Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property

Article: Kaprizov, the Wild, and the NHL’s Growing Tampering Question


Recommended Posts

Well the tampering was brough about by Wild themselve with their off season behavior . Also Kaprisov can read score sheets . 

Rossi did an excellent season and they underpaid him 

He got 4 when other players with similar numbers got 6 or 7 million 

So if I m Kaprisov and my own contract is portrayed as only a "return flight from Moscow away" I m at least curios what other teams are offering just to compare to Wild offer and asking my agent to have ears like "Dumbo" 

Same goes with teambuilding in general or maybe also situations like teams pushing for players when returning from injury 

The paycheque is not a gamechanger when you are aware that next team down the road would offer similar numbers 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, goenzoy said:

Well the tampering was brough about by Wild themselve with their off season behavior . Also Kaprisov can read score sheets . 

Rossi did an excellent season and they underpaid him 

He got 4 when other players with similar numbers got 6 or 7 million 

So if I m Kaprisov and my own contract is portrayed as only a "return flight from Moscow away" I m at least curios what other teams are offering just to compare to Wild offer and asking my agent to have ears like "Dumbo" 

Same goes owith teambuilding in general or maybe also situations like teams pushing for players when returning from injury 

The paycheque is not a gamechanger when you are aware that next team down the road would offer similar numbers

But, isn't most of this the definition of tampering? How would Paul T. know if someone else was interested unless there was tampering? Is he sitting in the Rangers' GM office and talking about Panarin and then just asks "so, what would you pay Kaprizov if he was, let's say, available?" 

And, if this gets out about Paul T., does the agent get banned? It's hard to know the market price for a guy when you get to this level. $16m is unchartered territory, and with the cap raising it's even further darkened. 

Of course, none of us are behind the closed doors of the negotiation, but you'd think that a counter offer would be made by Paul T. It could very well be that he wants to wait for the cap to go up so he can make the best deal, but if other clubs are "interested," that's simply tampering. 

Also, you don't want this to be a situation like the Micah Parsons contract either where Jerrah just kind of disrespected the agent and offended Micah. I think a little bit of understanding needs to come from Paul T. though as we were quite stung by the Gaborik departure. 

Once upon a time, there used to be something known as the Twins' curse. A player who left the club for "greener pastures" typically bottomed out, or worse in the case of Lyman Bostock. It also wasn't like Gaborik after leaving set the world on fire in NY. I just thought I'd throw that out there just in case it had legs and anyone was superstitious. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Getting into the cuts, I'm still surprised to see Johnson still on the roster. Lambos being sent down, to me, indicates they want to see a bit more of Johnson AND Brodin is ahead of schedule on his return. 

I'd still rather have Brodin-Jiricek partners and Buium-Spurgeon partners. I'd let Bogo be the 7th, but, I do wonder if Bogo is wanting that role or may want to move on to somewhere where he can play? Would Johnson make a good 7th D, but a callup of Lambos happens if there is an extended injury where he draws in and plays? 

I'm still thinking the Wild start the regular season with 22, or if they need to sneak Cal through waivers, they wait and he'll be 23. I had wanted Lambos to take over that 3rd pair left side IF Brodin was still sidelined. Looks like that may not be the case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This made me mad.

Quote
 

Rising cap changes position Kaprizov, the Wild, and others

TSN: Minnesota Wild owner Craig Leipold is confident that GM Bill Guerin can get a deal done with Kirill Kaprizov. The rising salary cap is complicating things.

“That’s a lot of new money in the system that, frankly, a year or two ago we certainly had no idea was going to be available,” Leipold said. ”So, it does change things, but we have to change with it.”

OCL, you had no idea that this new money was going to be available???????

Even us amateur armchair GMs knew this money was coming, it was obvious with the new tv deals!!!!!!!

How does a successful businessman such as yourself not have a pretty good indication as to what is going to happen with the cap 5 years out??????? This would have been discussed behind closed doors in the governors meetings!!!!! All owners know this was going to happen!!!!!!!

Don't try to pull the wool over our eyes and claim cluelessness!!! Nobody is buying it!!!! If you're going to lie to us about this, what else are you lying about??????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't watch NHL for a long time cause you couldn't find the games on TV for a lot of years it seems, the last few years I've been able to watch and got renewed interest in the Wild. I thought like probly most fans that buyout cap hell ending would bring the ability for the Wild to be competitive but after watching the league allow abuse of rules and norms such as Vegas and their "creative" use of IR rules that let them circumvent the salary cap and now whispers of tampering with Kaprisov I'm not sure I want to be emotionally invested anymore. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you asked me, the tampering questions are just the easiest explanation to give if Kaprizov did indeed reject the initial contract offer. This seems to be more true although initially there was a denial from the Wild. After all, MN would have made an offer by now. Kaprizov isn't signed, so there's a pretty good chance it's not rumor but true. 

Now, did he reject cause he wants out of MN? Tampering possible? Is he waiting to see what happens with other big name guys? All three things are possible, but there's no way OCL or GMBG would publicly admit they're losing the plot. 

They've been outspoken. In this case OCL's comments did not help, and never needed to be said at all. If there is indeed teams floating offers and it screws the Wild, I don't think anyone would be surprised. Blame-game will ensue. NHL will say, nothing can be proven. 

It's a business right? We always hear that. Top talent wants to be on a winning team. The Wild are perennial losers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kaprizov has a full No-Movement clause in his current contract. I seriously doubt that trading him (as many of these articles suggest is an alternative) is even an option for the Wild. He turned down the most lucrative contract proposal in NHL history, and he is not even in the top 5 NHL players in the league right now. Clearly he wants to be on a winning team; a team that is a REAL Stanley Cup contender. Why would Kaprizov agree to be traded to a team that is giving up substantial assets for him - making them less competitive than if they sign him for free - when he could just wait and sign with them as a free agent in the summer?

Edited by Fortis
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...