Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • Brock Faber May Be the Biggest Winner Of the Quinn Hughes Trade


    Image courtesy of Matt Krohn - Imagn Images
    Tony Abbott

    Going into Sunday's game, all eyes in the State of Hockey were on new Minnesota Wild acquisition Quinn Hughes. Friday's out-of-nowhere trade for the superstar defenseman sent a jolt of nervous excitement through a fanbase that was curious to see what this new era might hold. FanDuel Sports Network knew what the fans were tuning in to see, and they frequently highlighted Hughes with a circle to denote his position on the ice.

    Hughes had a tough act to follow. Zeev Buium, the crown jewel of the Wild's farm system until Friday, immediately notched a two-point night for the Vancouver Canucks. Fortunately, Hughes got his storybook beginning with the Wild, getting a goal as Minnesota rolled the Boston Bruins 6-2. 

    Being Hughes' big day, it was hard to imagine anyone else stealing the show. Still, as the game went on, it became impossible to take your eyes off the Wild's previous No. 1 defenseman, Brock Faber.

    Faber was amped about the Hughes acquisition, telling the media after Saturday's win against the Ottawa Senators, "It is gonna be an absolute treat, because he is terrible to play against." And presumably, great to play with, as well, with Faber getting the first crack at partnering up with Hughes.

    Faber's response was to play, well, a lot like Hughes. He was active in the offensive zone, with four shot attempts (three on goal) and moved the puck crisply, serving as an outlet for the rare times Hughes was stymied in the defensive zone. His power play assist was positively Hughesian, carrying the puck out of his own zone, into the offensive zone, and dancing through three Bruins to feed Ryan Hartman for the goal.

    It's one game, but let's not kid ourselves, Hughes is arguably the best defenseman in the world. The Wild view Faber as a franchise blueliner, with his defensive instincts and 93 points through 195 career games. Faber-Hughes might well become the NHL's best defense pairing in the league within a week, and if so, it'll be because Hughes is someone who can finally lighten Faber's load.

    Faber's not a Jonas Brodin, someone who is trusted in the defensive zone, can make efficient plays in transition, but doesn't contribute much more to the offense. No, Faber has proven that he can do everything. He can score, he can skate the puck out of his zone or make a breakout pass, he can defend, and he can thrive on the ice in any situation. 

    Faber's problem is that the Wild are often in a position where Faber must do everything, all the time. He's averaged over 25 minutes a night for his career, and those are rarely easy minutes. Faber's role has often been the blueline's primary puck-carrier, offensive generator, and a stout defender. There's no time to conserve energy -- Faber entered Monday with 115.22 miles skated in 2025-26, 11th-most in hockey, and he's fifth when it comes to even-strength play.

    Make no mistake, Faber can do that. Despite his struggles last year, he was the No. 1 defenseman on a playoff team. But the hope with Buium in Minnesota was that he'd quickly be able to take stuff off Faber's plate, allowing him to become an elite No. 2 defenseman.

    Now that Hughes is here, that dream is fulfilled, and then some. 

    Even during yesterday's feeling-out session, we saw what Hughes can do for Faber. Whether or not you believe Hughes is the best, second-best, or top-five defenseman in the league, there's no disputing that he's the best transition defenseman in the league. No one carries the puck more often or exits his zone more cleanly. The Wild have had their share of smooth-skating defensemen like Faber, Brodin, and Jared Spurgeon. Still, even last night, it was clear that Hughes' mobility is on another level.

    Suddenly, Faber has to expend significantly less energy in his 25 minutes, even if his job doesn't get much simpler. On paper, it'd seem like Faber would become the defensive complement to Hughes' go-go-go offensive style. What we got on Sunday was something much better.

    Again, Faber can do everything, and that means he gets to be whatever Hughes needs at a given moment. When opponents focus too hard on Hughes on the breakout, Faber can collect a pass and get things moving, with much less pressure than he's accustomed to. Hughes can find Faber in the offensive zone and know his partner is a threat to score. And yes, when it's time to bear down in front of the net, Faber can handle that with aplomb.

    Faber is set to be the biggest beneficiary of the Hughes Effect, but Wild fans are about to see how his presence impacts everyone, even those unlikely to play much with the shiny new star. Faber was a decent No. 1 option; now he's a top-tier No. 2. Having Hughes and Faber together means that Minnesota can lean on the long-running chemistry between Brodin and Spurgeon, without worrying about the need to break up that pair. Jake Middleton and Zach Bogosian get to fulfill their destinies as third-pairing, in-case-of-penalty-kill-break-glass options. Even David Jiříček benefits, with him getting the slow-rolling, sheltered development minutes instead of Buium.

    The most obvious benefits of having a superstar come from their play and production, of course. But Kirill Kaprizov's arrival in Minnesota was bigger than just his 40 goals per year; it's the knock-on effects that go up and down the roster. Mats Zuccarello was seen as a buyout candidate before Kaprizov revived his career. Joel Eriksson Ek and Matt Boldy both benefit from his presence, whether they play on his line or face softer competition on Line 2. Ryan Hartman can go off for 34 goals in a season. Victor Rask can become almost playable.

    Wild fans should expect to see something similar from Hughes, especially on the blueline. Minnesota's defensive core has been strong for years, even without a superstar to carry the load. A true game-breaker in that unit should ripple down and accentuate the strengths of everyone else, and that effect should be most noticeable in Faber's play.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 5

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    12 minutes ago, Imyourhuckleberry said:

    I have been critical of the trade because the Wild didn't get more in return for those significant assets sent out. If Kiefer Sherwood or the Canucks 2nd round pick came back with Hughes, I would feel like the trade were more even(even a 3rd round pick would have helped offset the loss of the 1st round pick, leaving more assets for future deals). Or if the Wild didn't give up any 4 of the assets in the deal, it would obviously have been better.

    The Wild need 1 of 2 things to happen for this trade to be historically positive for the Wild. 

    1)  If Hughes resigns to a longer deal.

    2)  If the Wild make it to a conference final in the next 2 years.

    If neither of those 2 things happens... then the Wild just gave away the house for nothing in return.  BG seems to reveal who he likes and who he doesn't quickly.  He likes Boldy, Ek, Kirill, Faber etc... He didn't like Fiala (gone), Rossi(gone).. argued with Cam Talbot (gone).    We were not going to keep Rossi or Ohgren.

    Players he likes he is willing to give massive contracts to... tough to say no by a player.  BG seems to honor handshake deals and expects players to honor them as well.  With that in mind I have to think Hughes signs long term.

    I am a big fan of Buium.  I just liked watching the guy play at another level with the puck on his stick.  I have no idea if he will become a player of Hughes caliber....  I think he will.  Ohgren and the late 1st rounder are no big deal.  Rossi left the lineup and we got better with Yurov at 1C.  Yurov "will be" better than Rossi.  Yurov made Rossi expendable.  For the Wild the trade comes down to Buium for Hughes.  We need a guy that can impact the playoffs in Kirill's prime.  Hughes does that.  Buium doesn't.  

    For Vancouver they can play all 3 and get meaningful improvements for all 3.  All 3 will be better in Vancouver.  BG did all 3 of them a favor as well.  It was a very favorable player trade for all players involved.

    Was it a good trade.  Nobody has that answer yet.  But that answer is out there and we will find out eventually.  Let's hope we find out in June. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 hours ago, MNCountryLife said:

    a big fan of Buium.  I just liked watching the guy play at another level with the puck on his stick.  I have no idea if he will become a player of Hughes caliber....  I think he will.

    I don't disagree. Ohgren scored his first goal of the season tonight, beating Quick on a shot off the rush. Both teams are playing well. Could be a good move for both. I'm very confident it was good for Vancouver, but coming around on it for the Wild.

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Quote

    “Vancouver did very well, considering the circumstances,” yet another West exec said. “Bold move by the Wild. Pressure is on to win now. I think the longer it went, the less the Canucks would get in return. Buium could be a very similar player in the near future.”

    There were a number of other rival team execs who didn’t want to be quoted, but if there was a theme to what they shared on background, it’s that the Wild deserve huge props for that kind of swing — but also the Canucks did very well on the return.

    I didn’t get one single exec who, even off the record, thought the Canucks could have done much better.

    --The Athletic

    Things have started nicely for both teams since the trade, and you can see some of the value that Quinn Hughes brings. The Wild were winning pretty regularly before he got here, so not reading too much into the last couple of games, but the team has been looking rather strong despite missing several guys. One thing that stands out to me is that Hughes has not been involved that much in the scoring, but the Wild have dominated the scoring. Hard to say why, but cannot argue that the results aren't there.

    Not seeing a lot of calls to fire Hynes now, are we?

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I agree with the idea that Buium is a Hughes like player but 2 years away. However, the Wild's main guy is in his prime right now and your TWO goalies are on fire right now. The future is never guaranteed. I get going all in this year to capitalize on the prime of Kaprizov and JEE. Would have loved to keep Buium but sometimes you have to give to get 

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    14 hours ago, Imyourhuckleberry said:

    Not seeing a lot of calls to fire Hynes now, are we?

    Fans are often fickle, myopic, impatient, and overly speculative.

    Plus, sports betting gets some of them worked up even more because now they also have a financial stake in the result of the game, leading to even more abrupt shifts in how people view a coach, a player, a GM, etc, and everyone else starts piling on too.

    While I don't think Hynes is a great coach, I also don't think he's as terrible as some people make him out to be.  He does an all right job and he much more adaptable than Evason ever was.

    I also had a bunch of back-and-forth with someone earlier in the season about how I thought everyone was overreacting to the slow start to the season.  The team started winning shortly thereafter and all that failed season/tear it down talk pretty much dried up too.  Funny how that works.

    I both understand people and don't understand people.

     

    • Like 4
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    15 hours ago, Imyourhuckleberry said:

    One thing that stands out to me is that Hughes has not been involved that much in the scoring, but the Wild have dominated the scoring. Hard to say why, but cannot argue that the results aren't there.

    I wonder a bit if this run is as much to do with Ek taking his game to a new level.  The guy has been really visible the last 2 weeks....and he wasn't playing bad before.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    56 minutes ago, MNCountryLife said:

    I wonder a bit if this run is as much to do with Ek taking his game to a new level.  The guy has been really visible the last 2 weeks....and he wasn't playing bad before.

    Definitely helps but I think as a whole, the team has been way more connected. 

    During October, there was a lot disjointed plays and clumsy passing. 

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...