Jump to content
Hockey Wilderness

Article: The Wild Can't Let Perfect Be the Enemy Of the Good With Rossi


Recommended Posts

Great article and I'm in the keep Rossi camp.

I assume Guerin's logic in moving Rossi+ is to acquire a linemate for #97, to incent 97 to stay with the Wild.  This is the only logic i can think of that makes sense to me.  If the return for a package including Rossi is to get a 26 year old studly linemate to keep 97 around I'm on board.  

If the return is multiple prospects, FAIL

If the return is a 30 something formerly studly fwd + some spare parts, FAIL

If the return is a 1 for 1 trade, FAIL (because what we'd get back is a young player with hockey upside, but attitude downside)

#don'tbedumbbill

  • Like 11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guerin's plan is cooked. If his only move is to trade away one of the few guys he has drafted and developed something is wrong. Rossi has done everything asked of him and more. Now they are frustrated he is getting to the dirty areas? Scoring more and passing less? Playing with more FU?

He was one of the best 5V5 players on the team this year. Both offensively and defensively and is still developing. 

Guerin has lost the plot. He got so entranced by his good ol' boys that he forgot he was suppose to be developing a team for 25-26 and that in truth, these years were a write off until the penalties came off. Instead he solidified a losing group, locked in underperforming veterans and focused on gutting the Wild organization to have his chosen people in positions of power.

His organization moves left our Iowa Wild plummeting from playoff bound to bound for the ground. While he complained of the development of his prospects as a reason to move on from Army, we saw the kids go backwards under McLean. He took the reins from Brackett for the first time and drafted an absolute bust in the first only to have Brackett save his ass with the Heidt pick late in the second. 

The busload of senior citizens he decided to lock in with NMC's has predictably ran out of gas a whole 400KM before expected and now we look to mortgage good developing players because it is his only move. Again this year we extend two pensioners in Bogosian and Fluery. I would place money on Bogosian's last season being a dead cat bounce as his history clearly indicates he played well above his norm. We extended Fleury for some nostalgia to watch him be sub.900% while putting the weight of the world on a first year goaltender in Wallstedt. Fishing with Gus while trading him would leave our goaltending completely in the lurch. 

I hate to say it, but the best thing we could do at this point is buy out Gaudreau and run the young guns to give them experience and a chance to push out the locked in vets. For crying out loud, extend Faber, Chisholm and Rossi and keep some of the small momentum we have in our young core. It is well past time that we lie in the bed BG made and see what we need for a run next year.

Okay, okay. Rant over.

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Pewterschmidt said:

If the return is multiple prospects, FAIL

Why is this a FAIL?  because Guerin & Co have not proven yet that they have the ability to sniff out diamond in the rough prospects (see: Dallas).  So to send a #9 overall who's a proven NHL contributor for multiple roll the dice prospects is dumb.

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Verified Member

If all this trade Rossi+ stuff is about keeping Kaprizov around  it sounds like subtraction by addition. I don't see how we do much more than a lateral move by moving Rossi. If all this mental trade gymnastics is about keeping Kaprizov around move Kaprizov. You could get an absolute haul for him right now at his peak value. If he's wavering on staying let him go. Personally I think it would be a faster path to becoming a Cup contender anyhow. Imagine what he would bring if Guerin maxed his value in a trade.  Besides if you trade Rossi now do you get a guarantee from Kaprizov he stays?

I sometimes think we over rate Kaprizov because he's the best thing ever to hit this team. He's no McDavid, Draisaitl, or Matthew Tkachuk even. He can be defended as we have seen and he can be a turnover machine as we have seen.  

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like how Tony started the article regarding Perfection being the enemy of good. Replacing a good young center for a player that fits the "perfect" description seems very challenging to accomplish. On the same thought, what GM would get rid of a better player than Rossi for a smaller center? I find it hard to believe any team would make that trade.

For the Wild, a team that is starved for secondary scoring, it is awfully hard to see where there is no place for a young, 40 point center on the roster. It is hard for me to see how he is not a fit or cannot be utilized productively.

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Pewterschmidt said:

I assume Guerin's logic in moving Rossi+ is to acquire a linemate for #97, to incent 97 to stay with the Wild.  This is the only logic i can think of that makes sense to me. 

What I don't get about that is -- Remember when Boldy and Ek + Kap made the best line in hockey? Just do that, win, and shouldn't that be all you need to attract Kaprizov?

  • Like 10
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, MacGyver said:

Personally I think it would be a faster path to becoming a Cup contender anyhow.

based on what evidence?  Charlie Stramel + RasmuKampu + 4 more years of Foli-jo-dreau is the guys who'll get us there?  

A mountain of picks and prospects = Stanley Cup run only if the team choosing the picks and prospects have a track record of making the correct choices.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Tony Abbott said:

Just do that, win, and shouldn't that be all you need to attract Kaprizov?

We learned this year that one good line is not enough. And the world learned that there ain't much after that 1st line, so 97 needs to see some more offense on the way or he'll do the math and know he'll be 33 and with a new GM before this org. rights the ship, under a best case scenario.  Meanwhile he can go to NYR, FLA, DAL etc. and be the final missing corner piece of Stanley Cup puzzle.  

Yes, I guess I've lost all faith in Guerin & Co.

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Yes, I guess I've lost all faith in Guerin & Co."

Guess someone had to.  Still going to say one bad year doesn't make this team a loser.  They showed they wouldn't quit, even in games that had nothing to play for.  I would rather root for a team like that tries its damnedest with what it has than pray and hope, "Maybe the next GM will do a better job."

*Remembers the team still has 1st and 2nd rounders*  Never forget; it can ALWAYS be worse.  One GM we know already ruined another team and got fired in the time since Guerin got here.  Funny how life works.

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Verified Member
1 hour ago, Will D. Ness said:

Carter is talking out of his ass.  If you want Rossi to be a playmaker, then don't center him on a line with guys who skate around the perimeter and turnover the puck trying to be playmakers.

This.  I've said multiple times that Rossi will show who he really is when Yurov comes over.  Our top 6 can't include Zuccarello AND Johansson.  Zuccarello isn't bad, but I'd rather have him on a 3rd line with Hartman and Foligno.  And I'd rather have Johansson be an injury emergency.

Rossi is playing like Ek because it's how he's being used.  No one else went to the net.  Hartman occasionally does, but doesn't really belong in the top 6.  Foligno was hurt most of the year and against isn't really top 6.

The two question marks are Ohgren and Khusnutdinov. 

I'm sure there was more expected of Khusnutdinov's speed, but the Wild usually didn't have him moving the puck.  I like his willingness to get in the trees, but he needs to get a little stronger to avoid getting pushed around.  I think he can be a good 4th liner and I'd really like to see him on the PK more provided he adds a little muscle.  Defensively he seems like he has some good instincts and he's quick enough to jump on a puck/knock it away.

Ohgren I have some hopes for next season.  In the brief sample of games, I liked what I initially saw out of him.  He's got good awareness and instincts for a young player.  He also isn't shy about heading towards the net.  I'd like to see him build on that and come into next season determined to claim more ice time.  If we don't get a top 6 player in free agency or through a trade, I'd like him to earn a spot on the 2nd line and give Rossi some freedom to move around in the zone.  I feel like 2nd is a bit of a reach, but it's mostly because I'd rather him have the opportunity over Hartman and Foligno if he shows he can be productive there.

Again though, I think it will take Yurov to fill out the top 6, assuming of course than he can make the transition to the NHL.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Verified Member
Posted (edited)

If Bill wants to trade people, Id start with any prospect not named Yurov, Wallstaed, Heidt or who they feel is their #1 D.  Outside that its fair game. Why the hell would they want to trade a player who has already made progress each year? Lets not forget he had myocarditis and could do nothing for over a year. Lets not forget Ek was underwhelming his first couple of years. Hell Nathan Mackinnon had 14,21 and 16 goals his 2-4 yrs. I am not saying hes going to be a Mackinnon. Just saying every player progresses at their own pace.My only huge flaw I see in Rossi is hes easy to knock off of the puck and knock over. His effort is there. Hes a good passer. He likes to hang out in front of the net. How about we give him another year to see if he takes the next step? Unless the trade blows the doors off, no way should Rossi  be traded.

Edited by TM6975
  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, they thought they might be getting a Mikael Granlund-type of player, but may have landed a Daniel Briere-type, so they want to trade him?

Briere and Brad Marchand seem like the best comps for Rossi and both eventually hit 60 assists in a season, but it did take them years to get there.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Verified Member
1 hour ago, Pewterschmidt said:

based on what evidence?  Charlie Stramel + RasmuKampu + 4 more years of Foli-jo-dreau is the guys who'll get us there?  

A mountain of picks and prospects = Stanley Cup run only if the team choosing the picks and prospects have a track record of making the correct choices.

There would obviously have to be a stud scorer and and proven up and comer who has a couple years under his belt involved. And some picks and prospects. I'm not even going to try to speculate what or who Kaprizov might bring but it sure would be interesting listening to offers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Who is the winger version of Ek?  Can we get like 3-4 of those for Kaprizov?  200-250 points per year total, all with the most punchable faces.

All-Ek All-Star team right there.

Edited by Citizen Strife
  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just read an article from a Flyers fan site, and they listed Farabee, York, and Frost as "eh, maybe?"  They did say, "If the Wild are dumb enough to go for Frost, let them,"

So, knowing nothing about Philly, not a great look if those are the options.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Put Rossi with some finishers and…. What do you know, he gets a lot of assists, huh. I see a drive in Rossi that’s top tier. Whatever his ceiling is (and I’m not sure anyone really knows) he’ll get there. If it’s up to me this is the kind of player I want on my team. What has become kind of scary about Wild management is they seem to want other kinds of players. Slower, less skilled, injury prone, and a lot older. Disclaimer: Not the whole roster. 

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Verified Member

Bill's loyalty bets didn't pay off well. 

Floating Rossi's name could attract a GM to offer a guy they'd wanna move. Maybe a guy you'd like. Does it mean 100% Rossi gets traded?

I think Bill needs to be perfect. Get the transactions right. Don't trade Rossi if he's about to have a big year and breakout. Especially for a lousy return.

If the right deal was possible and he's hit his ceiling, okay. We'll see over time butane older player has less commitment. Rossi will soon need an extension and as a good young player he is both an asset and a guy you'd have to extend at a fair price. Does his health create a concern or is that history?

I'm not sure the Wild are screwed and Cross-eyed Bill is nuts. It's been a tough year but there's plenty that can be done and this off season will be telling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

I don't know if they'd take Gus+13.  I wonder if they'd go for a middle tier prospect and go with it.  You're still getting a decent player at 13.  However, 10 nets an option for some of the remaining defensemen on the board.  Yakemchuk, Silayev or Dickinson as maybes?  Taking Iginla for sure if Calgary doesn't for some reason?  I think Guerin balks at 10 if Jersey wants Rossi as part of the deal.

Edited by Citizen Strife
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Citizen Strife said:

I don't know if they'd take Gus+13.  I wonder if they'd go for a middle tier prospect and go with it.  You're still getting a decent player at 13.  However, 10 nets an option for some of the remaining defensemen on the board.  Yakemchuk, Silayev or Dickinson as maybes?  Taking Iginla for sure if Calgary doesn't for some reason?  I think Guerin balks at 10 if Jersey wants Rossi as part of the deal.

It would be risky getting rid of Gus and relying on Wally and Flower. I think to move up 3 spots you almost have to wait and see whose there. See if someone drops, the problem there is NJ also knows who drops and the price goes up or it doesn't happen at all.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What I'm thinking is there doesn't seem to be some magic player that is a can't miss after Celebrini.  I wouldn't know the difference of say a Catton versus Helenius off the top of my head.  Eiserman has the crazy shot, but is he worth giving up a cheap goaltender who can rebound if he's there?  There are still good forwards at 13 (Greentree/BN/Maybe Helenius or Eiserman anyway)?  I think the Wild jump if they know a defenseman is there.  That seems to be their slower building prospect pipeline.  A 2nd or 3rd line forward at worst is an easy enough pick up if a trade price is too high.

Watching the Wild give up Rossi to get a package for a higher pick would be even worse.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...