Kalisha Turnipseed Verified Member Posted 8 hours ago Share Posted 8 hours ago View full article Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scalptrash Verified Member Posted 7 hours ago Share Posted 7 hours ago Sure, why not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dean Verified Member Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago How are you going to pay for this? Trade Spurg? Who wants an undersized injury prone old right hand d man when they could just go sign ekblad Billy is sitting at the kids table while the rest of the nhl is making moves. Rossi is proving size does matter. It wins games, cups an increases your value in a trade . We’re told by clowns at athletic we have top 3 prospect pool. So what it doesn’t translate into nhl players developed by wild.. it also doesn’t mean you will get fair value in a trade when your prospects are undersized dented cans . Nobody is clamoring for our undersized prospects but Judd said he’s sticking to his guns on draft. Small weak players that fall due to size is Judds cup of tea. However nobody wins playoff rounds with this type of team or can they trade them for a fair return. Billy’s x mas is looking pretty sad. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dean Verified Member Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago I will give Billy props for getting rid of Fred and him holding others back. Thank god ! He also won a trade. Fleeced the kraken. That’s not hard but at least Billy did it . He’s a magician trading bottom six players . Haha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willy the poor boy Verified Member Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago 1 hour ago, Dean said: How are you going to pay for this? Trade Spurg? Who wants an undersized injury prone old right hand d man when they could just go sign ekblad Billy is sitting at the kids table while the rest of the nhl is making moves. Rossi is proving size does matter. It wins games, cups an increases your value in a trade . We’re told by clowns at athletic we have top 3 prospect pool. So what it doesn’t translate into nhl players developed by wild.. it also doesn’t mean you will get fair value in a trade when your prospects are undersized dented cans . Nobody is clamoring for our undersized prospects but Judd said he’s sticking to his guns on draft. Small weak players that fall due to size is Judds cup of tea. However nobody wins playoff rounds with this type of team or can they trade them for a fair return. Billy’s x mas is looking pretty sad. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1Brotherbill Verified Member Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago Do you even watch the Wild? I'm serious. Most of your articles are about players that we don't need. Of all the areas that the Wild appear to be strong in defenseman is one of their strongest. So, why spend money that they really don't have on something that they have a relative wealth at? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.