Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • David Jiricek Offers the Wild More Than Raw Talent


    Image courtesy of Aaron Doster - Imagn Images
    Tony Abbott

    By the time Saturday's Minnesota Wild game starts, the team will have heisted No. 6 overall pick David Jiricek from the Columbus Blue Jackets. Daemon Hunt, the Wild's most NHL-ready defense prospect, will be sent the other way along with a first-round pick in 2025, a third in 2026, a second in 2027, and a pick swap, per Michael Russo

    The move doesn't come as a surprise, it's been in the ether for the last week. But now we know it's happening, we know the Wild beat out the other offers, and we know the hit to Minnesota's prospect capital. Having seen it all laid out, this is a decisive win for Bill Guerin and his front office. Should the Wild unlock his potential, they have the final missing piece to their youth movement.

    The Wild's under-25 movement was strong as hell earlier this week, having nearly everything a good, growing team needs. A star winger? Check, there's Matt Boldy. A potential (current?) No. 1 center? Hello, Marco Rossi. A guaranteed, bedrock top-pair defenseman? There's Brock Faber, right there. High-upside forward prospects? Danila Yurov and Riley Heidt have entered the chat. A bonafide power play quarterback that's nearly NHL-ready? That's what drafting Zeev Buium was for. A goalie of the future? We all know about Jesper Wallstedt

    The only question -- other than whether the Yurovs, Heidts, and Buiums would pan out -- was their defensive depth beyond Faber and Buium. The Wild had invested heavily in defense prospects at the 2020 and 2022 Drafts, spending top-70 picks on Ryan O'Rourke, Hunt, Carson Lambos, and Jack Peart. Despite the investment, only Hunt trended as NHL-ready in the near future.

    Beyond that, Minnesota wasn't able to land their Owen Power, Jake Sanderson, or Moritz Seider-type defenseman -- a defenseman with premium size and a top-four-caliber skill set. They'd also struggled to backfill the right side of the defense past Faber, with David Spacek being their only top right-shot defenseman.

    That's why Minnesota gave up three assets to get Jiricek. At 6-foot-3, 204 pounds, he brings beef, skill, and a right-shot to the next generation of Wild players. As soon as the end of the season, the Wild could theoretically ice a starting lineup that includes:

    Yurov - Rossi - Boldy
    Buium - Jiricek
    Wallstedt

    That's a tantalizing collection of young talent, even before realizing that the Wild would have Faber in the back. And Faber with those two makes Minnesota a potential defensive powerhouse for years to come. 

    The collection of pure, raw talent on the Wild blueline is now at incredible levels. Before the season, Corey Pronman released his rankings of Under-23 players and prospects. Buium slotted in at No. 16 (sixth among defensemen), Faber at No. 35 (11th among d-men), and Jiricek 47th (17th among d-men). Only the New Jersey Devils -- with Luke Hughes, Anton Silayev, and Simon Nemec -- rival that quantity of high-upside defense talent.

    But it's even better. Again, Jiricek gives Minnesota more talent and a diversity of skills. Here's the elevator pitch on all three of those top names, per Pronman:

    Buium: He is an extremely intelligent puck-mover who can run a power play like a top NHL player. He makes high-end plays routinely and can break shifts open with his puckhandling and passes.
    Faber: His excellent skating, gap work and compete have helped him become a great defender who kills a lot of plays, but the offense he showed this season was a pleasant surprise.
    Jiricek: He's very skilled, especially for a big man, and combined with a strong point shot, he should provide offense in the NHL. I like his defensive edge and thought he showed he could be a great two-way player at other levels.

    There's some overlap, but Minnesota now has three defensemen who fill three vital roles. The bloom has fallen ever-so-slightly off the rose with Jiricek, but Pronman's player comparable for him in 2022 was Alex Pietrangelo -- massive praise from the usually conservative draft analyst. Leading up to the 2024 Draft, Pronman tabbed Buium as a young Morgan Rielly. Faber has been a right-shot Jonas Brodin with surprising offensive chops. That sort of well-rounded blueline is hard to find, even among elite NHL clubs.

    As for the price, it's a big "Who cares?" from Minnesota's perspective. Hunt's future was likely as a third-pairing defenseman who could crack the top-4 in a pinch. The Wild's 2025 first-round pick is trending to be in the 20s, and perhaps the late-20s. Even if Minnesota would hit on that pick, it likely wouldn't have the upside of Jiricek and a much longer timetable to get a return on investment. A third-rounder in 2026 or second in 2027 is downright negligible.

    More importantly: the Wild got this deal done without sacrificing their forward depth, particularly NHL-ready, middle-six winger Liam Öhgren, who brings skill and physicality to the pool that would be hard for Minnesota to replace. They get a huge boost in near-term upside without sacrificing anything for the 2025 season when the Wild's Cup ambitions truly begin. Minnesota will need to unlock Jiricek's potential in a way that Columbus couldn't do, but the reward in acquiring Jiricek vastly outweighs the risk.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 6
    • Thanks 2

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    Just now, TheGoosesAreLooses said:

    How astute of not to even look at the teams these two are playing for. Wallstedt was better than or equal to Askarov in the past two years. Sharks have had 7 1+2nd round picks in 23-24 drafts including two in the top 4. The Barricuda's record is 12-6-0 and they were shite last year until some of the top picks in the last two drafts showed up. Yeah, they kind of have an advantage being in a rebuild and getting top picks. Meanwhile the Iowa wild have been bottom of the barrel since MacLean showed up, and haven't drafted in the top 10 since Rossi. Even though Army had them in the payoffs a year before. 

    Wallstedt was the among the best goaltenders in the league even while having a crap team in front of him 22-23 .908 save %, 23-24 .910 save . I'm saying maybe the anomaly season might be the outlier with other factors at play. Instead of wanting to call him a bust a quarter of the way into his first rough season.

    What about our defense? They are at most 23! they have time considering there are no spots for them on the line up right now. I would point to coaching more than anything in Iowa, not the players themselves.

    Askarov only played for SJ AHL team this year (previous were for Nash AHL team) so i am not going to say that celibrini-less AHL team boosted his stats. on top of that Asky is playing for SJ NHL team now - and producing still great numbers even though - you know they are the SHARKS. 

    I am not calling him a bust - i am saying there are some worry signs. 

    Defense? like our draft defense? when was the last time a D prospect made the NHL roster? We have not developed anyone! We had to trade for them. You combine that plus recent performances by Wally, Ohgren, and some disappointments from our 1st pick Stramel - don't you think it's worrisome? i don't think it's all gravy.

     

    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, Enforceror said:

    Chances of being an NHL'r (based on Dobberprospects study)

    1st Lambos 74% chance

    2nd O'Rourke 34% chance

    2nd Peart 34% chance

    3rd Hunt  27% chance

    4th Masters 22% chance

    5th Spacek 15% chance

     

    The actual breakdown is likely worse than that for many Wild picks.

    74% is for all 1st round picks, but it's probably over 90% for top 10 picks, around 75% or the next 10 picks, and below 60% for the final 12.

    The Wild have often been picking in the final 12, or very close to it, rather than the top 15. After pick 15, it's probably less than a 74% chance.

    Anyone selected after pick 20 has less than a 60% chance, I'd guess. The top of the 2nd round probably starts around 50% before quickly declining to around 30% after pick 50.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    21 hours ago, Imyourhuckleberry said:

    I'm not writing him off as a player, but he'll be an unrestricted free agent and I believe the team will be more focused on spending money on their top 6 forwards than in retaining him with a pay increase.

    Great catch Huck! This shows how much I miss capfriendly. Getting used to Puckpedia's presentation hasn't been smooth. I think you're right on this, and he may be trade bait at the TDL for a top 6 forward as you've suggested.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    7 minutes ago, OldDutchChip said:

    Askarov only played for SJ AHL team this year (previous were for Nash AHL team) so i am not going to say that celibrini-less AHL team boosted his stats. on top of that Asky is playing for SJ NHL team now - and producing still great numbers even though - you know they are the SHARKS. 

    I am not calling him a bust - i am saying there are some worry signs. 

    Defense? like our draft defense? when was the last time a D prospect made the NHL roster? We have not developed anyone! We had to trade for them. You combine that plus recent performances by Wally, Ohgren, and some disappointments from our 1st pick Stramel - don't you think it's worrisome? i don't think it's all gravy.

     

    Dude, you have no reference on where the rest of the prospects of the 2021 draft are at. Outside the top 15 picks in that draft a total of 3 players have over 100 games played. Three! Considering that 1 D man we drafted the year before in ROUND 3 is NHL ready is not concerning. 

    Celibrini wasn't the only draft pick they had in the past two years. They also are playing with 12 overagers, not a ELC blueline. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    20 hours ago, Imyourhuckleberry said:

    Well, Puckpedia has him currently listed as a rule 6 UFA, but with a ? after it, so perhaps he will not be. After reading up on it, if he reaches 80 NHL games, I guess he loses UFA eligibility. As such, if he stays healthy, maybe he will continue as a RFA for the Wild, but his solid play is likely to increase his next contract.

    One more reason to sit Merrill and play Chissy. What does he need this year? 60 games?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 minutes ago, TheGoosesAreLooses said:

    Dude, you have no reference on where the rest of the prospects of the 2021 draft are at. Outside the top 15 picks in that draft a total of 3 players have over 100 games played. Three! Considering that 1 D man we drafted the year before in ROUND 3 is NHL ready is not concerning. 

    Celibrini wasn't the only draft pick they had in the past two years. They also are playing with 12 overagers, not a ELC blueline. 

    why do i need to review 100's of prospects? i was told Wally was once in a lifetime goalie. he had another solid goalie prospect drafted at the same time. that prospect is kicking ass and ours is going the opposite way. that's it. it IS a cause for concern.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, mnfaninnc said:

    One more reason to sit Merrill and play Chissy. What does he need this year? 60 games?

    Chisholm had played in 33 NHL games prior to this season, so should be roughly 47 games in the NHL this season for him to lose the option of opting into "group 6" unrestricted free agency.

    He's already played 18 for the Wild this year, so I believe just 29 more to go.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 minutes ago, OldDutchChip said:

    why do i need to review 100's of prospects? i was told Wally was once in a lifetime goalie. he had another solid goalie prospect drafted at the same time. that prospect is kicking ass and ours is going the opposite way. that's it. it IS a cause for concern.

    Okay bud. Facts and stats just don't matter apparently so no frame of reference is going to make a difference.spacer.png

    Edited by TheGoosesAreLooses
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 minutes ago, OldDutchChip said:

    why do i need to review 100's of prospects? i was told Wally was once in a lifetime goalie. he had another solid goalie prospect drafted at the same time. that prospect is kicking ass and ours is going the opposite way. that's it. it IS a cause for concern.

    Askarov was drafted #11 a year earlier than Wallstedt, and has 2 total NHL wins, which is actually the same number as the younger goalie.

    Cossa would be the better comparison(same age & draft year, but selected #15) and he has 0 NHL games so far, but definitely looks more promising this season based upon AHL results.

    Wallstedt is having an off year so far, as many goalies do, but could bounce back.

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 minutes ago, Imyourhuckleberry said:

    Chisholm had played in 33 NHL games prior to this season, so should be roughly 47 games in the NHL this season for him to lose the option of opting into "group 6" unrestricted free agency.

    He's already played 18 for the Wild this year, so I believe just 29 more to go.

    I'd rather bank those games in quickly than have to play him at the end. IIRC, playoff games count too. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 minutes ago, TheGoosesAreLooses said:

    Okay bud. Facts and stats just don't matter apparently so no frame of reference is going to make a difference.spacer.png

    fact - our number 1 prospect - our goalie of the future - is struggling posting 860% and allowing 5 goals per game third year in. 

    fact - askarov is blossoming. 927% in NHL. 

    while this may be a small sample size and Wally can still climb out and even eclipse Asky, at THIS point - it's a bit disheartening to look at the way Wally is playing. 

    that's it. deal. with it. it's reality. 

     

     

    • Confused 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, Imyourhuckleberry said:

    Askarov was drafted #11 a year earlier than Wallstedt, and has 2 total NHL wins, which is actually the same number as the younger goalie.

    Cossa would be the better comparison(same age & draft year, but selected #15) and he has 0 NHL games so far, but definitely looks more promising this season based upon AHL results.

    Wallstedt is having an off year so far, as many goalies do, but could bounce back.

    This might be telling: I saw The Wall backing up Ferguson on Friday evening, but it was Vaj who started on Sunday. I didn't get to go to the game since I got sick. I did see the highlights, on our side, there weren't any. 

    I don't have any information that The Wall is injured. It's possible he has the sniffles, as walking pneumonia is going around here commonly (that's what has likely taken me out). 

    I was fully expecting The Wall to start Saturday, and was surprised to see Vaj played. I would have been pissed to go sick and not see The Wall.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 minutes ago, OldDutchChip said:

    fact - our number 1 prospect - our goalie of the future - is struggling posting 860% and allowing 5 goals per game third year in. 

    fact - askarov is blossoming. 927% in NHL. 

    while this may be a small sample size and Wally can still climb out and even eclipse Asky, at THIS point - it's a bit disheartening to look at the way Wally is playing. 

    that's it. deal. with it. it's reality. 

     

     

    I'm going to get my popcorn and await Gooses & Strife's responses

    • Haha 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 minutes ago, Imyourhuckleberry said:

    Askarov was drafted #11 a year earlier than Wallstedt, and has 2 total NHL wins, which is actually the same number as the younger goalie.

    Cossa would be the better comparison(same age & draft year, but selected #15) and he has 0 NHL games so far, but definitely looks more promising this season based upon AHL results.

    Wallstedt is having an off year so far, as many goalies do, but could bounce back.

    Askarov and Wally were considered the best goalie prospects in both years. Wally was recently voted as our top prospect. They are the same age right now - 22. One is having a great start, the other is struggling. 

    What else are we trying to argue? You want to say "all is well" ok. I am inclined to think that there is a bit of an issue to monitor. Especially given that he was deemed out #1 prospect. 

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 minutes ago, OldDutchChip said:

    fact - our number 1 prospect - our goalie of the future - is struggling posting 860% and allowing 5 goals per game third year in. 

    fact - askarov is blossoming. 927% in NHL. 

    while this may be a small sample size and Wally can still climb out and even eclipse Asky, at THIS point - it's a bit disheartening to look at the way Wally is playing. 

    that's it. deal. with it. it's reality. 

    Right, but it's also true that Askarov was drafted the prior year and should be a year more ready. Sadly, from looking at The Wall's stat sheet, and memory which is scary, The Wall has an even tempered approach to the game, but is a streaky goaltender. We'd all like to see the GAA over the last couple of years just be steady, but that's not really how his results are.

    Some of it is probably the young defense, another issue that we need to solve is was he expecting to be in the N this year exclusively? Does he feel he's learned as much as he can in the A? We just traded for a player with a similar gripe. Now, we did resign The Wall to a nice 2 year deal after this season, probably a better deal than he deserves. Hopefully that smoothed over any hard feelings.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 minutes ago, OldDutchChip said:

    I am inclined to think that there is a bit of an issue to monitor.

    I apologize to everyone. I guess I should have gone down to the floor with my grandson, had a sharpy ready asked for his autograph and asked him this question. I failed!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Many excellent comments and points to be considered by all.  And here's my 2 cents...

    The Wild are tied with the Jets at most points, in the entire NHL.  Whatever Hynes is doing, seems to be working.  The Wild somehow have gelled and working as a team.  It shows in the eye test.  Sure, we can all nit pick stats this and that, but the current position is the Wild are sitting at the top, with lots of momentum.  Hynes has proven that the current setup, current roster, can be successful.  

    So what does that all mean?  

    If the Wild continue on this momentum, even remotely, for the rest of the season we should be in the playoffs.  However, what do we need to do differently to avoid the dreaded 1 and done post season?   We are going to need to get past some assortment of Vegas, LA, Vancouver, Edmonton, Winnipeg, then probably Washington.  What assets will be needed for that setup?  

    Why not take the RH defenseman and develop the young'en beforehand?  What good are the 2025-2027 picks when you have already assembled the team you need?  And you have the pipeline with some future?  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 minutes ago, mnfaninnc said:

    Right, but it's also true that Askarov was drafted the prior year and should be a year more ready. Sadly, from looking at The Wall's stat sheet, and memory which is scary, The Wall has an even tempered approach to the game, but is a streaky goaltender. We'd all like to see the GAA over the last couple of years just be steady, but that's not really how his results are.

    Some of it is probably the young defense, another issue that we need to solve is was he expecting to be in the N this year exclusively? Does he feel he's learned as much as he can in the A? We just traded for a player with a similar gripe. Now, we did resign The Wall to a nice 2 year deal after this season, probably a better deal than he deserves. Hopefully that smoothed over any hard feelings.

    they are just 3 month apart in age and played about the same games in AHL (asky with 10 more or so). but i do recall Wally playing among sweden's elite for so long. i dunno - it felt as a warning sign. add to that ZERO developed D prospects in NHL since end of last century and there is a trend....no?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 hours ago, OldDutchChip said:

    Yeah i do hope he figures things out and comes back and be who he was promised to be OR he can continue the unfortunate path he is on now. Fleury decides that he wants another farewell tour - nothing is wrong with that

    back to Wally - we pretty much have our entire list of studly D prospects in front of him, that can't be all their fault  😜

    Masters, Hunt (used to), O'Rourke, Lambos, Spacek, Peart - all these gents were going to make an impact and will surely still will. (or maybe our prospects are not as great as we were lead to believe....?) 🙂 

    spacer.png

    IMO, that blueline is far too young for the AHL. It's a good thing to have 2-3 of those guys there, but putting them there all at once has been a disaster.

    • Like 7
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    30 minutes ago, OldDutchChip said:

    What else are we trying to argue? You want to say "all is well" ok. I am inclined to think that there is a bit of an issue to monitor. Especially given that he was deemed out #1 prospect. 

    It's not great. I argued all offseason that Gustavsson needed to be retained because he was the #1 goalie and the team couldn't count on Wallstedt ever being better. At that time, I couldn't have anticipated Wallstedt struggling as much as he has this year, but there was never any certainly that he would become as good as Gustavsson. Gus had a down year last season compared to the prior, but Fleury was worse and Wallstedt was unproven.

    Many goalies have a rough year here or there, so I'm not panicked about Wallstedt, but it's a damn good thing the Wild kept Gustavsson as they would be in a really bad spot with Wallstedt struggling and Fleury being asked to play in 70%+ of their games. Hopefully it's just a down year and Wallstedt makes the adjustments necessary for a big jump forward in his development.

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    21 minutes ago, OldDutchChip said:

    add to that ZERO developed D prospects in NHL since end of last century and there is a trend....no?

    Maybe that is because we used a single first round pick between 2013-2024 on a defenseman. 

    Since 2011 when we developed Brodin, and 2012 when we got Dumba then all our picks in first or second round on defensemen;

    2013 

    2nd round Olofsson

    5th round Carson Soucy

    2014

    2nd Belpedio

    2018

    1st Johansson

    2021 Late 1st Lambos

    2024 1st Zeev

     

    Wow, I wonder why our late round picks are turning into all stars when we haven't drafted a high percentage player (top 15) on defense since Matt Dumba. Why aren't all our 3rd and 4th rounders all stars?

    Why is the sky blue? 

    That is why perspective is important, so you don't look like a f*cking idiot claiming our development is failing when our development has been pretty on par with our draft picks based on % success rate. Meanwhile you complain about Brackett who wasn't with us until 2020 and about players who in all reasonable expectations wouldn't be in the NHL yet. 

     

    • Like 4
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    56 minutes ago, OldDutchChip said:

    fact - askarov is blossoming. 927% in NHL

    Fact: Askarov was been sent down to the Barracuda on 11/26 to work on things. 

    Edited by M_Nels
    Added Date
    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Imyourhuckleberry said:

    The actual breakdown is likely worse than that for many Wild picks.

    74% is for all 1st round picks, but it's probably over 90% for top 10 picks, around 75% or the next 10 picks, and below 60% for the final 12.

    The Wild have often been picking in the final 12, or very close to it, rather than the top 15. After pick 15, it's probably less than a 74% chance.

    Anyone selected after pick 20 has less than a 60% chance, I'd guess. The top of the 2nd round probably starts around 50% before quickly declining to around 30% after pick 50.

    Yeah, there was a chart that went to actual draft# but I didn't take the time to get that granular. I guess my whole point in posting that is I don't think we're any better or worse off than most teams as far as drafting goes and if we get more than 1 solid NHL D-men out of that pool, we're probably doing well.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...