reason that Chisholm can play here is not just his heavy shot but his ability to catch-and-pass. It’s better to have quick hands and skates like Addison does, but the ability to catch a puck and pass it immediately is crucial to take advantage of the extra skater. It’s what led to Chisholm’s first NHL point:

    Chisholm’s quick hands are the key to breaking down an opponent’s defensive structure through puck movement or set plays. An example of Chisholm running a set play on the OHL’s Peterborough Pirates shows how indefensible this can be. 

    The teams are playing five-on-five in the clip above, but it highlights how Chisholm’s quick hands can punish shot-block attempts from over-aggressive defenders. That becomes especially potent when combined with Chisholm’s clap bomb,  a weapon of mass production. He unleashed it to score his first AHL goal in Manitoba. 

    The slapshot goals are all over Chisholm’s highlight reel, and Wild fans are familiar with the ways that can open up the power play. Matt Dumba and Brad Hunt had a certain gravity on the power play, and Chisholm should experience the same. When defenders don’t square up to the shooting lane, there are consequences. 

    Minnesota-born Chaz Lucius won’t notch an easier assist in his whole career. Chisholm can turn a low-to-high pass into something goaltenders simply can’t see. 

    It will take some time for Chisholm’s game to mature fully. There must be reasons he hasn't earned more than 49 minutes of NHL ice time by age 24. But his offensive tools are effective enough that it likely stems from Winnipeg’s depth. 

    Chisholm seems primed to contribute as a third-pairing power-play defenseman for less than a one-million-dollar AAV over the next few years. That’s a great asset, especially since the Wild acquired him for free. It’s as much value as a team can get off waivers. 

    When Chisholm hits the ice, it will be long overdue. 

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 3

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    39 minutes ago, cloddish said:

    I did too! If you looked at his numbers all last year he was consistently in the mix for top 3 Rookie Defensemen, statistically.

    It was all smoke and mirrors that way. He racked up a lot of assists on the PP but did little else to help the cause. His indifference to defending and not really wanting to learn was a huge detriment to the team concept. The red flag was when late in the year, Iowa stuck him on the 3rd pairing. That was either a warning for us, or Addison was playing through an injury. Turns out it was a warning to us.

    Addison simply couldn't overcome his size at the next level. He was playing in the 170s with no concept of how to use leverage or take a body. He didn't want to learn either. If he got beat up the ice, he gave a half-assed effort to get back. That is simply unacceptable and was the same thing that Reilly did to get him shipped out of town. (with Reilly, I saw it live from Iowa and took note that he was nowhere near NHL ready. He played down there like he was just waiting for a call up with little real effort)

    Addison is also having a terrible year on a terrible Sharks team. He picked up an assist recently, but is 1-8-9, or, Bogosian offense and not Bogosian defense. Honestly, I don't think he'll be in the league long. He's simply too small and the longer we watch, the more like Ryan Murphy he looks. If you're healthy scratched from the worst team in the league, something's not working.

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    21 hours ago, mnfaninnc said:

    It was all smoke and mirrors that way. He racked up a lot of assists on the PP but did little else to help the cause. His indifference to defending and not really wanting to learn was a huge detriment to the team concept. The red flag was when late in the year, Iowa stuck him on the 3rd pairing. That was either a warning for us, or Addison was playing through an injury. Turns out it was a warning to us.

    Addison simply couldn't overcome his size at the next level. He was playing in the 170s with no concept of how to use leverage or take a body. He didn't want to learn either. If he got beat up the ice, he gave a half-assed effort to get back. That is simply unacceptable and was the same thing that Reilly did to get him shipped out of town. (with Reilly, I saw it live from Iowa and took note that he was nowhere near NHL ready. He played down there like he was just waiting for a call up with little real effort)

    Addison is also having a terrible year on a terrible Sharks team. He picked up an assist recently, but is 1-8-9, or, Bogosian offense and not Bogosian defense. Honestly, I don't think he'll be in the league long. He's simply too small and the longer we watch, the more like Ryan Murphy he looks. If you're healthy scratched from the worst team in the league, something's not working.

    Yeah, it wasn't until after that year that all of this you just laid out started to make sense to me too. But at the time, I was like, "Who is this Addison guy? He's got my attention!" Then you look at his PP stats and you start to piece together the bigger picture on the guy.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    A lot of good junior players never make it. MN has had guys who were excellent in NCAA who never make it. 

    Addison was another kick at the can which MN has done well with overall. They've given time to, and made an effort to get guys to evaluate along with keeping more draft capital than XGMCF. 

    They've done it via waivers or without sacrificing much. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I liked Chisholm paired with Brodin last night.  He is multitudes better than Addison and has a good attitude.  He is still a little shaky on the d end but looks willing to get in there.

    With Bogo out, I hope they stick with it although it would mean that the dreaded 3d pairing with 2 of the 3 stooges returns.

    Still no Hunt?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...