Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness
  • Could the Wild Pull Off A Surprise Trade To Round Out the Roster?


    Image courtesy of David Gonzales-USA TODAY Sports
    Luke Sims

     

     

    The Minnesota Wild signed Yakov Trenin in free agency, a bottom-six, hard-hitting, penalty-killing, defensive forward. Trenin is a redundant presence in the bottom six, which includes Marcus Foligno, Ryan Hartman, and Jakub Lauko

    Minnesota also has young forwards like Liam Ohgren and Marat Khusnutdinov, who could inject some much-needed secondary scoring. 

    The problem is that there’s not enough room for everyone. 

    The Wild are “hoping” that players like Marcus Johansson, Foligno, and Frederick Gaudreau will magically improve from last season. The team is counting on internal improvements from this group of players to score more and reignite a moribund penalty kill. 

    But it’s not guaranteed to happen; hope is not a plan. Minnesota needs a better solution. 

    The Wild have five of their six top-six spots lined up. Kirill Kaprizov, Marco Rossi, Joel Eriksson Ek, Matt Boldy, and Mats Zuccarello comprise the top line and two spots on the second line. 

    Minnesota had a rotating door at right wing, with Johansson occupying the spot most of the season. Ohgren took a shot at that spot near the end of the season and did not look out of place. 

    Johansson had an incredibly disappointing season. If the Wild want to improve their offensive output, they must find a better solution than using Johansson on the second line. Johansson will not be effective in a bottom-six role; that’s not his play style. However, he’s out of his depth in the top six and a drag on his linemates. It’s a tough spot for the coaching staff, but maybe a bottom-six role will force Johasson to engage and make an impact. 

    However, given the Wild’s current plan of hoping Johansson finds his form again, the Swedish winger will take the final spot in the top six. 

    As currently constructed, the Wild have Foligno, Hartman, Lauko, Gaudreau, Trenin, and Khusnutdinov as their bottom six forwards. That means there’s no room for prospects Ohgren or Riley Heidt to make the team in successful roles. 

    Ohgren could impact that game as a bottom-six forward. However, that would mean Ohgren would be taking a player's spot on an expensive long-term deal or a newly-signed physical player.

    The Wild also signed Travis Boyd and Reese Johnson as tweener forwards to backfill in case of injuries. Boyd has played for four teams in seven seasons and has 118 career points in 296 NHL games. Johnson has primarily played in the AHL, but he can be a physical presence in the bottom six. 

    Sammy Walker and Raska have re-signed with the Wild, and another batch of tweeners could fill in at the bottom of the lineup. Walker brings speed and skill, and Raska brings size and physicality. 

    Khusnutdinov will be fighting for a spot and his role going forward. However, the Wild had him playing in the NHL immediately after he arrived from Russia. 

    The Wild have locked themselves into a complacent roster that’s difficult to rebuild. Besides Lauko, Khusnutdinov, and Johansson, all of these players are on long-term deals that are almost impossible to trade. 

    A trade could shock the room and send a wake-up call to the other forwards. However, Wild would probably be the losing end of any deal they make. Those contracts are not good, and the Wild would probably need to attach other assets to offload one of their bad contracts. 

    Johansson would be the easiest to move. He’s only on a $2 million contract for one more year. But trading Johansson would open up a spot for Ohgren or Hedit to play in the top six and send a message to the other players on the roster. 

    That gives the team more flexibility to move skilled players and prospects, which will help with the secondary scoring and team dynamics. 

    All stats and data via Daily Faceoff and Elite Prospects unless otherwise noted.  

     

     

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    3 minutes ago, OldDutchChip said:

    5 years for freddy though??? 

    He was Dean's guy! And, he's waivable! I think he agreed to length of deal instead of a 3 year $10m deal, which with his point production could have been argued. I wouldn't have liked it, but it could have been explained with comparable contracts.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    19 minutes ago, mnfaninnc said:

    He was Dean's guy! And, he's waivable! I think he agreed to length of deal instead of a 3 year $10m deal, which with his point production could have been argued. I wouldn't have liked it, but it could have been explained with comparable contracts.

    1 year for 2MM, that would have been smart. you also tell him - here outperform and you'll get a better pay day next. if not - move on and we will look for another 3/4th liner. we did it with Steele, we did it with Harty, i mean there are always guys you can put in on bottom lines. no reason to tie yourself up for 5 years. sure - waiver is there, but it may be a pride thing now - saying you messed up and sending a player for what like 3 or 4 years to AHL to make good money? i dunno.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    14 minutes ago, OldDutchChip said:

    but it may be a pride thing now - saying you messed up and sending a player for what like 3 or 4 years to AHL to make good money? i dunno.

    or, he was paid market rates (just a lower AAV for more years) with the express knowledge that when he's passed, he will need to find another team. For us, he's probably a fringe player, but he could start in Chicago's lineup. Or San Jose's. 

    I'm convinced that Shooter was taking care of the players (which arguably is not his job, but some GMs do treat their players well) knowing that they needed market rates to stay so that when they were let go they didn't have to start all over again.

    I'd have rather it been 1 year also. But he'd had 2 good years prior and there was no reason to think he'd have such a bad year. Plus, it's obvious he wasn't playing at 100% and he did miss time. We could have had the top 2 lines from Iowa playing for us if guys wouldn't have played hurt.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 minutes ago, mnfaninnc said:

    or, he was paid market rates (just a lower AAV for more years) with the express knowledge that when he's passed, he will need to find another team. For us, he's probably a fringe player, but he could start in Chicago's lineup. Or San Jose's. 

    I'm convinced that Shooter was taking care of the players (which arguably is not his job, but some GMs do treat their players well) knowing that they needed market rates to stay so that when they were let go they didn't have to start all over again.

    I'd have rather it been 1 year also. But he'd had 2 good years prior and there was no reason to think he'd have such a bad year. Plus, it's obvious he wasn't playing at 100% and he did miss time. We could have had the top 2 lines from Iowa playing for us if guys wouldn't have played hurt.

    taking care of players is nice, but at some point it has to be business - he gave us 2 good years, but there is a limit to a player like him and we should have flexed a bit and dictated our terms, instead we just gifted him and others security. we also could have waited on some of them, but instead we just acted like it was a race against someone....who? us?

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    9 minutes ago, OldDutchChip said:

    taking care of players is nice, but at some point it has to be business

    BT's taking care of players needs to have a return by being able to lure talent here.  

    The dilemma is that he hasn't left enough cap space to sign anyone.

    I think we need to call it a BG-22.

    • Like 2
    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Will D. Ness said:

    BT's taking care of players needs to have a return by being able to lure talent here.  

    The dilemma is that he hasn't left enough cap space to sign anyone.

    I think we need to call it a BG-22.

    yeap he had a way forward and blocked it with all the stuff post 22

    Fire Billy

    Illicit - FU

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, OldDutchChip said:

    1 year for 2MM, that would have been smart. you also tell him - here outperform and you'll get a better pay day next.

    TRUTH BOMB!!!

     Run it like a business Guerin

    #nevergofullretardbill

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, OldDutchChip said:

    but there is a limit to a player like him and we should have flexed a bit and dictated our terms, instead we just gifted him and others security.

    KA-BOOM!

     Compounding of bad decisions begin to leave a mark

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    What happens if all these guys actually do rebound this year? What happens if we're in more shootouts and Freddy is slowly firing in round 3 goals? What happens if Hartzy, Foligno, Zuccarello have a renaissance? What happens if Spurgeon appears really fixed (I'd love to see that but am pessimistic)? 

    What happens if it ends up being that we just had a lousy year last season and we get back to business?

    Either could happen. I'm pretty sure this is still a 1 and done team in the playoffs, but getting the invitation is still very important to our owner, the GM's boss. I'm pretty sure that we will have a competitive product on the ice this next season. I'm also pretty sure that we'll see some more from The Wall this season than 3 starts. 

    I, for one, will be enjoying watching the young guys grow. It's been my only expectation for the dead cap era. I was pleasantly surprised we made the playoffs in 3 of those years. I also expected the promotion of young talent to be there before they were ready and to grow within the big Wild team, even though they'd make costly mistakes. I have no problem with the extra marinating either. If that's Guerin's philosophy, I can certainly see the logic.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Guys let's face it. One of the best inside jokes since forever is the mnfaninnc off-season workout philosophy. We all pretty much agree, it's just way funnier to imagine a 235lb Riley Heidt or if Da Buoy grows to the size of his older brother and arrives at 6'3 242, that's beefing up the back end. 

    😀

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...