Thomas Williams Administrator Posted 3 hours ago Share Posted 3 hours ago View full article Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MNCountryLife Verified Member Posted 3 hours ago Share Posted 3 hours ago I missed the game last night. Going to have to catch the re-air on Saturday. Comments in the game thread seem to indicate a pretty sloppy game. Anyone have thoughts on it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enforceror Verified Member Posted 3 hours ago Share Posted 3 hours ago 4 minutes ago, MNCountryLife said: I missed the game last night. Going to have to catch the re-air on Saturday. Comments in the game thread seem to indicate a pretty sloppy game. Anyone have thoughts on it? To be fair, I thought they played a lot more connected then they have been. For whatever reason our defense (or maybe Gus) is really struggling. There were several "answer back" goals from the Canes that we should have stopped. It's almost like the blueprint to beat Gus is to catch him before he can get settled. They pressured hard but I thought we didn't panic like in the Nucks game. I didn't really notice Hunt but that might be a good thing (no glaring mistakes). Just my humble observations. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pewterschmidt Verified Member Posted 3 hours ago Share Posted 3 hours ago 3 minutes ago, MNCountryLife said: I missed the game last night. Going to have to catch the re-air on Saturday. Comments in the game thread seem to indicate a pretty sloppy game. Anyone have thoughts on it? Highlight was Pitlick going full-Scott Stevens on Chatfield, if you’re into that. 97 did lots of 97 things (he’s trying to put the bottom nine on his back) and Z boo flashed what he’s going to be in couple years (FREAK). Hunt looked like he belonged (bright spot) Rossi, Ek, Ben Jones, Trenin and Foligno were 0-0-0 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enforceror Verified Member Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago 17 minutes ago, Pewterschmidt said: Z boo flashed what he’s going to be in couple years (FREAK) What was crazy to me was watching him thread through defenders MULTIPLE times like they were just standing still. It was like they didn't know what to do with him. Exciting indeed. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldDutchChip Verified Member Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago Game reaction: Gus and Faber need to be better Zeev looked great (he was a bit too unselfish at times) best game for him hunt was much better than barker 2.0 johy again played like a 5-7 mm player - great play by him 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aimlessone Verified Member Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago (edited) Maybe I am the odd man out in the comments here, but I feel like our defense is getting worse. This is the second game in a row where our defenders got out muscled on the puck in our own zone multiple times a game. These led to grade A chances for the Canes and puts Gus in a bad spot. And this isn't just forecheck, I'm referring to when we clearly have possession, should clear the zone but a single forward comes in on an attack and wins the puck with authority. What gives with that? Edited 2 hours ago by Aimlessone 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mnfaninnc Verified Member Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago Who did Hunt go in for? I assume Jiricek? I also didn't see the game, was blocked since it's my local market. What I did notice was giving up goals quickly after scoring them, and only putting 3 shots on goal in the 1st period. This team starts slow offensively almost every game. However, Carolina only had 7 and they are a shot volume team. Perhaps the strategy was to start out playing very structured? It didn't work as we converted on 2/3 shots, and the Canes converted on 3/7. It looked like we had a decent 3rd period in shots, but at this point we are chasing the game. So, I'm looking at the lineup and I see no Yurov....again. Yet I do see Trenin and Foligno playing, and I believe Foligno is banged up. The Canes are a very structured team but small. They have skill. It would seem to me that this would have been a perfect time to rest Moose. I'm starting to think heavily that the lineup is being mismanaged by the coaching staff and there needs to be change. Hunt is also a young player who needs TOI so I would put him in the mix too. Did he play left or right side? This may be the time to relieve Hynes of his duties as coach and kick him up into the FO. He can be useful there, as it seems we have one of the leanest FOs in the league. I know Moose will need rest as he ages. This is the type of game you don't need his attributes for. Rest him! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pewterschmidt Verified Member Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago 1 minute ago, mnfaninnc said: Who did Hunt go in for? I assume Jiricek? I also didn't see the game, was blocked since it's my local market. What I did notice was giving up goals quickly after scoring them, and only putting 3 shots on goal in the 1st period. This team starts slow offensively almost every game. However, Carolina only had 7 and they are a shot volume team. Perhaps the strategy was to start out playing very structured? It didn't work as we converted on 2/3 shots, and the Canes converted on 3/7. It looked like we had a decent 3rd period in shots, but at this point we are chasing the game. So, I'm looking at the lineup and I see no Yurov....again. Yet I do see Trenin and Foligno playing, and I believe Foligno is banged up. The Canes are a very structured team but small. They have skill. It would seem to me that this would have been a perfect time to rest Moose. I'm starting to think heavily that the lineup is being mismanaged by the coaching staff and there needs to be change. Hunt is also a young player who needs TOI so I would put him in the mix too. Did he play left or right side? This may be the time to relieve Hynes of his duties as coach and kick him up into the FO. He can be useful there, as it seems we have one of the leanest FOs in the league. I know Moose will need rest as he ages. This is the type of game you don't need his attributes for. Rest him! Gotta believe Hynze stay's in place at least thru Olympics 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mnfaninnc Verified Member Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago 7 minutes ago, Aimlessone said: And this isn't just forecheck, I'm referring to when we clearly have possession, should clear the zone but a single forward comes in on an attack and wins the puck with authority. What gives with that? Canes aren't even a big team and they are doing this? Could be concerning. Our D needs to be way more assertive. This was also, probably, a good game to give Jiricek a break. His skating wasn't going to keep up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mnfaninnc Verified Member Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago 1 minute ago, Pewterschmidt said: Gotta believe Hynze stay's in place at least thru Olympics If he's in the front office, he can still coach in the Olympics. I don't see a problem with that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scalptrash Verified Member Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago Quote I'm starting to think heavily that the lineup is being mismanaged by the coaching staff and there needs to be change. Starting??? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enforceror Verified Member Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago 7 minutes ago, mnfaninnc said: Hunt is also a young player who needs TOI so I would put him in the mix too. Did he play left or right side? Both I believe. Hynes started him with Buium, don't recall who he was with after that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mnfaninnc Verified Member Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago 6 minutes ago, Scalptrash said: Starting??? Yes, starting. I'm fairly patient when it comes to this, but my patience has about run its course. I would generally give a coach until the 20 game mark before passing judgment. We're at 15. One of the benefits of having vets is that their positioning is typically pretty solid. It seems that much of Hynes' system is based upon positioning. This is probably where the kids are having the most trouble, being at the wrong place at the wrong time. When he's been given 5 kids to train, he's got to move out of that comfort zone and account for those mistakes, yet he just can't do it. Some coaches will coach to the talent on the team. Others expect the players to fall in line with his system. Hynes seems to be from the ladder. He's fine winning games 3-2, 2-1. He doesn't seem like a coach who will realize his skill is good and let them run with the skill while somehow maintaining a defensive friendly system. Evason started out that way, but then fell back to concentrating on the vets. I will give Hynes a little credit, Boldy has played far better under him. You could also say so has Rossi, but I think that was more Rossi than Hynes. Hynes does not have an answer for what Buium can do. I thought his whole point of spending time with John Cooper before he got here was all about this sort of thing? He may have learned it then, but he never really implemented it into his instincts. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scalptrash Verified Member Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago 10 minutes ago, mnfaninnc said: Yes, starting. I'm fairly patient when it comes to this, but my patience has about run its course. I would generally give a coach until the 20 game mark before passing judgment. We're at 15. Hynes was hired as a favor to a friend in need. He never should've been hired after the interim stint. The results of his previous stops, plus his tenure here, are evidence of that. Both Billy and John have this team stuck in perpetual mediocrity. Neither one has moved the needle, or if they have, it has moved down. Remember, we were promised that THIS was the year. All I've heard are excuses. "No big names available, players resigned with their own teams", etc. What year are we in of the five year plan?! The elite teams still find a way to make big moves (Dallas, Colorado, Vegas). Even the Ducks and the Mammoth managed to improve their teams this past offseason. It is what it is, and has always been, with this team. It will probably never change under Leipold. He is only interested in consistent ticket sales, not building a contender. However, there is finally a crack starting to form there. Seeing empty seats now. I personally hope they miss the playoffs so Billy and staff are out. Better yet, do it now and maybe save the season. Either way, expect massive turnover for the franchise after this season. Anyone who can be moved, or will agree to be moved, will probably be gone. Then again, Leipold doesn't get it, so nothing will surprise me. He'll blow the next hire too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mnfaninnc Verified Member Posted 45 minutes ago Share Posted 45 minutes ago 14 minutes ago, Scalptrash said: I personally hope they miss the playoffs so Billy and staff are out. Better yet, do it now and maybe save the season. Either way, expect massive turnover for the franchise after this season. Anyone who can be moved, or will agree to be moved, will probably be gone. Then again, Leipold doesn't get it, so nothing will surprise me. He'll blow the next hire too. I just can't agree with you here. If OCL gives Guerin new marching orders, he'll do it, but according to the goals OCL has put in front of Guerin, Guerin has met them in spades. We might not like it, but OCL does and he's the only opinion that matters on this issue. One thing I haven't particularly liked is the lack of FO people. We have a very lean staff. Is it because they don't want to work for Guerin? Maybe, but we don't know that. Is it because Guerin hasn't found the right people for that spot? I think this is a higher probability. I have not been enamored with Judd's picks either. He's not picking players for the style of play the GM wants here. Clearly, Judd needs to revamp his priorities in this. I am specifically talking about size, and handedness here. We are out of balance with both of these. Judd will say that we don't draft high enough to get these guys with speed/size/skill. But Judd's history says he passed on Matthew Tkachuk and wasted a high single digit pick on a guy who never made it. We don't have many 6'4" 220 lb. guys in our system. These are the bottom 6 guys you hope develop. But they don't skate as pretty as he likes. They look clumsy because everything just grew on them. He needs to overlook this stuff, and get what they can be. But this is not a cleaning house type of thing here. It can be salvaged. And, I think OCL will do just that. If anyone leaves, I think it's Judd, but there's 2 parts to that. Judd has to be replaced and currently we don't have anyone else who can run a draft table. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.