Thomas Williams Administrator Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago View full article Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mnfaninnc Verified Member Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago It doesn't look like there is money to buy at the deadline. It would have to be a money in/money out type of deal. Is there a way to do that? Maybe, but likely expensive. I'm trying to wrap my head around the defense now and what's coming. Now, fully healthy, looks like: Middleton-Faber Brodin-Spurgeon Chisholm-Bogosian Merrill-Dermott But, what will be? 2 years of Spurgeon, both on the books and on the roster really gums things up. I think he'll need to be subtracted and if we can make a deal where we don't retain, even better. He's played well this season, but at $7.5m that's quite a boulder in the cap. I really miss capfriendly, but according to puckpedia he has a 10 team no trade designation, or if you're a positive person at 21 team trade clause 😁. This is what it would look like if we traded Spurgeon out next season: Middleton-Faber Brodin-Jiricek Buium-Bogosian Chisholm This is a really young unit, but still has some veteran presence. Lambos and Spacek would be the callups for injuries. They will likely be ready for their debuts next season too. What is the benefit of trading out Spurgeon? His roster spot and the longterm commitment to Jiricek who should be ready to go. We lose Spurgy's savvy play, but gain size in his spot and $6.5m in cap space. Buium likely starts out as a 3rd pairing guy but I'd assume he probably proves himself throughout the season and doesn't end up there. What do we do with Chisholm? He can play both sides. He can play in the top 4 and hold his own. He's young at 25, and based upon stats this year probably doesn't make more than $1.2m next season. Yes, that's the same price Merrill is making this season. Is he more valuable to keep as #7 at that price, or, is he a piece that we should move? For a comparison, when Soucy came aboard and Seeler was here, they split the #6 duties until Soucy just played better. Seeler was shipped out since it wasn't fair for him to be sitting around doing nothing. He was a better player than that. Guerin came into the organization in August 2019. He was the one who found a better situation for him in Chicago, and then on to Philly. I know you can never have too many defenders, but it seems like Chisholm is better than #7, and with Lambos improving, perhaps, he needs a new address? The other thought is having Bogosian as #7 and Buium and Chisholm be partners, one playing their off side and both can do that. I'd imagine that it would look something similar to early in the year when Chisholm and Merrill were splitting games. Or, do we trade out Chisholm and hire an older vet who can sit in the Prossbox for a long time and play when needed without missing a beat? He'd essentially be a "break glass in case of emergency" player, and if it was an IR injury, Lambos or Spacek would then be called up. The last question to ask is what would a Spurgy trade do to the locker room? Everyone could see that Jiricek filled in well when Spurgeon was hurt. It was a different style but a good result. As a GM goes, Guerin has been our best GM at navigating the locker room and putting in guys it needs or that click. Spurgeon is much more than a player, he's the captain. How would this affect the other 20+ guys on the team? Would it be wise to go this way: Middleton-Faber Brodin-Spurgeon Buium-Jiricek Bogosian In this scenario Chisholm is traded and we do not recoup $6.5m in cap space. If Spurgeon has an injury, Jiricek moves up. If Brodin or Middleton have injuries, Buium moves up, Lambos is called up. If both Brodin and Middleton are injured at the same time, well, we have a bit of a problem. The last scenario could work too. This would be that Spurgeon decides to call it a career. His body can no longer take the punishment. I do think this is somewhat likely too. Immediately, I would say Spurgeon has a role on the player development side of the organization and starts working with the young defenders in Iowa. Guerin signs him for probably more than his role is worth to make up for the 2 lost years of his contract. I think this could work out longterm as I see Spurgeon being a valuable asset. But, does he want to stay away from his family or have some time with them? Also, IMO, with no evidence, I really think Spurgeon wants to hit that 1,000 games played mark for his legacy. That would mean at least 1 more season. I, of course, do believe that 46 will be hanging from the rafters soon. Koivu is now the standard for this and I was against hanging 9 from the rafters since the Wild hadn't really won anything during his tenure. Jared Spurgeon has done everything Koivu had done on the defensive end and deserves the same honor that Koivu got. I do believe the organization still needs both alumni players moving forward in the FO. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Imyourhuckleberry Verified Member Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago As I've mentioned before, trading Chisholm for Nyquist is the type of move the Wild likely could make, maybe just adding a 5th round pick for Nashville to retain the cap hit difference. With roughly 1/3 of the season remaining, the cap hit difference for the two players is less than $1M. Perhaps the Wild do stand pat after adding Hinostroza, the AHL leader in points per game this season. They are unlikely to be involved in any headline making deals, but could make moves at the margins if they are so inclined. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mnfaninnc Verified Member Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago 5 minutes ago, Imyourhuckleberry said: As I've mentioned before, trading Chisholm for Nyquist is the type of move the Wild likely could make, maybe just adding a 5th round pick for Nashville to retain the cap hit difference. With roughly 1/3 of the season remaining, the cap hit difference for the two players is less than $1M. I'm just not much of a Nyquist fan, and don't feel like he's got the grittiness I'm looking for. I think it was Mr. Cheatachu who went through the stats and he's essentially a Johansson. He had a decent run with us a couple of years ago, but, have we heard that story before? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Imyourhuckleberry Verified Member Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago 3 minutes ago, mnfaninnc said: don't feel like he's got the grittiness I'm looking for. I agree with that. There's plenty of other guys who would be fine replacements for Johansson, it's just that the Wild have familiarity with Nyquist and he has some creativity in creating scoring opportunities that the team lacks with NoJo. If you put him with Boldy and JEE, that line would score more frequently than they do with Johansson, and the difference could be significant. He compared their scoring this season, but all of Nashville's stats are down this season compared to prior years(31st in scoring compared to 10th last year). Nyquist posted 52 assists just last year and Johansson has never exceeded 36 in a season despite playing with Ovechkin early in his career. He spends a lot of time with Boldy and JEE on the Wild and doesn't exceed 20 assists. I'm not calling it a massive upgrade, it's just an achievable upgrade for a team that likely doesn't want to give up a lot in future assets. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Will D. Ness Verified Member Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago I would roll the dice on Nyquist over Nojo any day of the week. I wouldn't give up on Chisholm though. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkolWild73 Verified Member Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago 11 minutes ago, Will D. Ness said: I would roll the dice on Nyquist over Nojo any day of the week. I wouldn't give up on Chisholm though. I like Chisholm too, but I wonder what the plans are for him next year. Bogo is signed through next year. With Zeev and Jiricek potentially playing next year, I am not sure there is room, unless they have a plan to trade Spurgeon. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Will D. Ness Verified Member Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago 27 minutes ago, SkolWild73 said: I like Chisholm too, but I wonder what the plans are for him next year. Bogo is signed through next year. With Zeev and Jiricek potentially playing next year, I am not sure there is room, unless they have a plan to trade Spurgeon. True. Chisholm is probably the odd man out. Bogo is at that point in his career that he can be 7D whereas Chisholm deserves to play somewhere. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Imyourhuckleberry Verified Member Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago 24 minutes ago, SkolWild73 said: I like Chisholm too, but I wonder what the plans are for him next year. Bogo is signed through next year. With Zeev and Jiricek potentially playing next year, I am not sure there is room, unless they have a plan to trade Spurgeon. That's exactly the reason I think the Wild would consider trading him. He's a guy who likely has a little value somewhere, but isn't necessarily a player they would miss greatly. Buium and Jiricek are close to being ready. Faber, Brodin, Spurgeon, and Middleton are playing as long as they are on the team. Chisholm is a free agent and likely needs a contract increase. I suspect the Wild may opt to simply replace him rather than sign him to a larger deal. Lambos might be ready for NHL minutes next year as an injury replacement. I think the Wild could trade out at least 1 defenseman this year and Chisholm probably has the most trade value of guys they might be willing to trade. Merrill could fill in this year until Buium arrives. It's not that I dislike Chisholm, it's just a question of whether the Wild see him as a fit next year given their strong mix of both youth and veterans in their system. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M_Nels Verified Member Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago (edited) 17 minutes ago, Imyourhuckleberry said: That's exactly the reason I think the Wild would consider trading him. He's a guy who likely has a little value somewhere, but isn't necessarily a player they would miss greatly. Buium and Jiricek are close to being ready. Faber, Brodin, Spurgeon, and Middleton are playing as long as they are on the team. Chisholm is a free agent and likely needs a contract increase. I suspect the Wild may opt to simply replace him rather than sign him to a larger deal. Lambos might be ready for NHL minutes next year as an injury replacement. I think the Wild could trade out at least 1 defenseman this year and Chisholm probably has the most trade value of guys they might be willing to trade. Merrill could fill in this year until Buium arrives. It's not that I dislike Chisholm, it's just a question of whether the Wild see him as a fit next year given their strong mix of both youth and veterans in their system. My thoughts exactly. Don't understand the talk about trading Spurgeon either, he's signed for 2 more years and will likely retire here. This isn't "Chel" where you can trade guys willy nilly. Doubt any teams are lining up to take on that contract for a guy his age unless Minnesota retains and I don't see that happening. He's playing well again after the surgeries and the injury from the slewfoot and is still 2nd pair caliber. Unless he has another major injury I see him playing out his contract in Minnesota. Bogo becomes your 7th D unless the Wild unload him for a pick or prospect. Chisholm is the odd LHD out with Buium coming in. Mids-Faber Brodin-Jiricek Buium-Spurgeon Edited 1 hour ago by M_Nels 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Citizen Strife Verified Member Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago I think the offseason is where the stuff happens. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedLake Verified Member Posted 36 minutes ago Share Posted 36 minutes ago Deal Spurgeon for a top 6er and toss them NoNo for nothing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pewterschmidt Verified Member Posted 33 minutes ago Share Posted 33 minutes ago 2 minutes ago, RedLake said: Deal Spurgeon for a top 6er and toss them NoNo for nothing. And then trade Trenin for Draisaitl. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkolWild73 Verified Member Posted 32 minutes ago Share Posted 32 minutes ago 1 hour ago, Imyourhuckleberry said: That's exactly the reason I think the Wild would consider trading him. He's a guy who likely has a little value somewhere, but isn't necessarily a player they would miss greatly. Buium and Jiricek are close to being ready. Faber, Brodin, Spurgeon, and Middleton are playing as long as they are on the team. Chisholm is a free agent and likely needs a contract increase. I suspect the Wild may opt to simply replace him rather than sign him to a larger deal. Lambos might be ready for NHL minutes next year as an injury replacement. I think the Wild could trade out at least 1 defenseman this year and Chisholm probably has the most trade value of guys they might be willing to trade. Merrill could fill in this year until Buium arrives. It's not that I dislike Chisholm, it's just a question of whether the Wild see him as a fit next year given their strong mix of both youth and veterans in their system. I agree with everything you said:) 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkolWild73 Verified Member Posted 29 minutes ago Share Posted 29 minutes ago 54 minutes ago, M_Nels said: My thoughts exactly. Don't understand the talk about trading Spurgeon either, he's signed for 2 more years and will likely retire here. This isn't "Chel" where you can trade guys willy nilly. Doubt any teams are lining up to take on that contract for a guy his age unless Minnesota retains and I don't see that happening. He's playing well again after the surgeries and the injury from the slewfoot and is still 2nd pair caliber. Unless he has another major injury I see him playing out his contract in Minnesota. Bogo becomes your 7th D unless the Wild unload him for a pick or prospect. Chisholm is the odd LHD out with Buium coming in. Mids-Faber Brodin-Jiricek Buium-Spurgeon I agree. Not a bad problem to have. What I really like is the mix of young guys and veterans. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Imyourhuckleberry Verified Member Posted 20 minutes ago Share Posted 20 minutes ago 9 minutes ago, Pewterschmidt said: And then trade Trenin for Draisaitl. Don't be ridiculous, P-train! Trenin for Bedard or Celebrini works a lot better for salary cap reasons. 😎 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.