Beast Verified Member Posted Friday at 09:39 PM Share Posted Friday at 09:39 PM I’d be surprised if they start Yurov or Ohgren in the top 6. My guess would be Ohgren on the 3rd and Yurov on the 4th. Id like to see Boldy headline the second line. He’s going to be a monster this year. He can drive play and score points on his own, and we need to distribute the scoring depth (or lack of) a bit. Can’t just have 1 line that can score. They’ll almost certainly start off with Tarasenko in the top 6. Wouldn’t surprise me much to see him squeezed in with Kaprizov and Ek at times. Also wouldn’t surprise me to see Foligno on the 2nd line with Boldy and Rossi. If they do that, I feel it’s inevitable we see Mojo on the 3rd line. Potentially with Hartman and Ohgren. I wouldn’t put that past them. Yurov/Haight, Trenin, Hinnesota on the 4th. Also wouldn’t surprise me if they ran Buium out sparingly even strength on the 3rd pairing, even with Brodin out. This isn’t what I think they should do. But I think they’ll do something pretty close to that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1Brotherbill Verified Member Posted 22 hours ago Share Posted 22 hours ago On 10/2/2025 at 9:15 PM, Scalptrash said: Why not? He has zero trade protection. https://sports.yahoo.com/article/marco-rossi-trade-rumors-spark-171904848.html RFA and new contract loopholes since the Wild still own him even after the contract he can't be traded this season. Though there might be a loophole for the trade deadline but from what I understand they could only have traded him if he signed a contract that would have put him to his UFA years and then only if he agreed to the sign and trade. But like most things NHL contract related I could be wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raithis Verified Member Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago Quote Hynes seems to have doubts about Rossi's defense, as evidenced by his demotion to the fourth line in the playoffs. This makes zero sense. If that were the case, why would Hynes decide to put Rossi on the PK this year? If Hynes thinks Rossi is a defensive liability, why is his idea to fix the penalty kill is to put Rossi out there when the team is a man down? Granted, at 30th in PK%, you can't get much worse, but that should be a big red flag that the reasons why Rossi was put on the 4th line were something other than the conclusion you came to - and my thinking is that those reasons are more complex than one particular thing. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.