Tony Abbott Administrator Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago View full article Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Citizen Strife Verified Member Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago I mean, that defensively lacking player doesn't exactly scream "thriving under Hynes's system," does it? Even worse if that's a centerman. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedLake Verified Member Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago Boldy Larkin Kaprizov Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GuntChuck Provisional Member Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago His flags are about as red as Boeser's. Massively red. Stay away. Tuch or Thompson are the only forwards anyone should want from Buf. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dean Verified Member Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago Braden schenn makes more sense than cozens. He’s a proven playoff warrior and winner. Cozens is not. If they think they’re going to be contenders next year than they need playoff players. Schenn could move anywhere in the lineup and in time settle in to 3 rd line center for less money and less risk . Yeah he’s getting older but he has that desire to win. So if they are going to waste assets on cozens I’d rather see it go to getting schenn instead. Less money shorter contract. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Imyourhuckleberry Verified Member Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago (edited) The fact that Buffalo fans/GM want a "scoring" forward at 24 years old traded off their team is also a glaring red flag. Wild will not be interested. Might be interested in a low draft pick to rent Zucker for the remainder of this season though. Edited 4 hours ago by Imyourhuckleberry added Zucker comment Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkolWild73 Verified Member Posted 3 hours ago Share Posted 3 hours ago Like I said yesterday, high risk, high reward, but the high reward is probably less than 25 percent. The only thing about it that I can find a positive is the players that have left Buffalo and thrived in Eichel and Reinhart. Cloud lightning strike thrice? Of course, I would say Eichel and Reinhart had less red flags, with Eichels only being his injury. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Will D. Ness Verified Member Posted 3 hours ago Share Posted 3 hours ago Cozens is soft. I would rather go with Nelson. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willy the poor boy Verified Member Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago MN. Wild record Without Ekker: 7-9-1 With Ekker: 27-12-3 Without KK: 12-10-1 Without both KK and Ek: 2-3-0 I thought that was interesting... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M_Nels Verified Member Posted 42 minutes ago Share Posted 42 minutes ago Thanks for the in-depth article Tony! Saw his name come up and was really intrigued because of his size and potential offensive upside but didn’t know the underlying issues. Admittedly, I don’t make it a point to watch Buffalo games unless they’re playing the Wild. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.