Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property
  • 3 Key Takeaways From Wild's Season-Ending Game 6 Loss to Golden Knights


    Image courtesy of © Nick Wosika-Imagn Images
    Thomas Williams

    That's it. The Minnesota Wild had their season ending by the hands of the Vegas Golden Knights and all it took was a 3-2 in Game 6 Thursday night.

    While the Wild were able to come alive for the majority of this series and surprised most by how competitive they were going to be for a Wild Card team that almost had their playoff spot slip away from them in the late regular season, it still leaves a sour taste. A lingering feeling that might not go away until the next time the Wild make the playoffs, and we can be filled with some more hope and praying that they would show something more.

    But on an individual game basis? What can we truly take away from 60 minutes we wish to forget almost immediately? Do we dare think of their performance that led us to think about what might happen at the 2025 NHL Draft or some offseason moves, already?

    Wild finally had underlying upper hand -- didn't matter

    As this series carried on, a whole lot of digital ink was spilled over which team was truly controlling the play. Sure, Minnesota got to the 2-1 series lead earlier, and Vegas came storming back in the next three games, but underneath the hood of each game was where some indicators truly lay.

    For the first five games, the Wild let the Golden Knights have the advantage in shot attempts and shots on goal at 5-on-5. The typical indicators of success generally tilted towards Vegas, but the Wild were more than comfortable taking their opportunities when they get them.

    On Thursday night, in the loss that sent Minnesota home very early, the Wild actually had the advantage when it came to underlying offensive statistics. A sizeable 55-34 advantage in shot attempts at 5-on-5, and won the shot battle at that game state 24-15 as well. You can continue just scrolling down through the single-game sample size of how the Wild were able to have plenty of control during Game 6, but it would become the same old story.

    The Wild played well but still ended up as the team that got knocked out. It was the first time where they walked away from the game this series with more scoring chances than their opponent, but sometimes it doesn't even matter. It could come down to some single-player performances.

    Came down to the big plays from big players

    When the Wild had the advantage in this series, both Mark Stone and Jack Eichel had not scored yet, and Minnesota was taking advantage of a quiet start. Both of those star players for the Golden Knights ended up putting pucks in the back of the net during Game 6.

    Sometimes it's not control or possession or any underlying metric you can think of. It's players that have been there before and know exactly what they need to do to get that greasy and nasty goal in the playoffs. Whether it was Stone batting a puck out of mid-air to just push through the Wild, or Stone connecting with Eichel to shoot him off for an odd-man rush and to score a series-killing goal; it proved to be the difference.

    Maybe the Wild were just lulled into some sense of safety as those two were held without a goal to start. And then they just pounce on the team that thinks they have this all figured out.

    The Golden Knights' stars came to play and showed up when it mattered the most. Maybe they were just the sleeping giant -- the series did end as most expected.

    Fleury send-off

    Thursday night's Game 6 loss meant no more games for the Wild, and that means no more games for Marc-Andre Fleury. The legendary netminder has now played in his final NHL game. It will be the last time he was able to sit on a bench wearing a team's colors over some equipment.

    Naturally, he got a heck of a send-off after the final whistle, and as the handshake line began.

    It is a terrible way for his career to end, before it eventually gets enshrined in the Hockey Hall of Fame. Standing on the loser's side of a first-round exit after experiencing the highs of this league for several years. But, at least the farewell was done right and the Wild got the rare chance to be the footnote on the career of one of the best to do it at their position.

    Now, where do the Wild go from here? Can they recover from yet another time they weren't able to move on in the playoffs? Will there be major changes to this roster? Will they keep the same players and just hope for a different result, and blame their underperformance on injuries? This summer, anything feels possible for this team that feels desperate to show that they can be something more.

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    • Like 1

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    I was impressed with the majority of the team's ability to lock down a style of play and be competitive.  IMO: Our 3rd pairing of D are a weak spot.  But that should be dramatically better next year with Buium and Jiricek both expected up next year and taking over for Merrill and Bogo. Bogo will be 7.  Give them plenty of ice time and they will be fine 20 games in.

    Offensively I have a bit of concern on Ek.  He is focusing too much on the extracurricular and needs to keep his focus on the puck.  Hartman.. same advice.  That guy can flat out play when not screwing around. 

    A few guys need to go.  Freddy, Nojo, Vinnie, Nyquist.   Yurov, Ogren take 2 spots and 2 spots for snipers that we desperately need.  Should leave us plenty of cash for a trade deadline pickup.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Pewterschmidt said:

    Very well said Protec sir.  Agree 100% on all.

    The Rossi take is the spiciest and will get the most push back.

    Your move Wild bill.  Don't be dumb this off-season. 

    My apologies to ODC.  Credit where credit is due.  While Protec is a gentleman and a scholar I'm still down with ODC Yah You Know Me.  

    • Like 1
    • Haha 4
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I am not as harsh on Rossi as some.  And no, I don’t think he deserves 8.5M or more a year.  I do agree that he had a better first playoffs than other current good players (JEE and Boldy).

    I think it was about half way through the 3rd period in Game 3 where the camera was focused on the Wild bench.  I am not an expert lip reader and there was obviously no audio, but Foligno leaned over to Rossi and appeared to say “hang in there” and gave him a fist bump on the shoulder.  Immediately after, Gaudreau leaned over to Rossi and appeared to ask “how does it feel” with Rossi replying “it’s okay”.  My point is injuries and necessary surgery information will start to trickle out now.  Maybe Rossi was completely healthy, but I don’t think he was.  And yes, I understand that lots of players are dealing with something in the playoffs.

    I have said something similar before, but the best teams usually have an abundance of centers with multiple on several lines.  This helps tremendously with being able to “cheat” on faceoffs as well as having players that are sound two way and 200 foot players.  I think it will be a mistake to get rid of Rossi.  He is a dedicated player, just look at his last two off seasons and year over year improvement.  Since the Wild are always starved for center depth, I am hoping they will start to accumulate centers.  Trading Rossi and other top prospects for an older and more expensive center won’t help us in the long run with building out our center depth, but seems to be the way GMBG is leaning.  Trading Rossi and other top prospects for an older and more expensive winger seems foolish to me, so GMBG will probably do exactly that.

    No where in this post did I say Rossi is the best, is more important than Kaprizov or should be paid 8.5M or more a year.

    • Like 8
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Now that the season is over, it will be interesting to see what direction this team goes this offseason and into next year.  Will we make some trades to bring in a few new players?  Will we resign any of our free agents, thus taking away some spots from our younger players?  Will we bring in a couple of free agents?  Will Kap get extended?   Lots of questions to get answered in the next few months.

    It is amazing how a playoff series can change the view of some of the players.  Not too long ago, everyone wanted us to get rid of Hartman in the offseason, some even sooner.  Then he goes out and is our third best player in the playoffs.  Many have wanted Spurg to be gone.  Some for his contract size, some for his age, others because they thought he would be a liability in the playoffs, yet he was probably our best defenseman in the playoffs.  Before this year's playoffs there were many that thought Boldy was not a playoff performer based off his two previous playoff performances.  I think he silenced most doubters. Will our management look at the entire season's work, the playoff performances or a combination of the two to decide who fits and who doesn't?  

    That leads to Rossi.  He had a nice improvement this year, then quieted off down the stretch.  Some people were happy with his production in the playoffs in his limited minutes (tied for 5th in points in the postseason), others were not.  I don't know what management will decide with him.  If they sign him to a beneficial contract for both sides great.  If he gets moved for a better piece, also good.  My personal feelings, whether you thought he was good or bad these playoffs, is to not judge a player on one series, especially his first and only.  Had management done that with Boldy, he would have been gone too.

    Can't wait to see what happens.  

     

    • Like 5
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    GMBG is always talking about fair deals and relationships with other teams.  Columbus is really trying to change the culture there.  I would like to see us try to leverage Evanston’s knowledge and relationships with the Wild and the players to trade out a couple of pieces that don’t fit the next level the Wild are trying to get to, but that could still help Columbus improve since it is still a tier below us.  This could truly be a “win-win” situation.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Aimlessone said:

    Basically, I feel like I am being lied to. That this isn't a sport but a production and it makes me like the game far less. 

    During the NFL "deflate-gate" is when it really donned on me... this is entertainment, this is marketing, and this is something for Vegas (gambling industry) to bet on.  Already had given up on the Twins by this point, and the deflate-gate made me recover my Sundays.  Since returning from Iraq in Oct 2006, I focused on following The Wild.  C'mon, State of Hockey, Miracle on Ice, MN finally gets a pro hockey team back again.  We've got to be a shoe-in for a Cup soon. 

    And now waiting... and waiting...and waiting.  

    So a part of me has this alter-thought if sports is fixed.  "They" already have their idea of winners for the given season.  However, exciting plays generate more attraction, awareness, and following.  So my theory is a "fix" could be in for a given team, but if they grind it out and overcome insurmountable odds, it makes for great awareness and increases the following, sells more merch.  If this theory is true, then the Wild will only see a Cup if they defeat the contenders, but also defeat "the fix".  

    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, IllicitFive said:

    Totally understand that, now we get to play the fun game of wait and see. For how well MJ played down the stretch and in the PO, I hope he's not coming back, its time to start bringing in the kids and see if any of them can stick and contribute as well and seeing if there are any upgrades available in FA or trades. We have seen the MJ end of year run during a contract year before, "Fool me once, shame on... shame on you. ' Fool me—you can't get fooled again"

    giphy.gif

    • Haha 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, Will D. Ness said:

    Brazo was a joke IMO.  He is an instant PP for Vegas after 30 seconds in the D zone.  The guy couldn't challenge a puck to save his life.  I think Gus basically bailed out the 4th line at least 10 times.

    Brazeau finished with 2 assists and +1 in the series. He was doing his job as a 4th liner. Rossi obviously helped the 4th line tally some points. Unclear if Gaudreau could do the same, but we may find out next season. I don't think Gaudreau will play above the 4th line when the Wild are healthy next year.

    I could see Hinostroza sticking around as the 13th forward. Minimum contract guys that can plug in on any line have value and I imagine he'd like to stick around even if Ohgren and Yurov are playing ahead of him.

    In search of a significant upgrade, it's possible that Ohgren might be packaged with Rossi and a pick to get a veteran sniper. Guerin has done a solid job accumulating assets and talent given where the team was when he took control. With the majority of cap constraints falling away, he can assemble the type of team he's been envisioning. Hopefully many Wild fans will be pleasantly surprised.

     

    • Like 7
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    37 minutes ago, hydguy75 said:

    So a part of me has this alter-thought if sports is fixed.  "They" already have their idea of winners for the given season.  However, exciting plays generate more attraction, awareness, and following.  So my theory is a "fix" could be in for a given team, but if they grind it out and overcome insurmountable odds, it makes for great awareness and increases the following, sells more merch.  If this theory is true, then the Wild will only see a Cup if they defeat the contenders, but also defeat "the fix".  

    I just have a hard time believing that if sports are fixed, we haven't had any whistle blowers at this point. But then again, I watch what happened last night and it's hard to argue against it. 

    I mean, the ref was so close to Johansson that he had to move out of the way of his sliding body after he was tripped. 

    Regardless of all of that, the Wild had many opportunities to bury an open net goal this series that they fanned on, they have nobody but themselves to blame. 

    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    20 seconds from missing the playoffs and they won two more games than I expected. I would attribute that to Hill's early shakiness more than the Wild dominating.

    It just feels good to get that 800 pound gorilla of cap hell off their back. Cautiously optimistic to see exactly what Guerin's 4-5 year plan is now that the shackles are off. I really try not to be a pessimist, but am a firm realist, and I have not been mildly impressed thus far. I do not believe that Guerin and/or Hynes will ever lead this team to the promised land. A coaching change should be made right now, IMO. Hynes did admirably with what he was given, but he isn't a winner when it matters. This team deserves a coach with SC experience and pedigree. Pretty sure Kaprizov will never be engraved on Lord Stanley's Cup, unless it's with another team.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Geurin’s trade deadline was a huge issue.  He gave away a second for a guy who cost them a game, and maybe the series, while providing almost nothing positive.

    I’ve had it with Geurin.  Nothing will change with the buyouts going away.  Having a little extra money only means more bad contracts.

    This franchise is turning into the Twins.  Always looking to future.  Always a highly touted prospect coming that they’re scared to turn loose (first Rossi, now Buium).  Always shrink in the biggest moments.  Awful personnel decisions, particularly with aging players.  Historic  incompetence.

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 hours ago, OldDutchChip said:

    Higher chance MJ is back then Rossi 🤣

    Please don't even joke around. Perhaps the universe will equalize and recognize the need for him to disappear to Swedish Spritzer-League never to be heard of again. 30pts can be found from a variety of places, no doubt neck-beard omission achieves the greatest good. 

    • Like 1
    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Scalptrash said:

    20 seconds from missing the playoffs and they won two more games than I expected. I would attribute that to Hill's early shakiness more than the Wild dominating.

    It just feels good to get that 800 pound gorilla of cap hell off their back. Cautiously optimistic to see exactly what Guerin's 4-5 year plan is now that the shackles are off. I really try not to be a pessimist, but am a firm realist, and I have not been mildly impressed thus far. I do not believe that Guerin and/or Hynes will ever lead this team to the promised land. A coaching change should be made right now, IMO. Hynes did admirably with what he was given, but he isn't a winner when it matters. This team deserves a coach with SC experience and pedigree. Pretty sure Kaprizov will never be engraved on Lord Stanley's Cup, unless it's with another team.

    Finding coaches with SC appearances would take a little work but there are a few unemployed right now with their names on the cup.

    Joel Quenneville

    Darryl Sutter

    Dan Bylsma

    Peter Laviolette

    Randy Carlyle

    Marc Crawford

    John Tortorella

    Bob Hartley (Currently with Omsk in KHL)

    Mike Babcock

     

    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 hours ago, Aimlessone said:

    I just don't know what a penalty is or isn't anymore. It's not just the Wild and Vegas series, either. It's every game I have watched. The no call trip on Johansson and the no interference call on Boldy in the last two minutes are beyond perplexing. 

    I just want some consistency as it makes it feel like there's direction from the top down to favor teams and it makes it really hard to watch as well as feel the outcomes of series are legitimate. 

    Basically, I feel like I am being lied to. That this isn't a sport but a production and it makes me like the game far less. 

    100%. Goalie interference all year was very tight and they didn't allow goals if the guy was in the paint, yet Karlsson did that exact thing with his skates both in the blue and backed up into Gus's pads so he was not able to get them flat on the Stone one-timer. 

    Hartzy gets cross-checked in the face game one, and Hauge immediately looks at the Ref. No call. The exact same thing happened when MN played Vegas four years ago.

    It's crazy to think it's all coincidence. The kicking-motion from Hartman's goal was another example of strange because the puck was already going in. The NHL rules and reviews are intentionally there to allow Toronto to inject influence and dictate outcomes. 

    Offsides review has become a technicality that no longer adheres to the intent of the rule and has created a path to negate good goals over meaningless inches of metal to blue-ice contact. Ask yourself how many blatant offsides are missed VS. how many great goals get taken off the board based on full-speed fractions of an inch. All other levels of hockey play the way the game was intended where offsides is to keep teams from floating a guy in or cheating on purpose. 

    That play in particular, Nyquist has the majority of his body along the line. It came about due to some egregious missed-calls, but now it's become a cheat for teams who just choked one away. If the goal-scorer himself is offside by 3ft nobody would whine. If you compiled all the beauty goals where some schmoe accidentally misses the timing by a hair away from the play it would be a lot more than the mega-obvious offsides where players try to sneak in ahead of the puck on purpose. They literally stop the video and look for a sliver of white to take em away. I can't be the only guy who sees this as the cure being worse than the sickness. 

    When you say production, I say damn right. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    To put things into perspective.

     

    This is Rossi’s 2nd year and his first playoff series. He had 3pts in 6 games, plus minus 0, 22.2% shooting percentage and was 48.9% on face offs and had an average toi of 11:08 min…

    Let’s compare to some other notable Wild players…

    Boldy’s first series(21-22)he scored 1pt in 6 games, was -1 and played an average toi of 13:19 min and 75% on face offs with 7.7% shooting percentage. His second playoff series (22-23) he had 3pts in 6 games, was -5 and had an average toi of 20:53 min with 45.9% on face offs and 0.0% on shooting. Third series you are all aware of. He had 7pts in 6 games, +/- of 0, 25:01 min of TOI, 20% on face offs

     

    JEE had the same amount of pts in 6 games as Rossi in this series, had an average toi of 22:00 min, 53.6% on face offs and a 0% shooting percentage.

    In his first 25 playoff games over 5 playoff series he had a total of 9pts.. He was also never higher than 47.5% on face offs. It took him his 5th series to get to 47.5% on face offs.

    Kaprizov first playoffs series (20-21) 3pts in 7 games, -3, 18:52 min of average time on ice, 20% shooting percentage.

     

    The reason I post this stuff is so people understand realistic expectations. Now, I’m not saying Rossi is flawless by any stretch of the imagination, he’s small and does get knocked around because of it. But he does a lot of things this team needs. He’s in his 2nd year ffs. There’s obviously things he could do better but I think a lot of that will come with time. Look at how long it took Boldy in the playoffs, look how long it took JEE in the playoffs, it even took Kaprizov his second playoff series to do much and Rossi had 8-15 min less a game to do it.

    • Like 3
    • Thanks 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    23 hours ago, Protec said:

    Let me tell ya who didn't do squat when it really mattered. 

    Fred, NoJo, Rossi, Nyquist, Zuccarello, the PP, and even Kaprizov wasn't himself this series. 

    What do you notice about the playoffs? Big players step up. Happy to see Boldy, Hartman, Foligno, and the NA guys like Faber and even Spurgeon didn't get dummied out there. 

    I don't care who thinks I'm racist against Euros, they're not the answer. 

    Fire Judd the Euro-lover and ask why Johnston plays for the Stars and where's Wallstedt. Oh, poor guy got slighted because HOF'er MAF got another kick at the can, who gives a crud, what's Wally done? Feel bad for himself? Classic Euro...

    I'm so sick and tired of the Wild's Owner and Twin Cities propaganda, it's not even funny. Carter, you need to go solo and admit the Wild need gutsy players like you were and quit kissing asses of who's payin ya. 

    The Wild need to shift towards the teams who whip your ass each and every time. North American hockey players who get the job done when it matters. The ones who can win when the Refs put their whistles away or eff you over. 

    That's all.

    What a stupid comment 

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    9 hours ago, Lovehockey said:

    What a stupid comment 

    Haha, why don't you elaborate and let me know which parts are untrue. 

    MN is out again. Teams made up of predominately bigger NA guys are still playing. The whole rest of the Central in fact. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...