Tony Abbott Administrator Posted January 30 Share Posted January 30 View full article Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
viper3119 Verified Member Posted January 30 Share Posted January 30 well put, bring on the draft lottery! 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mnfaninnc Verified Member Posted January 30 Share Posted January 30 This is precisely the right take. If we're going to acquire some players, they should be young and help us with the future. But, Tony, I think you underestimated the problem we're in. It's not just the 2 recent must haves where we had 3rd period leads, it was also the Winnipeg and Dallas home and homes. There is a lot of evidence out there that this simply isn't our year. I am fully against trading for a player who will be a rental UFA to try and make the playoffs. I'd be open to an idea of a player who would be a UFA and would resign here, though, who could help us going forward. That guy would likely be entering his prime. I'd prefer to sell rather than buy, but there may be a little of both. 6 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kapislife Verified Member Posted January 30 Share Posted January 30 I like the idea of trading for a once highly touted young guy. Especially if they are only asking a mid round pick. I agree that it's not worth trying to push for the playoffs this year, take your lumps and your lottery pick and come back next year with a couple cheap free agents. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Will D. Ness Verified Member Posted January 30 Share Posted January 30 It's pretty hard to watch this last game vs the Ducks and not admit that they mailed it in. I think this team's morale, attitude, or whatever you want to call it is crushed. I think it is mostly just the inconsistency of play and few duds in the lineup that flop when needed most. More than a few duds actually. Also, we cannot sit back and rely upon young guys to carry the team either. A lot of these losses look like young team losses. Things are a little fragile in the State of Hockey. The biggest problem of all though is defense hands down. It's a broken record at this point though so I won't bore y'all. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burnt Toast Verified Member Posted January 30 Share Posted January 30 (edited) I’m all for trying something different like you suggested. Go after some younger players that might be a fit for the future. It’s a nice consolation prize that we’re near the top for picking up players hitting waivers. BG can still be aggressive, just a short term change of what that might look like. Edited January 30 by Burnt Toast Spelling Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FredJohnson Verified Member Posted January 31 Share Posted January 31 Get into the lottery. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quebec1648 Verified Member Posted January 31 Share Posted January 31 Given that the front office gave out all those silly no movement clauses, what can we realistically do at the trade deadline? Who can we move out, that would get us a decent player or draft pick in return? Most of the older players, are the ones who have the no movement clauses. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B1GKappa97 Verified Member Posted January 31 Share Posted January 31 10 hours ago, Quebec1648 said: Given that the front office gave out all those silly no movement clauses, what can we realistically do at the trade deadline? Who can we move out, that would get us a decent player or draft pick in return? Most of the older players, are the ones who have the no movement clauses. Well I assume the guys who just got re-signed this past summer aren't moving anywhere. That said, a NMC isn't all that hard to get around if a guy wants to leave an organization that's going nowhere to join a potential contender. MAF had a NMC when we acquired him from Chicago, for instance. It DOES give them leverage on where they get traded to, however, so that lessens the potential return by eliminating potential suitors. So guys like Goose or MAF or Maroon are definitely still on the table to get moved despite their clauses. I just wouldn't expect a great return on them given their age and talent level at this stage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B1GKappa97 Verified Member Posted January 31 Share Posted January 31 Let's just fast-forward to July already! 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamesgang Verified Member Posted January 31 Share Posted January 31 The Wild need to be sellers at the trade deadline. Unload the veterans teams are looking for in a playoff run. Foligno, Gudreau, Fluery, Johanssen, Maroon, Hartman, Merrill 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Up North Guy Verified Member Posted February 1 Share Posted February 1 10 hours ago, Jamesgang said: The Wild need to be sellers at the trade deadline. Unload the veterans teams are looking for in a playoff run. Foligno, Gudreau, Fluery, Johanssen, Maroon, Hartman, Merrill The only ones that can be moved in that group without their permission are Maroon and Merrill. There may be a small market for Maroon but the move i can see for Merrill is Iowa. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacGyver Verified Member Posted February 1 Share Posted February 1 Given Guerin's propensity for painting himself in a corner he may have promised CL that if he agrees to buy out Parise and Suter that the Wild will at the very least continue to make the playoffs every year until cap hell is over giving CL those few extra games of gate receipts to help ease the pain. Now we are not only paying huge salaries to players we no longer have but are on the cusp of not making the playoffs putting CL further in the red. Seriously doubt he likes that business model. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Up North Guy Verified Member Posted February 1 Share Posted February 1 1 hour ago, MacGyver said: Given Guerin's propensity for painting himself in a corner he may have promised CL that if he agrees to buy out Parise and Suter that the Wild will at the very least continue to make the playoffs every year until cap hell is over giving CL those few extra games of gate receipts to help ease the pain. Now we are not only paying huge salaries to players we no longer have but are on the cusp of not making the playoffs putting CL further in the red. Seriously doubt he likes that business model. I believe CL is only paying Parise and Suter something like $1M a year at this point. The contracts were designed for the team to not feel any pain at the end. But of course the league had to step in an ruin the whole thing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Protec Verified Member Posted February 1 Share Posted February 1 Lindholm is gone already in Calgary. Off the board and finished as an option for the Wild. Didn't see if he signed long term in Vancouver. MN needs center depth and scoring. It's gonna have to come from somewhere. When and where from is the question. The Wild should be careful the rest of this year. The safest thing is to be sellers and prep for the Summer. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.