Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness

Article: Charlie Stramel Is Starting To Look Like A Better Jordan Greenway


Recommended Posts

Thank you for posting these plays. The assist and 1st goal looked like phenomenal plays by his teammates. Always easier to score when you are setup with a wide open goal to shoot at, but nice that he was able to find the net with his shot. The tip in looked like his best point so far on the season.

Hopefully he can continue to contribute positive plays and develop into a useful player for the Wild on the 3rd or 4th line.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Tony Abbott said:

Greenway's an interesting comp there, because Greenway wasn't a big-time scorer in college, either.

Certainly not big-time, but Greenway had 31 points(10 goals) in 37 games his 2nd college season, and was 1 point away from a point per game his 3rd year.

Stramel had 20 points in his first 67 games. If Stramel can exceed 25 points this season, it would go a long way towards showing a possible NHL future, even if that future is simply a checking line role.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I maintain the Stramel pick was a "need" pick rather than best player available, mostly due to the uncertainty about Rossi going into last season.  The Wild didn't have a lot of options at center past Ek.  Hartman and Gaudreau are swing players, but natural center players were kinda hard to come by.  Even moreso was fighting the "size" thing that is almost always going to cloud this team until their quality of play dictates it won't matter...if ever.

Rossi and Khusnutdinov are definitely playing up to their potential right now, and Ek is a lifer.  Hartman's better than he gets credit for, but there's always more.  You can never have too many options either due to injury, salary reason, or just pure depth concerns.  Kumpulainen could be a sleeper option as well, given he seems more offensively inclined than Stramel is right now.  Heidt obviously has the offense but is about a year or two away from cracking the lineup.

You have Yurov sitting there as the next guy up (whenever that actually freaking happens...).  But people like Stramel, Kumpulainen, Heidt, etc. can push for depth roles along with Khusnutdinov doing that now.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, FredJohnson said:

Is Stramel pronounced Stram-el or Stray-mul?

He'll tell us eventually. it only took Rossi 2 years to tell us it's pronounced Row-See.

If I was to venture a guess, I would say thats a big reason BG doesn't like him. He doesn't see him as strong mentally. Just a guess, but I get that from Guerin.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Willy the poor boy said:

He'll tell us eventually. it only took Rossi 2 years to tell us it's pronounced Row-See.

And then he went back to everyone calling him Ross-E.

Ross-E definitely sounds better to my ears than Row-C, but it was surprising that he gave the nod to go back to that after he had the announcers calling him Row-C for a season.

I like the sound of Stramm-el better than Stray-mull, but I could get used to either.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Imyourhuckleberry said:

And then he went back to everyone calling him Ross-E.

Ross-E definitely sounds better to my ears than Row-C, but it was surprising that he gave the nod to go back to that after he had the announcers calling him Row-C for a season.

I like the sound of Stramm-el better than Stray-mull, but I could get used to either.

 

I didn't even know it changed back, but ya I agree with you on both.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Imyourhuckleberry said:

And then he went back to everyone calling him Ross-E.

Ross-E definitely sounds better to my ears than Row-C, but it was surprising that he gave the nod to go back to that after he had the announcers calling him Row-C for a season.

I like the sound of Stramm-el better than Stray-mull, but I could get used to either.

 

Just don’t be the guy who rolls the R’s saying Row-C.  Don’t be that guy, please.  

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stramel was still a big reach, only projects as a bottom 6 center. Should never draft for need, especially when there was superior talent available still at 21.  Brackett missed the boat on that one.  I hope I am proven wrong though.  

  • Like 1
  • Confused 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Outskated said:

Stramel was still a big reach, only projects as a bottom 6 center. Should never draft for need, especially when there was superior talent available still at 21.  Brackett missed the boat on that one.  I hope I am proven wrong though.  

The consensus was that was Guerins pick. And, to me it never really fit Brackett's pattern so I believe it was BG's pick with Brackett's blessing. Lets not let Guerin off the hook again. It's always been, if it's good it's Guerin, if it's bad it's someone else, mostly Evason. Guerin gets the cap excuse, but no one else gets to use it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Verified Member
24 minutes ago, Outskated said:

Stramel was still a big reach, only projects as a bottom 6 center. Should never draft for need, especially when there was superior talent available still at 21.  Brackett missed the boat on that one.  I hope I am proven wrong though.  

Might go out in left field a little but stay with me. Stramel felt more like a "football draft pick" to me. Seems to happen quite a bit in the NFL draft especially with lineman. Some of these guys are drafted for their size, strength and athleticism even if they are still raw skill wise hoping that a professional coaching staff can develop the skill and mental side of the game to go along with the coveted, unteachable, size, strength and athleticism. 

Reeling it back in a bit but apparently they see a high-ish ceiling for Stramel if they can develop the skillset of his game. If he can develop into an Ek 2.0 then I think the 1st round pick is justifiable. Apparently Stramel scored well on his combine athleticism tests.

Edited by M_Nels
Further clarification
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

From Russo in 2023....

Wild GM Bill Guerin noted that with a deep prospect pool, he had the opportunity this year to make a pick more based on positional need. And that was part of the driving force in taking the 6-3, 222-pound center. Guerin said they made some calls about potentially moving up but were pleased when Stramel was available at No. 21. “There were a few other players we could have taken, but to fill the need was pretty important this year,” Guerin said.  “It’s so hard to find a center with his size, skating ability — the grit, the jam,” Brackett said. “He fits a lot of our identity.”

They definitely drafted for need at the time.  The Center position for the Wild was pretty weak then as we all remember.  The only counter I'll offer is it takes 3-4 years for these later 1st round prospects to get to the NHL. So, drafting for what you need at the NHL level during that draft year is not a sound strategy.  The C position is in a much better state now with Rossi, Ek, Hartman and Khusi plus Yurov coming next year and that was all done in-house.  And Heidt will be in the mix in the next year or two.  They should always always draft the best available player.  I agree about the 'football' analogy also M_Nels.

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...