Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • Cole Eiserman Can Make Wild Fans Forget Passing On Gabe Perreault


    Image courtesy of David Raginek-USA TODAY Sports
    Tony Abbott

    Minnesota Wild fans got a first-hand look at what could have been when Boston College played in the NCAA Championship Game at the Xcel Energy Center. The Wild had the No. 21 pick, and Gabriel Perreault was on the board. Perreault was one of the then-future engines of the BC Eagles, the team general manager Bill Guerin played for once upon a time.

    The Wild didn't draft Perreault, opting to take Charlie Stramel, a big, speedy center. In an alternate timeline, the Frozen Four would have been a homecoming for Perreault. Instead, Wild fans were pressing their noses to the window of the New York Rangers' future. 

    Everyone knew Perreault had talent, but he fell down the draft board. Scouts said his skating wasn't up to snuff. He wasn't big enough to compensate for his footspeed, they said. However, Perreault's stat sheet told a different story.

    He scored 53 goals and 132 points in 63 games for Team USA's U-18 squad.

    Guess which mattered more? For now, anyway, it's the jaw-dropping numbers, which continued as an Eagle. In his freshman season, he racked up 19 goals and 60 points in 36 NCAA games.

    But don't worry, Wild fans. There'll always be another player who inexplicably falls in the draft. This time, Cole Eiserman could be that player.

    As recently as September, Eiserman was widely considered the consolation prize to Macklin Celebrini at the 2024 Draft Lottery. Bob McKenzie's preseason rankings, which he takes from a consensus of NHL scouts, had Eiserman ranked No. 2 in a "Big Three," including Ivan Demidov. Eiserman fell to No. 4 at midseason. Still, he was likely a top-5 pick. Not someone who could fall to the Wild's likely draft range, anyway.

    But now? McKenzie's list has Eiserman ranked 13th in the 2024 Draft class. As luck would have it, the Wild have the 13th pick. Suddenly, the thought of Eiserman in a Wild jersey is entirely possible. McKenzie and his scouting contacts aren't wildly off-track from the public scouts, either. Elite Prospects' consolidated rankings have Eiserman at 14th.

    What's the deal? How bad of a year does a prospect have to have to fall from No. 2 to 13 in the rankings?

    The funny thing is, at least statistically, Eiserman had the kind of year you'd want a top prospect to have leading up to the draft. As one of the youngest players in his class, his August 29 birthday was less than three weeks away from being ineligible until the 2025 draft, he scored 58 goals and 89 points in 57 games for the US National U18 team. 

    That overall point total might not have the pop that Perreault had. But let's not freak out, either. Eiserman's 1.56 points per game matched Cole Caufield in his draft year. It was also sandwiched between superstars like Patrick Kane (1.58) and Phil Kessel's (1.53) production in their Draft-Minus-1 years. (Kane and Kessel were barely on the other side of the age cut-off, so about two-to-three months younger than Eiserman).

    And let's not forget -- hot damn, those goals. You can put up Eiserman versus almost anyone in the program's history.

    Most Goals Per Game For Draft Year Players, US National U-18 Team

    1. Cole Caufield, 2018-19: 1.12
    2. Cole Eiserman, 2023-24: 1.02
    3. Ryan Leonard, 2022-23: 0.89 
    4. Will Smith, 2022-23: 0.85
    5. Gabriel Perreault, 2022-23: 0.84
    6. Kieffer Bellows, 2015-16: 0.81
    7. Oliver Wahlstrom, 2017-18: 0.77
    8. Sasha Pastujov, 2020-21: 0.73
    9. Alex Turcotte, 2018-19: 0.73
    10. Jack Hughes, 2018-19: 0.68

    We can even compare Eiserman's goal production alongside older Draft-Minus-1 players in the program. Auston Matthews scored 55 goals in 60 games (0.92 per game), Kessel was precisely a goal-per-game with 41 in 41, and Jack Eichel hit twine 38 times in 53 games (0.72 per game) before jumping to the NCAA for his draft year.

    Is that good? That feels good.

    But here Eiserman is, with his "stock plummetting," per McKenzie and the rest of the Draft World. If that means the Wild can get him, though, they'll have a player with tremendous upside. The scouts McKenzie speaks to concede he still might be "the best pure scorer in the draft." In ranking Eiserman at No. 14 overall, The Athletic's Corey Pronman still says, "he has the potential to be a top-line winger."

    image.png

    If Judd Brackett has a "type" when it comes to his drafting in Minnesota, it's "Top Talents That Fall." Not picking Perreault was an outlier. In 2020, the Wild got a top-five talent in Marco Rossi, who tumbled to ninth. In 2021, Jesper Wallstedt went from a possible top-10 pick to the Pick 20 when the Wild traded up two slots to nab him. Just six picks later, Minnesota scooped up Carson Lambos, a possible top-10 pick in the preseason with injury concerns. In 2022, the Wild took Danila Yurov all the way at Pick 24.

    Brackett would seem poised to take a bet on Eiserman at No. 13, and it would be wise to do so. His strategy has allowed Minnesota to punch well above their weight for their mediocre draft positions, at least in terms of prospect rankings and hype. Who cares if you're picking 13th if someone who "shouldn't" be there falls to you?

    His scoring and lack of playmaking can come off as "selfish" or having a "me, me, me" attitude, according to scouts The Athletic's Scott Wheeler in a March 2024 profile. A writer at Hockey Wilderness isn't able to prove or disprove that. For the sake of argument, assume it's true. How many Wild fans and observers have begged this team to get a player who is selfish enough to fire the puck without hesitation?

    It would be a disappointment if he came to St. Paul and wasn't a bit selfish.

    (Editor's Note: The fact that he does the Rickey Henderson thing where he speaks in third-person is a plus, not a minus.)

    It should also be noted that Eiserman's coach advocates for Eiserman's makeup and attitude in Wheeler's piece. "He's emotional and he's competitive," USA Hockey National Development Program head coach Nick Fohr told Wheeler. "And I love him. His teammates love him."

    Eiserman is committed to playing at Boston University, and BU coach Jay Pandolfo also relayed the endorsement he got from his star player, none other than Macklin Celebrini: "He can't say enough about Cole not only as a player, but as a person."

    Sometimes, a player's star rises early, leading to scrutiny that affects their draft stock. That happened to Phil Kessel in 2006. "There might be some selfish play there sometimes," said a Columbus Blue Jacket scout during a behind-the-scenes look at the Columbus Blue Jackets' 2006 Draft war room by ESPN the Magazine's Gare Joyce. Columbus never got to make the ultimate call on him. Kessel went a pick before them and selfishly scored 413 goals and lifted two Stanley Cups in his career.

    The draft is seven weeks away, though, and teams will presumably get to talk to Eiserman at the upcoming combine. There's still plenty of time for his stock to reverse back to the top-10 or for one team in the first 12 picks to fall in love with him. It might already be happening; Eiserman shone in the Under-18 World Junior Championship. Eiserman's nine goals (11 points) tied for second in the tournament, with his USA team taking the Silver Medal. The U-18s are the last high-profile event before the Draft, so Eiserman at least left a nice final impression.

    But if not, the Wild are waiting in the wings at Pick 13 and should be waiting to scoop up the star sniper. Perhaps Brackett can re-run his playbook for Wallstedt and find a way to trade up a few slots to get him. If so, any fans still mourning Perreault's missed opportunity can find solace in knowing the Wild didn't let the next falling star slip through their grasp. 

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 3
    • Thanks 1

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    Eiserman would be a nice addition. I hope Guerin allows Brackett to take best available this year in the 1st. We can always target Kleber, or Marelli in second round who are big defensive right handers. Maybe we even get lucky and Emery or Mews falls a little to get scooped in the second round.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    thru the podcasts i listen to it sounds like Eiserman is a natural born goal scorer, but he's deficient in all other aspects of the game.  Not sure I can get too excited if he's the pick.  

    • Confused 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Have the Wild had a player before who refers to himself in the third-person?

    Seems like there's a lot of reasons he'd go before 13th.

    Do other teams need defense and will there be more of them taken before a scorer like this with a big ego?

    I'm telling myself already Brackett is gonna come out of left field with a guruism. Rather be surprised in a good way but mentally preparing for the worst.

    • Haha 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Protec said:

    I'm telling myself already Brackett is gonna come out of left field with a guruism. Rather be surprised in a good way but mentally preparing for the worst.

    Yeah, dude, he's done such a bad job so far.

    • Like 2
    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Tony Abbott said:

    Yeah, dude, he's done such a bad job so far.

    Huge disappointment! Rossi, Hunt, Khus and O'Rourke all in his first draft. Every single one of them just useless. Then we get into the absolute failure that is Wallstedt. Bankier, Masters, Peart, Lambos all already  21 years old and haven't had a 70 goal or 100 point season yet. All busts, every single one.

    Edited by TheGoosesAreLooses
    • Haha 4
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I have no faith in the Wild FO to make the right choice after last year’s draft.  It’s such a horrendous first round pick and clearly flawed process that led them there.  I do disclaim that Stramel can still work out and be fine, but there is no top 6 upside there.  You can get those guys later (like their second round pick, for example).

    Are people here really touting Bracket and Geurin as draft masters for picking a bunch of guys that haven’t even made it to the league?  Clearly, those guys could have very successful career.  But, they also may not.  Maybe locate a few actual success stories as examples?  For now, we know Rossi is a good hockey player at the NHL level.  

    Edited by Beast
    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I really don't think that the Stramel pick is so egregious. People (including myself!) said similar stuff about Joel Eriksson Ek, and look how that worked out. He had a bad year, but this isn't a kid without talent or upside. 

    • Like 4
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think Stramel was picked for need due to Rossi's uncertainty.  Rossi becoming a valid scorer in one year makes Stramel's struggles look even worse in context, because there's one less spot to go around unless he improves.  The thing is, you cannot teach size, so he and Kumpulainen will get chances other people won't.

    As for Eiserman, I'm all for someone anywhere in the vicinity of 30-40 goal scorer potential.  He seems like the most likely candidate to either go early or heavily drop.  If he does drop, and he's there, he offers something the Wild don't have: a guy who just wants the puck, and wants to shoot: perfect for the second line already.

    Still not going to hurt if people like Helenius, Yakemchuk, or Greentree are still around.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I was not one of those disappointed for not taking Perrault. He is 5'11" 165. That's where he is on Elite Prospects (likely his draft measurements) and he's the same on the BC site. If we thought Rossi was going to struggle or is small, this guy bleeds small. 

    Eiserman is 6' 196 right now according to Elite Prospects. We'll get a better indication from his combine measurements. But, his body is close to NHL ready. His shot appears close to that too. Does the rest of his game? Can he skate (the other big trait that Brackett uses)? 

    Some of the mocks by some much smarter writers than me have got Cayden Lindstrom dropping (really, no lower than 9th). If this happens, that's the guy I want to trade up for! I wouldn't mind a big defender either. If it's Eiserman who is the guy to drop, he matches my traits pretty well (skating unknown) except for being an RHS. 

    We are so loaded at LW. Is there any way we can maybe get some righties in here? I'm not against lefties, I just want balance and we're not balanced in handedness or the talent of those handedness players.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    "We are so loaded at LW. Is there any way we can maybe get some righties in here? I'm not against lefties, I just want balance and we're not balanced in handedness or the talent of those handedness players."

    Helenius, NB, or Sennecke would help with that.  Liam Greentree shoots left, but is RW too.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The Wild are desperate for someone to put the puck in back of the net, crazy desperate. We need offense, not defensemen, goal scorers. In today’s NHL you’ll never make it out of the first round of the playoffs playing 2-1 games. Somebody needs to figure that out.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    8 hours ago, TheGoosesAreLooses said:

    Huge disappointment! Rossi, Hunt, Khus and O'Rourke all in his first draft. Every single one of them just useless. Then we get into the absolute failure that is Wallstedt. Bankier, Masters, Peart, Lambos all already  21 years old and haven't had a 70 goal or 100 point season yet. All busts, every single one.

    Rossi for sure isn’t a disappointment, you can’t say Khus is, he’s only played a couple games, wallstedt either, he’s played what 2 games, you just don’t know about the rest, first they have to play, lol.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It seems there will be at least one prospect with high upside available at #13. After Celebrini there is some depth in the draft that might result in the Wild ending up with a good prospect.

    Regarding Eiserman, I think you can't underestimate the fact that he only turns 18 end of August. He is almost a year younger than other ranked players but already has a 196 lbs frame. There a things hat you can't teach and his offensive instincts could be lethal. The rest can be worked on.

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    If a guy is a natural goal scorer and isn't great at many other things, isn't up to the coaches to coach him? If I'm not mistaken, coaches do more than game plan. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Fezig said:

    If a guy is a natural goal scorer and isn't great at many other things, isn't up to the coaches to coach him? If I'm not mistaken, coaches do more than game plan. 

    He’s had the best coaches in the country for a few years now.  If he’s still selfish and lazy (I’m speculating based on reports I’ve heard) than that’s just who he is.   Imagine Pierre luc du bois 2.0.  

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    36 minutes ago, Fezig said:

    If a guy is a natural goal scorer and isn't great at many other things, isn't up to the coaches to coach him? If I'm not mistaken, coaches do more than game plan. 

    Yes. How coachable is he? Like Addison or like Rossi? That's a difference worth consideration. 

    I don't think a guy with his numbers slips past Philly or Columbus or Calgary. 

    MN has some good options. I don't expect a guy to jump right in so Connelly could be a lightweight noodle now but in a few years like Kyle Connor from WPG or Verhaeghe from FL who are like 180lb guys. I know mnfan wouldn't like it, but I just think the Wild need to try to get the best player. These big numbers guys shouldn't be passed over for a 200' player that "fits a need." The Wild have already done that with a few drafts while missing good NHL players who are already making bigger, more important impacts with their teams. 

    Guerin-goofs and Brackett-blunders are real.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    39 minutes ago, Pewterschmidt said:

    He’s had the best coaches in the country for a few years now.  If he’s still selfish and lazy (I’m speculating based on reports I’ve heard) than that’s just who he is.   Imagine Pierre luc du bois 2.0.  

    This should also be said about Eiserman, he de-committed from the Gophers for BU.  Is this a Guerin guy??

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Just now, Pewterschmidt said:

    This should also be said about Eiserman, he de-committed from the Gophers for BU.  Is this a Guerin guy??

    Hockey is weird cause you have some big ego guys who can be like Eichel, or Kessel who it kinda works for. Then there's guys like Suter who are so arrogant that nobody can stand it.

    It's tough to assess from afar. Yakupov had extreme confidence in junior. How'd that work out? I don't think that's a great comparison for Eiserman, but if you're an NHL team you'd better do a deep-dive into the psychology and personality of the guy first. Character evaluation. Perhaps that's how he's went from top 3 prospect to top 20. I still don't think he falls outside the top 10 with his production. Maturity-level and swagger combo can rub people the wrong way. In a few years, I think he'll still be a pretty good player.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 5/9/2024 at 9:39 PM, Ice Creeps said:

    Rossi for sure isn’t a disappointment, you can’t say Khus is, he’s only played a couple games, wallstedt either, he’s played what 2 games, you just don’t know about the rest, first they have to play, lol.

    Lol my comment was dripping with sarcasm. I think Brackett has done when given the reins. I think Stramel was a Guerin pick, not a Brackett pick.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 5/9/2024 at 3:29 PM, Tony Abbott said:

    I really don't think that the Stramel pick is so egregious. People (including myself!) said similar stuff about Joel Eriksson Ek, and look how that worked out. He had a bad year, but this isn't a kid without talent or upside. 

    I agree with what you said but he’s actually had two bad years in a row and he’s never really put up a lot of points in his entire year so idk why all of a sudden he would. He’s at best a 3rd or 4th line center and I’m actually a little worried he won’t make that. Wis hasn’t been a good team but still his numbers are atrocious the last couple years.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...