Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property

Article: Kaprizov Reportedly Turns Down 8-Year Extension. Now What For the Wild?


My hunch is that it's not about the money.  It's about the Wild missing a Championship culture and mentality.  The lack of a true SC contender.  Kap's NHL clock is ticking quickly and he can't wait around 5 more years for this team to hope things improve with greenhorns and mediocre swaps.  Most teams know they can shut us down with a more physical game, and the penalties and injuries pile up, with not enough brute and depth to push back.  Siding a bit here with Scalp and Outskated, the real focus from high up tends to be financially driven, fill the seats and boxes, splash ads everywhere.  Until Kap seems real depth and team success against those challenging physical games, he knows he can hunt and fish anywhere else.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Beast said:

Kaprizov deal in excess of $16M

Agree with a lot of your post. I want to see a reasonable line drawn in the sand similar to the negotiation with Marco Rossi. I know the players and situations are different but no one player is bigger than what’s best for the team. My biggest concern isn’t signing KK, but OCL caving in for reasons that are his own money driven ones. Florida has won back to back cups with 10$M tops AAV. Maybe the Wild can start a new trend, make it under $9M. suddenly Faber becomes the #1 contract. Get KK at a deal within reason or deal him with good reason. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they really offered 8 x 16 it's not about money. It's about winning (and not competently stocking the lakes around the Twin Cities with enough Walleye). The question then becomes what is KK willing to give up to win.

 Huck mentioned 5 x 15. That ain't enough. He needs to give up more than that IMO.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Imyourhuckleberry said:

Kind of wish The Athletic would have waited to validate prior to posting the Seravalli report.

You want RUSSO to validate before publishing a juicy rumor!  Lol. He is way too much of a narcissist.

 

If this ends up being true it's good for the Wild. You can't win paying a fragile 12 million dollar a year guy 16 million.  If it's true trade him ASAP because another year of 50 games and he won't get you anything.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Patrick said:

If this ends up being true it's good for the Wild

What do you think would be the best scenario moving forward If KK walks? I had the Wild contenting (top eight)  around 2027 assuming KK extended. If he’s gone yikes. $16M was the very highest I was hoping to go to keep KK and avoid a ten year rebuild. Christmas Day feels like it’s becoming The Grinch that Stole Christmas instead. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Verified Member
1 hour ago, Willy the poor boy said:

 (and not competently stocking the lakes around the Twin Cities with enough Walleye).

Actually, I’ve heard that Kirill is more of a Northern Pike kind of guy. It tastes more like the fish he catches in Siberia.

Edited by Sam
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Makes sense for Kaprizov to sign for a shorter term deal.  

Makes sense for Guerin to want to sign him for a longer term deal.  

What could be happening is the possiblity that there might be some Russian collusion going on here.  Where Kaprizov says he wants a smaller dollar value if they sign someone like Panarin in the off season.  Or the conspiracy that Putin wants more money to take from Kaprizov.

Regardless if he doesn't sign by the start of the season they have to move him at the trade deadline.  Doesn't matter where the team is in the standings or how good they are.  If Kaprizov goes free agent on July 1st everyone in the league will want to make him the highest paid player in the league.  

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Verified Member
6 minutes ago, 1Brotherbill said:

What could be happening is the possiblity that there might be some Russian collusion going on here.

I thought it was meddling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Beast said:

I don’t know what kind of benefit there would be for any party to fabricate and leak that information.  Doesn’t make sense for either side.  That leads me to lean toward it being true.

It gets the core fanbase riled up, it gets corporate sponsors riled up, and it gets broadcast partners riled up. All of which gets ownership riled up. Giving this to the press (fact or fiction) generates leverage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Willy the poor boy said:

If they really offered 8 x 16 it's not about money. It's about winning

More likely about the length of the contract. If he takes a shorter contract he can cash in again on his next contract when the salary cap is bigger. That would be ALL about money.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, FredJohnson said:

More likely about the length of the contract. If he takes a shorter contract he can cash in again on his next contract when the salary cap is bigger. That would be ALL about money.

Unless he gets a career ending or limiting injury.  

Edited by AKwildkraken
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, BeanPole Harvester said:

We've all got our opinions on each contract that is on the books and that will of course vary for each of us. Dean, I am curious, as we know you are not a fan of Billy, if you were given the position to personally terminate his contract and hire his replacement, who would you choose? If you are taking a GM from another team, how do you get them over to the Wild?

He never answers these types of questions because it wouldn't be something he could complain about later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...