Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • Brock Faber May Be the Biggest Winner Of the Quinn Hughes Trade


    Image courtesy of Matt Krohn - Imagn Images
    Tony Abbott

    Going into Sunday's game, all eyes in the State of Hockey were on new Minnesota Wild acquisition Quinn Hughes. Friday's out-of-nowhere trade for the superstar defenseman sent a jolt of nervous excitement through a fanbase that was curious to see what this new era might hold. FanDuel Sports Network knew what the fans were tuning in to see, and they frequently highlighted Hughes with a circle to denote his position on the ice.

    Hughes had a tough act to follow. Zeev Buium, the crown jewel of the Wild's farm system until Friday, immediately notched a two-point night for the Vancouver Canucks. Fortunately, Hughes got his storybook beginning with the Wild, getting a goal as Minnesota rolled the Boston Bruins 6-2. 

    Being Hughes' big day, it was hard to imagine anyone else stealing the show. Still, as the game went on, it became impossible to take your eyes off the Wild's previous No. 1 defenseman, Brock Faber.

    Faber was amped about the Hughes acquisition, telling the media after Saturday's win against the Ottawa Senators, "It is gonna be an absolute treat, because he is terrible to play against." And presumably, great to play with, as well, with Faber getting the first crack at partnering up with Hughes.

    Faber's response was to play, well, a lot like Hughes. He was active in the offensive zone, with four shot attempts (three on goal) and moved the puck crisply, serving as an outlet for the rare times Hughes was stymied in the defensive zone. His power play assist was positively Hughesian, carrying the puck out of his own zone, into the offensive zone, and dancing through three Bruins to feed Ryan Hartman for the goal.

    It's one game, but let's not kid ourselves, Hughes is arguably the best defenseman in the world. The Wild view Faber as a franchise blueliner, with his defensive instincts and 93 points through 195 career games. Faber-Hughes might well become the NHL's best defense pairing in the league within a week, and if so, it'll be because Hughes is someone who can finally lighten Faber's load.

    Faber's not a Jonas Brodin, someone who is trusted in the defensive zone, can make efficient plays in transition, but doesn't contribute much more to the offense. No, Faber has proven that he can do everything. He can score, he can skate the puck out of his zone or make a breakout pass, he can defend, and he can thrive on the ice in any situation. 

    Faber's problem is that the Wild are often in a position where Faber must do everything, all the time. He's averaged over 25 minutes a night for his career, and those are rarely easy minutes. Faber's role has often been the blueline's primary puck-carrier, offensive generator, and a stout defender. There's no time to conserve energy -- Faber entered Monday with 115.22 miles skated in 2025-26, 11th-most in hockey, and he's fifth when it comes to even-strength play.

    Make no mistake, Faber can do that. Despite his struggles last year, he was the No. 1 defenseman on a playoff team. But the hope with Buium in Minnesota was that he'd quickly be able to take stuff off Faber's plate, allowing him to become an elite No. 2 defenseman.

    Now that Hughes is here, that dream is fulfilled, and then some. 

    Even during yesterday's feeling-out session, we saw what Hughes can do for Faber. Whether or not you believe Hughes is the best, second-best, or top-five defenseman in the league, there's no disputing that he's the best transition defenseman in the league. No one carries the puck more often or exits his zone more cleanly. The Wild have had their share of smooth-skating defensemen like Faber, Brodin, and Jared Spurgeon. Still, even last night, it was clear that Hughes' mobility is on another level.

    Suddenly, Faber has to expend significantly less energy in his 25 minutes, even if his job doesn't get much simpler. On paper, it'd seem like Faber would become the defensive complement to Hughes' go-go-go offensive style. What we got on Sunday was something much better.

    Again, Faber can do everything, and that means he gets to be whatever Hughes needs at a given moment. When opponents focus too hard on Hughes on the breakout, Faber can collect a pass and get things moving, with much less pressure than he's accustomed to. Hughes can find Faber in the offensive zone and know his partner is a threat to score. And yes, when it's time to bear down in front of the net, Faber can handle that with aplomb.

    Faber is set to be the biggest beneficiary of the Hughes Effect, but Wild fans are about to see how his presence impacts everyone, even those unlikely to play much with the shiny new star. Faber was a decent No. 1 option; now he's a top-tier No. 2. Having Hughes and Faber together means that Minnesota can lean on the long-running chemistry between Brodin and Spurgeon, without worrying about the need to break up that pair. Jake Middleton and Zach Bogosian get to fulfill their destinies as third-pairing, in-case-of-penalty-kill-break-glass options. Even David Jiříček benefits, with him getting the slow-rolling, sheltered development minutes instead of Buium.

    The most obvious benefits of having a superstar come from their play and production, of course. But Kirill Kaprizov's arrival in Minnesota was bigger than just his 40 goals per year; it's the knock-on effects that go up and down the roster. Mats Zuccarello was seen as a buyout candidate before Kaprizov revived his career. Joel Eriksson Ek and Matt Boldy both benefit from his presence, whether they play on his line or face softer competition on Line 2. Ryan Hartman can go off for 34 goals in a season. Victor Rask can become almost playable.

    Wild fans should expect to see something similar from Hughes, especially on the blueline. Minnesota's defensive core has been strong for years, even without a superstar to carry the load. A true game-breaker in that unit should ripple down and accentuate the strengths of everyone else, and that effect should be most noticeable in Faber's play.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 5

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    I am betting that there are players out there that view MN as a desireable location to go now as well.  Who doesn't want to play with a couple of elite players that can feed pucks cleanly from stick to stick and make the game fun.

    Solid goalies, exceptional defensemen and some dynamic forwards in Ek, Boldy and Kirill makes for an inviting roster.

    • Like 9
    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    30 minutes ago, Patrick said:

    Since Faber and Hughes are both excellent when they have the puck does it make more sense to pair them with Brodin and Spurgeon rather than each other? 

    Great question…maybe change the pairings to match up with opponents?

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    39 minutes ago, Patrick said:

    Since Faber and Hughes are both excellent when they have the puck does it make more sense to pair them with Brodin and Spurgeon rather than each other? 

    You could, but it also makes them more dynamic to both be good with the puck on their stick. They can pass it between each other and you're not missing out on that aspect then. 

    If you pair them with Brodin or Spurgy then you're limiting your offensive output with them on the ice. It'll be nice to have a shutdown pair of defensemen again. And a 3rd pairing of bruisers.

    • Like 5
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 hours ago, B1GKappa97 said:

    It'll be nice to have a shutdown pair of defensemen again. And a 3rd pairing of bruisers.

    Agreed, but I'd put Mids with Spurgeon (they work well together) and Bogo with Brodin for the 1st and 2nd periods, then pair Brodin - Spurgeon in the third.  Balance everyone's minutes better, and go full shutdown with four D when you need to.

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'm tired of people calling Hughes "arguably" the best defenseman in the world.

    Does anyone really want to make a case that he's better than Cale Makar?

    They both are around 4 assists every 5 games, but Quinn Hughes has 62 goals in 460 games while Cale Makar has 126 goals in 427 games. Yes, Makar has scored goals at more than double the rate, and he's a better defender along with possessing better size.

    Is anyone arguing that Quinn Hughes is better? Does anyone think that Colorado would trade Makar straight up for Quinn Hughes right now???

    Quinn Hughes is good, but it's actually arguable that he isn't even top 3(Werenski and Heiskanen have more goals/points), especially considering the average defense of Hughes. He's an exciting player and an elite skater, but the hyperbole doesn't need to get overly ridiculous when describing him.

    I certainly hope the Wild do well with him, but I really think we can wait on the Bobby Orr comparisons, at least until he has won a cup...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 hours ago, bisopher said:

    Agreed, but I'd put Mids with Spurgeon (they work well together) and Bogo with Brodin for the 1st and 2nd periods, then pair Brodin - Spurgeon in the third.  Balance everyone's minutes better, and go full shutdown with four D when you need to.

    It's a shame that Jiricek hasn't developed as quickly as we had hoped. I do like the idea of a Middsy-Spurgy combo, because they have been great as you said. And that would keep a physical presence on the ice at all times. 

    I just feel like putting Brodin with Bogo is kind of a waste though. Idk. Like maybe play Jiricek more in that instance so he can at least use his offensive abilities? 

    A Brodin-Spurgy combo would at least let Spurgeon jump into the play at times and I think he's got better instincts for that than Bogosian does. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    9 hours ago, Imyourhuckleberry said:

    I'm tired of people calling Hughes "arguably" the best defenseman in the world.

    Does anyone really want to make a case that he's better than Cale Makar?

    They both are around 4 assists every 5 games, but Quinn Hughes has 62 goals in 460 games while Cale Makar has 126 goals in 427 games. Yes, Makar has scored goals at more than double the rate, and he's a better defender along with possessing better size.

    Is anyone arguing that Quinn Hughes is better? Does anyone think that Colorado would trade Makar straight up for Quinn Hughes right now???

    Quinn Hughes is good, but it's actually arguable that he isn't even top 3(Werenski and Heiskanen have more goals/points), especially considering the average defense of Hughes. He's an exciting player and an elite skater, but the hyperbole doesn't need to get overly ridiculous when describing him.

    I certainly hope the Wild do well with him, but I really think we can wait on the Bobby Orr comparisons, at least until he has won a cup...

    I think most NHL experts (like 99%) consider Quinn Hughes to be the 2nd best dman in the league behind Makar. Better than Werenski and better than Heiskanen. You can disagree but according to about everybody else that watches hockey and follows it at a national level--he's top 2.

     

    • Like 4
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It's too bad Billy couldn't have traded Spurgeon or Brodin instead of Buium. It would have been incredible to see Zeev and Quinn on the same team. I know, impossible, but one can dream.

    I think Zeev is out to prove he can be just as good as Quinn to show Billy he made a mistake. Best of luck...big shoes.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    55 minutes ago, TCMooch said:

    I think most NHL experts (like 99%) consider Quinn Hughes to be the 2nd best dman in the league behind Makar. Better than Werenski and better than Heiskanen. You can disagree but according to about everybody else that watches hockey and follows it at a national level--he's top 2.

    Both defenders are really good, but I don't think you can separate them by statistics alone. For instance, Huck is talking about the goal differential between the 2. 

    I would argue that having a trio of MacKinnon-Rantanen-Makar was better than anything Vancouver could put on the ice. Just like Tony was talking about the effect Hughes has on everyone else on our team, I think Makar's numbers were also affected by the talent surrounding him. 

    So, then we go to the eye test. How is Makar performing within his system and now Hughes in ours? Does a trio of Boldy-Kaprizov-Hughes strike fear into opponents like Makar-MacKinnon-Necas? Obviously, the Avs have an advantage of speed, but maybe both of these trios are scary, and the Wild might have an advantage of power. 

    Or, maybe we just look now at MN, CO, Dal and marvel at how much talent is in the Central Division, and getting out of the 1st round truly depends on a teams' health at the time of the series?

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    31 minutes ago, Scalptrash said:

    I think Zeev is out to prove he can be just as good as Quinn to show Billy he made a mistake. Best of luck...big shoes.

    One thing I think we'll see is that all 3 of the players traded will get an increase in TOI and should actually develop faster than they would have here. Buium's rope got a lot longer and instead of playing 3rd pairing sheltered minutes, he jumps into top pairing 23 minutes a game. I thought he was learning quickly here, but that curve just got turned up.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    47 minutes ago, Scalptrash said:

    It's too bad Billy couldn't have traded Spurgeon or Brodin instead of Buium. It would have been incredible to see Zeev and Quinn on the same team. I know, impossible, but one can dream.

    I think Zeev is out to prove he can be just as good as Quinn to show Billy he made a mistake. Best of luck...big shoes.

    Not much (if anything at all) has been said about the fact Randolph didn't quibble and took Guerins first offer. I doubt he would've needed to throw in that first rounder. If they wanted our first Guerin should have sent Jiricek instead of Buium. JMO. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    14 minutes ago, Willy the poor boy said:

    Not much (if anything at all) has been said about the fact Randolph didn't quibble and took Guerins first offer. I doubt he would've needed to throw in that first rounder. If they wanted our first Guerin should have sent Jiricek instead of Buium. JMO. 

    From what I've seen, there were a few other offers on the table (New Jersey, Detroit, Philly, Carolina), but no other team offered, or had, a Zeev Buium equivalent (Quinn's and Patrick's comments about it were very telling). That was the main reason they chose the Wild. Rossi was pretty much always going to a part of any big trade and Ohgren, plus the first, were the sweeteners that put it over the top.

    There might even be some animosity towards New Jersey for not offering more, based on his comments and openness to stay in MN. They had their chance and didn't "sack up".

    Some in Vancouver are saying they got too much, that they might be competitive again right away instead of tanking for the first overall pick.

    Edited by Scalptrash
    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    14 minutes ago, Scalptrash said:

    From what I've seen, there were a few other offers on the table (New Jersey, Detroit, Philly, Carolina), but no other team offered, or had, a Zeev Buium equivalent (Quinn's and Patrick's comments about it were very telling). That was the main reason they chose the Wild. Rossi was pretty much always going to a part of any big trade and Ohgren, plus the first, were the sweeteners that put it over the top.

    There might even be some animosity towards New Jersey for not offering more, based on his comments and openness to stay in MN. They had their chance and didn't "sack up".

    Some in Vancouver are saying they got too much, that they might be competitive again right away instead of tanking for the first overall pick.

    Ya, they got a lot back. We're better now, they're better in the future. Zeev will be a stud.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    11 hours ago, Imyourhuckleberry said:

    I'm tired of people calling Hughes "arguably" the best defenseman in the world.

    Does anyone really want to make a case that he's better than Cale Makar?

    They both are around 4 assists every 5 games, but Quinn Hughes has 62 goals in 460 games while Cale Makar has 126 goals in 427 games. Yes, Makar has scored goals at more than double the rate, and he's a better defender along with possessing better size.

    Is anyone arguing that Quinn Hughes is better? Does anyone think that Colorado would trade Makar straight up for Quinn Hughes right now???

    Quinn Hughes is good, but it's actually arguable that he isn't even top 3(Werenski and Heiskanen have more goals/points), especially considering the average defense of Hughes. He's an exciting player and an elite skater, but the hyperbole doesn't need to get overly ridiculous when describing him.

    I certainly hope the Wild do well with him, but I really think we can wait on the Bobby Orr comparisons, at least until he has won a cup...

    What do you want from your defenseman?

    Makar is probably the best pure offensive defenseman in the world. Hughes is probably the best pure transition defenseman in the world. Both are probably on a "both teams say no" level of trade value. 

    • Like 4
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, Willy the poor boy said:

    Not much (if anything at all) has been said about the fact Randolph didn't quibble and took Guerins first offer. I doubt he would've needed to throw in that first rounder. If they wanted our first Guerin should have sent Jiricek instead of Buium. JMO. 

    'Nucks GM was quoted somewhere saying "no others team's offer was even close."

    So yeah, maybe we could have offered a 2nd instead or Jiricek instead of Buium (doubt it). I think BG was afraid of losing the opportunity though...

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    13 hours ago, Imyourhuckleberry said:

    Does anyone really want to make a case that he's better than Cale Makar?

    Hughes has never played with a guy like Kirill.  Neither JT Miller or Elias Peterson are close.  He has played with some big D men but Faber, Spurgeon and Brodin are all skilled.  Not the dynamic players of Hughes... but I expect Hughest to bennefit from their talent as well.  I fully expect Hughes' numbers to be better with the Wild than they were with Vancouver.

    McKinnon opens up a lot for Makar.  Dallas has several players that open up space for Heiskanen.  

    I'm not saying that Hughes is better than these 2.  But I think the comparison numbers will be closer in the future with Hughes in Minny.

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    16 minutes ago, Enforceror said:

    'Nucks GM was quoted somewhere saying "no others team's offer was even close."

    So yeah, maybe we could have offered a 2nd instead or Jiricek instead of Buium (doubt it). I think BG was afraid of losing the opportunity though...

    Guerin won’t do a deal unless he’s assured to overpay by at least 35%

    • Thanks 1
    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    31 minutes ago, Enforceror said:

    'Nucks GM was quoted somewhere saying "no others team's offer was even close."

    So yeah, maybe we could have offered a 2nd instead or Jiricek instead of Buium (doubt it). I think BG was afraid of losing the opportunity though...

    You never know, the questionable part is he took the offer and didn't try to get more. I would guess that rarely happens in any professional sport. Reports are when MN. got involved it happened quickly.

    • Like 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    33 minutes ago, Enforceror said:

    'Nucks GM was quoted somewhere saying "no others team's offer was even close."

    So yeah, maybe we could have offered a 2nd instead or Jiricek instead of Buium (doubt it). I think BG was afraid of losing the opportunity though...

    Nucks GM also said No to all the other trades and kept looking.

    Maybe we could have offered less... but maybe someone else would offer more and we missed out.  BG put out his best offer first and stole the show.  Gotta give it to the guy... when he is in on something he puts both feet in.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, Tony Abbott said:

    What do you want from your defenseman?

    I want strong defense, and some playmaking ability. If you're giving up more goals than you are generating, I'm less excited by the amazing skating. Also, the highlight goals that Makar scores are more incredible than the highlight goals I've seen from Quinn Hughes. He certainly might get more opportunities for points with Colorado, but he's also just insanely gifted.

    I understand Vancouver is really poor right now(last in the league when they made the trade), but they did win without Hughes in their first game and the Wild were winning without Hughes prior to the trade. Boston had a rough night against an energized Wild squad, there's no question about that.

    I'm looking forward to seeing what the future holds. I know a lot of people suggest Quinn Hughes is a top 2 defenseman, but he hasn't proven that to me yet. Hughes is an elite talent, but it's not clear to be at this point if he impacts the game more positively than all other defensemen in the league.

    Werenski has 115 points in his last 113 games, and plays some PK minutes.

    Quinn Hughes has 100 points in his last 95 games, with barely any PK minutes.

    The point difference isn't enough between the two to make me think offense alone separates them. Who is the better defender? Werenski at least plays some penalty kill, so I'm guessing he might be.

    It's certainly easy to argue that Quinn Hughes is a top 5 defenseman. Please note that Quinn Hughes finished behind Werenski in Norris voting last season, and I assume would be behind him up to this point this season. So, why wouldn't people consider Werenski to be arguably the 2nd best defenseman in the league?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    20 minutes ago, MNCountryLife said:

    Maybe we could have offered less... but maybe someone else would offer more and we missed out.  BG put out his best offer first and stole the show.  Gotta give it to the guy... when he is in on something he puts both feet in.

    I have been critical of the trade because the Wild didn't get more in return for those significant assets sent out. If Kiefer Sherwood or the Canucks 2nd round pick came back with Hughes, I would feel like the trade were more even(even a 3rd round pick would have helped offset the loss of the 1st round pick, leaving more assets for future deals). Or if the Wild didn't give up any 4 of the assets in the deal, it would obviously have been better.

    It felt like Vancouver was given a deal they couldn't reasonably say no to given that they had no option but to trade Quinn Hughes, and Buium is maybe 2 years away from being a Quinn Hughes type of player, plus they got a lot more than that.

    Obviously Guerin had a strong desire to get the trade done, and I'm not saying he's an idiot, but I see a chance of Buium becoming as good as the player he traded for, or better, even if he isn't right now. I personally would have needed more to part with what the Wild gave up.

    There's a reason that the Canucks essentially asked the Wild to make an offer, and that's because Buium is a young player like the one they had to trade.

    Most good trades do leave both teams thinking they should have gotten more to make the deal, so I'm not saying it was an insane deal, but I still feel like it favored Vancouver given the situation. Now, if the Wild fail to get beyond the 1st round and need to trade Quinn Hughes because he will not extend here(and Buium excels in the manner many people expect), then I will think it's a fireable misuse of assets, but there were a lot of people that wanted to fire Guerin before this, so I guess that goes with the territory.

    The trade certainly made this hockey season more interesting. Definitely more for the 2 teams involved in the deal, but also generating buzz among all hockey fans.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...