Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • Can Justin Brazeau Become the Player He Was Earlier This Season?


    Image courtesy of Brian Fluharty-Imagn Images
    Bekki Antonelli

    On March 6, the Minnesota Wild traded Marat Khusnutdinov, Jakub Lauko, and a 2026 sixth-round pick for Boston Bruins forward Justin Brazeau. All three players are young and early in their careers but have potential despite limited performance. 

    Often, a change of scenery is the key to unlocking better performance. Unfortunately, only the Bruins have immediately benefitted from the deal. Khunutdinov had 2 goals and 5 assists in 57 games for the Wild this season. However, he already has 2 goals for the Bruins in just 5 games, including this beauty:

    While Minnesotans may have buyer's remorse seeing Khusnutdinov’s sudden success, it's a testament to how important confidence and team placement can be. Brazeau has 0 points in 6 games for the Wild, but his stats reflect a confidence problem rather than a lack of skill. If Brazeau can dangle Sergei Bobrovsky like this in one of his first NHL games, he already has a seasoned player's confidence and scoring ability. He doesn’t have a future riding pine.

    Brazeau has scored 10 goals and 10 assists in his 63 games this season. However, he hasn’t scored in 18 games. He’s in his first NHL season, so 20 points in 45 games is solid, especially on a team fighting to make the playoffs. 

    During the first half of the season, Boston regularly gave him 20+ shifts, never dropping below 17 per game except in the first 3 games of the season. However, in mid-January, Brazeau’s production and ice time decreased. 

    The Bruins were on a 6-game losing streak from Dec 31, 2024, to January 9, 2025. During this period, it would have made sense for the Bruins to shift things around to break the losing streak, but Brazeau played consistently throughout it. He scored 2 goals and stayed +1 through the period, even though the Bruins allowed 24 goals against during these 6 games. 

    Boston broke their losing streak in a 4-3 overtime win on January 11 against the Florida Panthers, in which Brazeau had an assist. Oddly, this was the start of Brazeau’s drop in production and ice time. It’s unclear whether the coaching staff lost confidence in him and reduced his ice time or he lost it in himself and started producing less. Regardless, it becomes a vicious cycle. Less ice time means fewer opportunities and often a drop in self-confidence, which means fewer goals and assists and less ice time.

    Coaches lose confidence in players or stop playing them despite their success for various reasons. However, in mid-January, Boston made no major coaching changes, no major players returned from injury, and made no headline trades. 

    The only notable event around that time was a brawl at the end of Boston’s January 9 game against the Tampa Bay Lightning. Brazeau came away with a penalty and a game misconduct, but he served neither because it was at the end of the game. Additionally, the brawl was a result of Emil Lilleberg’s dirty cross-check against Bruins center Mark Kastelic. It was more likely to earn Brazeau a pat on the back than getting him benched and traded. 

    Ultimately, it’s not clear what started the downward shift for Brazeau. 

    Unfortunately, Minnesota has not put much faith in Brazeau either. He finally broke 10 minutes of TOI on Saturday after playing as little as 4:10 minutes in a game for the Wild. Still, this recent upward shift is a positive sign. Brazeau has been making the most of his opportunities despite minimal ice time. 

    Brazeau may not have any points for the Wild, but he has been effective on the ice. He has 47 high-danger shots this season, compared to the 25.8 average for forwards. He has already had at least 2 near-goals for Minnesota, which shows his readiness to jump into action. He kept high pressure on the Los Angeles Kings on Monday night, picked up a loose puck, and nearly scored:

    During Minnesota’s game against the New York Rangers last Thursday, he sent a one-timer on net, which Igor Shesterkin saved.

    He’s creating and capitalizing on opportunities, and the points will come if Brazeau stays consistent. 

    Brazeau has also been effective on PK. At 6-foot-6, 227 lbs., he has incredible reach and easily blocks passing and shooting lanes. His penalty kill defensive and offensive zone times are better than average. This season, he has spent 33% of the time in the offensive zone, compared to the 29.6% average. He has also spent 49.6% of the time in the defensive zone, compared to the 56.4% average.

    He has 5 blocked shots in 6 games for the Wild, which is well above the 0.5 average per game for a power forward and 0.4 per game for a smaller forward. While in Boston, he averaged 0.45 this season, which is still strong, considering he got considerably less ice time than other forwards. 

    Brazeau has shown his value but has had a difficult couple of months. Still, he has maintained his strong defensive game and continues to create opportunities for the Wild. While his efforts have not yet resulted in a goal for Minnesota, he’s on track to contribute the way he did earlier this season. 

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 1

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    18 hours ago, mnhockeyfan03 said:

    I think we have to keep Zeev.  He has huge offensive potential.  The more I watch Faber the more he has to go.  That contract is not going to age well.  For 8.5mm you have to be elite and bring it offensively and he doesn’t bring offense and can’t clear front of net of D.  The amount if time he monkeys around with his loose helmet is crazy.  Just tighten it up and stop trying to look cool and hit someone. Spurgeon also has to go. I would do anything to get Tage Thompson from Buffalo.  Every time he was one the ice today stuff happened. He is a game changer and will change our PP.   I would give up Faber, Rossi and another pic or prospect for him.  Tuch had a tough game today. We need 2-3 top end forwards not including Yurov. Our D is solid so we can afford loose a few to upgrade forwards which we need badly.   I am not a big fan of paying over 5-6mm for D.  There are to many good guys out there in that range.  

    Faber ain’t going anywhere, period. Don’t know why several people are throwing his name out to go. What’s your master plan to get a #1 or #2 RHD immediately if we let him go? Nobody in IA fits that bill right now, Spurge is aging, Jiri likely not top pair, Bogo likely 7th next year. 
     

    How is $8.5m not going to age well? At worst he’s a 2nd pair RHD. With the cap going up that’s a good value. He’s only 22yrs old, many owners would love to have a kid that young that can play in all situations like he does. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    28 minutes ago, M_Nels said:

    Faber ain’t going anywhere, period. Don’t know why several people are throwing his name out to go. What’s your master plan to get a #1 or #2 RHD immediately if we let him go? Nobody in IA fits that bill right now, Spurge is aging, Jiri likely not top pair, Bogo likely 7th next year. 
     

    How is $8.5m not going to age well? At worst he’s a 2nd pair RHD. With the cap going up that’s a good value. He’s only 22yrs old, many owners would love to have a kid that young that can play in all situations like he does. 

    Yah if faber jumping into the lineup and delivering from day one to him being a beast at 4 nations isn’t enough for you to want to keep him around, I don’t know what you’re looking for.  On top of that he’s a solid person, squeaky clean with zero drama. 

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 minutes ago, mnhockeyfan03 said:

    Just trying to build a Cup winning team and it’s not happening with him making 8.5mm on this team

    Well no shit we’re trying to build a cup winning team but defense does matter ya know? What’s your master plan at RHD moving forward then?

    With the cap going up $8.5m for a franchise RHD that is only 22 years old is a good value. He’s not blocking some cheap star on a ELC either. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Just now, M_Nels said:

    Well no shit we’re trying to build a cup winning team but defense does matter ya know? What’s your master plan at RHD moving forward then?

    With the cap going up $8.5m for a franchise RHD that is only 22 years old is a good value. He’s not blocking some cheap star on a ELC either. 

    We need  high powered forwards to get better and nothing worth a dang is out in free agency.  We have to look at trades and he and Rossi are our best trade chips.  Trading him and Rossi for Tage we will have 5-6mm left to sign a RHD.  We can do that easily.  Faber is not a shut down and powerful offensive D for 8.5mm.  He is worth 5mm and Billy jumped the gun on his contract.  We need forwards, forwards, forwards, forwards……

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 minutes ago, mnhockeyfan03 said:

    We need  high powered forwards to get better and nothing worth a dang is out in free agency.  We have to look at trades and he and Rossi are our best trade chips.  Trading him and Rossi for Tage we will have 5-6mm left to sign a RHD.  We can do that easily.  Faber is not a shut down and powerful offensive D for 8.5mm.  He is worth 5mm and Billy jumped the gun on his contract.  We need forwards, forwards, forwards, forwards……

    Easily?? Name a #1 or #2 dman out there for $5-6m. FA is always the easy, convenient answer but who are you going to get that’s not a journeyman. You get 2 maybe 3yrs and then start over again. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Pewterschmidt said:

    Yah if faber jumping into the lineup and delivering from day one to him being a beast at 4 nations isn’t enough for you to want to keep him around, I don’t know what you’re looking for.  On top of that he’s a solid person, squeaky clean with zero drama. 

    i was the one suggesting faber trade and i stand by that move. 

    sometimes you need to sacrifice someone you like to address a bigger need. And that's what Faber can be. 

    We need toughness in our top 6. So what do we do?

    Faber's stock is at the all time high (after four nations and minute munching love affair from the media), should he be dangled for Tkachuk - that may be enough to make the deal go through. I think that's a fairly even trade for both teams actually.

    You can pair Tkachuk and Kaprizov together and get a bit more "deterrence" for our all-world player and you can see what a Tkachuk team can do when he is motivated (FL and US team).

    You can also dangle Faber to TOR after their inevitable collapse in the 1st round and target Nylander. TOR will likely re-adjust their all-offensive approach and may bite. You do the same and pair Nylander and Kap together. 

    To be a contender, you have to be a player and take risks. Otherwise we will be playing Nyquist of the world and trying out failed projects from other teams. 

    Edited by OldDutchChip
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, M_Nels said:

    Easily?? Name a #1 or #2 dman out there for $5-6m. FA is always the easy, convenient answer but who are you going to get that’s not a journeyman. You get 2 maybe 3yrs and then start over again. 

    The guy who carried Faber at the 4 nations Jacob Slavin.  Signed for 6mm.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, OldDutchChip said:

    Faber's stock is at the all time high (after four nations and minute munching love affair from the media), should he be dangled for Tkachuk - that may be enough to make the deal

    I would love this deal.  I do not think Ottawa would make this trade though

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    12 minutes ago, mnhockeyfan03 said:

    The guy who carried Faber at the 4 nations Jacob Slavin.  Signed for 6mm.  

    I wouldn’t say he carried him, they were a good tandem. You put Merrill with him and you get nowhere near the same result. Slavin’s contract is a hell of a deal, I applaud Cane’s management for pulling that off. 

    But…Slavin is also 31, signed through age 39. Does he make it that long at this level? How far does he fall off? Do injuries catch up with him. Faber is a full 9yrs younger and can play 1st pair. I’m keeping him. 

    AND he’s already signed long term. Where’s your FA’s that can play 1st or 2nd pair that aren’t journeymen  

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, M_Nels said:

    I wouldn’t say he carried him, they were a good tandem. You put Merrill with him and you get nowhere near the same result. Slavin’s contract is a hell of a deal, I applaud Cane’s management for pulling that off. 

    But…Slavin is also 31, signed through age 39. Does he make it that long at this level? How far does he fall off? Do injuries catch up with him. Faber is a full 9yrs younger and can play 1st pair. I’m keeping him. 

    AND he’s already signed long term. Where’s your FA’s that can play 1st or 2nd pair that aren’t journeymen  

     

    I understand your opinion and I have mine.  We need high powered forwards and MN is not a free agent destination so we have to acquire them through trades.  Faber is our best trade chip to acquire that player and we need that player more than we need Faber.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    10 minutes ago, Pewterschmidt said:

    I would love this deal.  I do not think Ottawa would make this trade though

    that's fair. but should Brady become a bit grumpy and miss his homeland - billy should be ready. but knowing billy - that is very unlikely. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, M_Nels said:

    Easily?? Name a #1 or #2 dman out there for $5-6m. FA is always the easy, convenient answer but who are you going to get that’s not a journeyman. You get 2 maybe 3yrs and then start over again. 

    Going to clarify..I meant in free agency not a current, signed roster player. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 minutes ago, M_Nels said:

    Going to clarify..I meant in free agency not a current, signed roster player. 

    A very similar player to Faber that is very up and coming is available this offseason and could get him for $4-5mm.  He was finlands best player at the 4 nations and been really coming on.  Henri Jokiharju

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, RedLake said:

    Why the Hell was Crotty recalled? 

    Hopefully my gut isn’t right but something tells me Brodin is going to be out again. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 minutes ago, mnhockeyfan03 said:

    A very similar player to Faber that is very up and coming is available this offseason and could get him for $4-5mm.  He was finlands best player at the 4 nations and been really coming on.  Henri Jokiharju

    Good call, I’d say you’re right on the money and could very well work out. Former 1st round pick only fetching a 4th for trade is a little curious.  His highest point total in his career is only 20 but he could be a Brodin type. Not sure cause I don’t watch the B’s. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    57 minutes ago, RedLake said:

     Blues 4 points from catching us. Flames 5 points away. This isn't gonna end well.

    But we have 2 games in hand over the Blews and Flamers are 8 points back with 1 game in hand over us. We have a very difficult stretch coming up, hopefully we KK back sooner than later..

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    18 hours ago, mnhockeyfan03 said:

    We need forwards, forwards, forwards, forwards……

    This is actually true, as is MHF's previous statement that Faber is worth $5m. Let me break this down a bit:

    • Faber could have had a bridge deal of a couple of years at the $4.5m mark after last season
    • Faber's 1st couple of years on this contract are probably overpriced, the next 2 are probably reasonably priced, the last 4 are value
    • Faber is going through the sophomore slump which many players go through
    • This includes hitting the wall of exhaustion
    • I completely disagree with the defensive part of the equation, I believe he is a shutdown defender
    • Points aren't the only thing to look at. Faber is very balanced. He's already exceeded, in both years, what most expected from him offensively
    • This kid is getting better!!!

    But, MHF is also correct that we need the forwards. Based upon drafting, it appears that Guerin preferred to take a goalie forward approach to this rebuild which is a proven strategy. He got his goalie and some defenders. The right defenders? Maybe not, they all looked like the same player. But, the issue here is that goalies take the longest to develop, then the defenders and lastly the forwards.

    Boldy Guerin gets no credit for drafting, Rossi I believe was purely a Judd selection, but the building and focus came the following year with the defenders. And, he just picked up Jiricek to double down on the defenders. Everyone sees the holes in the forwards, emphasized with a giant hole that is a missing Kaprizov. Does he have guys to step into the top 6? I count 1 in Yurov. I think OgZ is a middle 6, and I don't see much else coming soon. 

    Other teams are on different timelines, and they may part with a mid-20s guy who wants to win now, if they are in rebuild mode. But this will require some of our prospects to do it. I think we've got a lot of potential prospects who are tradeable and can move our timeline up a little. I'd concentrate on size and the '20-22 drafted players. 

    MHF is right about there being very little in UFA. So, likely this will not be the way to go. Further decimating our hopes is a salary cap shooting up, meaning, teams that might need some cap relief from us, just got it from the league. So, the remedy might be finding a disgruntled guy who wants to win, is in our window, and purchasing him. Not that he's currently available, but the noise that was heard (a faint noise) about B. Tkachuk being sick of losing last offseason was something that needed exploring and hoping he was quietly available. As things have turned out, it appears he isn't (though the booing of the anthem has raised more noise from his direction). 

    Having the #2 rated prospect pool means we have several solid prospects that could be traded and play NHL minutes. Simply put, we keep the ones we want and expect to make an NHL impact, and we hope some others have impressed enough where other teams think they can make an impact. Who could that be? 

    For me, Yurov, The Wall, Jiricek and Buium are pretty much untouchable. I would take OgZ out of the prospect mix into NHLer. There are a lot of other good looking kids who need opportunity. I'd say Lambos has improved and would be sorry to see him go. I think Spacek is our future 3rd pairing RD. We also have a very cheap Chisholm who is ready for a top 4 role elsewhere. 

    Some teams starting the rebuilding process may need volume more than quality since their prospect cupboards are empty. These would be the teams to target which could include more draft picks also. 

    I also think it's important to consider how Guerin wants this team to play. He wants offense but is unwilling to sacrifice 200' games. He's got many players on this team with 200' games and wants to keep that going. This may take out some of the huge point getters, for solid 2-way players in his view. A quick look at the Hurricanes/Rantanen debacle explains this shift. Rantanen could wheel and deal in Colorado, but placed into a structured environment like Carolina, even with his best friend there, didn't match up with his game or preferred style. Some will look at this as Carolina making a huge blunder, but in reality, Carolina probably saved an 8 x $14m salary by finding this out early. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    17 hours ago, mnhockeyfan03 said:

    The guy who carried Faber at the 4 nations Jacob Slavin.  Signed for 6mm.

    Slavin is not the offensive guy that Faber is, he's more like a Brodin. He allows his partner to be able to take risks. He'll chip in offensively but takes care of the back end. He's like a Middleton would be to Spurgeon when they first paired up. Yes, he's a top pairing, but not the guy who carries the full load.

    Slavin signed this contract last July 1st. I'd also like to remind people that the weather is fairly nice in Carolina and with a 4.25% flat state tax, his money goes a little further. This was a fair, hometown discount deal done with Carolina where he has a full NMC until his last season. It also has a $1m base salary with the rest bonus which gets him past any type of lockout. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    19 hours ago, OldDutchChip said:

    i was the one suggesting faber trade and i stand by that move. 

    sometimes you need to sacrifice someone you like to address a bigger need. And that's what Faber can be. 

    We need toughness in our top 6. So what do we do?

    Faber's stock is at the all time high (after four nations and minute munching love affair from the media), should he be dangled for Tkachuk - that may be enough to make the deal go through. I think that's a fairly even trade for both teams actually.

    You can pair Tkachuk and Kaprizov together and get a bit more "deterrence" for our all-world player and you can see what a Tkachuk team can do when he is motivated (FL and US team).

    I wouldn't do Nylander, but if B. Tkachuk could be had for pretty much Faber alone, I'd do that. It's not just B. Tkachuk's stats either, it's his intangibles and I believe with him in the lineup everyone will play better. To me, Faber would be a tough ask, but he'd also be the right sacrifice and we have a Jiricek/Buium/Spacek right side for the future. 

    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    17 hours ago, M_Nels said:

    Going to clarify..I meant in free agency not a current, signed roster player. 

    Then note Brady Skjei's contract signed last season. That's the number you're looking for. $7m x 7.

    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 minutes ago, mnfaninnc said:

    I wouldn't do Nylander, but if B. Tkachuk could be had for pretty much Faber alone, I'd do that. It's not just B. Tkachuk's stats either, it's his intangibles and I believe with him in the lineup everyone will play better. To me, Faber would be a tough ask, but he'd also be the right sacrifice and we have a Jiricek/Buium/Spacek right side for the future. 

    EXACTLY! 🍻

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 hours ago, mnfaninnc said:

    This is actually true, as is MHF's previous statement that Faber is worth $5m. Let me break this down a bit:

    • Faber could have had a bridge deal of a couple of years at the $4.5m mark after last season
    • Faber's 1st couple of years on this contract are probably overpriced, the next 2 are probably reasonably priced, the last 4 are value
    • Faber is going through the sophomore slump which many players go through
    • This includes hitting the wall of exhaustion
    • I completely disagree with the defensive part of the equation, I believe he is a shutdown defender
    • Points aren't the only thing to look at. Faber is very balanced. He's already exceeded, in both years, what most expected from him offensively
    • This kid is getting better!!!

    But, MHF is also correct that we need the forwards. Based upon drafting, it appears that Guerin preferred to take a goalie forward approach to this rebuild which is a proven strategy. He got his goalie and some defenders. The right defenders? Maybe not, they all looked like the same player. But, the issue here is that goalies take the longest to develop, then the defenders and lastly the forwards.

    Boldy Guerin gets no credit for drafting, Rossi I believe was purely a Judd selection, but the building and focus came the following year with the defenders. And, he just picked up Jiricek to double down on the defenders. Everyone sees the holes in the forwards, emphasized with a giant hole that is a missing Kaprizov. Does he have guys to step into the top 6? I count 1 in Yurov. I think OgZ is a middle 6, and I don't see much else coming soon. 

    Other teams are on different timelines, and they may part with a mid-20s guy who wants to win now, if they are in rebuild mode. But this will require some of our prospects to do it. I think we've got a lot of potential prospects who are tradeable and can move our timeline up a little. I'd concentrate on size and the '20-22 drafted players. 

    MHF is right about there being very little in UFA. So, likely this will not be the way to go. Further decimating our hopes is a salary cap shooting up, meaning, teams that might need some cap relief from us, just got it from the league. So, the remedy might be finding a disgruntled guy who wants to win, is in our window, and purchasing him. Not that he's currently available, but the noise that was heard (a faint noise) about B. Tkachuk being sick of losing last offseason was something that needed exploring and hoping he was quietly available. As things have turned out, it appears he isn't (though the booing of the anthem has raised more noise from his direction). 

    Having the #2 rated prospect pool means we have several solid prospects that could be traded and play NHL minutes. Simply put, we keep the ones we want and expect to make an NHL impact, and we hope some others have impressed enough where other teams think they can make an impact. Who could that be? 

    For me, Yurov, The Wall, Jiricek and Buium are pretty much untouchable. I would take OgZ out of the prospect mix into NHLer. There are a lot of other good looking kids who need opportunity. I'd say Lambos has improved and would be sorry to see him go. I think Spacek is our future 3rd pairing RD. We also have a very cheap Chisholm who is ready for a top 4 role elsewhere. 

    Some teams starting the rebuilding process may need volume more than quality since their prospect cupboards are empty. These would be the teams to target which could include more draft picks also. 

    I also think it's important to consider how Guerin wants this team to play. He wants offense but is unwilling to sacrifice 200' games. He's got many players on this team with 200' games and wants to keep that going. This may take out some of the huge point getters, for solid 2-way players in his view. A quick look at the Hurricanes/Rantanen debacle explains this shift. Rantanen could wheel and deal in Colorado, but placed into a structured environment like Carolina, even with his best friend there, didn't match up with his game or preferred style. Some will look at this as Carolina making a huge blunder, but in reality, Carolina probably saved an 8 x $14m salary by finding this out early. 

    Russo has mentioned a couple times a free agent from Western Michigan that sounds good.

    If the Wild dip into the college free agent market, one wonders if they’d be interested in Western Michigan’s Tim Washe. The Detroit native is big (6-3), he can skate and he’s the best faceoff guy in the country — three areas that could help the Wild in the long term. Washe, 23, enters the NCAA tournament this weekend against Minnesota State with 15 goals and 34 points in 38 games.

    A 6'3" center that can win face offs would be great. Stramel probably stays at MSU another year.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...