Robert Brent Verified Member Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 View full article Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Citizen Strife Verified Member Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 The biggest problem is just plain zero money and roster flexibility. Granlund would be a great comeback story, but man. If people keep dropping, the retention route is the only option. I don't know what teams would bite. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mnfaninnc Verified Member Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 Personally, I think Tuch makes a bigger impact. I wouldn't go the blockbuster route like Kalisha presented, but I think you could get Tuch + another year for about the same price. And, you get the player 4 years younger. 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldDutchChip Verified Member Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 nah. he is small and slow and brings very little physically. will be 33. salary wise he is the same as tuch. so might as well push in on tuch and just add a bit more spice to the deal and get it done; while keeping core of Zeev and Yurov here. 3 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pewterschmidt Verified Member Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 I know it's a slow news day but still can't believe were talking about bringing older, slower, weaker Granlund back. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldDutchChip Verified Member Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 and do we want to annoy Kap? granny and his stupid lacrosse goal against russia? no we do not. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MNCountryLife Verified Member Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 First question should be: Is this team a contender this year? I don't think so. So why buy anything that only lasts through this year and requires you to trade a future away. We are sellers. Trade out Marcus and Freddy and get anything in return for future. We will need those future assets for trades in 2026. Ogren, Yurov and Zeev should enter the lineup for next season. We should be a much better team next season and we can use those assets and extra cap space to trade for a higher quality player. 3 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mnfaninnc Verified Member Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 4 minutes ago, MNCountryLife said: We are sellers. I just don't see us being sellers in the midst of a playoff chase. I don't see us being able to get around the money issue much either. Outside of a significant LTIR player, I just don't think we can help ourselves unless we're promoting from within. Yurov with 4 apples in 3 games. I'm hoping he's heating up. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MNCountryLife Verified Member Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 5 minutes ago, mnfaninnc said: I just don't see us being sellers in the midst of a playoff chase. I don't see us being able to get around the money issue much either. Outside of a significant LTIR player, I just don't think we can help ourselves unless we're promoting from within. Yurov with 4 apples in 3 games. I'm hoping he's heating up. We have played well this year. Being this close to the top it is easy to say "Go for it". But we can't afford much and we struggle with the top teams and still haven't fixed the PK. I mention us as sellers simply because removing Nojo and Freddy won't hurt us and could actually make us better this year. It also increases our chances next season when hopefully the coaches figure out how to be a bit more consistent on PK. Add in Yurov, Ohgren, Zeev and a more experienced Jiricek and this team might look like more then just a contender... perhaps a favorite for the cup. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldDutchChip Verified Member Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 1 hour ago, MNCountryLife said: We have played well this year. Being this close to the top it is easy to say "Go for it". But we can't afford much and we struggle with the top teams and still haven't fixed the PK. I mention us as sellers simply because removing Nojo and Freddy won't hurt us and could actually make us better this year. It also increases our chances next season when hopefully the coaches figure out how to be a bit more consistent on PK. Add in Yurov, Ohgren, Zeev and a more experienced Jiricek and this team might look like more then just a contender... perhaps a favorite for the cup. i've said it before, but i believe we have to be buyers and have to overcome the first round obstacle. there is no next year and no selling. this is our chance. next year brings its own what-ifs and unknowns and new fits and rookie struggles.....kaprizov has been patient and gave us plenty of time. to whimper out and say - nah we are not ready = won't sit well with him. he is playing on a superior level to all other players. in his mind, he will drag this team as high as he can. he just needs a dependable goalie - who we have. a dependable steady d - which i think we have once we suit all of them back up. and a top 6 that can protect him a bit more. give him that. give him tuch and see what he can do. you inject tuch and bring back the D core healthy - that will give us enough to challenge stars/avs. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patrick Verified Member Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 2 hours ago, mnfaninnc said: Personally, I think Tuch makes a bigger impact. I wouldn't go the blockbuster route like Kalisha presented, but I think you could get Tuch + another year for about the same price. And, you get the player 4 years younger. Tuch is grossly overrated on this message board. In fact I doubt even the most diehard Buffalo or Vegas fans put as much value on Tuch as some do here. ..🙄 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldDutchChip Verified Member Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 22 minutes ago, Patrick said: Tuch is grossly overrated on this message board. In fact I doubt even the most diehard Buffalo or Vegas fans put as much value on Tuch as some do here. ..🙄 word 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mnfaninnc Verified Member Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 25 minutes ago, Patrick said: Tuch is grossly overrated on this message board. In fact I doubt even the most diehard Buffalo or Vegas fans put as much value on Tuch as some do here. ..🙄 Perhaps so, however, name another guy with speed, size, puts up points, rhs shot and a $4.75m contract that carries over to next year. Add in he's 28. Even as much as I like Tkachuk, Tuch certainly brings more than half a Tkachuk to the table. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burnt Toast Verified Member Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 I’m not much of a stats guy but…. MG 5’10” 185 lb. Almost exactly a half a point/ playoff game guy. (-4) The crazy thing is he would be a pretty big upgrade for this team. That shows how many holes we presently have. I’m more inclined to wait until next year, see if any of the upcoming prospects stick, and use the available assets to get a bigger, better, younger, more playoff proven player. We shouldn’t be doing 1 shot rentals right now. If the coaches really like him, and he wants to extend, that’s a little more tolerable. Also we just may need to allocate more $ at the goalie position than previously anticipated, including extending Gus (2026). We might even need a backup goalie. I guess we’ll see how JW finishes the season. The fact that this guy is predicting the Wild go after MG kinda shows how bare the trade line cupboards appear this year. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FredJohnson Verified Member Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 He's far better than NoJo (RIP) but I'd like to get more talent than just Granny. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Will D. Ness Verified Member Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 22 minutes ago, FredJohnson said: He's far better than NoJo (RIP) but I'd like to get more talent than just Granny. I'm more inclined for a more physical forechecking C to put between Foligno and Trenin. Someone who wins face-offs and battles. Freddy is having a good year but he looks outmatched physically for that heavy line. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hydguy75 Verified Member Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 What a unique year for the Wild. So many injuries and lost game or minutes on ice by key players, and the Wild still find a way to collect enough points to be competitive. Heck, even the last few Losses have been close until the 3rd. And we have a much better record on the road this than at home (is that because of the long road series kicking off the season without injuries, to softer teams?). Given several skaters seem to be injury prone, and without an enforcer, does the Wild really have what it takes to match up to the harder checks (and crosschecks, especially when the zebras get out of the way), faster skating/passing/shooting, the stamina required to go deep? What characteristic(s) are the Wild missing? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedLake Verified Member Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 Add Tuch. Granny, Ohgren, Buuim. Subtract Spurgeon, NoNo, Folingo. Might as well rent O'Reilly. It's possible going the Bettman Knights cheat route. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1Brotherbill Verified Member Posted January 17 Share Posted January 17 I don't see Granny being a plus on this team. Healthy he would be on the third line at best and he isn't that guy. He is at the end of his contract which means he is a rental. The Wild are pretty much in their current state because they have rented players often over the last twenty plus years. Tuch has a year left on his deal so he would actually be something you keep after you buy it. He isn't a point per game player. But he is a big physical guy who has skills. He would fit on the third line well. Hartman, Foglino, and Tuch would be a solid third line. If he needs to play top six minutes he can. Plus he would give the top six size and physicality. Tuch with Ek on a line would cause a lot of teams to be concerned. Even with all that the Wild should just stand pat this year. If anything they should move the contracts that are not going to be renewed at the end of the year. At least get a box of lightbulbs for those two. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mnfaninnc Verified Member Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 On 1/16/2025 at 9:37 PM, 1Brotherbill said: Tuch has a year left on his deal so he would actually be something you keep after you buy it. He isn't a point per game player. But he is a big physical guy who has skills. He would fit on the third line well. Hartman, Foglino, and Tuch would be a solid third line. If he needs to play top six minutes he can. Plus he would give the top six size and physicality. Tuch with Ek on a line would cause a lot of teams to be concerned. We talk a lot about Tuch's size, but what really makes him appealing (besides the low contract) is his size/speed ratio. He's a fast player too and most people don't remember that. This means he would have the speed to keep up with a Kaprizov or Boldy. His game is north and that helps Boldy too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.