Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • David Jiricek Offers the Wild More Than Raw Talent


    Image courtesy of Aaron Doster - Imagn Images
    Tony Abbott

    By the time Saturday's Minnesota Wild game starts, the team will have heisted No. 6 overall pick David Jiricek from the Columbus Blue Jackets. Daemon Hunt, the Wild's most NHL-ready defense prospect, will be sent the other way along with a first-round pick in 2025, a third in 2026, a second in 2027, and a pick swap, per Michael Russo

    The move doesn't come as a surprise, it's been in the ether for the last week. But now we know it's happening, we know the Wild beat out the other offers, and we know the hit to Minnesota's prospect capital. Having seen it all laid out, this is a decisive win for Bill Guerin and his front office. Should the Wild unlock his potential, they have the final missing piece to their youth movement.

    The Wild's under-25 movement was strong as hell earlier this week, having nearly everything a good, growing team needs. A star winger? Check, there's Matt Boldy. A potential (current?) No. 1 center? Hello, Marco Rossi. A guaranteed, bedrock top-pair defenseman? There's Brock Faber, right there. High-upside forward prospects? Danila Yurov and Riley Heidt have entered the chat. A bonafide power play quarterback that's nearly NHL-ready? That's what drafting Zeev Buium was for. A goalie of the future? We all know about Jesper Wallstedt

    The only question -- other than whether the Yurovs, Heidts, and Buiums would pan out -- was their defensive depth beyond Faber and Buium. The Wild had invested heavily in defense prospects at the 2020 and 2022 Drafts, spending top-70 picks on Ryan O'Rourke, Hunt, Carson Lambos, and Jack Peart. Despite the investment, only Hunt trended as NHL-ready in the near future.

    Beyond that, Minnesota wasn't able to land their Owen Power, Jake Sanderson, or Moritz Seider-type defenseman -- a defenseman with premium size and a top-four-caliber skill set. They'd also struggled to backfill the right side of the defense past Faber, with David Spacek being their only top right-shot defenseman.

    That's why Minnesota gave up three assets to get Jiricek. At 6-foot-3, 204 pounds, he brings beef, skill, and a right-shot to the next generation of Wild players. As soon as the end of the season, the Wild could theoretically ice a starting lineup that includes:

    Yurov - Rossi - Boldy
    Buium - Jiricek
    Wallstedt

    That's a tantalizing collection of young talent, even before realizing that the Wild would have Faber in the back. And Faber with those two makes Minnesota a potential defensive powerhouse for years to come. 

    The collection of pure, raw talent on the Wild blueline is now at incredible levels. Before the season, Corey Pronman released his rankings of Under-23 players and prospects. Buium slotted in at No. 16 (sixth among defensemen), Faber at No. 35 (11th among d-men), and Jiricek 47th (17th among d-men). Only the New Jersey Devils -- with Luke Hughes, Anton Silayev, and Simon Nemec -- rival that quantity of high-upside defense talent.

    But it's even better. Again, Jiricek gives Minnesota more talent and a diversity of skills. Here's the elevator pitch on all three of those top names, per Pronman:

    Buium: He is an extremely intelligent puck-mover who can run a power play like a top NHL player. He makes high-end plays routinely and can break shifts open with his puckhandling and passes.
    Faber: His excellent skating, gap work and compete have helped him become a great defender who kills a lot of plays, but the offense he showed this season was a pleasant surprise.
    Jiricek: He's very skilled, especially for a big man, and combined with a strong point shot, he should provide offense in the NHL. I like his defensive edge and thought he showed he could be a great two-way player at other levels.

    There's some overlap, but Minnesota now has three defensemen who fill three vital roles. The bloom has fallen ever-so-slightly off the rose with Jiricek, but Pronman's player comparable for him in 2022 was Alex Pietrangelo -- massive praise from the usually conservative draft analyst. Leading up to the 2024 Draft, Pronman tabbed Buium as a young Morgan Rielly. Faber has been a right-shot Jonas Brodin with surprising offensive chops. That sort of well-rounded blueline is hard to find, even among elite NHL clubs.

    As for the price, it's a big "Who cares?" from Minnesota's perspective. Hunt's future was likely as a third-pairing defenseman who could crack the top-4 in a pinch. The Wild's 2025 first-round pick is trending to be in the 20s, and perhaps the late-20s. Even if Minnesota would hit on that pick, it likely wouldn't have the upside of Jiricek and a much longer timetable to get a return on investment. A third-rounder in 2026 or second in 2027 is downright negligible.

    More importantly: the Wild got this deal done without sacrificing their forward depth, particularly NHL-ready, middle-six winger Liam Öhgren, who brings skill and physicality to the pool that would be hard for Minnesota to replace. They get a huge boost in near-term upside without sacrificing anything for the 2025 season when the Wild's Cup ambitions truly begin. Minnesota will need to unlock Jiricek's potential in a way that Columbus couldn't do, but the reward in acquiring Jiricek vastly outweighs the risk.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 6
    • Thanks 2

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    2 minutes ago, Enforceror said:

    Yeah, there was a chart that went to actual draft# but I didn't take the time to get that granular. I guess my whole point in posting that is I don't think we're any better or worse off than most teams as far as drafting goes and if we get more than 1 solid NHL D-men out of that pool, we're probably doing well.

    I was only supporting that premise. When you look at most picks having less than a 30% chance of working out for the Wild, then getting a few to help, like we anticipate with Ohgren and Yurov, starts to feel a lot better.

    There simply aren't a lot of great NHL players under the age of 23, particularly those picked outside the top 10, but if these guys keep developing, they could get there in the next couple of years.

    Hunt developing to the point that they could trade him in the Jiricek deal might be considered a pretty good pick as well. Hopefully Jiricek actually pans out now.

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    47 minutes ago, Imyourhuckleberry said:

    It's not great. I argued all offseason that Gustavsson needed to be retained because he was the #1 goalie and the team couldn't count on Wallstedt ever being better. At that time, I couldn't have anticipated Wallstedt struggling as much as he has this year, but there was never any certainly that he would become as good as Gustavsson. Gus had a down year last season compared to the prior, but Fleury was worse and Wallstedt was unproven.

    Many goalies have a rough year here or there, so I'm not panicked about Wallstedt, but it's a damn good thing the Wild kept Gustavsson as they would be in a really bad spot with Wallstedt struggling and Fleury being asked to play in 70%+ of their games. Hopefully it's just a down year and Wallstedt makes the adjustments necessary for a big jump forward in his development.

    tough to disagree with any of this. i'm glad gus is with us! cheers!

    and hopefully Wally gets better and better to regain the form

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    41 minutes ago, TheGoosesAreLooses said:

    Maybe that is because we used a single first round pick between 2013-2024 on a defenseman. 

    Since 2011 when we developed Brodin, and 2012 when we got Dumba then all our picks in first or second round on defensemen;

    2013 

    2nd round Olofsson

    5th round Carson Soucy

    2014

    2nd Belpedio

    2018

    1st Johansson

    2021 Late 1st Lambos

    2024 1st Zeev

     

    Wow, I wonder why our late round picks are turning into all stars when we haven't drafted a high percentage player (top 15) on defense since Matt Dumba. Why aren't all our 3rd and 4th rounders all stars?

    Why is the sky blue? 

    That is why perspective is important, so you don't look like a f*cking idiot claiming our development is failing when our development has been pretty on par with our draft picks based on % success rate. Meanwhile you complain about Brackett who wasn't with us until 2020 and about players who in all reasonable expectations wouldn't be in the NHL yet. 

     

    you always comes out ahead if instead of talking to the point, you call others idiots. or actually F#cking idiots! :classic_love:

    but let me end on this - if none of the D prospects we drafted for nearly a decade are worth a sniff in NHL (regardless of scout/gm) and we have to go out looking for them - then it would be right to question development / concept / strategy 😉 

    cheers  

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    "Can't wait to see Strife's reply"

    Already said what I needed to earlier.  Goalie voodoo exists. Wild will lose in the first round until they prove otherwise. Vikings always play close 4th quarter games just to spite us.  Water is wet.  

    *Wants to sleep after work*

     

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    15 minutes ago, OldDutchChip said:

    if none of the D prospects we drafted for nearly a decade are worth a sniff in NHL (regardless of scout/gm

    Haha bud I tried to present it in terms you could understand multiple times. I referenced the number of players in the same draft playing in the NHL right now, Enforcer gave a nice graphic on the success rate of draft picks, I gave you background and you just refused to listen, so i stand by my comment. You want to ignore statistics and facts (like this 1/4 year being an anomaly in Wallstedt's development) or continuing to insist our defensive prospects aren't developing despite Hunt being NHL ready as a third rounder and the rest of the defensive prospects being at least a year younger (other than O'Rourke who was a 4th rounder) and that being a perfectly normal timeline for development. Or even this last comment above as I laid out why our success rate has been super low due to lack of picks and us targeting forwards instead in the high percentage parts of the draft. You like to ignore circumstances like an ELC blueline vs 12 overagers (Admirals roster consisted of 8/11 defensemen over 25 during 22-23) or draft pick pedigree.

    So cheers to you too!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Tony Abbott said:

    IMO, that blueline is far too young for the AHL. It's a good thing to have 2-3 of those guys there, but putting them there all at once has been a disaster.

    Would it be better if all 20 year old defenders head to the Heartlanders for a year? Maybe not all, but anyone taken outside of the top 10? 

    I cannot get off my stand that the Baby Wild simply do not have a respected defensive coach on their staff to develop these guys. However, my eye test in Charlotte saw a team that played fairly structured without the puck, which they had plenty of opportunity to work on.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    7 minutes ago, TheGoosesAreLooses said:

    Haha bud I tried to present it in terms you could understand multiple times. I referenced the number of players in the same draft playing in the NHL right now, Enforcer gave a nice graphic on the success rate of draft picks, I gave you background and you just refused to listen, so i stand by my comment. You want to ignore statistics and facts (like this 1/4 year being an anomaly in Wallstedt's development) or continuing to insist our defensive prospects aren't developing despite Hunt being NHL ready as a third rounder and the rest of the defensive prospects being at least a year younger (other than O'Rourke who was a 4th rounder) and that being a perfectly normal timeline for development. Or even this last comment above as I laid out why our success rate has been super low due to lack of picks and us targeting forwards instead in the high percentage parts of the draft. You like to ignore circumstances like an ELC blueline vs 12 overagers (Admirals roster consisted of 8/11 defensemen over 25 during 22-23) or draft pick pedigree.

    So cheers to you too!

    enforcer did provide a fancy excel graph 🍻

    as for you - you are a stubborn ogre

    i said that i have some concerns with overall strategy of our development department as not ONE of our D prospects for the last decade has made the NHL or is any close to making it (nope it's OK we got stats to prove that it's totally normal!)

    i also said that based on current showing Wally is not doing good. and for #1 rated prospect - that is worrisome. i am not calling him a bust but i am saying that it's something we can note. (nothing to see here - he is experiencing a slight bump in the road, according to goose "resident expert on goalie bumps")

    as for comparison to Asky  - even though he is back in AHL - his taste of NHL went pretty well and he was likely just a casualty of circumstance (two other goalies are there)

    Take some valerian root and chill out a bit

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Enforceror said:

    Yeah, there was a chart that went to actual draft# but I didn't take the time to get that granular. I guess my whole point in posting that is I don't think we're any better or worse off than most teams as far as drafting goes and if we get more than 1 solid NHL D-men out of that pool, we're probably doing well.

    I'd suggest that this chart gets thrown out for 2020-2022 due to covid interruptions. The teams with the best scouting teams will escape positively, the worst negatively. My hope is that we are one of the best.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 minutes ago, mnfaninnc said:

    Would it be better if all 20 year old defenders head to the Heartlanders for a year? Maybe not all, but anyone taken outside of the top 10? 

    I cannot get off my stand that the Baby Wild simply do not have a respected defensive coach on their staff to develop these guys. However, my eye test in Charlotte saw a team that played fairly structured without the puck, which they had plenty of opportunity to work on.

    Not going to help anything now but I wonder if Spurg would consider being our Iowa D-coach when he retires. With his experience, leadership and well-rounded skill set....that'd be F'n awesome.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, mnfaninnc said:

    I'd suggest that this chart gets thrown out for 2020-2022 due to covid interruptions. The teams with the best scouting teams will escape positively, the worst negatively. My hope is that we are one of the best.

    Definitely a factor, I didn't consider that.....but I'm just throwing out food for thought, honestly I'm somewhere in the middle on how we stack up in most departments.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    8 minutes ago, Enforceror said:

    Not going to help anything now but I wonder if Spurg would consider being our Iowa D-coach when he retires. With his experience, leadership and well-rounded skill set....that'd be F'n awesome.

    only if he can do it remotely from edina

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, TheGoosesAreLooses said:

    That is why perspective is important, so you don't look like a f*cking idiot claiming our development is failing when our development has been pretty on par with our draft picks based on % success rate. Meanwhile you complain about Brackett who wasn't with us until 2020 and about players who in all reasonable expectations wouldn't be in the NHL yet. 

    I've been pounding the table over coaching in the minors. It doesn't seem like it's set up to develop these guys. That's why my eye test was very revealing. For instance, Peart is listed as 195. Looking down on him he was wearing 15 lb. socks on each leg when he was weighed. But, looks can be deceiving. I watched him play and he knocked 0 people off the puck, and they essentially ignored him when he made contact. He's got serious strength issues. 

    Lambos, to me looked bigger in preseason than I remember him. This was not an anomaly, he's bigger, and his stickhandling was very good twice taking pucks out of crowds and skating them to safety. I thought his gaps were good, and I would say he's improved, especially being on the #1 pairing.

    Spacek, to me, was the guy to really get excited about. He has taken the leap between year 1 & 2. He's a little shorter, but feisty with offensive upside. He's leading Wild defenders in points (Iowa) and I could see why. I could project him to a 3rd pairing in a couple of years. 

    O'Rourke didn't play, and as I remember it, he was a 2nd round pick. 

    I don't see why we aren't set up like I'd want coaching wise, but there does seem to be improvement. I'd like it to happen faster, but defenders usually take an extra year.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I guess my thought on Wallstedt is that he looks so bad in the AHL because he is more successful with a structured defense in front of him.

    I have a distinct feeling that Gustavsson would not look nearly as good if he was on a team with poorer defensive structure. 

    Last year when our team defense was in shambles with all the injuries, Gus did far worse.  I don't think that's a coincidence.  I also don't think it's a coincidence that Wallstedt has looked worse this year   I do think he is also going through some troubles but part of it is likely the defense in front of a young Swedish goalie that is very much like our #1 goalie in the NHL.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    25 minutes ago, raithis said:

    I guess my thought on Wallstedt is that he looks so bad in the AHL because he is more successful with a structured defense in front of him.

    I have a distinct feeling that Gustavsson would not look nearly as good if he was on a team with poorer defensive structure. 

    Last year when our team defense was in shambles with all the injuries, Gus did far worse.  I don't think that's a coincidence.  I also don't think it's a coincidence that Wallstedt has looked worse this year   I do think he is also going through some troubles but part of it is likely the defense in front of a young Swedish goalie that is very much like our #1 goalie in the NHL.

    Well, I guess at least we have experience with young Swedish goalies now.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 11/30/2024 at 7:02 PM, Lovehockey said:

    I really like the trade BUT two questions:

    - like was said before next year we will have Faber, Brodin, Spurgeon, Middleton, Bogosian, Buium, and Jiricek. All of them except Bogosian are top 4 defenders. Who will be 3rd pairing?

    - if we are in the “win now” mode as we should be, will having 3 very young defenders be a problem? 

    Youth isnt a problem when they are studs. They just grow better together!!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 12/2/2024 at 10:56 AM, Enforceror said:

    Chances of being an NHL'r (based on Dobberprospects study)

    1st Lambos 74% chance

    2nd O'Rourke 34% chance

    2nd Peart 34% chance

    3rd Hunt  27% chance

    4th Masters 22% chance

    5th Spacek 15% chance

     

    image.png.70b3f4942c6f56e6f829be9b064a8168.png

    I will say that from what I’ve seen over the years is that Dobberprospects isn’t super accurate. I’ve been following them and I think they are way too generous in some evaluation and daft in others. A lot of their rankings are extremely outdated. I honestly think Spacek should be way higher and O’Rourke should be a lot lower. The only ones I think that have a chance are possibly Lambos and Spacek (Spacek has 8pts in his last 10 games in the Ahl). I’m basing that off of progress these players have made throughout the years and how highly Spacek has been talked about by his Czech coach.

    Having Buium, Faber and Jiricek is a solid group of up and coming defenders and I really do think those 3 are going to be solid top 4 nhlers. I think we have plenty offensive Dmen, now I think we need to draft big physical shut down guys to pair them.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 12/2/2024 at 2:27 PM, OldDutchChip said:

    they are just 3 month apart in age and played about the same games in AHL (asky with 10 more or so). but i do recall Wally playing among sweden's elite for so long. i dunno - it felt as a warning sign. add to that ZERO developed D prospects in NHL since end of last century and there is a trend....no?

    Where did you learn to count? They are born in the same year which is 2002 but Askarov was born Jun 16th and Wallstedt was born Nov 14th…

    I get what you’re saying but having solid defense in front of you makes a world of difference. Just ask Gus.

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...