Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness Zone Coverage Property

Article: The Wild Have Corrected A Longstanding Self-Inflicted Burden


Recommended Posts

Kaprizov, JEE, MoJo, Hartman, and all of the recent line 4 have zero penalty minutes on the season. Gaudreau has 2 from a tripping call in the October 15th game in St. Louis, which may have been on line 4.

Faber(5 minute major) and Chisholm also have zero minor penalties for the defense.

Trenin is the leader by far with 8 penalty minutes and nobody else above Faber's 5.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If this trend continues and we keep rolling 4 solid lines, we will be in an excellent position come playoff time. But it can’t just be a short string of organized play. The real challenge is making this the norm for this team. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

With Hartman returning so will additional penalties. Unfortunately he doesn't seem capable of playing otherwise.  I thought Trenin was supposed to fix our PK? How will he do that when he is always the guy in the box? Funny that our elite PP and atrocious PK are inverse of each other % wise.

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not all penalties are equal. For instance, so what, Faber had a fighting major. He took someone with him who also accrued another 2 minute infraction. It should have been an instigator, but he avoided that due to a technicality. 

I have not problem with coincidental penalties, and based upon the statistics shown above, it does not take that into account. I will agree that reducing our short handed time is a good goal, and especially working on earning penalties instead of the weeny stick infractions. To this, the Wild has done a good job this year. 

It also might be helpful to talk about drawn penalties. Certain players, like Hartman who has been called out, take a lot of penalties due to their play. However, they may be a net positive in taken vs. drawn penalties. One would expect that the defense would be a huge - in this category. It also might be helpful to compare this with their career. Is it a small sample size that could implode at any time? Or, is it part of a trend that they've been working on?

One would also think that a team that is working harder is going to draw more penalties, so looking at the team wide collective is also a good comparison (noting the small sample size). So far, I like the results. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...