Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property

Article: The Wild Face Two Hurdles In Trying To Land Ryan O'Reilly


Recommended Posts

The Wild traded a 1,2,3 & 4 rounder and Hunt for Jiricek... got a 5th back.  I'm really not sure why his value would be less.  At 22 and knowing that bigger players tend to take a bit longer to establish themselves I think Jiricek's value would still be considered comparable.  Add in that Hunt has been playing quite well I think Jiricek is expendable.  That being said... I still think Jiricek has a future in the NHL and just needs games and a bit more simmering in the kettle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Probably won’t be a popular comment, but I think the Wild should have gotten a solid youngish center for the haul it gave up for Hughes.  Why?  Because although Hughes is a superstar player, I don’t think he will help this version of the Wild in the playoffs.  With Hughes, it means Faber is the “big bad” in the top 4 d-men.  That is significant in that I don’t think most people would consider Faber a big bully like d-man.  In addition, Spurgeon is small and although Brodin is still elite, he isn’t physical.  The big d-men (Bogo and Midsy) are regulated to the 3rd pair and will have limited minutes come playoffs.

Compounding the above issue, the Wild have several smaller forwards and/or guys who aren’t physical (Zuccy, NoJo, Hinne, etc.)

Bottomline, I think the Wild are fun to watch, but it gave up a lot for a dynamic d-man when the most glaring weakness was size and grit in the top two forward lines.  Maybe GMBG can pull off a Tuch rental with the remaining assets, but there isn’t a lot left.  Especially when I think it would be a bad idea to trade the Wall or Yurov.

Could the same trade package have gotten us Thompson and Tuch or even BT?  The d corps was solid before the trade.  Also, consider that Rossi was deemed too small and was thicker than Hughes, with Hughes being on the ice twice as much as Rossi.

If Hughes doesn’t resign, I think the Wild gave up way too much.  Even if he does resign, I think the Wild are 1-2 top 6 forwards away and likely a top 4 d-man with size and nastiness.

I think the Wild are a better regular season team, but not a better playoff team after the trade.  I hope they prove me wrong come playoffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, WildNotMild said:

Probably won’t be a popular comment, but I think the Wild should have gotten a solid youngish center for the haul it gave up for Hughes.  Why?  Because although Hughes is a superstar player, I don’t think he will help this version of the Wild in the playoffs.  With Hughes, it means Faber is the “big bad” in the top 4 d-men.  That is significant in that I don’t think most people would consider Faber a big bully like d-man.  In addition, Spurgeon is small and although Brodin is still elite, he isn’t physical.  The big d-men (Bogo and Midsy) are regulated to the 3rd pair and will have limited minutes come playoffs.

Compounding the above issue, the Wild have several smaller forwards and/or guys who aren’t physical (Zuccy, NoJo, Hinne, etc.)

Bottomline, I think the Wild are fun to watch, but it gave up a lot for a dynamic d-man when the most glaring weakness was size and grit in the top two forward lines.  Maybe GMBG can pull off a Tuch rental with the remaining assets, but there isn’t a lot left.  Especially when I think it would be a bad idea to trade the Wall or Yurov.

Could the same trade package have gotten us Thompson and Tuch or even BT?  The d corps was solid before the trade.  Also, consider that Rossi was deemed too small and was thicker than Hughes, with Hughes being on the ice twice as much as Rossi.

If Hughes doesn’t resign, I think the Wild gave up way too much.  Even if he does resign, I think the Wild are 1-2 top 6 forwards away and likely a top 4 d-man with size and nastiness.

I think the Wild are a better regular season team, but not a better playoff team after the trade.  I hope they prove me wrong come playoffs.

image.gif.cb8cfa5bf15c925d23721b02243b446d.gif
 

I agree with every sentence in your post

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...