Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property

Article: Are Gus and Wallstedt the Wild's Best Goaltending Tandem Since 2003?


Eric Forga
 Share

Recommended Posts

I think our Swede tending tandem is really well suited for a highly disciplined defense (and offense for that matter) that stays home and doesn't hand opportunity to the opposition on a silver platter 10 times a game.

Adding QH into the mix is going to change that.  It should be interesting to see how the team responds by opening up the game a bit and seeing if we can recover when things break.

Gus hasn't really shined too brightly when this is the case.  Wally is still a question mark but actually looked good in SO's so maybe?

Also, one of our best recovery defenseman is Spurge.  The guy is a master of disrupting odd man rushes and breaking up plays even when behind the play.

I wonder if we should pair Spurge with QH?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m reserving judgement until later in the season.  A couple of bad games from one or both of them and it changes the stats considerably.

They’ve both been good to date.  But, the rotation has each playing much less than other top goalies.  For example, Bobrovski, Wedgewood, Shesterkin, Vejmelka, Oettinger, Thompson, and Saros all have as many wins (or equal) the number of starts Wallstadt has made.  Gustavsson has 10 more starts, but is 15th overall in GAA and 12th in SV%.

Wallstadts numbers will come down to earth (more than they already have, he’s down to 4th in GAA after a commanding lead a few weeks ago).

I think it’s a good tandem.  But there’s definitely some recency bias.  Things could turn quickly.  I can’t say they’re the best since year X until the full picture is there.

Also, 22-23 season was pretty darn good here for goaltending.  Gus was near the top of the league and in Vezina discussions with awesome GAA and SV% (2.10 and .931 - better  than Wallstadts small sample this year) and Fluery had a 2.85 GAA and .908 SV% coming off a vezina the year before  (Gus has a .912 SV% this year).  Chances are they don’t surpass those counting stats this year.  I’d be hard pressed to say this tandem is better than that right now, let alone once the full sample is there with some likely regression.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...